linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhi Wang <zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
Cc: <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-coco@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-mm@kvack.org>, <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
	<x86@kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<tglx@linutronix.de>, <mingo@redhat.com>, <jroedel@suse.de>,
	<thomas.lendacky@amd.com>, <hpa@zytor.com>, <ardb@kernel.org>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <seanjc@google.com>, <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	<wanpengli@tencent.com>, <jmattson@google.com>, <luto@kernel.org>,
	<dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>, <slp@redhat.com>,
	<pgonda@google.com>, <peterz@infradead.org>,
	<srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>, <rientjes@google.com>,
	<dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>, <tobin@ibm.com>, <bp@alien8.de>,
	<vbabka@suse.cz>, <kirill@shutemov.name>, <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	<tony.luck@intel.com>, <marcorr@google.com>,
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>,
	<alpergun@google.com>, <dgilbert@redhat.com>, <jarkko@kernel.org>,
	<ashish.kalra@amd.com>, <harald@profian.com>,
	Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
	Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@profian.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v7 20/64] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 12:42:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230117124203.00001961@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221214194056.161492-21-michael.roth@amd.com>

On Wed, 14 Dec 2022 13:40:12 -0600
Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com> wrote:

> From: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> 
> When SEV-SNP is enabled globally, a write from the host goes through the
> RMP check. When the host writes to pages, hardware checks the following
> conditions at the end of page walk:
> 
> 1. Assigned bit in the RMP table is zero (i.e page is shared).
> 2. If the page table entry that gives the sPA indicates that the target
>    page size is a large page, then all RMP entries for the 4KB
>    constituting pages of the target must have the assigned bit 0.
> 3. Immutable bit in the RMP table is not zero.
> 

Just being curious. AMD APM table 15-37 "RMP Page Assignment Settings" shows
Immuable bit is "don't care" when a page is owned by the hypervisor. The 
table 15-39 "RMP Memory Access Checks" shows the hardware will do
"Hypervisor-owned" check for host data write and page table access. I suppose
"Hypervisor-owned" check means HW will check if the RMP entry is configured
according to the table 15-37 (Assign bit = 0, ASID = 0, Immutable = X)

None of them mentions that Immutable bit in the related RMP-entry should
be 1 for hypervisor-owned page.

I can understand 1) 2). Can you explain more about 3)?

> The hardware will raise page fault if one of the above conditions is not
> met. Try resolving the fault instead of taking fault again and again. If
> the host attempts to write to the guest private memory then send the
> SIGBUS signal to kill the process. If the page level between the host and
> RMP entry does not match, then split the address to keep the RMP and host
> page levels in sync.
> 
> Co-developed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@profian.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@profian.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/mm/fault.c      | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/mm.h       |  3 +-
>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 ++
>  mm/memory.c              | 10 +++++
>  4 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> index f8193b99e9c8..d611051dcf1e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/mm/fault.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
>  #include <asm/kvm_para.h>		/* kvm_handle_async_pf		*/
>  #include <asm/vdso.h>			/* fixup_vdso_exception()	*/
>  #include <asm/irq_stack.h>
> +#include <asm/sev.h>			/* snp_lookup_rmpentry()	*/
>  
>  #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>  #include <asm/trace/exceptions.h>
> @@ -414,6 +415,7 @@ static void dump_pagetable(unsigned long address)
>  	pr_cont("PTE %lx", pte_val(*pte));
>  out:
>  	pr_cont("\n");
> +
>  	return;
>  bad:
>  	pr_info("BAD\n");
> @@ -1240,6 +1242,90 @@ do_kern_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long hw_error_code,
>  }
>  NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_kern_addr_fault);
>  
> +enum rmp_pf_ret {
> +	RMP_PF_SPLIT	= 0,
> +	RMP_PF_RETRY	= 1,
> +	RMP_PF_UNMAP	= 2,
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * The goal of RMP faulting routine is really to check whether the
> + * page that faulted should be accessible.  That can be determined
> + * simply by looking at the RMP entry for the 4k address being accessed.
> + * If that entry has Assigned=1 then it's a bad address. It could be
> + * because the 2MB region was assigned as a large page, or it could be
> + * because the region is all 4k pages and that 4k was assigned.
> + * In either case, it's a bad access.
> + * There are basically two main possibilities:
> + * 1. The 2M entry has Assigned=1 and Page_Size=1. Then all 511 middle
> + * entries also have Assigned=1. This entire 2M region is a guest page.
> + * 2. The 2M entry has Assigned=0 and Page_Size=0. Then the 511 middle
> + * entries can be anything, this region consists of individual 4k assignments.
> + */
> +static int handle_user_rmp_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long error_code,
> +				      unsigned long address)
> +{
> +	int rmp_level, level;
> +	pgd_t *pgd;
> +	pte_t *pte;
> +	u64 pfn;
> +
> +	pgd = __va(read_cr3_pa());
> +	pgd += pgd_index(address);
> +
> +	pte = lookup_address_in_pgd(pgd, address, &level);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * It can happen if there was a race between an unmap event and
> +	 * the RMP fault delivery.
> +	 */
> +	if (!pte || !pte_present(*pte))
> +		return RMP_PF_UNMAP;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * RMP page fault handler follows this algorithm:
> +	 * 1. Compute the pfn for the 4kb page being accessed
> +	 * 2. Read that RMP entry -- If it is assigned then kill the process
> +	 * 3. Otherwise, check the level from the host page table
> +	 *    If level=PG_LEVEL_4K then the page is already smashed
> +	 *    so just retry the instruction
> +	 * 4. If level=PG_LEVEL_2M/1G, then the host page needs to be split
> +	 */
> +
> +	pfn = pte_pfn(*pte);
> +
> +	/* If its large page then calculte the fault pfn */
> +	if (level > PG_LEVEL_4K)
> +		pfn = pfn | PFN_DOWN(address & (page_level_size(level) - 1));
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If its a guest private page, then the fault cannot be resolved.
> +	 * Send a SIGBUS to terminate the process.
> +	 *
> +	 * As documented in APM vol3 pseudo-code for RMPUPDATE, when the 2M range
> +	 * is covered by a valid (Assigned=1) 2M entry, the middle 511 4k entries
> +	 * also have Assigned=1. This means that if there is an access to a page
> +	 * which happens to lie within an Assigned 2M entry, the 4k RMP entry
> +	 * will also have Assigned=1. Therefore, the kernel should see that
> +	 * the page is not a valid page and the fault cannot be resolved.
> +	 */
> +	if (snp_lookup_rmpentry(pfn, &rmp_level)) {
> +		pr_info("Fatal RMP page fault, terminating process, entry assigned for pfn 0x%llx\n",
> +			pfn);
> +		do_sigbus(regs, error_code, address, VM_FAULT_SIGBUS);
> +		return RMP_PF_RETRY;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * The backing page level is higher than the RMP page level, request
> +	 * to split the page.
> +	 */
> +	if (level > rmp_level)
> +		return RMP_PF_SPLIT;
> +
> +	return RMP_PF_RETRY;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * Handle faults in the user portion of the address space.  Nothing in here
>   * should check X86_PF_USER without a specific justification: for almost
> @@ -1337,6 +1423,17 @@ void do_user_addr_fault(struct pt_regs *regs,
>  	if (error_code & X86_PF_INSTR)
>  		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION;
>  
> +	/*
> +	 * If its an RMP violation, try resolving it.
> +	 */
> +	if (error_code & X86_PF_RMP) {
> +		if (handle_user_rmp_page_fault(regs, error_code, address))
> +			return;
> +
> +		/* Ask to split the page */
> +		flags |= FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT;
> +	}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
>  	/*
>  	 * Faults in the vsyscall page might need emulation.  The
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 3c84f4e48cd7..2fd8e16d149c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -466,7 +466,8 @@ static inline bool fault_flag_allow_retry_first(enum fault_flag flags)
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_USER,		"USER" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_REMOTE,		"REMOTE" }, \
>  	{ FAULT_FLAG_INSTRUCTION,	"INSTRUCTION" }, \
> -	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE,	"INTERRUPTIBLE" }, \
> +	{ FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT,	"PAGESPLIT" }
>  
>  /*
>   * vm_fault is filled by the pagefault handler and passed to the vma's
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 500e536796ca..06ba34d51638 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -962,6 +962,8 @@ typedef struct {
>   *                      mapped R/O.
>   * @FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID: whether the fault has vmf->orig_pte cached.
>   *                        We should only access orig_pte if this flag set.
> + * @FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT: The fault was due page size mismatch, split the
> + *                         region to smaller page size and retry.
>   *
>   * About @FAULT_FLAG_ALLOW_RETRY and @FAULT_FLAG_TRIED: we can specify
>   * whether we would allow page faults to retry by specifying these two
> @@ -999,6 +1001,7 @@ enum fault_flag {
>  	FAULT_FLAG_INTERRUPTIBLE =	1 << 9,
>  	FAULT_FLAG_UNSHARE =		1 << 10,
>  	FAULT_FLAG_ORIG_PTE_VALID =	1 << 11,
> +	FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT =		1 << 12,
>  };
>  
>  typedef unsigned int __bitwise zap_flags_t;
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index f88c351aecd4..e68da7e403c6 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -4996,6 +4996,12 @@ static vm_fault_t handle_pte_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static int handle_split_page_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> +{
> +	__split_huge_pmd(vmf->vma, vmf->pmd, vmf->address, false, NULL);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  /*
>   * By the time we get here, we already hold the mm semaphore
>   *
> @@ -5078,6 +5084,10 @@ static vm_fault_t __handle_mm_fault(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>  				pmd_migration_entry_wait(mm, vmf.pmd);
>  			return 0;
>  		}
> +
> +		if (flags & FAULT_FLAG_PAGE_SPLIT)
> +			return handle_split_page_fault(&vmf);
> +
>  		if (pmd_trans_huge(vmf.orig_pmd) || pmd_devmap(vmf.orig_pmd)) {
>  			if (pmd_protnone(vmf.orig_pmd) && vma_is_accessible(vma))
>  				return do_huge_pmd_numa_page(&vmf);


  reply	other threads:[~2023-01-17 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 205+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-12-14 19:39 [PATCH RFC v7 00/64] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 01/64] KVM: Fix memslot boundary condition for large page Michael Roth
2022-12-22 12:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  3:37     ` Chao Peng
2023-01-04 12:01   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-05  3:34     ` Chao Peng
2023-01-05  4:08       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-05  8:14         ` Chao Peng
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 02/64] KVM: x86: Add KVM_CAP_UNMAPPED_PRIVATE_MEMORY Michael Roth
2022-12-22 12:26   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-04 17:47     ` Michael Roth
2023-01-05 11:57       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-19 13:03       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-04 12:03   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-04 17:56     ` Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 03/64] KVM: SVM: Advertise private memory support to KVM Michael Roth
2022-12-23 16:56   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  2:14     ` Michael Roth
2023-01-05 15:04       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05 18:17         ` Michael Roth
2023-01-13 14:16           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-20 21:20       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-20 16:18         ` Michael Roth
2023-01-18  0:20   ` Huang, Kai
2023-01-18 21:33     ` Sean Christopherson
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 04/64] KVM: x86: Add 'fault_is_private' x86 op Michael Roth
2022-12-29 16:14   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  2:42     ` Michael Roth
2023-01-13 14:34       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-13 15:48         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-13 18:45           ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-20 16:22           ` Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 05/64] KVM: x86: Add 'update_mem_attr' " Michael Roth
2022-12-30 11:27   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 06/64] KVM: x86: Add platform hooks for private memory invalidations Michael Roth
2022-12-30 11:53   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-05  2:27     ` Michael Roth
2023-01-22 12:43   ` Tom Dohrmann
2023-01-26 15:52     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-14 19:39 ` [PATCH RFC v7 07/64] KVM: SEV: Handle KVM_HC_MAP_GPA_RANGE hypercall Michael Roth
2023-01-13 16:00   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-01-13 16:17     ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-16  7:56       ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-17 17:19         ` Sean Christopherson
2023-01-27 16:35   ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-01-31 14:15     ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 08/64] KVM: Move kvm_for_each_memslot_in_hva_range() to be used in SVM Michael Roth
2023-01-13 18:46   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 09/64] KVM: Add HVA range operator Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 10/64] KVM: SEV: Populate private memory fd during LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA Michael Roth
2023-01-13 19:11   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-20 17:49     ` Michael Roth
2023-01-17 23:42   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-02-20 17:54     ` Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 11/64] KVM: SEV: Support private pages in LAUNCH_UPDATE_DATA Michael Roth
2022-12-22 18:24   ` erbse.13
2022-12-23 11:57     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-01-17 23:30   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-18  8:04     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2023-02-01 18:22   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-02  8:09     ` Nikunj A. Dadhania
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 12/64] KVM: SEV: Implement .fault_is_private callback Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 13/64] x86/cpufeatures: Add SEV-SNP CPU feature Michael Roth
2023-02-01 18:39   ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-20 16:26     ` Michael Roth
2023-02-20 17:50       ` Borislav Petkov
2023-02-20 18:00         ` Michael Roth
2023-02-20 18:36           ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 14/64] x86/sev: Add the host SEV-SNP initialization support Michael Roth
2023-01-11 14:50   ` Sabin Rapan
2023-01-19 16:26     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-18 15:55   ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-01-19 23:59     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-20 16:51       ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-02-02 11:16   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 15/64] x86/sev: Add RMP entry lookup helpers Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 16/64] x86/sev: Add helper functions for RMPUPDATE and PSMASH instruction Michael Roth
2023-01-31 21:26   ` Alexander Graf
2023-02-01 17:14     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-02-01 17:20       ` Alexander Graf
2023-02-02 19:04         ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-02-08 16:30   ` Liam Merwick
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 17/64] x86/mm/pat: Introduce set_memory_p Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 18/64] x86/sev: Invalidate pages from the direct map when adding them to the RMP table Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 19/64] x86/traps: Define RMP violation #PF error code Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 20/64] x86/fault: Add support to handle the RMP fault for user address Michael Roth
2023-01-17 10:42   ` Zhi Wang [this message]
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 21/64] x86/fault: fix handle_split_page_fault() to work with memfd backed pages Michael Roth
2022-12-15  1:01   ` Hugh Dickins
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 22/64] x86/fault: Return pfn from dump_pagetable() for SEV-specific fault handling Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 23/64] x86/fault: Add support to dump RMP entry on fault Michael Roth
2023-01-13 22:56   ` Alper Gun
2023-01-13 23:49     ` Kalra, Ashish
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 24/64] crypto:ccp: Define the SEV-SNP commands Michael Roth
2023-01-22 16:09   ` Sabin Rapan
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 25/64] crypto: ccp: Add support to initialize the AMD-SP for SEV-SNP Michael Roth
2022-12-31 15:32   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-05 22:40     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-20 22:19       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-04 12:12   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-05 22:54     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-20 22:56       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 26/64] crypto:ccp: Provide API to issue SEV and SNP commands Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 27/64] crypto: ccp: Introduce snp leaked pages list Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 28/64] crypto: ccp: Handle the legacy TMR allocation when SNP is enabled Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 29/64] crypto: ccp: Handle the legacy SEV command " Michael Roth
2023-01-12 20:47   ` Alper Gun
2023-01-13 22:03     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-13 22:42       ` Alper Gun
2023-01-13 22:48         ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-12 23:45   ` Alper Gun
2023-01-13 22:34     ` Kalra, Ashish
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 30/64] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_PLATFORM_STATUS command Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 31/64] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_{SET,GET}_EXT_CONFIG command Michael Roth
2023-01-19  7:23   ` Dov Murik
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 32/64] crypto: ccp: Provide APIs to query extended attestation report Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 33/64] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle AP reset MSR protocol Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 34/64] KVM: SVM: Provide the Hypervisor Feature support VMGEXIT Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 35/64] KVM: SVM: Make AVIC backing, VMSA and VMCB memory allocation SNP safe Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 36/64] KVM: SVM: Add initial SEV-SNP support Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 37/64] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SNP_INIT command Michael Roth
2022-12-31 14:27   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-31 14:47     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-31 15:16       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-05 23:37     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-20 23:17       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2023-01-23 22:49       ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-26 21:25         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 38/64] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_START command Michael Roth
2023-03-15 13:50   ` Peter Gonda
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 39/64] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_UPDATE command Michael Roth
2023-01-11 13:56   ` Tom Dohrmann
2023-01-11 14:04     ` Harald Hoyer
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 40/64] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH command Michael Roth
2022-12-19 18:04   ` Tom Lendacky
2022-12-19 23:24     ` Kalra, Ashish
2022-12-20 14:25       ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-11 13:27   ` Sabin Rapan
2023-01-11 23:18     ` Kalra, Ashish
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 41/64] KVM: X86: Keep the NPT and RMP page level in sync Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 42/64] KVM: x86: Define RMP page fault error bits for #NPF Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 43/64] KVM: SVM: Do not use long-lived GHCB map while setting scratch area Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 44/64] KVM: SVM: Remove the long-lived GHCB host map Michael Roth
2023-01-18 15:27   ` Jeremi Piotrowski
2023-01-18 18:15     ` Alper Gun
2023-01-20 20:10       ` Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 45/64] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle GHCB GPA register VMGEXIT Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 46/64] KVM: SVM: Add KVM_EXIT_VMGEXIT Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 47/64] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle MSR based Page State Change VMGEXIT Michael Roth
2023-01-11 14:38   ` Tom Dohrmann
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 48/64] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle " Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 49/64] KVM: SVM: Introduce ops for the post gfn map and unmap Michael Roth
2023-01-11 13:49   ` Sabin Rapan
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 50/64] KVM: x86: Export the kvm_zap_gfn_range() for the SNP use Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 51/64] KVM: SVM: Add support to handle the RMP nested page fault Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 52/64] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Michael Roth
2023-01-09  3:33   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-09 23:41     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-10  2:28       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-10  8:33         ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-11  0:48           ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-11  2:01             ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-31  1:54               ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-31 16:23                 ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-31 20:21                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-31 21:21                     ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-31 22:00                       ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-01-31 22:42                         ` Tom Lendacky
2023-05-11 23:02                           ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-05-11 23:32                             ` Sean Christopherson
2023-05-15 16:45                               ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-01-31 17:52                 ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-02-06  3:13               ` [PATCH kernel] KVM: SVM: Fix SVM_VMGEXIT_EXT_GUEST_REQUEST to follow the rest of API Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-06 21:57                 ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-02-07  1:24                   ` Alexey Kardashevskiy
2023-02-08 21:50                     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-19 20:35   ` [PATCH RFC v7 52/64] KVM: SVM: Provide support for SNP_GUEST_REQUEST NAE event Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-01-19 20:54     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-19 21:06       ` Dov Murik
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 53/64] KVM: SVM: Use a VMSA physical address variable for populating VMCB Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 54/64] KVM: SVM: Support SEV-SNP AP Creation NAE event Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 55/64] KVM: SVM: Add SNP-specific handling for memory attribute updates Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 56/64] KVM: x86/mmu: Generate KVM_EXIT_MEMORY_FAULT for implicit conversions for SNP Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 57/64] KVM: SEV: Handle restricted memory invalidations " Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 58/64] KVM: SVM: Add module parameter to enable the SEV-SNP Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 59/64] ccp: Add support to decrypt the page Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 60/64] KVM: SVM: Sync the GHCB scratch buffer using already mapped ghcb Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 61/64] KVM: SVM: Make VMSAVE target area memory allocation SNP safe Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 62/64] x86/sev: Add KVM commands for instance certs Michael Roth
2022-12-22 14:57   ` Dov Murik
2023-01-09 16:55     ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-01-09 22:27       ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-10  7:10         ` Dov Murik
2023-01-10 15:10           ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-10 15:23             ` Peter Gonda
2023-01-11  7:26               ` Dov Murik
2023-01-11  6:00             ` Dov Murik
2023-01-11 14:32               ` Tom Lendacky
2023-01-19 18:49   ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2023-01-19 22:18     ` Kalra, Ashish
2023-01-20  1:40       ` Dionna Amalie Glaze
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 63/64] x86/sev: Document KVM_SEV_SNP_{G,S}ET_CERTS Michael Roth
2022-12-14 19:40 ` [PATCH RFC v7 64/64] iommu/amd: Add IOMMU_SNP_SHUTDOWN support Michael Roth
2022-12-23 20:33 ` [PATCH RFC v7 00/64] Add AMD Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP) Hypervisor Support Borislav Petkov
2023-01-04 17:21   ` Michael Roth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230117124203.00001961@gmail.com \
    --to=zhi.wang.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashish.kalra@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=dovmurik@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=harald@profian.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@profian.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=jroedel@suse.de \
    --cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=marcorr@google.com \
    --cc=michael.roth@amd.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pgonda@google.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=slp@redhat.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tobin@ibm.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).