linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, acme@kernel.org
Cc: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 01/10] perf: Add irq and exception return branch types
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2022 11:05:07 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220315053516.431515-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220315053516.431515-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>

This expands generic branch type classification by adding two more entries
there in i.e irq and exception return. Also updates the x86 implementation
to process X86_BR_IRET and X86_BR_IRQ records as appropriate. This changes
branch types reported to user space on x86 platform but it should not be a
problem. The possible scenarios and impacts are enumerated here.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
| kernel | perf tool |                     Impact                        |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   old  |    old    |  Works as before                                  |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   old  |    new    |  PERF_BR_UNKNOWN is processed                     |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   new  |    old    |  PERF_BR_ERET/IRQ are blocked via old PERF_BR_MAX |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   new  |    new    |  PERF_BR_ERET/IRQ are recognized                  |
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

When PERF_BR_ERET/IRQ are blocked via old PERF_BR_MAX (new kernel with old
perf tool) the user space might throw up an warning complaining about some
unrecognized branch types being reported, but it is expected. PERF_BR_ERET
and PERF_BR_IRQ branch types will be used for BRBE implementation on arm64
platform.

Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c     | 4 ++--
 include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h | 2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
index 669c2be14784..fe1742c4ca49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/lbr.c
@@ -1329,10 +1329,10 @@ static int branch_map[X86_BR_TYPE_MAP_MAX] = {
 	PERF_BR_SYSCALL,	/* X86_BR_SYSCALL */
 	PERF_BR_SYSRET,		/* X86_BR_SYSRET */
 	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_INT */
-	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IRET */
+	PERF_BR_ERET,		/* X86_BR_IRET */
 	PERF_BR_COND,		/* X86_BR_JCC */
 	PERF_BR_UNCOND,		/* X86_BR_JMP */
-	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IRQ */
+	PERF_BR_IRQ,		/* X86_BR_IRQ */
 	PERF_BR_IND_CALL,	/* X86_BR_IND_CALL */
 	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_ABORT */
 	PERF_BR_UNKNOWN,	/* X86_BR_IN_TX */
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
index 82858b697c05..d37629dbad72 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/perf_event.h
@@ -251,6 +251,8 @@ enum {
 	PERF_BR_SYSRET		= 8,	/* syscall return */
 	PERF_BR_COND_CALL	= 9,	/* conditional function call */
 	PERF_BR_COND_RET	= 10,	/* conditional function return */
+	PERF_BR_ERET		= 11,	/* exception return */
+	PERF_BR_IRQ		= 12,	/* irq */
 	PERF_BR_MAX,
 };
 
-- 
2.25.1


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-15  5:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-15  5:35 [PATCH V4 00/10] perf: Expand perf_branch_entry Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 02/10] perf: Add system error and not in transaction branch types Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 03/10] perf: Extend branch type classification Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15 11:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-15 13:06     ` Robin Murphy
2022-03-16 12:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-03-17  5:41         ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 04/10] perf: Capture branch privilege information Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-16 17:26   ` James Clark
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 05/10] perf: Add PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_[N] map for BRBE on arm64 platform Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 06/10] perf/tools: Add irq and exception return branch types Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 07/10] perf/tools: Add system error and not in transaction " Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 08/10] perf/tools: Extend branch type classification Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 09/10] perf/tools: Add branch privilege information request flag Anshuman Khandual
2022-03-15  5:35 ` [PATCH V4 10/10] perf/tools: Add PERF_BR_NEW_ARCH_[N] map for BRBE on arm64 platform Anshuman Khandual

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220315053516.431515-2-anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).