linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
@ 2022-05-16 18:56 Andy Shevchenko
  2022-05-16 18:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Drop unsued irqchip member in struct intel_pinctrl Andy Shevchenko
  2022-05-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Mika Westerberg
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-05-16 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: Mika Westerberg, Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij

Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:

   "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"

Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.

While at it, align IRQ chip callback names with member names for
the sake of consistency.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c | 44 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
index 826d494f3cc6..0d9161a3edf3 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.c
@@ -1039,15 +1039,14 @@ static void intel_gpio_irq_ack(struct irq_data *d)
 	}
 }
 
-static void intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool mask)
+static void intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct gpio_chip *gc, irq_hw_number_t hwirq, bool mask)
 {
-	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
 	const struct intel_community *community;
 	const struct intel_padgroup *padgrp;
 	int pin;
 
-	pin = intel_gpio_to_pin(pctrl, irqd_to_hwirq(d), &community, &padgrp);
+	pin = intel_gpio_to_pin(pctrl, hwirq, &community, &padgrp);
 	if (pin >= 0) {
 		unsigned int gpp, gpp_offset;
 		unsigned long flags;
@@ -1077,15 +1076,23 @@ static void intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(struct irq_data *d, bool mask)
 
 static void intel_gpio_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, true);
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+	intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(gc, hwirq, true);
+	gpiochip_disable_irq(gc, hwirq);
 }
 
 static void intel_gpio_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
 {
-	intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(d, false);
+	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+	irq_hw_number_t hwirq = irqd_to_hwirq(d);
+
+	gpiochip_enable_irq(gc, hwirq);
+	intel_gpio_irq_mask_unmask(gc, hwirq, false);
 }
 
-static int intel_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
+static int intel_gpio_irq_set_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
@@ -1142,7 +1149,7 @@ static int intel_gpio_irq_type(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int type)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int intel_gpio_irq_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
+static int intel_gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
 {
 	struct gpio_chip *gc = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 	struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl = gpiochip_get_data(gc);
@@ -1157,6 +1164,17 @@ static int intel_gpio_irq_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static const struct irq_chip intel_gpio_irq_chip = {
+	.name		= "intel-gpio",
+	.irq_ack	= intel_gpio_irq_ack,
+	.irq_mask	= intel_gpio_irq_mask,
+	.irq_unmask	= intel_gpio_irq_unmask,
+	.irq_set_type	= intel_gpio_irq_set_type,
+	.irq_set_wake	= intel_gpio_irq_set_wake,
+	.flags		= IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND | IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE,
+	GPIOCHIP_IRQ_RESOURCE_HELPERS,
+};
+
 static int intel_gpio_community_irq_handler(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl,
 					    const struct intel_community *community)
 {
@@ -1319,15 +1337,6 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
 	pctrl->chip.add_pin_ranges = intel_gpio_add_pin_ranges;
 	pctrl->irq = irq;
 
-	/* Setup IRQ chip */
-	pctrl->irqchip.name = dev_name(pctrl->dev);
-	pctrl->irqchip.irq_ack = intel_gpio_irq_ack;
-	pctrl->irqchip.irq_mask = intel_gpio_irq_mask;
-	pctrl->irqchip.irq_unmask = intel_gpio_irq_unmask;
-	pctrl->irqchip.irq_set_type = intel_gpio_irq_type;
-	pctrl->irqchip.irq_set_wake = intel_gpio_irq_wake;
-	pctrl->irqchip.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND;
-
 	/*
 	 * On some platforms several GPIO controllers share the same interrupt
 	 * line.
@@ -1340,8 +1349,9 @@ static int intel_gpio_probe(struct intel_pinctrl *pctrl, int irq)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/* Setup IRQ chip */
 	girq = &pctrl->chip.irq;
-	girq->chip = &pctrl->irqchip;
+	gpio_irq_chip_set_chip(girq, &intel_gpio_irq_chip);
 	/* This will let us handle the IRQ in the driver */
 	girq->parent_handler = NULL;
 	girq->num_parents = 0;
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Drop unsued irqchip member in struct intel_pinctrl
  2022-05-16 18:56 [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Andy Shevchenko
@ 2022-05-16 18:56 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2022-05-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Mika Westerberg
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-05-16 18:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, linux-gpio, linux-kernel
  Cc: Mika Westerberg, Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij

There is no users of irqchip member in struct intel_pinctrl. Drop it.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h
index c4fef03b663f..710341bb67cc 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/intel/pinctrl-intel.h
@@ -223,7 +223,6 @@ struct intel_pinctrl_context {
  * @pctldesc: Pin controller description
  * @pctldev: Pointer to the pin controller device
  * @chip: GPIO chip in this pin controller
- * @irqchip: IRQ chip in this pin controller
  * @soc: SoC/PCH specific pin configuration data
  * @communities: All communities in this pin controller
  * @ncommunities: Number of communities in this pin controller
@@ -236,7 +235,6 @@ struct intel_pinctrl {
 	struct pinctrl_desc pctldesc;
 	struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev;
 	struct gpio_chip chip;
-	struct irq_chip irqchip;
 	const struct intel_pinctrl_soc_data *soc;
 	struct intel_community *communities;
 	size_t ncommunities;
-- 
2.35.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
  2022-05-16 18:56 [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Andy Shevchenko
  2022-05-16 18:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Drop unsued irqchip member in struct intel_pinctrl Andy Shevchenko
@ 2022-05-17 10:09 ` Mika Westerberg
  2022-05-17 16:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Mika Westerberg @ 2022-05-17 10:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko; +Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij

On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:56:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
> 
>    "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
> 
> Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
> 
> While at it, align IRQ chip callback names with member names for
> the sake of consistency.

Or for the sake of inconsistency? ;-)  All the other structs are not
using this kind of alignment and I would like to keep this one matching
the rest too. Also I prefer the format currently used in the driver.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable
  2022-05-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Mika Westerberg
@ 2022-05-17 16:33   ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2022-05-17 16:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mika Westerberg; +Cc: linux-gpio, linux-kernel, Andy Shevchenko, Linus Walleij

On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 01:09:53PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 09:56:17PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Since recently, the kernel is nagging about mutable irq_chips:
> > 
> >    "not an immutable chip, please consider fixing it!"
> > 
> > Drop the unneeded copy, flag it as IRQCHIP_IMMUTABLE, add the new
> > helper functions and call the appropriate gpiolib functions.
> > 
> > While at it, align IRQ chip callback names with member names for
> > the sake of consistency.
> 
> Or for the sake of inconsistency? ;-)  All the other structs are not
> using this kind of alignment and I would like to keep this one matching
> the rest too. Also I prefer the format currently used in the driver.

I got your point. I will drop that part from v2.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-05-17 16:33 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-05-16 18:56 [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Andy Shevchenko
2022-05-16 18:56 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] pinctrl: intel: Drop unsued irqchip member in struct intel_pinctrl Andy Shevchenko
2022-05-17 10:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] pinctrl: intel: make irq_chip immutable Mika Westerberg
2022-05-17 16:33   ` Andy Shevchenko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).