linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
                   ` (5 more replies)
  0 siblings, 6 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Xu Kuohai (5):
  arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
  bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code
  bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64
  bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
  selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c

 arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |   2 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h               |  10 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c               |   1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S              |  18 +-
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h                      |  14 +-
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                 | 390 +++++++++++++++++-
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c                   |  20 -
 include/linux/bpf.h                           |   5 +
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c                   |   4 +-
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c                       |  36 +-
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c   |   4 +-
 11 files changed, 470 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 ` Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-14  5:58   ` Song Liu
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code Xu Kuohai
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

Add ftrace direct support for arm64.

1. When there is custom trampoline only, replace the fentry nop to a
   jump instruction that jumps directly to the custom trampoline.

2. When ftrace trampoline and custome coexist, jump from fentry to
   ftrace trampoline first, then jump to custom trampoline when ftrace
   trampoline exits. The currently unused register pt_regs->x0 is used
   as an intermediary for jumping from ftrace trampoline to custom
   trampoline.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  2 ++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h  | 10 ++++++++++
 arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c  |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 18 +++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
index 57c4c995965f..81cc330daafc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
@@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ config ARM64
 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS \
 		if $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=2)
+	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS \
+		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
 	select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY \
 		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
 	select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
index 1494cfa8639b..3a363d6a3bd0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
@@ -78,6 +78,16 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
 	return addr;
 }
 
+static inline void arch_ftrace_set_direct_caller(struct pt_regs *regs,
+						 unsigned long addr)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Place custom trampoline address in regs->orig_x0 to let ftrace
+	 * trampoline jump to it.
+	 */
+	regs->orig_x0 = addr;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
 struct dyn_ftrace;
 int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
index 1197e7679882..b1ed0bf01c59 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ int main(void)
   DEFINE(S_SDEI_TTBR1,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, sdei_ttbr1));
   DEFINE(S_PMR_SAVE,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, pmr_save));
   DEFINE(S_STACKFRAME,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe));
+  DEFINE(S_ORIG_X0,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_x0));
   DEFINE(PT_REGS_SIZE,		sizeof(struct pt_regs));
   BLANK();
 #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
index e535480a4069..b1bd6576f205 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
@@ -60,6 +60,9 @@
 	str	x29, [sp, #S_FP]
 	.endif
 
+	/* Set orig_x0 to zero  */
+	str     xzr, [sp, #S_ORIG_X0]
+
 	/* Save the callsite's SP and LR */
 	add	x10, sp, #(PT_REGS_SIZE + 16)
 	stp	x9, x10, [sp, #S_LR]
@@ -119,12 +122,21 @@ ftrace_common_return:
 	/* Restore the callsite's FP, LR, PC */
 	ldr	x29, [sp, #S_FP]
 	ldr	x30, [sp, #S_LR]
-	ldr	x9, [sp, #S_PC]
-
+	ldr	x10, [sp, #S_PC]
+
+	ldr	x11, [sp, #S_ORIG_X0]
+	cbz	x11, 1f
+	/* Set x9 to parent ip before jump to bpf trampoline */
+	mov	x9,  x30
+	/* Set lr to self ip */
+	ldr	x30, [sp, #S_PC]
+	/* Set x10 (used for return address) to bpf trampoline */
+	mov	x10, x11
+1:
 	/* Restore the callsite's SP */
 	add	sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE + 16
 
-	ret	x9
+	ret	x10
 SYM_CODE_END(ftrace_common)
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 ` Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Xu Kuohai
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() is not relevant to architecture, so move it
to the public trampoline code.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 20 --------------------
 include/linux/bpf.h         |  5 +++++
 kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c |  4 ++--
 kernel/bpf/trampoline.c     | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8fe35ed11fd6..774f05f92737 100644
--- a/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/x86/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1900,23 +1900,6 @@ static int invoke_bpf_mod_ret(const struct btf_func_model *m, u8 **pprog,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static bool is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(unsigned int flags)
-{
-	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) &&
-	    (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME))
-		return false;
-
-	/*
-	 * BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
-	 * and it must be used alone.
-	 */
-	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET) &&
-	    (flags & ~BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET))
-		return false;
-
-	return true;
-}
-
 /* Example:
  * __be16 eth_type_trans(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev);
  * its 'struct btf_func_model' will be nr_args=2
@@ -1995,9 +1978,6 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image, void *i
 	if (nr_args > 6)
 		return -ENOTSUPP;
 
-	if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
 	/* Generated trampoline stack layout:
 	 *
 	 * RBP + 8         [ return address  ]
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index bdb5298735ce..c650b7fe87ee 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -706,6 +706,11 @@ int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *i
 				const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
 				struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
 				void *orig_call);
+int bpf_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *image_end,
+			   const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
+			   struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
+			   void *orig_call);
+
 /* these two functions are called from generated trampoline */
 u64 notrace __bpf_prog_enter(struct bpf_prog *prog);
 void notrace __bpf_prog_exit(struct bpf_prog *prog, u64 start);
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
index 21069dbe9138..5f9bdd530df2 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/bpf_struct_ops.c
@@ -325,8 +325,8 @@ int bpf_struct_ops_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
 	tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].progs[0] = prog;
 	tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY].nr_progs = 1;
 	flags = model->ret_size > 0 ? BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET : 0;
-	return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(NULL, image, image_end,
-					   model, flags, tprogs, NULL);
+	return bpf_prepare_trampoline(NULL, image, image_end, model, flags,
+				      tprogs, NULL);
 }
 
 static int bpf_struct_ops_map_update_elem(struct bpf_map *map, void *key,
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
index ada97751ae1b..6bd61f9cff7a 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/trampoline.c
@@ -360,9 +360,9 @@ static int bpf_trampoline_update(struct bpf_trampoline *tr)
 	if (ip_arg)
 		flags |= BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG;
 
-	err = arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(im, im->image, im->image + PAGE_SIZE,
-					  &tr->func.model, flags, tprogs,
-					  tr->func.addr);
+	err = bpf_prepare_trampoline(im, im->image, im->image + PAGE_SIZE,
+				     &tr->func.model, flags, tprogs,
+				     tr->func.addr);
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out;
 
@@ -641,6 +641,36 @@ arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *image
 	return -ENOTSUPP;
 }
 
+static bool is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(unsigned int flags)
+{
+	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS) &&
+	    (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME))
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
+	 * and it must be used alone.
+	 */
+	if ((flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET) &&
+	    (flags & ~BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET))
+		return false;
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+int
+bpf_prepare_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *tr, void *image, void *image_end,
+		       const struct btf_func_model *m, u32 flags,
+		       struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
+		       void *orig_call)
+{
+	if (!is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags(flags))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	return arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(tr, image, image_end, m, flags,
+					   tprogs, orig_call);
+}
+
 static int __init init_trampolines(void)
 {
 	int i;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 ` Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline " Xu Kuohai
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64, so bpf trampoline code can use
it to replace nop with jump, or replace jump with nop.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 8ab4035dea27..1a1c3ea75ee2 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/bitfield.h>
 #include <linux/bpf.h>
+#include <linux/memory.h>
 #include <linux/filter.h>
 #include <linux/printk.h>
 #include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -18,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
 #include <asm/insn.h>
+#include <asm/patching.h>
 #include <asm/set_memory.h>
 
 #include "bpf_jit.h"
@@ -1529,3 +1531,53 @@ void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr)
 {
 	return vfree(addr);
 }
+
+static int gen_branch_or_nop(enum aarch64_insn_branch_type type, void *ip,
+			     void *addr, u32 *insn)
+{
+	if (!addr)
+		*insn = aarch64_insn_gen_nop();
+	else
+		*insn = aarch64_insn_gen_branch_imm((unsigned long)ip,
+						    (unsigned long)addr,
+						    type);
+
+	return *insn != AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT ? 0 : -EFAULT;
+}
+
+int bpf_arch_text_poke(void *ip, enum bpf_text_poke_type poke_type,
+		       void *old_addr, void *new_addr)
+{
+	int ret;
+	u32 old_insn;
+	u32 new_insn;
+	u32 replaced;
+	enum aarch64_insn_branch_type branch_type;
+
+	if (poke_type == BPF_MOD_CALL)
+		branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_LINK;
+	else
+		branch_type = AARCH64_INSN_BRANCH_NOLINK;
+
+	if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, old_addr, &old_insn) < 0)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	if (gen_branch_or_nop(branch_type, ip, new_addr, &new_insn) < 0)
+		return -EFAULT;
+
+	mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
+	if (aarch64_insn_read(ip, &replaced)) {
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	if (replaced != old_insn) {
+		ret = -EFAULT;
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	ret =  aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync((void *)ip, new_insn);
+out:
+	mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
+	return ret;
+}
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 ` Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13 18:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h      |  14 +-
 arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 338 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 2 files changed, 348 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
index 194c95ccc1cf..e29761dc8004 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit.h
@@ -86,9 +86,18 @@
 		AARCH64_INSN_VARIANT_64BIT, \
 		AARCH64_INSN_LDST_##ls##_PAIR_##type)
 /* Rn -= 16; Rn[0] = Rt; Rn[8] = Rt2; */
-#define A64_PUSH(Rt, Rt2, Rn) A64_LS_PAIR(Rt, Rt2, Rn, -16, STORE, PRE_INDEX)
+#define A64_PUSH(Rt, Rt2, Rn) \
+	A64_LS_PAIR(Rt, Rt2, Rn, -16, STORE, PRE_INDEX)
 /* Rt = Rn[0]; Rt2 = Rn[8]; Rn += 16; */
-#define A64_POP(Rt, Rt2, Rn)  A64_LS_PAIR(Rt, Rt2, Rn, 16, LOAD, POST_INDEX)
+#define A64_POP(Rt, Rt2, Rn) \
+	A64_LS_PAIR(Rt, Rt2, Rn, 16, LOAD, POST_INDEX)
+
+/* Rn[imm] = Xt1; Rn[imm + 8] = Xt2 */
+#define A64_STP(Xt1, Xt2, Xn, imm)  \
+	A64_LS_PAIR(Xt1, Xt2, Xn, imm, STORE, SIGNED_OFFSET)
+/* Xt1 = Rn[imm]; Xt2 = Rn[imm + 8] */
+#define A64_LDP(Xt1, Xt2, Xn, imm)  \
+	A64_LS_PAIR(Xt1, Xt2, Xn, imm, LOAD, SIGNED_OFFSET)
 
 /* Load/store exclusive */
 #define A64_SIZE(sf) \
@@ -270,6 +279,7 @@
 #define A64_BTI_C  A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_BTIC)
 #define A64_BTI_J  A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_BTIJ)
 #define A64_BTI_JC A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_BTIJC)
+#define A64_NOP    A64_HINT(AARCH64_INSN_HINT_NOP)
 
 /* DMB */
 #define A64_DMB_ISH aarch64_insn_gen_dmb(AARCH64_INSN_MB_ISH)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
index 1a1c3ea75ee2..5f6bd755050f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c
@@ -1333,10 +1333,16 @@ static int validate_code(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ctx->idx; i++) {
 		u32 a64_insn = le32_to_cpu(ctx->image[i]);
-
 		if (a64_insn == AARCH64_BREAK_FAULT)
 			return -1;
 	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int validate_ctx(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
+{
+	if (validate_code(ctx))
+		return -1;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(ctx->exentry_idx != ctx->prog->aux->num_exentries))
 		return -1;
@@ -1461,7 +1467,7 @@ struct bpf_prog *bpf_int_jit_compile(struct bpf_prog *prog)
 	build_epilogue(&ctx);
 
 	/* 3. Extra pass to validate JITed code. */
-	if (validate_code(&ctx)) {
+	if (validate_ctx(&ctx)) {
 		bpf_jit_binary_free(header);
 		prog = orig_prog;
 		goto out_off;
@@ -1532,6 +1538,334 @@ void bpf_jit_free_exec(void *addr)
 	return vfree(addr);
 }
 
+static void invoke_bpf_prog(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_prog *p,
+			    int args_off, int retval_off, bool save_ret)
+{
+	u32 *branch;
+	u64 enter_prog;
+	u64 exit_prog;
+	u8 tmp = bpf2a64[TMP_REG_1];
+	u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
+
+	if (p->aux->sleepable) {
+		enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter_sleepable;
+		exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit_sleepable;
+	} else {
+		enter_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_enter;
+		exit_prog = (u64)__bpf_prog_exit;
+	}
+
+	/* bl __bpf_prog_enter */
+	emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)p, ctx);
+	emit_addr_mov_i64(tmp, enter_prog, ctx);
+	emit(A64_BLR(tmp), ctx);
+
+	/*
+	 * if (__bpf_prog_enter(prog) == 0)
+	 *         goto skip_exec_of_prog;
+	 */
+	branch = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
+	emit(A64_NOP, ctx);
+
+	/* move return value to x19 */
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(19), r0), ctx);
+
+	/* bl bpf_prog */
+	emit(A64_ADD_I(1, A64_R(0), A64_SP, args_off), ctx);
+	if (!p->jited)
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(1), (const u64)p->insnsi, ctx);
+	emit_addr_mov_i64(tmp, (const u64)p->bpf_func, ctx);
+	emit(A64_BLR(tmp), ctx);
+
+	/* store return value */
+	if (save_ret)
+		emit(A64_STR64I(r0, A64_SP, retval_off), ctx);
+
+	if (ctx->image) {
+		int offset = &ctx->image[ctx->idx] - branch;
+		*branch = A64_CBZ(1, A64_R(0), offset);
+	}
+
+	/* bl __bpf_prog_exit */
+	emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)p, ctx);
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(1), A64_R(19)), ctx);
+	emit_addr_mov_i64(tmp, exit_prog, ctx);
+	emit(A64_BLR(tmp), ctx);
+}
+
+static void invoke_bpf_mod_ret(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_progs *tp,
+			       int args_off, int retval_off, u32 **branches)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	/* The first fmod_ret program will receive a garbage return value.
+	 * Set this to 0 to avoid confusing the program.
+	 */
+	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_ZR, A64_SP, retval_off), ctx);
+	for (i = 0; i < tp->nr_progs; i++) {
+		invoke_bpf_prog(ctx, tp->progs[i], args_off, retval_off, true);
+		/*
+		 * if (*(u64 *)(sp + retval_off) !=  0)
+		 *	goto do_fexit;
+		 */
+		emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retval_off), ctx);
+		/* Save the location of branch, and generate a nop.
+		 * This nop will be replaced with a cbnz later.
+		 */
+		branches[i] = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
+		emit(A64_NOP, ctx);
+	}
+}
+
+static void save_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int args_off, int nargs)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		emit(A64_STR64I(i, A64_SP, args_off), ctx);
+		args_off += 8;
+	}
+}
+
+static void restore_args(struct jit_ctx *ctx, int args_off, int nargs)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) {
+		emit(A64_LDR64I(i, A64_SP, args_off), ctx);
+		args_off += 8;
+	}
+}
+
+/*
+ * Based on the x86's implementation of arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline().
+ *
+ * We dpend on DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS to set return address and nop.
+ *
+ * fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
+ *   mov x9, x30
+ *   nop
+ *
+ * fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
+ *   mov x9, x30
+ *   bl  <bpf_trampoline>
+ *
+ */
+static int prepare_trampoline(struct jit_ctx *ctx, struct bpf_tramp_image *im,
+			      struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs, void *orig_call,
+			      int nargs, u32 flags)
+{
+	int i;
+	int stack_size;
+	int retaddr_off;
+	int regs_off;
+	int retval_off;
+	int args_off;
+	int nargs_off;
+	struct bpf_tramp_progs *fentry = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FENTRY];
+	struct bpf_tramp_progs *fexit = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_FEXIT];
+	struct bpf_tramp_progs *fmod_ret = &tprogs[BPF_TRAMP_MODIFY_RETURN];
+	bool save_ret;
+	u32 **branches = NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * trampoline stack layout:
+	 *                  [ parent ip       ]
+	 *                  [ FP              ]
+	 * SP + retaddr_off [ self ip         ]
+	 * FP               [ FP              ]
+	 *
+	 * sp + regs_off    [ x19             ] callee-saved regs, currently
+	 *                                      only x19 is used
+	 *
+	 * SP + retval_off  [ return value    ] BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG or
+	 *                                      BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET flags
+	 *
+	 *                  [ argN            ]
+	 *                  [ ...             ]
+	 * sp + args_off    [ arg1            ]
+	 *
+	 * SP + nargs_off   [ args count      ]
+	 *
+	 * SP + 0           [ traced function ] BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG flag
+	 */
+
+	stack_size = 0;
+	/* room for IP address argument */
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG)
+		stack_size += 8;
+
+	nargs_off = stack_size;
+	/* room for args count */
+	stack_size += 8;
+
+	args_off = stack_size;
+	/* room for args */
+	stack_size += nargs * 8;
+
+	/* room for return value */
+	retval_off = stack_size;
+	save_ret = flags & (BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG | BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
+	if (save_ret)
+		stack_size += 8;
+
+	/* room for callee-saved registers, currently only x19 is used */
+	regs_off = stack_size;
+	stack_size += 8;
+
+	retaddr_off = stack_size + 8;
+
+	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM64_BTI_KERNEL))
+		emit(A64_BTI_C, ctx);
+
+	/* frame for parent function */
+	emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_R(9), A64_SP), ctx);
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
+
+	/* frame for patched function */
+	emit(A64_PUSH(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_FP, A64_SP), ctx);
+
+	/* allocate stack space */
+	emit(A64_SUB_I(1, A64_SP, A64_SP, stack_size), ctx);
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_IP_ARG) {
+		/* save ip address of the traced function */
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(10), (const u64)orig_call, ctx);
+		emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, 0), ctx);
+	}
+
+	/* save args count*/
+	emit(A64_MOVZ(1, A64_R(10), nargs, 0), ctx);
+	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, nargs_off), ctx);
+
+	/* save args */
+	save_args(ctx, args_off, nargs);
+
+	/* save callee saved registers */
+	emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(10), (const u64)__bpf_tramp_enter, ctx);
+		emit(A64_BLR(A64_R(10)), ctx);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < fentry->nr_progs; i++)
+		invoke_bpf_prog(ctx, fentry->progs[i], args_off, retval_off,
+				flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET);
+
+	if (fmod_ret->nr_progs) {
+		branches = kcalloc(fmod_ret->nr_progs, sizeof(u32 *),
+				   GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!branches)
+			return -ENOMEM;
+
+		invoke_bpf_mod_ret(ctx, fmod_ret, args_off, retval_off,
+				   branches);
+	}
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
+		restore_args(ctx, args_off, nargs);
+		emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(10), A64_SP, retaddr_off), ctx);
+		emit(A64_BLR(A64_R(10)), ctx);
+		emit(A64_STR64I(A64_R(0), A64_SP, retval_off), ctx);
+		im->ip_after_call = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
+		emit(A64_NOP, ctx);
+	}
+
+	/* update the branches saved in invoke_bpf_mod_ret with cbnz */
+	for (i = 0; i < fmod_ret->nr_progs && ctx->image != NULL; i++) {
+		int offset = &ctx->image[ctx->idx] - branches[i];
+		*branches[i] = A64_CBNZ(1, A64_R(10), offset);
+	}
+
+	for (i = 0; i < fexit->nr_progs; i++)
+		invoke_bpf_prog(ctx, fexit->progs[i], args_off, retval_off,
+				false);
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_RESTORE_REGS)
+		restore_args(ctx, args_off, nargs);
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_CALL_ORIG) {
+		im->ip_epilogue = ctx->image + ctx->idx;
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(0), (const u64)im, ctx);
+		emit_addr_mov_i64(A64_R(10), (const u64)__bpf_tramp_exit, ctx);
+		emit(A64_BLR(A64_R(10)), ctx);
+	}
+
+	/* restore x19 */
+	emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(19), A64_SP, regs_off), ctx);
+
+	if (save_ret)
+		emit(A64_LDR64I(A64_R(0), A64_SP, retval_off), ctx);
+
+	/* reset SP  */
+	emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_SP, A64_FP), ctx);
+
+	/* pop frames  */
+	emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_LR, A64_SP), ctx);
+	emit(A64_POP(A64_FP, A64_R(9), A64_SP), ctx);
+
+	if (flags & BPF_TRAMP_F_SKIP_FRAME) {
+		/* skip patched function, return to parent */
+		emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_LR, A64_R(9)), ctx);
+		emit(A64_RET(A64_R(9)), ctx);
+	} else {
+		/* return to patched function */
+		emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_R(10), A64_LR), ctx);
+		emit(A64_MOV(1, A64_LR, A64_R(9)), ctx);
+		emit(A64_RET(A64_R(10)), ctx);
+	}
+
+	if (ctx->image)
+		bpf_flush_icache(ctx->image, ctx->image + ctx->idx);
+
+	kfree(branches);
+
+	return ctx->idx;
+}
+
+int arch_prepare_bpf_trampoline(struct bpf_tramp_image *im, void *image,
+				void *image_end, const struct btf_func_model *m,
+				u32 flags, struct bpf_tramp_progs *tprogs,
+				void *orig_call)
+{
+	int ret;
+	int nargs = m->nr_args;
+	int max_insns = ((long)image_end - (long)image) / AARCH64_INSN_SIZE;
+	struct jit_ctx ctx = {
+		.image = NULL,
+		.idx = 0
+	};
+
+	/* we depends on ftrace to set return address and place nop */
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS))
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+	/* the first 8 arguments are passed by registers */
+	if (nargs > 8)
+		return -ENOTSUPP;
+
+	ret =  prepare_trampoline(&ctx, im, tprogs, orig_call, nargs, flags);
+	if (ret < 0)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (ret > max_insns)
+		return -EFBIG;
+
+	ctx.image = image;
+	ctx.idx = 0;
+
+	jit_fill_hole(image, (unsigned int)(image_end - image));
+	ret = prepare_trampoline(&ctx, im, tprogs, orig_call, nargs, flags);
+
+	if (ret > 0 && validate_code(&ctx) < 0)
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int gen_branch_or_nop(enum aarch64_insn_branch_type type, void *ip,
 			     void *addr, u32 *insn)
 {
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline " Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13  5:49 ` Xu Kuohai
  2022-04-13 18:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-13  5:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

The "ipv6" word in assertion message should be "fentry_fexit".

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
index 130f5b82d2e6..e3c139bde46e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/fentry_fexit.c
@@ -28,8 +28,8 @@ void test_fentry_fexit(void)
 
 	prog_fd = fexit_skel->progs.test1.prog_fd;
 	err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(prog_fd, &topts);
-	ASSERT_OK(err, "ipv6 test_run");
-	ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "ipv6 test retval");
+	ASSERT_OK(err, "fentry_fexit test_run");
+	ASSERT_OK(topts.retval, "fentry_fexit test retval");
 
 	fentry_res = (__u64 *)fentry_skel->bss;
 	fexit_res = (__u64 *)fexit_skel->bss;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64
  2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-13 18:34 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
  5 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen @ 2022-04-13 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xu Kuohai, bpf, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, netdev, linux-kselftest
  Cc: Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt, Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov,
	Zi Shen Lim, Andrii Nakryiko, Martin KaFai Lau, Song Liu,
	Yonghong Song, John Fastabend, KP Singh, x86, hpa, Shuah Khan,
	Mark Rutland, Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin,
	Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss, Sudeep Holla, Steven Price,
	Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown, Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi,
	Delyan Kratunov

Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> writes:

> Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
> x86.
>
> Tested on qemu, result:
>  #55 fentry_fexit:OK
>  #56 fentry_test:OK
>  #58 fexit_sleep:OK
>  #59 fexit_stress:OK
>  #60 fexit_test:OK
>  #67 get_func_args_test:OK
>  #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
>  #101 modify_return:OK

Yay! Great to see this; thanks a bunch for tackling it! :)

-Toke

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
  2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
@ 2022-04-14  5:58   ` Song Liu
  2022-04-14  6:35     ` Xu Kuohai
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Song Liu @ 2022-04-14  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xu Kuohai
  Cc: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, open list, Networking,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt,
	Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov, Zi Shen Lim,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin Lau, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
	KP Singh, X86 ML, H. Peter Anvin, Shuah Khan, Mark Rutland,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin, Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss,
	Sudeep Holla, Steven Price, Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Delyan Kratunov



> On Apr 12, 2022, at 10:49 PM, Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Add ftrace direct support for arm64.
> 
> 1. When there is custom trampoline only, replace the fentry nop to a
>   jump instruction that jumps directly to the custom trampoline.
> 
> 2. When ftrace trampoline and custome coexist, jump from fentry to
>   ftrace trampoline first, then jump to custom trampoline when ftrace
>   trampoline exits. The currently unused register pt_regs->x0 is used
>   as an intermediary for jumping from ftrace trampoline to custom
>   trampoline.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>

For the series: 

Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>

(Pardon my laziness, I somehow only got 1/5 and 3/5 in one of my 
inboxes, and nothing in my other inbox. :( ) 

Just one nitpick for 2/5: as we move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags to
trampoline.c, we should change the multi-line comment into net
style:

	/* BPF_TRAMP_F_RET_FENTRY_RET is only used by bpf_struct_ops,
	 * and it must be used alone.
	 */

Thanks,
Song

> ---
> arch/arm64/Kconfig               |  2 ++
> arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h  | 10 ++++++++++
> arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c  |  1 +
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S | 18 +++++++++++++++---
> 4 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 57c4c995965f..81cc330daafc 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@ -177,6 +177,8 @@ config ARM64
> 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
> 	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS \
> 		if $(cc-option,-fpatchable-function-entry=2)
> +	select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_DIRECT_CALLS \
> +		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> 	select FTRACE_MCOUNT_USE_PATCHABLE_FUNCTION_ENTRY \
> 		if DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> 	select HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> index 1494cfa8639b..3a363d6a3bd0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/ftrace.h
> @@ -78,6 +78,16 @@ static inline unsigned long ftrace_call_adjust(unsigned long addr)
> 	return addr;
> }
> 
> +static inline void arch_ftrace_set_direct_caller(struct pt_regs *regs,
> +						 unsigned long addr)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * Place custom trampoline address in regs->orig_x0 to let ftrace
> +	 * trampoline jump to it.
> +	 */
> +	regs->orig_x0 = addr;
> +}
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_DYNAMIC_FTRACE_WITH_REGS
> struct dyn_ftrace;
> int ftrace_init_nop(struct module *mod, struct dyn_ftrace *rec);
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> index 1197e7679882..b1ed0bf01c59 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/asm-offsets.c
> @@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ int main(void)
>   DEFINE(S_SDEI_TTBR1,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, sdei_ttbr1));
>   DEFINE(S_PMR_SAVE,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, pmr_save));
>   DEFINE(S_STACKFRAME,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, stackframe));
> +  DEFINE(S_ORIG_X0,		offsetof(struct pt_regs, orig_x0));
>   DEFINE(PT_REGS_SIZE,		sizeof(struct pt_regs));
>   BLANK();
> #ifdef CONFIG_COMPAT
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
> index e535480a4069..b1bd6576f205 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry-ftrace.S
> @@ -60,6 +60,9 @@
> 	str	x29, [sp, #S_FP]
> 	.endif
> 
> +	/* Set orig_x0 to zero  */
> +	str     xzr, [sp, #S_ORIG_X0]
> +
> 	/* Save the callsite's SP and LR */
> 	add	x10, sp, #(PT_REGS_SIZE + 16)
> 	stp	x9, x10, [sp, #S_LR]
> @@ -119,12 +122,21 @@ ftrace_common_return:
> 	/* Restore the callsite's FP, LR, PC */
> 	ldr	x29, [sp, #S_FP]
> 	ldr	x30, [sp, #S_LR]
> -	ldr	x9, [sp, #S_PC]
> -
> +	ldr	x10, [sp, #S_PC]
> +
> +	ldr	x11, [sp, #S_ORIG_X0]
> +	cbz	x11, 1f
> +	/* Set x9 to parent ip before jump to bpf trampoline */
> +	mov	x9,  x30
> +	/* Set lr to self ip */
> +	ldr	x30, [sp, #S_PC]
> +	/* Set x10 (used for return address) to bpf trampoline */
> +	mov	x10, x11
> +1:
> 	/* Restore the callsite's SP */
> 	add	sp, sp, #PT_REGS_SIZE + 16
> 
> -	ret	x9
> +	ret	x10
> SYM_CODE_END(ftrace_common)
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support
  2022-04-14  5:58   ` Song Liu
@ 2022-04-14  6:35     ` Xu Kuohai
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Xu Kuohai @ 2022-04-14  6:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Song Liu
  Cc: bpf, linux-arm-kernel, open list, Networking,
	open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK, Will Deacon, Steven Rostedt,
	Daniel Borkmann, Alexei Starovoitov, Zi Shen Lim,
	Andrii Nakryiko, Martin Lau, Yonghong Song, John Fastabend,
	KP Singh, X86 ML, H. Peter Anvin, Shuah Khan, Mark Rutland,
	Ard Biesheuvel, Pasha Tatashin, Peter Collingbourne, Daniel Kiss,
	Sudeep Holla, Steven Price, Marc Zyngier, Mark Brown,
	Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi, Delyan Kratunov

On 4/14/2022 1:58 PM, Song Liu wrote:
> Just one nitpick for 2/5: as we move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags to
> trampoline.c, we should change the multi-line comment into net
> style:

Thanks for your suggestion, will fix in v2.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-04-14  6:35 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-04-13  5:49 [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 1/5] arm64: ftrace: Add ftrace direct call support Xu Kuohai
2022-04-14  5:58   ` Song Liu
2022-04-14  6:35     ` Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 2/5] bpf: Move is_valid_bpf_tramp_flags() to the public trampoline code Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 3/5] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 4/5] bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline " Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13  5:49 ` [PATCH bpf-next 5/5] selftests/bpf: Fix trivial typo in fentry_fexit.c Xu Kuohai
2022-04-13 18:34 ` [PATCH bpf-next 0/5] bpf trampoline for arm64 Toke Høiland-Jørgensen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).