linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
To: Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@kernel.org>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
	Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>,
	Hyunchul Lee <hyc.lee@gmail.com>,
	linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
	"Brian Johannesmeyer" <bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com>,
	Cristiano Giuffrida <c.giuffrida@vu.nl>,
	"Bos, H.J." <h.j.bos@vu.nl>,
	Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ksmbd: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable
Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2022 08:13:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220324071301.60228-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com> (raw)

To move the list iterator variable into the list_for_each_entry_*()
macro in the future it should be avoided to use the list iterator
variable after the loop body.

To *never* use the list iterator variable after the loop it was
concluded to use a separate iterator variable instead of a
found boolean [1].

This removes the need to use a found variable and simply checking if
the variable was set, can determine if the break/goto was hit.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CAHk-=wgRr_D8CB-D9Kg-c=EHreAsk5SqXPwr9Y7k9sA6cWXJ6w@mail.gmail.com/
Signed-off-by: Jakob Koschel <jakobkoschel@gmail.com>
---
 fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c | 21 ++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
index 67e8e28e3fc3..be9606b9a944 100644
--- a/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
+++ b/fs/ksmbd/smb2pdu.c
@@ -6618,8 +6618,7 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 	struct ksmbd_conn *conn = work->conn;
 	struct smb2_hdr *hdr = smb2_get_msg(work->request_buf);
 	struct smb2_hdr *chdr;
-	struct ksmbd_work *cancel_work = NULL;
-	int canceled = 0;
+	struct ksmbd_work *cancel_work = NULL, *iter;
 	struct list_head *command_list;
 
 	ksmbd_debug(SMB, "smb2 cancel called on mid %llu, async flags 0x%x\n",
@@ -6629,11 +6628,11 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		command_list = &conn->async_requests;
 
 		spin_lock(&conn->request_lock);
-		list_for_each_entry(cancel_work, command_list,
+		list_for_each_entry(iter, command_list,
 				    async_request_entry) {
-			chdr = smb2_get_msg(cancel_work->request_buf);
+			chdr = smb2_get_msg(iter->request_buf);
 
-			if (cancel_work->async_id !=
+			if (iter->async_id !=
 			    le64_to_cpu(hdr->Id.AsyncId))
 				continue;
 
@@ -6641,7 +6640,7 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 				    "smb2 with AsyncId %llu cancelled command = 0x%x\n",
 				    le64_to_cpu(hdr->Id.AsyncId),
 				    le16_to_cpu(chdr->Command));
-			canceled = 1;
+			cancel_work = iter;
 			break;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&conn->request_lock);
@@ -6649,24 +6648,24 @@ int smb2_cancel(struct ksmbd_work *work)
 		command_list = &conn->requests;
 
 		spin_lock(&conn->request_lock);
-		list_for_each_entry(cancel_work, command_list, request_entry) {
-			chdr = smb2_get_msg(cancel_work->request_buf);
+		list_for_each_entry(iter, command_list, request_entry) {
+			chdr = smb2_get_msg(iter->request_buf);
 
 			if (chdr->MessageId != hdr->MessageId ||
-			    cancel_work == work)
+			    iter == work)
 				continue;
 
 			ksmbd_debug(SMB,
 				    "smb2 with mid %llu cancelled command = 0x%x\n",
 				    le64_to_cpu(hdr->MessageId),
 				    le16_to_cpu(chdr->Command));
-			canceled = 1;
+			cancel_work = iter;
 			break;
 		}
 		spin_unlock(&conn->request_lock);
 	}
 
-	if (canceled) {
+	if (cancel_work) {
 		cancel_work->state = KSMBD_WORK_CANCELLED;
 		if (cancel_work->cancel_fn)
 			cancel_work->cancel_fn(cancel_work->cancel_argv);

base-commit: f443e374ae131c168a065ea1748feac6b2e76613
-- 
2.25.1


             reply	other threads:[~2022-03-24  7:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-24  7:13 Jakob Koschel [this message]
2022-03-25  6:58 ` [PATCH] ksmbd: replace usage of found with dedicated list iterator variable Hyunchul Lee
2022-03-26  0:49 ` Namjae Jeon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220324071301.60228-1-jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --to=jakobkoschel@gmail.com \
    --cc=bjohannesmeyer@gmail.com \
    --cc=c.giuffrida@vu.nl \
    --cc=h.j.bos@vu.nl \
    --cc=hyc.lee@gmail.com \
    --cc=linkinjeon@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
    --cc=sfrench@samba.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).