* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
@ 2022-09-21 21:53 ` Justin Forbes
2022-09-21 22:54 ` Shuah Khan
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Justin Forbes @ 2022-09-21 21:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Tested rc2 against the Fedora build system (aarch64, armv7, ppc64le,
s390x, x86_64), and boot tested x86_64. No regressions noted.
Tested-by: Justin M. Forbes <jforbes@fedoraproject.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-21 21:53 ` Justin Forbes
@ 2022-09-21 22:54 ` Shuah Khan
2022-09-22 7:15 ` Bagas Sanjaya
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Shuah Khan @ 2022-09-21 22:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade,
Shuah Khan
On 9/21/22 10:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
>
Compiled and booted on my test system. No dmesg regressions.
Tested-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
thanks,
-- Shuah
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
2022-09-21 21:53 ` Justin Forbes
2022-09-21 22:54 ` Shuah Khan
@ 2022-09-22 7:15 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2022-09-22 9:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Bagas Sanjaya @ 2022-09-22 7:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
Successfully cross-compiled for arm64 (bcm2711_defconfig, GCC 10.2.0) and
powerpc (ps3_defconfig, GCC 12.1.0).
Tested-by: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>
--
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 7:15 ` Bagas Sanjaya
@ 2022-09-22 9:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
2022-09-22 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Naresh Kamboju @ 2022-09-22 9:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade, William Breathitt Gray, Wei Yongjun, Linus Walleij,
Bartosz Golaszewski, open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM
On Wed, 21 Sept 2022 at 22:18, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Results from Linaro’s test farm.
No regressions on arm64, arm, x86_64, and i386.
Tested-by: Linux Kernel Functional Testing <lkft@linaro.org>
NOTE:
As we have already reported from the previous stable rc review
about the gpiod test runs causing kernel crash on 5.19. 5.15 and 5.10
This is caused by commit 303e6da99429 ("gpio: mockup: remove gpio
debugfs when remove device")
Crash log:
---------
+ cd ./automated/linux/gpiod
+ ./gpiod.sh /opt/libgpiod/bin/
[INFO] libgpiod test suite
[INFO] 117 tests registered
[INFO] checking the linux kernel version
[INFO] kernel release is v5.19.11 - ok to run tests
[INFO] using gpio-tools from '/usr/bin'
[ 11.896410] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at
virtual address 00000000000000a0
[ 11.897453] Mem abort info:
[ 11.897727] ESR = 0x0000000096000006
[ 11.898066] EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
[ 11.898534] SET = 0, FnV = 0
[ 11.898819] EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
[ 11.899087] FSC = 0x06: level 2 translation fault
[ 11.903218] Data abort info:
[ 11.903507] ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
[ 11.903832] CM = 0, WnR = 0
[ 11.904072] user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000103292000
[ 11.904618] [00000000000000a0] pgd=08000001070fb003,
p4d=08000001070fb003, pud=0800000104941003, pmd=0000000000000000
[ 11.905598] Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
[ 11.906088] Modules linked in: gpio_mockup(-) bluetooth cfg80211
rfkill crct10dif_ce fuse drm
[ 11.906899] CPU: 3 PID: 366 Comm: gpiod-test Not tainted 5.19.11-rc2 #1
[ 11.907491] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 11.907932] pstate: 60400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
[ 11.908535] pc : down_write+0x1c/0x24c
[ 11.908885] lr : simple_recursive_removal+0x50/0x280
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/CA+G9fYtxYKgqia+Crjok5yLshm3TpFwMyD8V5_-OkayA8UnDww@mail.gmail.com/
## Build
* kernel: 5.19.11-rc2
* git: https://gitlab.com/Linaro/lkft/mirrors/stable/linux-stable-rc
* git branch: linux-5.19.y
* git commit: 8d4fd61ab089cbb028a32652f9096cf53dfe54b3
* git describe: v5.19.10-40-g8d4fd61ab089
* test details:
https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-linux-5.19.y/build/v5.19.10-40-g8d4fd61ab089
## No Test Regressions (compared to v5.19.10)
## No Metric Regressions (compared to v5.19.10)
## No Test Fixes (compared to v5.19.10)
## No Metric Fixes (compared to v5.19.10)
## Test result summary
total: 112536, pass: 99749, fail: 876, skip: 11697, xfail: 214
## Build Summary
* arc: 10 total, 10 passed, 0 failed
* arm: 339 total, 336 passed, 3 failed
* arm64: 72 total, 70 passed, 2 failed
* i386: 61 total, 55 passed, 6 failed
* mips: 62 total, 59 passed, 3 failed
* parisc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* powerpc: 75 total, 66 passed, 9 failed
* riscv: 32 total, 27 passed, 5 failed
* s390: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sh: 26 total, 24 passed, 2 failed
* sparc: 14 total, 14 passed, 0 failed
* x86_64: 65 total, 63 passed, 2 failed
## Test suites summary
* fwts
* igt-gpu-tools
* kselftest-android
* kselftest-arm64
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.btitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_c_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_j_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_jc_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.bti_none_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.nohint_func
* kselftest-arm64/arm64.nobtitest.paciasp_func
* kselftest-breakpoints
* kselftest-capabilities
* kselftest-cgroup
* kselftest-clone3
* kselftest-core
* kselftest-cpu-hotplug
* kselftest-cpufreq
* kselftest-drivers-dma-buf
* kselftest-efivarfs
* kselftest-filesystems
* kselftest-filesystems-binderfs
* kselftest-firmware
* kselftest-fpu
* kselftest-futex
* kselftest-gpio
* kselftest-ipc
* kselftest-ir
* kselftest-kcmp
* kselftest-kvm
* kselftest-lib
* kselftest-membarrier
* kselftest-memfd
* kselftest-memory-hotplug
* kselftest-mincore
* kselftest-mount
* kselftest-mqueue
* kselftest-netfilter
* kselftest-nsfs
* kselftest-openat2
* kselftest-pid_namespace
* kselftest-pidfd
* kselftest-proc
* kselftest-pstore
* kselftest-rseq
* kselftest-rtc
* kselftest-seccomp
* kselftest-sigaltstack
* kselftest-size
* kselftest-splice
* kselftest-static_keys
* kselftest-sync
* kselftest-sysctl
* kselftest-tc-testing
* kselftest-timens
* kselftest-timers
* kselftest-tmpfs
* kselftest-tpm2
* kselftest-user
* kselftest-vm
* kselftest-zram
* kunit
* kvm-unit-tests
* libhugetlbfs
* log-parser-boot
* log-parser-test
* ltp-cap_bounds
* ltp-commands
* ltp-containers
* ltp-controllers
* ltp-cpuhotplug
* ltp-crypto
* ltp-cve
* ltp-dio
* ltp-fcntl-locktests
* ltp-filecaps
* ltp-fs
* ltp-fs_bind
* ltp-fs_perms_simple
* ltp-fsx
* ltp-hugetlb
* ltp-io
* ltp-ipc
* ltp-math
* ltp-mm
* ltp-nptl
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* ltp-pty
* ltp-sched
* ltp-securebits
* ltp-smoke
* ltp-syscalls
* ltp-tracing
* network-basic-tests
* rcutorture
* v4l2-compliance
* vdso
--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 9:39 ` Naresh Kamboju
@ 2022-09-22 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
2022-09-22 11:42 ` Ron Economos
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink) @ 2022-09-22 10:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, slade
Hi Greg,
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
Build test (gcc version 12.2.1 20220919):
mips: 59 configs -> no failure
arm: 99 configs -> no failure
arm64: 3 configs -> no failure
x86_64: 4 configs -> no failure
alpha allmodconfig -> no failure
csky allmodconfig -> no failure
powerpc allmodconfig -> no failure
riscv allmodconfig -> no failure
s390 allmodconfig -> no failure
xtensa allmodconfig -> no failure
Boot test:
x86_64: Booted on my test laptop. No regression.
x86_64: Booted on qemu. No regression. [1]
arm64: Booted on rpi4b (4GB model). No regression. [2]
mips: Booted on ci20 board. No regression. [3]
[1]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1876
[2]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1880
[3]. https://openqa.qa.codethink.co.uk/tests/1882
Tested-by: Sudip Mukherjee <sudip.mukherjee@codethink.co.uk>
--
Regards
Sudip
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 10:40 ` Sudip Mukherjee (Codethink)
@ 2022-09-22 11:42 ` Ron Economos
2022-09-22 15:45 ` Florian Fainelli
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Ron Economos @ 2022-09-22 11:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 9/21/22 9:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Built and booted successfully on RISC-V RV64 (HiFive Unmatched).
Tested-by: Ron Economos <re@w6rz.net>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 11:42 ` Ron Economos
@ 2022-09-22 15:45 ` Florian Fainelli
2022-09-22 16:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-23 4:03 ` Jiri Slaby
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Florian Fainelli @ 2022-09-22 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 9/21/22 09:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
On ARCH_BRCMSTB using 32-bit and 64-bit ARM kernels, build tested on
BMIPS_GENERIC:
Tested-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
--
Florian
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 15:45 ` Florian Fainelli
@ 2022-09-22 16:44 ` Guenter Roeck
2022-09-23 4:03 ` Jiri Slaby
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Guenter Roeck @ 2022-09-22 16:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Cc: linux-kernel, stable, torvalds, akpm, shuah, patches,
lkft-triage, pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee,
slade
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 06:47:57PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
Sorry, this is the one I should have replied to.
Build results:
total: 150 pass: 150 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 490 pass: 490 fail: 0
Tested-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Guenter
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review
2022-09-21 16:47 [PATCH 5.19 00/39] 5.19.11-rc2 review Greg Kroah-Hartman
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2022-09-22 16:44 ` Guenter Roeck
@ 2022-09-23 4:03 ` Jiri Slaby
8 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Jiri Slaby @ 2022-09-23 4:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman, linux-kernel
Cc: stable, torvalds, akpm, linux, shuah, patches, lkft-triage,
pavel, jonathanh, f.fainelli, sudipm.mukherjee, slade
On 21. 09. 22, 18:47, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.19.11 release.
> There are 39 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Fri, 23 Sep 2022 16:47:28 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
> https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.19.11-rc2.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.19.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
openSUSE configs¹⁾ all green. x86_64 runs fine.
Tested-by: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>
¹⁾ armv6hl armv7hl arm64 i386 ppc64 ppc64le riscv64 s390x x86_64
--
js
suse labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread