[PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[Jiasheng Jiang]

As kzalloc may return NULL pointer, the return value should
be checked and return error if fails in order to avoid the
NULL pointer dereference.
Moreover, use the goto-label to share the clean code.

Fixes: d6b98c8d242a ("ice: add write functionality for GNSS TTY")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
---
Changelog:

v1 -> v2:

1. Use goto-label to share the clean code.
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c | 25 ++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
index b5a7f246d230..7bd3452a16d2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
 	const int ICE_TTYDRV_NAME_MAX = 14;
 	struct tty_driver *tty_driver;
 	char *ttydrv_name;
-	unsigned int i;
+	unsigned int i, j;
 	int err;
 
 	tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES,
@@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
 					       GFP_KERNEL);
 		pf->gnss_serial[i] = NULL;
 
+		if (!pf->gnss_tty_port[i])
+			goto err_out;
+
 		tty_port_init(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
 		tty_port_link_device(pf->gnss_tty_port[i], tty_driver, i);
 	}
@@ -469,21 +472,23 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
 	err = tty_register_driver(tty_driver);
 	if (err) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register TTY driver err=%d\n", err);
-
-		for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++) {
-			tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
-			kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
-		}
-		kfree(ttydrv_name);
-		tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
-
-		return NULL;
+		goto err_out;
 	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++)
 		dev_info(dev, "%s%d registered\n", ttydrv_name, i);
 
 	return tty_driver;
+
+err_out:
+	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
+		tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
+		kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
+	}
+	kfree(ttydrv_name);
+	tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
+
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /**
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[Leon Romanovsky]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 09:19:36AM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> As kzalloc may return NULL pointer, the return value should
> be checked and return error if fails in order to avoid the
> NULL pointer dereference.
> Moreover, use the goto-label to share the clean code.
> 
> Fixes: d6b98c8d242a ("ice: add write functionality for GNSS TTY")
> Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> Changelog:
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> 
> 1. Use goto-label to share the clean code.
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c | 25 ++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> index b5a7f246d230..7bd3452a16d2 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/ice_gnss.c
> @@ -421,7 +421,7 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
>  	const int ICE_TTYDRV_NAME_MAX = 14;
>  	struct tty_driver *tty_driver;
>  	char *ttydrv_name;
> -	unsigned int i;
> +	unsigned int i, j;
>  	int err;
>  
>  	tty_driver = tty_alloc_driver(ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES,
> @@ -462,6 +462,9 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
>  					       GFP_KERNEL);
>  		pf->gnss_serial[i] = NULL;
>  
> +		if (!pf->gnss_tty_port[i])
> +			goto err_out;
> +
>  		tty_port_init(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
>  		tty_port_link_device(pf->gnss_tty_port[i], tty_driver, i);
>  	}
> @@ -469,21 +472,23 @@ static struct tty_driver *ice_gnss_create_tty_driver(struct ice_pf *pf)
>  	err = tty_register_driver(tty_driver);
>  	if (err) {
>  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register TTY driver err=%d\n", err);
> -
> -		for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++) {
> -			tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
> -			kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[i]);
> -		}
> -		kfree(ttydrv_name);
> -		tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
> -
> -		return NULL;
> +		goto err_out;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (i = 0; i < ICE_GNSS_TTY_MINOR_DEVICES; i++)
>  		dev_info(dev, "%s%d registered\n", ttydrv_name, i);
>  
>  	return tty_driver;
> +
> +err_out:
> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {

You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.

Thanks

> +		tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
> +		kfree(pf->gnss_tty_port[j]);
> +	}
> +	kfree(ttydrv_name);
> +	tty_driver_kref_put(pf->ice_gnss_tty_driver);
> +
> +	return NULL;
>  }
>  
>  /**
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[Jiasheng Jiang]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 07:17:59PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>>> +err_out:
>>>> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
>>> 
>>> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.
>>
>>No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].
> 
> Are you sure??

Yes, you are right.
I will submit a v3 to add this change.

Thanks,
Jiang

Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[Jiri Pirko]

Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 11:06:03AM CET, jiasheng@iscas.ac.cn wrote:
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:25:02PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>>> +err_out:
>>> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
>> 
>> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.
>
>No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].

Are you sure??


>If using "while(i--)", the code should be "tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i - 1]);".
>It will be more complex.
>Therefore, it is worthwhile to use an extra varaible.
>
>Thanks,
>Jiang
>

Re: [PATCH net v2] ice: Add check for kzalloc

[Jiasheng Jiang]

On Thu, Dec 08, 2022 at 05:25:02PM +0800, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> +err_out:
>> +	for (j = 0; j < i; j++) {
> 
> You don't need an extra variable, "while(i--)" will do the trick.

No, the right range is [0, i - 1], but the "while(i--)" is [1, i].
If using "while(i--)", the code should be "tty_port_destroy(pf->gnss_tty_port[i - 1]);".
It will be more complex.
Therefore, it is worthwhile to use an extra varaible.

Thanks,
Jiang