From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, michel@lespinasse.org,
jglisse@google.com, mhocko@suse.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
hannes@cmpxchg.org, dave@stgolabs.net, willy@infradead.org,
liam.howlett@oracle.com, peterz@infradead.org,
ldufour@linux.ibm.com, paulmck@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
will@kernel.org, luto@kernel.org, songliubraving@fb.com,
peterx@redhat.com, david@redhat.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
hughd@google.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
kent.overstreet@linux.dev, punit.agrawal@bytedance.com,
lstoakes@gmail.com, peterjung1337@gmail.com, rientjes@google.com,
axelrasmussen@google.com, joelaf@google.com, minchan@google.com,
jannh@google.com, shakeelb@google.com, tatashin@google.com,
edumazet@google.com, gthelen@google.com, gurua@google.com,
arjunroy@google.com, soheil@google.com, hughlynch@google.com,
leewalsh@google.com, posk@google.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@android.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] mm: replace vma->vm_flags direct modifications with modifier calls
Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:26:57 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230126172657.bmga5hy74ifsbhun@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJuCfpEzAbpy9rZ5KeZXQsqFTPOGYv6CZQfP9SHqcqFi0s7neg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 08:10:26AM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 7:10 AM Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 03:35:51PM -0800, Suren Baghdasaryan wrote:
> > > Replace direct modifications to vma->vm_flags with calls to modifier
> > > functions to be able to track flag changes and to keep vma locking
> > > correctness.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>
> > > Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> >
> > Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> >
> > Minor comments that are safe to ignore.
> >
> > I think a better name for mod_vm_flags is set_clear_vm_flags to hint that
> > the first flags are to be set and the second flags are to be cleared.
> > For this patch, it doesn't matter, but it might avoid accidental swapping
> > in the future.
> >
> > reset_vm_flags might also be better named as reinit_vma_flags (or
> > vma_flags_reinit). Maybe also encourage the use of [set|clear_mod]_vm_flags
> > where possible in the comment to track exactly what is changing and
> > why. Some cases like userfaultfd just want to clear __VM_UFFD_FLAGS but
> > altering the flow in this patch is inappropriate and error prone. Others
> > such as the infiniband changes and madvise are a lot more complex.
>
> That's a good point, but I don't want people to use mod_vm_flags() for
> the cases when the order of set/clear really matters. In such cases
> set_vm_flags() and clear_vm_flags() should be explicitly used. Maybe
> to make that clear I should add a comment and rewrite the functions
> as:
>
> void mod_vm_flags(vma, set, clear) {
> vma.vm_flags = vma.vm_flags | set & clear;
> }
>
Offhand, I'm not thinking of a case where that really matters and as they
are not necessarily ordered, it's raising a read flag so yes, it definitely
it needs a comment if the ordering matters.
> In this patchset it's not that obvious but mod_vm_flags() was really
> introduced in the original per-VMA lock patchset for efficiency to
> avoid taking extra per-VMA locks. A combo of
> set_vm_flags()+clear_vm_flags() would try to retake the same per-VMA
> lock in the second call while mod_vm_flags() takes the lock only once
> and does both operations.
Ok, that seems fair but still needs a comment on why a mod_vm_flags is
not necessarily equivalent to a set_vm_flags + clear_vm_flags in terms of
correctness if that is indeed the case.
> Not a huge overhead because we check if the
> lock is already taken and bail out early but still...
> So, would the above modification to mod_vm_flags() address your concern?
>
My concerns are entirely with the callers, not the implementation. If
someone is modifying a call site using mod_vm_flags, they have to read
through all the preceding logic to ensure the final combination of flags
is valid. It's a code maintenance issue, not a correctness issue.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-26 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-25 23:35 [PATCH v3 0/7] introduce vm_flags modifier functions Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] kernel/fork: convert vma assignment to a memcpy Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 0:21 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-26 0:50 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 1:34 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-26 11:52 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 15:59 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 17:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2023-02-07 17:16 ` Marco Elver
2023-02-07 17:23 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-02-07 17:51 ` Marco Elver
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] mm: introduce vma->vm_flags wrapper functions Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 0:24 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-26 0:51 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 17:48 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2023-01-26 0:28 ` Andrew Morton
2023-01-26 0:56 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 7:59 ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-26 8:33 ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-26 13:58 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 16:01 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] mm: replace VM_LOCKED_CLEAR_MASK with VM_LOCKED_MASK Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 13:59 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 14:16 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] mm: replace vma->vm_flags direct modifications with modifier calls Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 15:10 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 16:10 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 17:26 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2023-01-26 17:28 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] mm: replace vma->vm_flags indirect modification in ksm_madvise Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 15:19 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 16:11 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] mm: introduce mod_vm_flags_nolock and use it in untrack_pfn Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 8:34 ` Michal Hocko
2023-01-26 15:47 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 16:18 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-26 17:32 ` Mel Gorman
2023-01-26 17:34 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2023-01-25 23:35 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] mm: export dump_mm() Suren Baghdasaryan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230126172657.bmga5hy74ifsbhun@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjunroy@google.com \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=gthelen@google.com \
--cc=gurua@google.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=hughlynch@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@google.com \
--cc=joelaf@google.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=ldufour@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=leewalsh@google.com \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lstoakes@gmail.com \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=michel@lespinasse.org \
--cc=minchan@google.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterjung1337@gmail.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=posk@google.com \
--cc=punit.agrawal@bytedance.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=soheil@google.com \
--cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tatashin@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).