linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
	Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org,
	kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting
Date: Mon,  4 Jul 2022 17:05:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220704150514.48816-1-elver@google.com>

Add KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting, with various
interesting mixes of breakpoint targets (some care was taken to catch
interesting corner cases via bug-injection).

The test cannot be built as a module because it requires access to
hw_breakpoint_slots(), which is not inlinable or exported on all
architectures.

Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
v3:
* Don't use raw_smp_processor_id().

v2:
* New patch.
---
 kernel/events/Makefile             |   1 +
 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c | 323 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 lib/Kconfig.debug                  |  10 +
 3 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c

diff --git a/kernel/events/Makefile b/kernel/events/Makefile
index 8591c180b52b..91a62f566743 100644
--- a/kernel/events/Makefile
+++ b/kernel/events/Makefile
@@ -2,4 +2,5 @@
 obj-y := core.o ring_buffer.o callchain.o
 
 obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT) += hw_breakpoint.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST) += hw_breakpoint_test.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_UPROBES) += uprobes.o
diff --git a/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..433c5c45e2a5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/kernel/events/hw_breakpoint_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * KUnit test for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting logic.
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2022, Google LLC.
+ */
+
+#include <kunit/test.h>
+#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/hw_breakpoint.h>
+#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/perf_event.h>
+#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
+
+#define TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, slots)						\
+	do {										\
+		if ((slots) > get_test_bp_slots()) {					\
+			kunit_skip((test), "Requires breakpoint slots: %d > %d", slots,	\
+				   get_test_bp_slots());				\
+		}									\
+	} while (0)
+
+#define TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(expr) KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, -ENOSPC, PTR_ERR(expr))
+
+#define MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS 512
+
+static char break_vars[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct perf_event *test_bps[MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS];
+static struct task_struct *__other_task;
+
+static struct perf_event *register_test_bp(int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int idx)
+{
+	struct perf_event_attr attr = {};
+
+	if (WARN_ON(idx < 0 || idx >= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS))
+		return NULL;
+
+	hw_breakpoint_init(&attr);
+	attr.bp_addr = (unsigned long)&break_vars[idx];
+	attr.bp_len = HW_BREAKPOINT_LEN_1;
+	attr.bp_type = HW_BREAKPOINT_RW;
+	return perf_event_create_kernel_counter(&attr, cpu, tsk, NULL, NULL);
+}
+
+static void unregister_test_bp(struct perf_event **bp)
+{
+	if (WARN_ON(IS_ERR(*bp)))
+		return;
+	if (WARN_ON(!*bp))
+		return;
+	unregister_hw_breakpoint(*bp);
+	*bp = NULL;
+}
+
+static int get_test_bp_slots(void)
+{
+	static int slots;
+
+	if (!slots)
+		slots = hw_breakpoint_slots(TYPE_DATA);
+
+	return slots;
+}
+
+static void fill_one_bp_slot(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk)
+{
+	struct perf_event *bp = register_test_bp(cpu, tsk, *id);
+
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(test, bp);
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(bp));
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_NULL(test, test_bps[*id]);
+	test_bps[(*id)++] = bp;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fills up the given @cpu/@tsk with breakpoints, only leaving @skip slots free.
+ *
+ * Returns true if this can be called again, continuing at @id.
+ */
+static bool fill_bp_slots(struct kunit *test, int *id, int cpu, struct task_struct *tsk, int skip)
+{
+	for (int i = 0; i < get_test_bp_slots() - skip; ++i)
+		fill_one_bp_slot(test, id, cpu, tsk);
+
+	return *id + get_test_bp_slots() <= MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS;
+}
+
+static int dummy_kthread(void *arg)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct task_struct *get_other_task(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	struct task_struct *tsk;
+
+	if (__other_task)
+		return __other_task;
+
+	tsk = kthread_create(dummy_kthread, NULL, "hw_breakpoint_dummy_task");
+	KUNIT_ASSERT_FALSE(test, IS_ERR(tsk));
+	__other_task = tsk;
+	return __other_task;
+}
+
+static int get_test_cpu(int num)
+{
+	int cpu;
+
+	WARN_ON(num < 0);
+
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (num-- <= 0)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	return cpu;
+}
+
+/* ===== Test cases ===== */
+
+static void test_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL, 0);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_many_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+	int cpu;
+
+	/* Test that CPUs are independent. */
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		bool do_continue = fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, cpu, NULL, 0);
+
+		TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(cpu, NULL, idx));
+		if (!do_continue)
+			break;
+	}
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	/* Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work. */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	/* Test that tasks are independent. */
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 0);
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	/* Remove one from first task and adding back CPU-target should not work. */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	/*
+	 * Remove one and adding back CPU-target should work; this case is
+	 * special vs. above because the task's constraints are CPU-dependent.
+	 */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+}
+
+static void test_one_task_mixed(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 1);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+	/* Transition from CPU-dependent pinned count to CPU-independent. */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[0]);
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[1]);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), NULL);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	/* Can still create breakpoints on some other CPU. */
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static void test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current, 0);
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, get_other_task(test), 0);
+
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), get_other_task(test), idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	/* Cannot create breakpoints on some other CPU either. */
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static void test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	int tsk_on_cpu_idx, cpu_idx;
+	int idx = 0;
+
+	TEST_REQUIRES_BP_SLOTS(test, 3);
+
+	fill_bp_slots(test, &idx, -1, current, 2);
+	/* Transitioning from only all CPU breakpoints to mixed. */
+	tsk_on_cpu_idx = idx;
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(0), current);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+
+	/* We should still be able to use up another CPU's slots. */
+	cpu_idx = idx;
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, get_test_cpu(1), NULL);
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+
+	/* Transitioning back to task target on all CPUs. */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[tsk_on_cpu_idx]);
+	/* Still have a CPU target breakpoint in get_test_cpu(1). */
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	/* Remove it and try again. */
+	unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[cpu_idx]);
+	fill_one_bp_slot(test, &idx, -1, current);
+
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(-1, current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), current, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(0), NULL, idx));
+	TEST_EXPECT_NOSPC(register_test_bp(get_test_cpu(1), NULL, idx));
+}
+
+static struct kunit_case hw_breakpoint_test_cases[] = {
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_one_cpu),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_many_cpus),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_all_cpus),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_all_cpus),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_on_one_cpu),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_one_task_mixed),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_cpu),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_two_tasks_on_one_all_cpus),
+	KUNIT_CASE(test_task_on_all_and_one_cpu),
+	{},
+};
+
+static int test_init(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	/* Most test cases want 2 distinct CPUs. */
+	return num_online_cpus() < 2 ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+
+static void test_exit(struct kunit *test)
+{
+	for (int i = 0; i < MAX_TEST_BREAKPOINTS; ++i) {
+		if (test_bps[i])
+			unregister_test_bp(&test_bps[i]);
+	}
+
+	if (__other_task) {
+		kthread_stop(__other_task);
+		__other_task = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static struct kunit_suite hw_breakpoint_test_suite = {
+	.name = "hw_breakpoint",
+	.test_cases = hw_breakpoint_test_cases,
+	.init = test_init,
+	.exit = test_exit,
+};
+
+kunit_test_suites(&hw_breakpoint_test_suite);
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Marco Elver <elver@google.com>");
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
index 2e24db4bff19..4c87a6edf046 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
@@ -2513,6 +2513,16 @@ config STACKINIT_KUNIT_TEST
 	  CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK, CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF,
 	  or CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL.
 
+config HW_BREAKPOINT_KUNIT_TEST
+	bool "Test hw_breakpoint constraints accounting" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	depends on HAVE_HW_BREAKPOINT
+	depends on KUNIT=y
+	default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+	help
+	  Tests for hw_breakpoint constraints accounting.
+
+	  If unsure, say N.
+
 config TEST_UDELAY
 	tristate "udelay test driver"
 	help
-- 
2.37.0.rc0.161.g10f37bed90-goog


  reply	other threads:[~2022-07-04 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-04 15:05 [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2022-07-04 15:10   ` [PATCH v3 01/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Add KUnit test for constraints accounting Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-20 15:22     ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-21 16:22   ` Mark Rutland
2022-07-22  9:10     ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22  9:20       ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 10:10         ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 10:31           ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-22 11:03             ` Will Deacon
2022-07-22 13:41               ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-25 11:00     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Provide hw_breakpoint_is_used() and use in test Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:09   ` Dmitry Vyukov
2022-07-20 15:22     ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Clean up headers Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:23   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize list of per-task breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:29   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-20 15:39     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Mark data __ro_after_init Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:30   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize constant number of breakpoint slots Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:31   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Make hw_breakpoint_weight() inlinable Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:32   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Remove useless code related to flexible breakpoints Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:34   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/14] powerpc/hw_breakpoint: Avoid relying on caller synchronization Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:35   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/14] locking/percpu-rwsem: Add percpu_is_write_locked() and percpu_is_read_locked() Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:36   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 12:47   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29  6:00     ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Reduce contention with large number of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:38   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-17 13:03   ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-17 13:14     ` Marco Elver
2022-08-29  8:38       ` Peter Zijlstra
2022-08-29  9:38         ` Marco Elver
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Introduce bp_slots_histogram Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:40   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 13/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize max_bp_pinned_slots() for CPU-independent task targets Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:42   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-04 15:05 ` [PATCH v3 14/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize toggle_bp_slot() " Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:44   ` Ian Rogers
2022-07-12 13:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/14] perf/hw_breakpoint: Optimize for thousands of tasks Marco Elver
2022-07-20 15:47   ` Ian Rogers
2022-08-16 14:12     ` Marco Elver

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220704150514.48816-2-elver@google.com \
    --to=elver@google.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).