linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove redundant bits from extended role
Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2022 03:39:54 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220414074000.31438-17-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220414074000.31438-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>

Before the separation of the CPU and the MMU role, CR0.PG was not
available in the base MMU role, because two-dimensional paging always
used direct=1 in the MMU role.  However, now that the raw role is
snapshotted in mmu->cpu_role, CR0.PG *can* be found (though inverted)
as !cpu_role.base.direct.  There is no need to store it again in union
kvm_mmu_extended_role; instead, write an is_cr0_pg accessor by hand that
takes care of the inversion.

Likewise, CR4.PAE is now always present in the CPU role as
!cpu_role.base.has_4_byte_gpte.  The inversion makes certain tests on
the MMU role easier, and is easily hidden by the is_cr4_pae accessor
when operating on the CPU role.

Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  2 --
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c          | 14 ++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 6bc5550ae530..52ceeadbed28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -367,8 +367,6 @@ union kvm_mmu_extended_role {
 	struct {
 		unsigned int valid:1;
 		unsigned int execonly:1;
-		unsigned int cr0_pg:1;
-		unsigned int cr4_pae:1;
 		unsigned int cr4_pse:1;
 		unsigned int cr4_pke:1;
 		unsigned int cr4_smap:1;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 483a3761db81..cf8a41675a79 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -224,16 +224,24 @@ static inline bool __maybe_unused is_##reg##_##name(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)	\
 {								\
 	return !!(mmu->cpu_role. base_or_ext . reg##_##name);	\
 }
-BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr0, pg);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, cr0, wp);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, pse);
-BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, pae);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, smep);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, smap);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, pke);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(ext,  cr4, la57);
 BUILD_MMU_ROLE_ACCESSOR(base, efer, nx);
 
+static inline bool is_cr0_pg(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
+{
+        return !mmu->cpu_role.base.direct;
+}
+
+static inline bool is_cr4_pae(struct kvm_mmu *mmu)
+{
+        return !mmu->cpu_role.base.has_4_byte_gpte;
+}
+
 static struct kvm_mmu_role_regs vcpu_to_role_regs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
 {
 	struct kvm_mmu_role_regs regs = {
@@ -4712,8 +4720,6 @@ kvm_calc_cpu_role(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, const struct kvm_mmu_role_regs *regs)
 	else
 		role.base.level = PT32_ROOT_LEVEL;
 
-	role.ext.cr0_pg = 1;
-	role.ext.cr4_pae = ____is_cr4_pae(regs);
 	role.ext.cr4_smep = ____is_cr4_smep(regs);
 	role.ext.cr4_smap = ____is_cr4_smap(regs);
 	role.ext.cr4_pse = ____is_cr4_pse(regs);
-- 
2.31.1



  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-04-14  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-14  7:39 [PATCH v3 00/22] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg267878.html Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 01/22] KVM: x86/mmu: nested EPT cannot be used in SMM Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 02/22] KVM: x86/mmu: constify uses of struct kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 03/22] KVM: x86/mmu: pull computation of kvm_mmu_role_regs to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 04/22] KVM: x86/mmu: rephrase unclear comment Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 05/22] KVM: x86: Clean up and document nested #PF workaround Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 06/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove "bool base_only" arguments Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 07/22] KVM: x86/mmu: split cpu_role from mmu_role Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-15  4:16   ` Like Xu
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 08/22] KVM: x86/mmu: do not recompute root level from kvm_mmu_role_regs Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 09/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove ept_ad field Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 10/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove kvm_calc_shadow_root_page_role_common Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 11/22] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for two-dimensional paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 12/22] KVM: x86/mmu: cleanup computation of MMU roles for shadow paging Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 13/22] KVM: x86/mmu: store shadow EFER.NX in the MMU role Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 14/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove extended bits from mmu_role, rename field Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 15/22] KVM: x86/mmu: rename kvm_mmu_role union Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2022-04-14  8:27   ` [PATCH 16/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove redundant bits from extended role Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-10  0:20   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-11 13:53     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-12 13:59     ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-12 14:18       ` Sean Christopherson
2022-05-12 16:09         ` Paolo Bonzini
2022-05-12 21:34           ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 17/22] KVM: x86/mmu: remove valid " Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 18/22] KVM: x86/mmu: simplify and/or inline computation of shadow MMU roles Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 19/22] KVM: x86/mmu: pull CPU mode computation to kvm_init_mmu Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 20/22] KVM: x86/mmu: replace shadow_root_level with root_role.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:39 ` [PATCH 21/22] KVM: x86/mmu: replace root_level with cpu_role.base.level Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:40 ` [PATCH 22/22] KVM: x86/mmu: replace direct_map with root_role.direct Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14  7:47 ` [PATCH v3 00/22] https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg267878.html Paolo Bonzini
2022-04-14 15:02   ` Sean Christopherson
2022-04-14 15:09     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220414074000.31438-17-pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).