From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>,
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 10:51:36 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220614025137.1632762-12-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220614025137.1632762-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
The device_domain_lock is used to protect the device tracking list of
a domain. Remove unnecessary spin_lock/unlock()'s and move the necessary
ones around the list access.
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 68 +++++++++++++++----------------------
1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
index 8345e0c0824c..aa3dea1c9f13 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
@@ -534,16 +534,10 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
int nid = NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ unsigned long flags;
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
- if (list_empty(&domain->devices))
- return NUMA_NO_NODE;
-
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
- if (!info->dev)
- continue;
-
/*
* There could possibly be multiple device numa nodes as devices
* within the same domain may sit behind different IOMMUs. There
@@ -554,6 +548,7 @@ static int domain_update_device_node(struct dmar_domain *domain)
if (nid != NUMA_NO_NODE)
break;
}
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
return nid;
}
@@ -1376,49 +1371,50 @@ static void __iommu_flush_iotlb(struct intel_iommu *iommu, u16 did,
}
static struct device_domain_info *
-iommu_support_dev_iotlb (struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
- u8 bus, u8 devfn)
+iommu_support_dev_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct intel_iommu *iommu,
+ u8 bus, u8 devfn)
{
- struct device_domain_info *info;
-
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
+ struct device_domain_info *info = NULL, *tmp;
+ unsigned long flags;
if (!iommu->qi)
return NULL;
- list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link)
- if (info->iommu == iommu && info->bus == bus &&
- info->devfn == devfn) {
- if (info->ats_supported && info->dev)
- return info;
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(tmp, &domain->devices, link) {
+ if (tmp->iommu == iommu && tmp->bus == bus &&
+ tmp->devfn == devfn) {
+ if (tmp->ats_supported)
+ info = tmp;
break;
}
+ }
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
- return NULL;
+ return info;
}
static void domain_update_iotlb(struct dmar_domain *domain)
{
struct device_domain_info *info;
bool has_iotlb_device = false;
+ unsigned long flags;
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
- list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link)
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+ list_for_each_entry(info, &domain->devices, link) {
if (info->ats_enabled) {
has_iotlb_device = true;
break;
}
-
+ }
domain->has_iotlb_device = has_iotlb_device;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
}
static void iommu_enable_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev;
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
if (!info || !dev_is_pci(info->dev))
return;
@@ -1464,8 +1460,6 @@ static void iommu_disable_dev_iotlb(struct device_domain_info *info)
{
struct pci_dev *pdev;
- assert_spin_locked(&device_domain_lock);
-
if (!dev_is_pci(info->dev))
return;
@@ -1908,11 +1902,11 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
struct pasid_table *table,
u8 bus, u8 devfn)
{
+ struct device_domain_info *info =
+ iommu_support_dev_iotlb(domain, iommu, bus, devfn);
u16 did = domain->iommu_did[iommu->seq_id];
int translation = CONTEXT_TT_MULTI_LEVEL;
- struct device_domain_info *info = NULL;
struct context_entry *context;
- unsigned long flags;
int ret;
WARN_ON(did == 0);
@@ -1925,7 +1919,6 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
BUG_ON(!domain->pgd);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -1978,7 +1971,6 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
* Setup the Device-TLB enable bit and Page request
* Enable bit:
*/
- info = iommu_support_dev_iotlb(domain, iommu, bus, devfn);
if (info && info->ats_supported)
context_set_sm_dte(context);
if (info && info->pri_supported)
@@ -2001,7 +1993,6 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
goto out_unlock;
}
- info = iommu_support_dev_iotlb(domain, iommu, bus, devfn);
if (info && info->ats_supported)
translation = CONTEXT_TT_DEV_IOTLB;
else
@@ -2047,7 +2038,6 @@ static int domain_context_mapping_one(struct dmar_domain *domain,
out_unlock:
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
@@ -2460,15 +2450,14 @@ static int domain_add_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain, struct device *dev)
if (!iommu)
return -ENODEV;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
- info->domain = domain;
ret = domain_attach_iommu(domain, iommu);
- if (ret) {
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+ if (ret)
return ret;
- }
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
list_add(&info->link, &domain->devices);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
+ info->domain = domain;
/* PASID table is mandatory for a PCI device in scalable mode. */
if (sm_supported(iommu) && !dev_is_real_dma_subdevice(dev)) {
@@ -4637,7 +4626,6 @@ int intel_iommu_enable_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev)
struct device_domain_info *info = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
struct context_entry *context;
struct dmar_domain *domain;
- unsigned long flags;
u64 ctx_lo;
int ret;
@@ -4645,7 +4633,6 @@ int intel_iommu_enable_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev)
if (!domain)
return -EINVAL;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&device_domain_lock, flags);
spin_lock(&iommu->lock);
ret = -EINVAL;
@@ -4677,7 +4664,6 @@ int intel_iommu_enable_pasid(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct device *dev)
out:
spin_unlock(&iommu->lock);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-06-14 3:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-06-14 2:51 [PATCH v2 00/12] iommu/vt-d: Optimize the use of locks Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] iommu/vt-d: debugfs: Remove device_domain_lock usage Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 6:43 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 7:15 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15 1:53 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15 6:13 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:02 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove for_each_device_domain() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] iommu/vt-d: Remove clearing translation data in disable_dmar_iommu() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 6:49 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 7:21 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-15 6:22 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-15 13:10 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-16 4:00 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] iommu/vt-d: Use pci_get_domain_bus_and_slot() in pgtable_walk() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] iommu/vt-d: Unnecessary spinlock for root table alloc and free Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in domain ID allocation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 6:52 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 7:22 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] iommu/vt-d: Acquiring lock in pasid manipulation helpers Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] iommu/vt-d: Replace spin_lock_irqsave() with spin_lock() Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 6:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] iommu/vt-d: Check device list of domain in domain free path Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 6:57 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] iommu/vt-d: Fold __dmar_remove_one_dev_info() into its caller Lu Baolu
2022-06-14 7:07 ` Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 7:44 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` Lu Baolu [this message]
2022-06-14 7:16 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] iommu/vt-d: Use device_domain_lock accurately Tian, Kevin
2022-06-14 7:47 ` Baolu Lu
2022-06-14 2:51 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] iommu/vt-d: Convert global spinlock into per domain ones Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20220614025137.1632762-12-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@intel.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).