linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: remove redundant check in select_idle_smt
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2022 16:20:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220712082036.5130-4-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220712082036.5130-1-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>

If two cpus share LLC cache, then the two cores they belong to
are also in the same LLC domain.

Signed-off-by: Abel Wu <wuyun.abel@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 11 ++++-------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index c72093f282ec..0d7e8555bcf9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -6339,14 +6339,11 @@ static int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpumask *cpu
 /*
  * Scan the local SMT mask for idle CPUs.
  */
-static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
+static int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
 {
 	int cpu;
 
-	for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(target)) {
-		if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, p->cpus_ptr) ||
-		    !cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
-			continue;
+	for_each_cpu_and(cpu, cpu_smt_mask(target), p->cpus_ptr) {
 		if (available_idle_cpu(cpu) || sched_idle_cpu(cpu))
 			return cpu;
 	}
@@ -6370,7 +6367,7 @@ static inline int select_idle_core(struct task_struct *p, int core, struct cpuma
 	return __select_idle_cpu(core, p);
 }
 
-static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, struct sched_domain *sd, int target)
+static inline int select_idle_smt(struct task_struct *p, int target)
 {
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -6607,7 +6604,7 @@ static int select_idle_sibling(struct task_struct *p, int prev, int target)
 		has_idle_core = test_idle_cores(target);
 
 		if (!has_idle_core && cpus_share_cache(prev, target)) {
-			i = select_idle_smt(p, sd, prev);
+			i = select_idle_smt(p, prev);
 			if ((unsigned int)i < nr_cpumask_bits)
 				return i;
 		}
-- 
2.31.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-12  8:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-12  8:20 [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: SIS improvements and cleanups Abel Wu
2022-07-12  8:20 ` [PATCH 1/5] sched/fair: ignore SIS_UTIL when has idle core Abel Wu
2022-07-13  3:47   ` Chen Yu
2022-07-13 16:14     ` Abel Wu
2022-07-14  6:19   ` Yicong Yang
2022-07-14  6:58     ` Abel Wu
2022-07-14  7:15       ` Yicong Yang
2022-07-14  8:00         ` Abel Wu
2022-07-14  8:16           ` Yicong Yang
2022-07-14  8:34             ` Yicong Yang
2022-08-04  9:59       ` Chen Yu
2022-08-15  2:54         ` Abel Wu
2022-08-10 13:50   ` Chen Yu
2022-08-15  2:44     ` Abel Wu
2022-08-29 13:08   ` Mel Gorman
2022-08-29 14:11     ` Abel Wu
2022-08-29 14:56       ` Mel Gorman
2022-09-01 13:08         ` Abel Wu
2022-09-02  4:12         ` Abel Wu
2022-09-02 10:25           ` Mel Gorman
2022-09-05 14:40             ` Abel Wu
2022-09-06  9:57               ` Mel Gorman
2022-09-07  7:27                 ` Chen Yu
2022-09-07  8:41                   ` Mel Gorman
2022-09-07  7:52                 ` Abel Wu
2022-07-12  8:20 ` [PATCH 2/5] sched/fair: default to false in test_idle_cores Abel Wu
2022-08-29 12:36   ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-12  8:20 ` Abel Wu [this message]
2022-08-29 12:36   ` [PATCH 3/5] sched/fair: remove redundant check in select_idle_smt Mel Gorman
2022-07-12  8:20 ` [PATCH 4/5] sched/fair: avoid double search on same cpu Abel Wu
2022-08-29 12:36   ` Mel Gorman
2022-07-12  8:20 ` [PATCH 5/5] sched/fair: remove useless check in select_idle_core Abel Wu
2022-08-29 12:37   ` Mel Gorman
2022-08-15 13:31 ` [PATCH 0/5] sched/fair: SIS improvements and cleanups Abel Wu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220712082036.5130-4-wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    --to=wuyun.abel@bytedance.com \
    --cc=joshdon@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).