linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "Clément Léger" <clement.leger@bootlin.com>
Cc: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
	Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>,
	Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@nxp.com>,
	"alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com" <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	"UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com" <UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: ocelot: fix wrong time_after usage
Date: Thu, 26 May 2022 20:42:25 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220526204225.03b7804c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220523160004.6d285609@fixe.home>

On Mon, 23 May 2022 16:00:04 +0200 Clément Léger wrote:
> > If you're looking at me, I don't have the hardware to test, sorry.
> > Frame DMA is one of the components NXP removed when building their DSA
> > variants of these switches. But the function is called once or twice per
> > NAPI poll cycle, so it's worth optimizing as much as possible.
> > 
> > Clement, could you please do some testing? The patch that Andrew is
> > talking about is 35da1dfd9484 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Improve performance
> > of busy bit polling").  
> 
> Ok, I'll have to wake up that ocelot board but I'll try to do that.

We can't hold it in PW for much longer, please repost once tested.

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-27  3:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-05-19 20:40 [PATCH] net: ocelot: fix wront time_after usage Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-19 23:13 ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-20  8:21   ` Clément Léger
2022-05-20 12:40 ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-20 21:06   ` Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-20 21:31   ` [PATCH v2] net: ocelot: fix wrong " Pavel Skripkin
2022-05-21 13:55     ` Andrew Lunn
2022-05-21 16:21       ` Vladimir Oltean
2022-05-23 14:00         ` Clément Léger
2022-05-27  3:42           ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2022-06-24 15:14         ` Clément Léger
2022-06-27 14:46           ` Pavel Skripkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220526204225.03b7804c@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=claudiu.manoil@nxp.com \
    --cc=clement.leger@bootlin.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).