linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [ammarfaizi2-block:mellanox/linux/queue-next 2/14] net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c:280:3: error: call to undeclared function 'dev_put_track'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
@ 2022-06-28 11:14 kernel test robot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-28 11:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Leon Romanovsky
  Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, GNU/Weeb Mailing List, linux-kernel, Raed Salem

tree:   https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block mellanox/linux/queue-next
head:   62681695cd9969a82026b2b93d0c4ca1a8500eee
commit: 0a1347c1f766cddc63032227434bc7b581904dc2 [2/14] xfrm: add new full offload flag
config: i386-randconfig-a004-20220627 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220628/202206281926.yJ1l888L-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project df18167ac56d05f2ab55f9d874aee7ab6d5bc9a2)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block/commit/0a1347c1f766cddc63032227434bc7b581904dc2
        git remote add ammarfaizi2-block https://github.com/ammarfaizi2/linux-block
        git fetch --no-tags ammarfaizi2-block mellanox/linux/queue-next
        git checkout 0a1347c1f766cddc63032227434bc7b581904dc2
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=i386 SHELL=/bin/bash net/

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c:280:3: error: call to undeclared function 'dev_put_track'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
                   dev_put_track(dev, &xso->dev_tracker);
                   ^
   net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c:280:3: note: did you mean 'get_net_track'?
   include/net/net_namespace.h:331:27: note: 'get_net_track' declared here
   static inline struct net *get_net_track(struct net *net,
                             ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/dev_put_track +280 net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c

   208	
   209	int xfrm_dev_state_add(struct net *net, struct xfrm_state *x,
   210			       struct xfrm_user_offload *xuo)
   211	{
   212		int err;
   213		struct dst_entry *dst;
   214		struct net_device *dev;
   215		struct xfrm_dev_offload *xso = &x->xso;
   216		xfrm_address_t *saddr;
   217		xfrm_address_t *daddr;
   218	
   219		if (!x->type_offload)
   220			return -EINVAL;
   221	
   222		/* We don't yet support UDP encapsulation and TFC padding. */
   223		if (x->encap || x->tfcpad)
   224			return -EINVAL;
   225	
   226		if (xuo->flags & ~(XFRM_OFFLOAD_IPV6 | XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND))
   227			return -EINVAL;
   228	
   229		dev = dev_get_by_index(net, xuo->ifindex);
   230		if (!dev) {
   231			if (!(xuo->flags & XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND)) {
   232				saddr = &x->props.saddr;
   233				daddr = &x->id.daddr;
   234			} else {
   235				saddr = &x->id.daddr;
   236				daddr = &x->props.saddr;
   237			}
   238	
   239			dst = __xfrm_dst_lookup(net, 0, 0, saddr, daddr,
   240						x->props.family,
   241						xfrm_smark_get(0, x));
   242			if (IS_ERR(dst))
   243				return 0;
   244	
   245			dev = dst->dev;
   246	
   247			dev_hold(dev);
   248			dst_release(dst);
   249		}
   250	
   251		if (!dev->xfrmdev_ops || !dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add) {
   252			xso->dev = NULL;
   253			dev_put(dev);
   254			return 0;
   255		}
   256	
   257		if (x->props.flags & XFRM_STATE_ESN &&
   258		    !dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_advance_esn) {
   259			xso->dev = NULL;
   260			dev_put(dev);
   261			return -EINVAL;
   262		}
   263	
   264		xso->dev = dev;
   265		netdev_tracker_alloc(dev, &xso->dev_tracker, GFP_ATOMIC);
   266		xso->real_dev = dev;
   267	
   268		if (xuo->flags & XFRM_OFFLOAD_INBOUND)
   269			xso->dir = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_IN;
   270		else
   271			xso->dir = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_OUT;
   272	
   273		xso->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_CRYPTO;
   274	
   275		err = dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add(x);
   276		if (err) {
   277			xso->dev = NULL;
   278			xso->dir = 0;
   279			xso->real_dev = NULL;
 > 280			dev_put_track(dev, &xso->dev_tracker);
   281			xso->type = XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_UNSPECIFIED;
   282	
   283			if (err != -EOPNOTSUPP)
   284				return err;
   285		}
   286	
   287		return 0;
   288	}
   289	EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_dev_state_add);
   290	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] only message in thread

only message in thread, other threads:[~2022-06-28 11:15 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-06-28 11:14 [ammarfaizi2-block:mellanox/linux/queue-next 2/14] net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c:280:3: error: call to undeclared function 'dev_put_track'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations kernel test robot

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).