linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
To: Steven Sistare <steven.sistare@oracle.com>
Cc: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	lizhe.67@bytedance.com, cohuck@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lizefan.x@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vfio: remove useless judgement
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2022 11:04:59 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220628140459.GP23621@ziepe.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f7b7a7b0-9404-6b0f-99b5-346af041a479@oracle.com>

On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 09:54:19AM -0400, Steven Sistare wrote:

> >> As you and I have discussed, the count is also wrong in the direct
> >> exec model, because exec clears mm->locked_vm.
> > 
> > Really? Yikes, I thought exec would generate a new mm?
> 
> Yes, exec creates a new mm with locked_vm = 0.  The old locked_vm count is dropped
> on the floor.  The existing dma points to the same task, but task->mm has changed,
> and dma->task->mm->locked_vm is 0.  An unmap ioctl drives it
> negative.

Oh.. This is probably a bug, vfio should never use task->mm, the mm
itself should be held using mmgrab instead.

Otherwise exec case is broken as you describe.

> I have prototyped a few possible fixes.  One changes vfio to use user->locked_vm.
> Another changes to mm->pinned_vm and preserves it during exec.  A third preserves
> mm->locked_vm across exec, but that is not practical, because mm->locked_vm mixes
> vfio pins and mlocks.  The mlock component must be cleared during exec, and we don't 
> have a separate count for it.

Lossing locked_vm on exec/fork is the correct and expected behavior
for the core kernel code, the bug is that vfio drives it negative.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-28 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-27  3:51 [PATCH] vfio: remove useless judgement lizhe.67
2022-06-27 22:06 ` Alex Williamson
2022-06-28 12:48   ` Steven Sistare
2022-06-28 13:03     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2022-06-28 13:54       ` Steven Sistare
2022-06-28 14:04         ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2022-06-30 19:51 ` Alex Williamson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220628140459.GP23621@ziepe.ca \
    --to=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan.x@bytedance.com \
    --cc=lizhe.67@bytedance.com \
    --cc=steven.sistare@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).