linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/45] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (44 more replies)
  0 siblings, 45 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Hi all,

1. Background
=============

We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [1], but then kernel
test robot reported -88.8% regression in stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test
case [2], so we reverted it [3].

This patch series aims to re-implement the lockless slab shrink using the
refcount+RCU method proposed by Dave Chinner [4].

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313112819.38938-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[3]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev/
[4]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/

2. Implementation
=================

Currently, the shrinker instances can be divided into the following three types:

a) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel, such as
   workingset_shadow_shrinker.

b) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel modules, such as
   mmu_shrinker in x86.

c) shrinker instance embedded in other structures.

For case a, the memory of shrinker instance is never freed. For case b, the
memory of shrinker instance will be freed after synchronize_rcu() when the
module is unloaded. For case c, the memory of shrinker instance will be freed
along with the structure it is embedded in.

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, we need to dynamically
allocate those shrinker instances in case c, then the memory can be dynamically
freed alone by calling kfree_rcu().

This patchset adds the following new APIs for dynamically allocating shrinker,
and add a private_data field to struct shrinker to record and get the original
embedded structure.

1. shrinker_alloc()
2. shrinker_register()
3. shrinker_free()

In order to simplify shrinker-related APIs and make shrinker more independent of
other kernel mechanisms, this patchset uses the above APIs to convert all
shrinkers (including case a and b) to dynamically allocated, and then remove all
existing APIs. This will also have another advantage mentioned by Dave Chinner:

```
The other advantage of this is that it will break all the existing out of tree
code and third party modules using the old API and will no longer work with a
kernel using lockless slab shrinkers. They need to break (both at the source and
binary levels) to stop bad things from happening due to using uncoverted
shrinkers in the new setup.
```

Then we free the shrinker by calling call_rcu(), and use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}()
to ensure that the shrinker instance is valid. And the shrinker::refcount
mechanism ensures that the shrinker instance will not be run again after
unregistration. So the structure that records the pointer of shrinker instance
can be safely freed without waiting for the RCU read-side critical section.

In this way, while we implement the lockless slab shrink, we don't need to be
blocked in unregister_shrinker() to wait RCU read-side critical section.

PATCH 1: introduce new APIs
PATCH 2~38: convert all shrinnkers to use new APIs
PATCH 39: remove old APIs
PATCH 40~41: some cleanups and preparations
PATCH 42-43: implement the lockless slab shrink
PATCH 44~45: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex

3. Testing
==========

3.1 slab shrink stress test
---------------------------

We can reproduce the down_read_trylock() hotspot through the following script:

```

DIR="/root/shrinker/memcg/mnt"

do_create()
{
    mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
    echo 4G > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
    for i in `seq 0 $1`;
    do
        mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i;
        echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
        mkdir -p $DIR/$i;
    done
}

do_mount()
{
    for i in `seq $1 $2`;
    do
        mount -t tmpfs $i $DIR/$i;
    done
}

do_touch()
{
    for i in `seq $1 $2`;
    do
        echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
        dd if=/dev/zero of=$DIR/$i/file$i bs=1M count=1 &
    done
}

case "$1" in
  touch)
    do_touch $2 $3
    ;;
  test)
    do_create 4000
    do_mount 0 4000
    do_touch 0 3000
    ;;
  *)
    exit 1
    ;;
esac
```

Save the above script, then run test and touch commands. Then we can use the
following perf command to view hotspots:

perf top -U -F 999

1) Before applying this patchset:

  40.44%  [kernel]            [k] down_read_trylock
  17.59%  [kernel]            [k] up_read
  13.64%  [kernel]            [k] pv_native_safe_halt
  11.90%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_slab
   8.21%  [kernel]            [k] idr_find
   2.71%  [kernel]            [k] _find_next_bit
   1.36%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_node
   0.81%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_lruvec
   0.80%  [kernel]            [k] __radix_tree_lookup
   0.50%  [kernel]            [k] do_shrink_slab
   0.21%  [kernel]            [k] list_lru_count_one
   0.16%  [kernel]            [k] mem_cgroup_iter

2) After applying this patchset:

  60.17%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_slab
  20.42%  [kernel]           [k] pv_native_safe_halt
   3.03%  [kernel]           [k] do_shrink_slab
   2.73%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_node
   2.27%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_lruvec
   2.00%  [kernel]           [k] __rcu_read_unlock
   1.92%  [kernel]           [k] mem_cgroup_iter
   0.98%  [kernel]           [k] __rcu_read_lock
   0.91%  [kernel]           [k] osq_lock
   0.63%  [kernel]           [k] mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
   0.55%  [kernel]           [k] shrinker_put
   0.46%  [kernel]           [k] list_lru_count_one

We can see that the first perf hotspot becomes shrink_slab, which is what we
expect.

3.2 registeration and unregisteration stress test
-------------------------------------------------

Run the command below to test:

stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics-brief --ramfs 9 &

1) Before applying this patchset:

setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
                          (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs            735238     60.00     12.37    363.70     12253.05        1955.08
for a 60.01s run time:
   1440.27s available CPU time
     12.36s user time   (  0.86%)
    363.70s system time ( 25.25%)
    376.06s total time  ( 26.11%)
load average: 10.79 4.47 1.69
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)

2) After applying this patchset:

setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
                          (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs            746698     60.00     12.45    376.16     12444.02        1921.47
for a 60.01s run time:
   1440.28s available CPU time
     12.44s user time   (  0.86%)
    376.16s system time ( 26.12%)
    388.60s total time  ( 26.98%)
load average: 9.01 3.85 1.49
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)

We can see that the ops/s has hardly changed.

This series is based on next-20230823 and depends on the cleanup patchset [5].

Comments and suggestions are welcome.

[5]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230824033539.34570-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/

Thanks,
Qi

Changelog in v4 -> v5:
 - split out some cleanups
 - split cleanup in [PATCH v4 46/48] as a separate patch
   (pointed by Dave Chinner)
 - add more comments for lockless algorithm
   (pointed by Dave Chinner)
 - remove shrinker_info_rcu() helper
   (pointed by Dave Chinner)
 - collect Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys
 - rebase onto the next-20230823

Changelog in v3 -> v4:
 - [PATCH v3 01/49] has been merged, so discard it.
 - fix wrong return value in patch v3 15\16\22\27\28\29\34\40.
   (pointed by Damien Le Moal)
 - fix uninitialized variable in [PATCH v3 04/49]
   (pointed by Simon Horman)
 - fix typo in [PATCH v3 05/49] (pointed by Simon Horman)
 - rebase onto the next-20230807.

Changelog in v2 -> v3:
 - add the patch that [PATCH v3 07/49] depends on
 - move some shrinker-related function declarations to mm/internal.h
   (suggested by Muchun Song)
 - combine shrinker_free_non_registered() and shrinker_unregister() into
   shrinker_free() (suggested by Dave Chinner)
 - add missing __init and fix return value in bch_btree_cache_alloc()
   (pointed by Muchun Song)
 - remove unnecessary WARN_ON() (pointed by Steven Price)
 - go back to use completion to implement lockless slab shrink
   (pointed by Dave Chinner)
 - collect Acked-bys and Reviewed-bys
 - rebase onto the next-20230726.

Changelog in v1 -> v2:
 - implement the new APIs and convert all shrinkers to use it.
   (suggested by Dave Chinner)
 - fix UAF in PATCH [05/29] (pointed by Steven Price)
 - add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred}
 - re-implement the lockless slab shrink
   (Since unifying the processing of global and memcg slab shrink needs to
    modify the startup sequence (As I mentioned in https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/38b14080-4ce5-d300-8a0a-c630bca6806b@bytedance.com/),
    I finally choose to process them separately.)
 - collect Acked-bys

Qi Zheng (45):
  mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker
  kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker
  binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker
  drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker
  xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker
  erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker
  f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker
  gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker
  gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker
  NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers
  nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker
  nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker
  quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker
  ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker
  rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker
  rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker
  mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers
  sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker
  mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker
  drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker
  drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker
  drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker
  dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker
  dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker
  md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker
  bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker
  vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker
  virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker
  mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker
  ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker
  jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker
  nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker
  nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker
  xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker
  xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker
  xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker
  zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker
  fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink
  mm: shrinker: remove old APIs
  mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map,
    nr_deferred}
  mm: shrinker: rename {prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to
    shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}()
  mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless
  mm: shrinker: make memcg slab shrink lockless
  mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred
  mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex

 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c                        |  18 +-
 drivers/android/binder_alloc.c                |  31 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c  |  30 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h               |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c                 |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h                 |   4 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c        |  34 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h    |   2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c       |   6 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h       |   2 +-
 .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c  |  30 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c                |  23 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h                    |   2 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c                     |  27 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c                     |   3 +-
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c                         |  28 +-
 drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c                |   2 +-
 drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c                |  29 +-
 drivers/md/raid5.c                            |  26 +-
 drivers/md/raid5.h                            |   2 +-
 drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c                    |  38 +-
 drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c               |  25 +-
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c     |  18 +-
 fs/btrfs/super.c                              |   2 +-
 fs/erofs/utils.c                              |  20 +-
 fs/ext4/ext4.h                                |   2 +-
 fs/ext4/extents_status.c                      |  24 +-
 fs/f2fs/super.c                               |  32 +-
 fs/gfs2/glock.c                               |  20 +-
 fs/gfs2/main.c                                |   6 +-
 fs/gfs2/quota.c                               |  26 +-
 fs/gfs2/quota.h                               |   3 +-
 fs/jbd2/journal.c                             |  30 +-
 fs/kernfs/mount.c                             |   2 +-
 fs/mbcache.c                                  |  23 +-
 fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c                           |  87 +--
 fs/nfs/super.c                                |  22 +-
 fs/nfsd/filecache.c                           |  23 +-
 fs/nfsd/netns.h                               |   4 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c                           |  20 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfscache.c                            |  31 +-
 fs/proc/root.c                                |   2 +-
 fs/quota/dquot.c                              |  18 +-
 fs/super.c                                    |  36 +-
 fs/ubifs/super.c                              |  22 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c                              |  25 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h                              |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c                           |  26 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c                            |   4 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h                            |   2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c                               |  28 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h                               |   2 +-
 include/linux/fs.h                            |   2 +-
 include/linux/jbd2.h                          |   2 +-
 include/linux/memcontrol.h                    |  12 +-
 include/linux/shrinker.h                      |  54 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree.c                             |  22 +-
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h                        |  20 +-
 mm/huge_memory.c                              |  69 ++-
 mm/internal.h                                 |  11 +
 mm/shrinker.c                                 | 581 +++++++++++-------
 mm/shrinker_debug.c                           |  31 +-
 mm/workingset.c                               |  27 +-
 mm/zsmalloc.c                                 |  28 +-
 net/sunrpc/auth.c                             |  21 +-
 65 files changed, 1076 insertions(+), 734 deletions(-)

-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 01/45] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/45] kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (43 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Currently, the shrinker instances can be divided into the following three
types:

a) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel, such as
   workingset_shadow_shrinker.

b) global shrinker instance statically defined in the kernel modules, such
   as mmu_shrinker in x86.

c) shrinker instance embedded in other structures.

For case a, the memory of shrinker instance is never freed. For case b,
the memory of shrinker instance will be freed after synchronize_rcu() when
the module is unloaded. For case c, the memory of shrinker instance will
be freed along with the structure it is embedded in.

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, we need to
dynamically allocate those shrinker instances in case c, then the memory
can be dynamically freed alone by calling kfree_rcu().

So this commit adds the following new APIs for dynamically allocating
shrinker, and add a private_data field to struct shrinker to record and
get the original embedded structure.

1. shrinker_alloc()

Used to allocate shrinker instance itself and related memory, it will
return a pointer to the shrinker instance on success and NULL on failure.

2. shrinker_register()

Used to register the shrinker instance, which is same as the current
register_shrinker_prepared().

3. shrinker_free()

Used to unregister (if needed) and free the shrinker instance.

In order to simplify shrinker-related APIs and make shrinker more
independent of other kernel mechanisms, subsequent submissions will use
the above API to convert all shrinkers (including case a and b) to
dynamically allocated, and then remove all existing APIs.

This will also have another advantage mentioned by Dave Chinner:

```
The other advantage of this is that it will break all the existing
out of tree code and third party modules using the old API and will
no longer work with a kernel using lockless slab shrinkers. They
need to break (both at the source and binary levels) to stop bad
things from happening due to using unconverted shrinkers in the new
setup.
```

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/shrinker.h |   7 +++
 mm/internal.h            |  11 +++++
 mm/shrinker.c            | 101 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 mm/shrinker_debug.c      |  17 ++++++-
 4 files changed, 134 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 6b5843c3b827..3f3fd9974ce5 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@ struct shrinker {
 	int seeks;	/* seeks to recreate an obj */
 	unsigned flags;
 
+	void *private_data;
+
 	/* These are for internal use */
 	struct list_head list;
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
@@ -95,6 +97,11 @@ struct shrinker {
  * non-MEMCG_AWARE shrinker should not have this flag set.
  */
 #define SHRINKER_NONSLAB	(1 << 3)
+#define SHRINKER_ALLOCATED	(1 << 4)
+
+struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
+void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
+void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 
 extern int __printf(2, 3) prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 					    const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/mm/internal.h b/mm/internal.h
index 5d4697612073..b9a116dce28e 100644
--- a/mm/internal.h
+++ b/mm/internal.h
@@ -1162,6 +1162,9 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
 extern int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker);
+extern int shrinker_debugfs_name_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker,
+				       const char *fmt, va_list ap);
+extern void shrinker_debugfs_name_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 extern struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_detach(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 					      int *debugfs_id);
 extern void shrinker_debugfs_remove(struct dentry *debugfs_entry,
@@ -1171,6 +1174,14 @@ static inline int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+static inline int shrinker_debugfs_name_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker,
+					      const char *fmt, va_list ap)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+static inline void shrinker_debugfs_name_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+}
 static inline struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_detach(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 						     int *debugfs_id)
 {
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index a16cd448b924..36711c5c01f9 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -550,6 +550,107 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	return freed;
 }
 
+struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...)
+{
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
+	unsigned int size;
+	va_list ap;
+	int err;
+
+	shrinker = kzalloc(sizeof(struct shrinker), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!shrinker)
+		return NULL;
+
+	va_start(ap, fmt);
+	err = shrinker_debugfs_name_alloc(shrinker, fmt, ap);
+	va_end(ap);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_name;
+
+	shrinker->flags = flags | SHRINKER_ALLOCATED;
+
+	if (flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
+		err = prealloc_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
+		if (err == -ENOSYS)
+			shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
+		else if (err == 0)
+			goto done;
+		else
+			goto err_flags;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * The nr_deferred is available on per memcg level for memcg aware
+	 * shrinkers, so only allocate nr_deferred in the following cases:
+	 *  - non memcg aware shrinkers
+	 *  - !CONFIG_MEMCG
+	 *  - memcg is disabled by kernel command line
+	 */
+	size = sizeof(*shrinker->nr_deferred);
+	if (flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)
+		size *= nr_node_ids;
+
+	shrinker->nr_deferred = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
+		goto err_flags;
+
+done:
+	return shrinker;
+
+err_flags:
+	shrinker_debugfs_name_free(shrinker);
+err_name:
+	kfree(shrinker);
+	return NULL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_alloc);
+
+void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+	if (unlikely(!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_ALLOCATED))) {
+		pr_warn("Must use shrinker_alloc() to dynamically allocate the shrinker");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
+	shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
+	shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
+	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_register);
+
+void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+	struct dentry *debugfs_entry = NULL;
+	int debugfs_id;
+
+	if (!shrinker)
+		return;
+
+	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
+		list_del(&shrinker->list);
+		debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_detach(shrinker, &debugfs_id);
+		shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
+	} else {
+		shrinker_debugfs_name_free(shrinker);
+	}
+
+	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
+		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
+	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+
+	if (debugfs_entry)
+		shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
+
+	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
+	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
+
+	kfree(shrinker);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
+
 /*
  * Add a shrinker callback to be called from the vm.
  */
diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
index e4ce509f619e..38452f539f40 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
@@ -193,6 +193,20 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+int shrinker_debugfs_name_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt,
+				va_list ap)
+{
+	shrinker->name = kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
+
+	return shrinker->name ? 0 : -ENOMEM;
+}
+
+void shrinker_debugfs_name_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+	kfree_const(shrinker->name);
+	shrinker->name = NULL;
+}
+
 int shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
 {
 	struct dentry *entry;
@@ -241,8 +255,7 @@ struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_detach(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
 
-	kfree_const(shrinker->name);
-	shrinker->name = NULL;
+	shrinker_debugfs_name_free(shrinker);
 
 	*debugfs_id = entry ? shrinker->debugfs_id : -1;
 	shrinker->debugfs_entry = NULL;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 02/45] kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/45] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (42 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Thomas Gleixner, Ingo Molnar, Borislav Petkov, Dave Hansen, kvm,
	x86

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
CC: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
CC: kvm@vger.kernel.org
CC: x86@kernel.org
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index e1d011c67cc6..9252f2e7afbc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -6796,11 +6796,7 @@ static unsigned long mmu_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return percpu_counter_read_positive(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
 }
 
-static struct shrinker mmu_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = mmu_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = mmu_shrink_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS * 10,
-};
+static struct shrinker *mmu_shrinker;
 
 static void mmu_destroy_caches(void)
 {
@@ -6933,10 +6929,16 @@ int kvm_mmu_vendor_module_init(void)
 	if (percpu_counter_init(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto out;
 
-	ret = register_shrinker(&mmu_shrinker, "x86-mmu");
-	if (ret)
+	mmu_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "x86-mmu");
+	if (!mmu_shrinker)
 		goto out_shrinker;
 
+	mmu_shrinker->count_objects = mmu_shrink_count;
+	mmu_shrinker->scan_objects = mmu_shrink_scan;
+	mmu_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS * 10;
+
+	shrinker_register(mmu_shrinker);
+
 	return 0;
 
 out_shrinker:
@@ -6958,7 +6960,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_vendor_module_exit(void)
 {
 	mmu_destroy_caches();
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&kvm_total_used_mmu_pages);
-	unregister_shrinker(&mmu_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(mmu_shrinker);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/45] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/45] kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-31 16:41   ` Carlos Llamas
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/45] drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (41 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Carlos Llamas

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
CC: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
---
 drivers/android/binder_alloc.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
index e3db8297095a..62675cedd38e 100644
--- a/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
+++ b/drivers/android/binder_alloc.c
@@ -1053,11 +1053,7 @@ binder_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 			    NULL, sc->nr_to_scan);
 }
 
-static struct shrinker binder_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = binder_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = binder_shrink_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *binder_shrinker;
 
 /**
  * binder_alloc_init() - called by binder_open() for per-proc initialization
@@ -1077,19 +1073,30 @@ void binder_alloc_init(struct binder_alloc *alloc)
 
 int binder_alloc_shrinker_init(void)
 {
-	int ret = list_lru_init(&binder_alloc_lru);
+	int ret;
 
-	if (ret == 0) {
-		ret = register_shrinker(&binder_shrinker, "android-binder");
-		if (ret)
-			list_lru_destroy(&binder_alloc_lru);
+	ret = list_lru_init(&binder_alloc_lru);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	binder_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "android-binder");
+	if (!binder_shrinker) {
+		list_lru_destroy(&binder_alloc_lru);
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
-	return ret;
+
+	binder_shrinker->count_objects = binder_shrink_count;
+	binder_shrinker->scan_objects = binder_shrink_scan;
+	binder_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(binder_shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void binder_alloc_shrinker_exit(void)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&binder_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(binder_shrinker);
 	list_lru_destroy(&binder_alloc_lru);
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 04/45] drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (40 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Daniel Vetter, Christian Koenig, Huang Rui, David Airlie,
	dri-devel

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CC: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig@amd.com>
CC: Huang Rui <ray.huang@amd.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c | 23 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
index 648ca70403a7..fe610a3cace0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_pool.c
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static struct ttm_pool_type global_dma32_uncached[MAX_ORDER + 1];
 
 static spinlock_t shrinker_lock;
 static struct list_head shrinker_list;
-static struct shrinker mm_shrinker;
+static struct shrinker *mm_shrinker;
 static DECLARE_RWSEM(pool_shrink_rwsem);
 
 /* Allocate pages of size 1 << order with the given gfp_flags */
@@ -749,8 +749,8 @@ static int ttm_pool_debugfs_shrink_show(struct seq_file *m, void *data)
 	struct shrink_control sc = { .gfp_mask = GFP_NOFS };
 
 	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
-	seq_printf(m, "%lu/%lu\n", ttm_pool_shrinker_count(&mm_shrinker, &sc),
-		   ttm_pool_shrinker_scan(&mm_shrinker, &sc));
+	seq_printf(m, "%lu/%lu\n", ttm_pool_shrinker_count(mm_shrinker, &sc),
+		   ttm_pool_shrinker_scan(mm_shrinker, &sc));
 	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	return 0;
@@ -794,10 +794,17 @@ int ttm_pool_mgr_init(unsigned long num_pages)
 			    &ttm_pool_debugfs_shrink_fops);
 #endif
 
-	mm_shrinker.count_objects = ttm_pool_shrinker_count;
-	mm_shrinker.scan_objects = ttm_pool_shrinker_scan;
-	mm_shrinker.seeks = 1;
-	return register_shrinker(&mm_shrinker, "drm-ttm_pool");
+	mm_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "drm-ttm_pool");
+	if (!mm_shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	mm_shrinker->count_objects = ttm_pool_shrinker_count;
+	mm_shrinker->scan_objects = ttm_pool_shrinker_scan;
+	mm_shrinker->seeks = 1;
+
+	shrinker_register(mm_shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -817,6 +824,6 @@ void ttm_pool_mgr_fini(void)
 		ttm_pool_type_fini(&global_dma32_uncached[i]);
 	}
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&mm_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(mm_shrinker);
 	WARN_ON(!list_empty(&shrinker_list));
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/45] drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  6:00   ` Juergen Gross
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (39 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Juergen Gross, Stefano Stabellini, Oleksandr Tyshchenko,
	xen-devel

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
CC: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
CC: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
---
 drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c | 18 +++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
index da96c260e26b..929c41a5ccee 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe_backend.c
@@ -284,13 +284,9 @@ static unsigned long backend_shrink_memory_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker backend_memory_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = backend_shrink_memory_count,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
-
 static int __init xenbus_probe_backend_init(void)
 {
+	struct shrinker *backend_memory_shrinker;
 	static struct notifier_block xenstore_notifier = {
 		.notifier_call = backend_probe_and_watch
 	};
@@ -305,8 +301,16 @@ static int __init xenbus_probe_backend_init(void)
 
 	register_xenstore_notifier(&xenstore_notifier);
 
-	if (register_shrinker(&backend_memory_shrinker, "xen-backend"))
-		pr_warn("shrinker registration failed\n");
+	backend_memory_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "xen-backend");
+	if (!backend_memory_shrinker) {
+		pr_warn("shrinker allocation failed\n");
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	backend_memory_shrinker->count_objects = backend_shrink_memory_count;
+	backend_memory_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(backend_memory_shrinker);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-25  1:18   ` Chao Yu
  2023-08-25  2:54   ` Gao Xiang
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (38 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 2 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Gao Xiang, Chao Yu, Yue Hu, Jeffle Xu, linux-erofs

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
CC: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
CC: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
CC: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
CC: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org
---
 fs/erofs/utils.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/erofs/utils.c b/fs/erofs/utils.c
index cc6fb9e98899..6e1a828e6ca3 100644
--- a/fs/erofs/utils.c
+++ b/fs/erofs/utils.c
@@ -270,19 +270,25 @@ static unsigned long erofs_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return freed;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker erofs_shrinker_info = {
-	.scan_objects = erofs_shrink_scan,
-	.count_objects = erofs_shrink_count,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *erofs_shrinker_info;
 
 int __init erofs_init_shrinker(void)
 {
-	return register_shrinker(&erofs_shrinker_info, "erofs-shrinker");
+	erofs_shrinker_info = shrinker_alloc(0, "erofs-shrinker");
+	if (!erofs_shrinker_info)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	erofs_shrinker_info->count_objects = erofs_shrink_count;
+	erofs_shrinker_info->scan_objects = erofs_shrink_scan;
+	erofs_shrinker_info->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(erofs_shrinker_info);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void erofs_exit_shrinker(void)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&erofs_shrinker_info);
+	shrinker_free(erofs_shrinker_info);
 }
 #endif	/* !CONFIG_EROFS_FS_ZIP */
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-25  1:17   ` Chao Yu
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (37 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Jaegeuk Kim, Chao Yu, linux-f2fs-devel

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
CC: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
CC: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
---
 fs/f2fs/super.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 050f4f8ee8f5..86047da85856 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
@@ -83,11 +83,27 @@ void f2fs_build_fault_attr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi, unsigned int rate,
 #endif
 
 /* f2fs-wide shrinker description */
-static struct shrinker f2fs_shrinker_info = {
-	.scan_objects = f2fs_shrink_scan,
-	.count_objects = f2fs_shrink_count,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *f2fs_shrinker_info;
+
+static int __init f2fs_init_shrinker(void)
+{
+	f2fs_shrinker_info = shrinker_alloc(0, "f2fs-shrinker");
+	if (!f2fs_shrinker_info)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	f2fs_shrinker_info->count_objects = f2fs_shrink_count;
+	f2fs_shrinker_info->scan_objects = f2fs_shrink_scan;
+	f2fs_shrinker_info->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(f2fs_shrinker_info);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void f2fs_exit_shrinker(void)
+{
+	shrinker_free(f2fs_shrinker_info);
+}
 
 enum {
 	Opt_gc_background,
@@ -4944,7 +4960,7 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
 	err = f2fs_init_sysfs();
 	if (err)
 		goto free_garbage_collection_cache;
-	err = register_shrinker(&f2fs_shrinker_info, "f2fs-shrinker");
+	err = f2fs_init_shrinker();
 	if (err)
 		goto free_sysfs;
 	err = register_filesystem(&f2fs_fs_type);
@@ -4989,7 +5005,7 @@ static int __init init_f2fs_fs(void)
 	f2fs_destroy_root_stats();
 	unregister_filesystem(&f2fs_fs_type);
 free_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&f2fs_shrinker_info);
+	f2fs_exit_shrinker();
 free_sysfs:
 	f2fs_exit_sysfs();
 free_garbage_collection_cache:
@@ -5021,7 +5037,7 @@ static void __exit exit_f2fs_fs(void)
 	f2fs_destroy_post_read_processing();
 	f2fs_destroy_root_stats();
 	unregister_filesystem(&f2fs_fs_type);
-	unregister_shrinker(&f2fs_shrinker_info);
+	f2fs_exit_shrinker();
 	f2fs_exit_sysfs();
 	f2fs_destroy_garbage_collection_cache();
 	f2fs_destroy_extent_cache();
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 08/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (6 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (36 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Bob Peterson, Andreas Gruenbacher, cluster-devel

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
CC: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
CC: cluster-devel@redhat.com
---
 fs/gfs2/glock.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/glock.c b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
index 675bfec77706..fd3eba1856a5 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/glock.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/glock.c
@@ -2039,11 +2039,7 @@ static unsigned long gfs2_glock_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return vfs_pressure_ratio(atomic_read(&lru_count));
 }
 
-static struct shrinker glock_shrinker = {
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-	.count_objects = gfs2_glock_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = gfs2_glock_shrink_scan,
-};
+static struct shrinker *glock_shrinker;
 
 /**
  * glock_hash_walk - Call a function for glock in a hash bucket
@@ -2463,13 +2459,19 @@ int __init gfs2_glock_init(void)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
-	ret = register_shrinker(&glock_shrinker, "gfs2-glock");
-	if (ret) {
+	glock_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "gfs2-glock");
+	if (!glock_shrinker) {
 		destroy_workqueue(glock_workqueue);
 		rhashtable_destroy(&gl_hash_table);
-		return ret;
+		return -ENOMEM;
 	}
 
+	glock_shrinker->count_objects = gfs2_glock_shrink_count;
+	glock_shrinker->scan_objects = gfs2_glock_shrink_scan;
+	glock_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(glock_shrinker);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < GLOCK_WAIT_TABLE_SIZE; i++)
 		init_waitqueue_head(glock_wait_table + i);
 
@@ -2478,7 +2480,7 @@ int __init gfs2_glock_init(void)
 
 void gfs2_glock_exit(void)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&glock_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(glock_shrinker);
 	rhashtable_destroy(&gl_hash_table);
 	destroy_workqueue(glock_workqueue);
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 09/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (7 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/45] NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers Qi Zheng
                   ` (35 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Bob Peterson, Andreas Gruenbacher, cluster-devel

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
CC: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
CC: cluster-devel@redhat.com
---
 fs/gfs2/main.c  |  6 +++---
 fs/gfs2/quota.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++------
 fs/gfs2/quota.h |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/gfs2/main.c b/fs/gfs2/main.c
index afcb32854f14..e47b1cc79f59 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/main.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/main.c
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static int __init init_gfs2_fs(void)
 	if (!gfs2_trans_cachep)
 		goto fail_cachep8;
 
-	error = register_shrinker(&gfs2_qd_shrinker, "gfs2-qd");
+	error = gfs2_qd_shrinker_init();
 	if (error)
 		goto fail_shrinker;
 
@@ -196,7 +196,7 @@ static int __init init_gfs2_fs(void)
 fail_wq2:
 	destroy_workqueue(gfs_recovery_wq);
 fail_wq1:
-	unregister_shrinker(&gfs2_qd_shrinker);
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker_exit();
 fail_shrinker:
 	kmem_cache_destroy(gfs2_trans_cachep);
 fail_cachep8:
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ static int __init init_gfs2_fs(void)
 
 static void __exit exit_gfs2_fs(void)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&gfs2_qd_shrinker);
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker_exit();
 	gfs2_glock_exit();
 	gfs2_unregister_debugfs();
 	unregister_filesystem(&gfs2_fs_type);
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/quota.c b/fs/gfs2/quota.c
index 632806c5ed67..d1e4d8ab8fa1 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/quota.c
+++ b/fs/gfs2/quota.c
@@ -186,13 +186,27 @@ static unsigned long gfs2_qd_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return vfs_pressure_ratio(list_lru_shrink_count(&gfs2_qd_lru, sc));
 }
 
-struct shrinker gfs2_qd_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = gfs2_qd_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = gfs2_qd_shrink_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-	.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE,
-};
+static struct shrinker *gfs2_qd_shrinker;
+
+int __init gfs2_qd_shrinker_init(void)
+{
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE, "gfs2-qd");
+	if (!gfs2_qd_shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker->count_objects = gfs2_qd_shrink_count;
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker->scan_objects = gfs2_qd_shrink_scan;
+	gfs2_qd_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(gfs2_qd_shrinker);
 
+	return 0;
+}
+
+void gfs2_qd_shrinker_exit(void)
+{
+	shrinker_free(gfs2_qd_shrinker);
+}
 
 static u64 qd2index(struct gfs2_quota_data *qd)
 {
diff --git a/fs/gfs2/quota.h b/fs/gfs2/quota.h
index 21ada332d555..f0d54dcbbc75 100644
--- a/fs/gfs2/quota.h
+++ b/fs/gfs2/quota.h
@@ -59,7 +59,8 @@ static inline int gfs2_quota_lock_check(struct gfs2_inode *ip,
 }
 
 extern const struct quotactl_ops gfs2_quotactl_ops;
-extern struct shrinker gfs2_qd_shrinker;
+int __init gfs2_qd_shrinker_init(void);
+void gfs2_qd_shrinker_exit(void);
 extern struct list_lru gfs2_qd_lru;
 extern void __init gfs2_quota_hash_init(void);
 
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 10/45] NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (8 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/45] nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (34 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, linux-nfs

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
CC: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 1 file changed, 44 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
index 911f634ba3da..2ad66a8922f4 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
@@ -796,28 +796,9 @@ static unsigned long nfs4_xattr_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long nfs4_xattr_entry_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 					   struct shrink_control *sc);
 
-static struct shrinker nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects	= nfs4_xattr_cache_count,
-	.scan_objects	= nfs4_xattr_cache_scan,
-	.seeks		= DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-	.flags		= SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
-};
-
-static struct shrinker nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects	= nfs4_xattr_entry_count,
-	.scan_objects	= nfs4_xattr_entry_scan,
-	.seeks		= DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-	.batch		= 512,
-	.flags		= SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
-};
-
-static struct shrinker nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects	= nfs4_xattr_entry_count,
-	.scan_objects	= nfs4_xattr_entry_scan,
-	.seeks		= 1,
-	.batch		= 512,
-	.flags		= SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
-};
+static struct shrinker *nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker;
+static struct shrinker *nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker;
+static struct shrinker *nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker;
 
 static enum lru_status
 cache_lru_isolate(struct list_head *item,
@@ -943,7 +924,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_entry_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry;
 	struct list_lru *lru;
 
-	lru = (shrink == &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker) ?
+	lru = (shrink == nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker) ?
 	    &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru : &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
 
 	freed = list_lru_shrink_walk(lru, sc, entry_lru_isolate, &dispose);
@@ -971,7 +952,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_entry_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	unsigned long count;
 	struct list_lru *lru;
 
-	lru = (shrink == &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker) ?
+	lru = (shrink == nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker) ?
 	    &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru : &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
 
 	count = list_lru_shrink_count(lru, sc);
@@ -991,18 +972,34 @@ static void nfs4_xattr_cache_init_once(void *p)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->dispose);
 }
 
-static int nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(struct shrinker *shrinker,
-				    struct list_lru *lru, const char *name)
+typedef unsigned long (*count_objects_cb)(struct shrinker *s,
+					  struct shrink_control *sc);
+typedef unsigned long (*scan_objects_cb)(struct shrinker *s,
+					 struct shrink_control *sc);
+
+static int __init nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(struct shrinker **shrinker,
+					   struct list_lru *lru, const char *name,
+					   count_objects_cb count,
+					   scan_objects_cb scan, long batch, int seeks)
 {
-	int ret = 0;
+	int ret;
 
-	ret = register_shrinker(shrinker, name);
-	if (ret)
+	*shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE, name);
+	if (!*shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	ret = list_lru_init_memcg(lru, *shrinker);
+	if (ret) {
+		shrinker_free(*shrinker);
 		return ret;
+	}
 
-	ret = list_lru_init_memcg(lru, shrinker);
-	if (ret)
-		unregister_shrinker(shrinker);
+	(*shrinker)->count_objects = count;
+	(*shrinker)->scan_objects = scan;
+	(*shrinker)->batch = batch;
+	(*shrinker)->seeks = seeks;
+
+	shrinker_register(*shrinker);
 
 	return ret;
 }
@@ -1010,7 +1007,7 @@ static int nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 static void nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 					struct list_lru *lru)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(shrinker);
 	list_lru_destroy(lru);
 }
 
@@ -1026,27 +1023,31 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	ret = nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(&nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker,
-				       &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru,
-				       "nfs-xattr_cache");
+				       &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru, "nfs-xattr_cache",
+				       nfs4_xattr_cache_count,
+				       nfs4_xattr_cache_scan, 0, DEFAULT_SEEKS);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out1;
 
 	ret = nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(&nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker,
-				       &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru,
-				       "nfs-xattr_entry");
+				       &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru, "nfs-xattr_entry",
+				       nfs4_xattr_entry_count,
+				       nfs4_xattr_entry_scan, 512, DEFAULT_SEEKS);
 	if (ret)
 		goto out2;
 
 	ret = nfs4_xattr_shrinker_init(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker,
 				       &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru,
-				       "nfs-xattr_large_entry");
+				       "nfs-xattr_large_entry",
+				       nfs4_xattr_entry_count,
+				       nfs4_xattr_entry_scan, 512, 1);
 	if (!ret)
 		return 0;
 
-	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker,
+	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker,
 				    &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru);
 out2:
-	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker,
+	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker,
 				    &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru);
 out1:
 	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep);
@@ -1056,11 +1057,11 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 
 void nfs4_xattr_cache_exit(void)
 {
-	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker,
+	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker,
 				    &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru);
-	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker,
+	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(nfs4_xattr_entry_shrinker,
 				    &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru);
-	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker,
+	nfs4_xattr_shrinker_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_shrinker,
 				    &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru);
 	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep);
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 11/45] nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (9 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/45] NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (33 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, linux-nfs

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
CC: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfs/super.c | 22 ++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/super.c b/fs/nfs/super.c
index 2284f749d892..1b5cd0444dda 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/super.c
@@ -129,11 +129,7 @@ static void nfs_ssc_unregister_ops(void)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_NFS_V4_2 */
 
-static struct shrinker acl_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects	= nfs_access_cache_count,
-	.scan_objects	= nfs_access_cache_scan,
-	.seeks		= DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *acl_shrinker;
 
 /*
  * Register the NFS filesystems
@@ -153,9 +149,19 @@ int __init register_nfs_fs(void)
 	ret = nfs_register_sysctl();
 	if (ret < 0)
 		goto error_2;
-	ret = register_shrinker(&acl_shrinker, "nfs-acl");
-	if (ret < 0)
+
+	acl_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "nfs-acl");
+	if (!acl_shrinker) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
 		goto error_3;
+	}
+
+	acl_shrinker->count_objects = nfs_access_cache_count;
+	acl_shrinker->scan_objects = nfs_access_cache_scan;
+	acl_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(acl_shrinker);
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_2
 	nfs_ssc_register_ops();
 #endif
@@ -175,7 +181,7 @@ int __init register_nfs_fs(void)
  */
 void __exit unregister_nfs_fs(void)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&acl_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(acl_shrinker);
 	nfs_unregister_sysctl();
 	unregister_nfs4_fs();
 #ifdef CONFIG_NFS_V4_2
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 12/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (10 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/45] nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (32 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo,
	Tom Talpey, linux-nfs

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
CC: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
CC: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
CC: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>
CC: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfsd/filecache.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
index ee9c923192e0..9c62b4502539 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/filecache.c
@@ -521,11 +521,7 @@ nfsd_file_lru_scan(struct shrinker *s, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker	nfsd_file_shrinker = {
-	.scan_objects = nfsd_file_lru_scan,
-	.count_objects = nfsd_file_lru_count,
-	.seeks = 1,
-};
+static struct shrinker *nfsd_file_shrinker;
 
 /**
  * nfsd_file_cond_queue - conditionally unhash and queue a nfsd_file
@@ -746,12 +742,19 @@ nfsd_file_cache_init(void)
 		goto out_err;
 	}
 
-	ret = register_shrinker(&nfsd_file_shrinker, "nfsd-filecache");
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_err("nfsd: failed to register nfsd_file_shrinker: %d\n", ret);
+	nfsd_file_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "nfsd-filecache");
+	if (!nfsd_file_shrinker) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		pr_err("nfsd: failed to allocate nfsd_file_shrinker\n");
 		goto out_lru;
 	}
 
+	nfsd_file_shrinker->count_objects = nfsd_file_lru_count;
+	nfsd_file_shrinker->scan_objects = nfsd_file_lru_scan;
+	nfsd_file_shrinker->seeks = 1;
+
+	shrinker_register(nfsd_file_shrinker);
+
 	ret = lease_register_notifier(&nfsd_file_lease_notifier);
 	if (ret) {
 		pr_err("nfsd: unable to register lease notifier: %d\n", ret);
@@ -774,7 +777,7 @@ nfsd_file_cache_init(void)
 out_notifier:
 	lease_unregister_notifier(&nfsd_file_lease_notifier);
 out_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&nfsd_file_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(nfsd_file_shrinker);
 out_lru:
 	list_lru_destroy(&nfsd_file_lru);
 out_err:
@@ -891,7 +894,7 @@ nfsd_file_cache_shutdown(void)
 		return;
 
 	lease_unregister_notifier(&nfsd_file_lease_notifier);
-	unregister_shrinker(&nfsd_file_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(nfsd_file_shrinker);
 	/*
 	 * make sure all callers of nfsd_file_lru_cb are done before
 	 * calling nfsd_file_cache_purge
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (11 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  9:51   ` Jan Kara
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 14/45] ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (31 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song, Jan Kara

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
---
 fs/quota/dquot.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
index 9e72bfe8bbad..c303cffdf433 100644
--- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
+++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
@@ -791,12 +791,6 @@ dqcache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	percpu_counter_read_positive(&dqstats.counter[DQST_FREE_DQUOTS]));
 }
 
-static struct shrinker dqcache_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = dqcache_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = dqcache_shrink_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
-
 /*
  * Safely release dquot and put reference to dquot.
  */
@@ -2956,6 +2950,7 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void)
 {
 	int i, ret;
 	unsigned long nr_hash, order;
+	struct shrinker *dqcache_shrinker;
 
 	printk(KERN_NOTICE "VFS: Disk quotas %s\n", __DQUOT_VERSION__);
 
@@ -2990,8 +2985,15 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void)
 	pr_info("VFS: Dquot-cache hash table entries: %ld (order %ld,"
 		" %ld bytes)\n", nr_hash, order, (PAGE_SIZE << order));
 
-	if (register_shrinker(&dqcache_shrinker, "dquota-cache"))
-		panic("Cannot register dquot shrinker");
+	dqcache_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "dquota-cache");
+	if (!dqcache_shrinker)
+		panic("Cannot allocate dquot shrinker");
+
+	dqcache_shrinker->count_objects = dqcache_shrink_count;
+	dqcache_shrinker->scan_objects = dqcache_shrink_scan;
+	dqcache_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(dqcache_shrinker);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 14/45] ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (12 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 15/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (30 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Richard Weinberger, linux-mtd

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
CC: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
---
 fs/ubifs/super.c | 22 ++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
index b08fb28d16b5..c690782388a8 100644
--- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
@@ -54,11 +54,7 @@ module_param_cb(default_version, &ubifs_default_version_ops, &ubifs_default_vers
 static struct kmem_cache *ubifs_inode_slab;
 
 /* UBIFS TNC shrinker description */
-static struct shrinker ubifs_shrinker_info = {
-	.scan_objects = ubifs_shrink_scan,
-	.count_objects = ubifs_shrink_count,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *ubifs_shrinker_info;
 
 /**
  * validate_inode - validate inode.
@@ -2373,7 +2369,7 @@ static void inode_slab_ctor(void *obj)
 
 static int __init ubifs_init(void)
 {
-	int err;
+	int err = -ENOMEM;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct ubifs_ch) != 24);
 
@@ -2439,10 +2435,16 @@ static int __init ubifs_init(void)
 	if (!ubifs_inode_slab)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	err = register_shrinker(&ubifs_shrinker_info, "ubifs-slab");
-	if (err)
+	ubifs_shrinker_info = shrinker_alloc(0, "ubifs-slab");
+	if (!ubifs_shrinker_info)
 		goto out_slab;
 
+	ubifs_shrinker_info->count_objects = ubifs_shrink_count;
+	ubifs_shrinker_info->scan_objects = ubifs_shrink_scan;
+	ubifs_shrinker_info->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(ubifs_shrinker_info);
+
 	err = ubifs_compressors_init();
 	if (err)
 		goto out_shrinker;
@@ -2467,7 +2469,7 @@ static int __init ubifs_init(void)
 	dbg_debugfs_exit();
 	ubifs_compressors_exit();
 out_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&ubifs_shrinker_info);
+	shrinker_free(ubifs_shrinker_info);
 out_slab:
 	kmem_cache_destroy(ubifs_inode_slab);
 	return err;
@@ -2483,7 +2485,7 @@ static void __exit ubifs_exit(void)
 	dbg_debugfs_exit();
 	ubifs_sysfs_exit();
 	ubifs_compressors_exit();
-	unregister_shrinker(&ubifs_shrinker_info);
+	shrinker_free(ubifs_shrinker_info);
 
 	/*
 	 * Make sure all delayed rcu free inodes are flushed before we
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 15/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (13 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 14/45] ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (29 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Joel Fernandes, rcu

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
CC: rcu@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h | 20 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
index 5598212d1f27..e1c59c33738a 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_nocb.h
@@ -1396,13 +1396,6 @@ lazy_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 
 	return count ? count : SHRINK_STOP;
 }
-
-static struct shrinker lazy_rcu_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan,
-	.batch = 0,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
 #endif // #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
 
 void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
@@ -1410,6 +1403,7 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
 	int cpu;
 	struct rcu_data *rdp;
 	const struct cpumask *cpumask = NULL;
+	struct shrinker * __maybe_unused lazy_rcu_shrinker;
 
 #if defined(CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL)
 	if (tick_nohz_full_running && !cpumask_empty(tick_nohz_full_mask))
@@ -1436,8 +1430,16 @@ void __init rcu_init_nohz(void)
 		return;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
-	if (register_shrinker(&lazy_rcu_shrinker, "rcu-lazy"))
-		pr_err("Failed to register lazy_rcu shrinker!\n");
+	lazy_rcu_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "rcu-lazy");
+	if (!lazy_rcu_shrinker) {
+		pr_err("Failed to allocate lazy_rcu shrinker!\n");
+	} else {
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->count_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_count;
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->scan_objects = lazy_rcu_shrink_scan;
+		lazy_rcu_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+		shrinker_register(lazy_rcu_shrinker);
+	}
 #endif // #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_LAZY
 
 	if (!cpumask_subset(rcu_nocb_mask, cpu_possible_mask)) {
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (14 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 15/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 17/45] mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers Qi Zheng
                   ` (28 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Joel Fernandes,
	Muchun Song, rcu

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: rcu@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index cb1caefa8bd0..6d2f82f79c65 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3449,13 +3449,6 @@ kfree_rcu_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	return freed == 0 ? SHRINK_STOP : freed;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker kfree_rcu_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_scan,
-	.batch = 0,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
-
 void __init kfree_rcu_scheduler_running(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
@@ -4931,6 +4924,7 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
 {
 	int cpu;
 	int i, j;
+	struct shrinker *kfree_rcu_shrinker;
 
 	/* Clamp it to [0:100] seconds interval. */
 	if (rcu_delay_page_cache_fill_msec < 0 ||
@@ -4962,8 +4956,18 @@ static void __init kfree_rcu_batch_init(void)
 		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&krcp->page_cache_work, fill_page_cache_func);
 		krcp->initialized = true;
 	}
-	if (register_shrinker(&kfree_rcu_shrinker, "rcu-kfree"))
-		pr_err("Failed to register kfree_rcu() shrinker!\n");
+
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "rcu-kfree");
+	if (!kfree_rcu_shrinker) {
+		pr_err("Failed to allocate kfree_rcu() shrinker!\n");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->count_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_count;
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->scan_objects = kfree_rcu_shrink_scan;
+	kfree_rcu_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(kfree_rcu_shrinker);
 }
 
 void __init rcu_init(void)
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 17/45] mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (15 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 18/45] sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (27 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the thp-zero and thp-deferred_split
shrinkers.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/huge_memory.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
index 3e9443082035..3c9c692e3376 100644
--- a/mm/huge_memory.c
+++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
@@ -65,7 +65,11 @@ unsigned long transparent_hugepage_flags __read_mostly =
 	(1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_DEFRAG_KHUGEPAGED_FLAG)|
 	(1<<TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE_USE_ZERO_PAGE_FLAG);
 
-static struct shrinker deferred_split_shrinker;
+static struct shrinker *deferred_split_shrinker;
+static unsigned long deferred_split_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
+					  struct shrink_control *sc);
+static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
+					 struct shrink_control *sc);
 
 static atomic_t huge_zero_refcount;
 struct page *huge_zero_page __read_mostly;
@@ -229,11 +233,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_huge_zero_page_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker huge_zero_page_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = shrink_huge_zero_page_count,
-	.scan_objects = shrink_huge_zero_page_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *huge_zero_page_shrinker;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSFS
 static ssize_t enabled_show(struct kobject *kobj,
@@ -454,6 +454,40 @@ static inline void hugepage_exit_sysfs(struct kobject *hugepage_kobj)
 }
 #endif /* CONFIG_SYSFS */
 
+static int __init thp_shrinker_init(void)
+{
+	huge_zero_page_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "thp-zero");
+	if (!huge_zero_page_shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	deferred_split_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE |
+						 SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE |
+						 SHRINKER_NONSLAB,
+						 "thp-deferred_split");
+	if (!deferred_split_shrinker) {
+		shrinker_free(huge_zero_page_shrinker);
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	}
+
+	huge_zero_page_shrinker->count_objects = shrink_huge_zero_page_count;
+	huge_zero_page_shrinker->scan_objects = shrink_huge_zero_page_scan;
+	huge_zero_page_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	shrinker_register(huge_zero_page_shrinker);
+
+	deferred_split_shrinker->count_objects = deferred_split_count;
+	deferred_split_shrinker->scan_objects = deferred_split_scan;
+	deferred_split_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	shrinker_register(deferred_split_shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __init thp_shrinker_exit(void)
+{
+	shrinker_free(huge_zero_page_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(deferred_split_shrinker);
+}
+
 static int __init hugepage_init(void)
 {
 	int err;
@@ -482,12 +516,9 @@ static int __init hugepage_init(void)
 	if (err)
 		goto err_slab;
 
-	err = register_shrinker(&huge_zero_page_shrinker, "thp-zero");
-	if (err)
-		goto err_hzp_shrinker;
-	err = register_shrinker(&deferred_split_shrinker, "thp-deferred_split");
+	err = thp_shrinker_init();
 	if (err)
-		goto err_split_shrinker;
+		goto err_shrinker;
 
 	/*
 	 * By default disable transparent hugepages on smaller systems,
@@ -505,10 +536,8 @@ static int __init hugepage_init(void)
 
 	return 0;
 err_khugepaged:
-	unregister_shrinker(&deferred_split_shrinker);
-err_split_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&huge_zero_page_shrinker);
-err_hzp_shrinker:
+	thp_shrinker_exit();
+err_shrinker:
 	khugepaged_destroy();
 err_slab:
 	hugepage_exit_sysfs(hugepage_kobj);
@@ -2828,7 +2857,7 @@ void deferred_split_folio(struct folio *folio)
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 		if (memcg)
 			set_shrinker_bit(memcg, folio_nid(folio),
-					 deferred_split_shrinker.id);
+					 deferred_split_shrinker->id);
 #endif
 	}
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ds_queue->split_queue_lock, flags);
@@ -2902,14 +2931,6 @@ static unsigned long deferred_split_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	return split;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker deferred_split_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = deferred_split_count,
-	.scan_objects = deferred_split_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-	.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE |
-		 SHRINKER_NONSLAB,
-};
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS
 static void split_huge_pages_all(void)
 {
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 18/45] sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (16 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 17/45] mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 19/45] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (26 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chuck Lever, Jeff Layton, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo,
	Tom Talpey, Trond Myklebust, Anna Schumaker, linux-nfs, netdev

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
CC: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
CC: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
CC: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>
CC: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
CC: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
CC: Anna Schumaker <anna@kernel.org>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
CC: netdev@vger.kernel.org
---
 net/sunrpc/auth.c | 21 +++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sunrpc/auth.c b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
index 2f16f9d17966..0cc52e39f859 100644
--- a/net/sunrpc/auth.c
+++ b/net/sunrpc/auth.c
@@ -861,11 +861,7 @@ rpcauth_uptodatecred(struct rpc_task *task)
 		test_bit(RPCAUTH_CRED_UPTODATE, &cred->cr_flags) != 0;
 }
 
-static struct shrinker rpc_cred_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = rpcauth_cache_shrink_count,
-	.scan_objects = rpcauth_cache_shrink_scan,
-	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
-};
+static struct shrinker *rpc_cred_shrinker;
 
 int __init rpcauth_init_module(void)
 {
@@ -874,9 +870,18 @@ int __init rpcauth_init_module(void)
 	err = rpc_init_authunix();
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto out1;
-	err = register_shrinker(&rpc_cred_shrinker, "sunrpc_cred");
-	if (err < 0)
+	rpc_cred_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "sunrpc_cred");
+	if (!rpc_cred_shrinker) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out2;
+	}
+
+	rpc_cred_shrinker->count_objects = rpcauth_cache_shrink_count;
+	rpc_cred_shrinker->scan_objects = rpcauth_cache_shrink_scan;
+	rpc_cred_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+
+	shrinker_register(rpc_cred_shrinker);
+
 	return 0;
 out2:
 	rpc_destroy_authunix();
@@ -887,5 +892,5 @@ int __init rpcauth_init_module(void)
 void rpcauth_remove_module(void)
 {
 	rpc_destroy_authunix();
-	unregister_shrinker(&rpc_cred_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(rpc_cred_shrinker);
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 19/45] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (17 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 18/45] sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 20/45] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (25 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/workingset.c | 27 ++++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/workingset.c b/mm/workingset.c
index da58a26d0d4d..3c53138903a7 100644
--- a/mm/workingset.c
+++ b/mm/workingset.c
@@ -763,13 +763,6 @@ static unsigned long scan_shadow_nodes(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 					NULL);
 }
 
-static struct shrinker workingset_shadow_shrinker = {
-	.count_objects = count_shadow_nodes,
-	.scan_objects = scan_shadow_nodes,
-	.seeks = 0, /* ->count reports only fully expendable nodes */
-	.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
-};
-
 /*
  * Our list_lru->lock is IRQ-safe as it nests inside the IRQ-safe
  * i_pages lock.
@@ -778,9 +771,10 @@ static struct lock_class_key shadow_nodes_key;
 
 static int __init workingset_init(void)
 {
+	struct shrinker *workingset_shadow_shrinker;
 	unsigned int timestamp_bits;
 	unsigned int max_order;
-	int ret;
+	int ret = -ENOMEM;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(BITS_PER_LONG < EVICTION_SHIFT);
 	/*
@@ -797,17 +791,24 @@ static int __init workingset_init(void)
 	pr_info("workingset: timestamp_bits=%d max_order=%d bucket_order=%u\n",
 	       timestamp_bits, max_order, bucket_order);
 
-	ret = prealloc_shrinker(&workingset_shadow_shrinker, "mm-shadow");
-	if (ret)
+	workingset_shadow_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE |
+						    SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
+						    "mm-shadow");
+	if (!workingset_shadow_shrinker)
 		goto err;
+
 	ret = __list_lru_init(&shadow_nodes, true, &shadow_nodes_key,
-			      &workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+			      workingset_shadow_shrinker);
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_list_lru;
-	register_shrinker_prepared(&workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+
+	workingset_shadow_shrinker->count_objects = count_shadow_nodes;
+	workingset_shadow_shrinker->scan_objects = scan_shadow_nodes;
+
+	shrinker_register(workingset_shadow_shrinker);
 	return 0;
 err_list_lru:
-	free_prealloced_shrinker(&workingset_shadow_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(workingset_shadow_shrinker);
 err:
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 20/45] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (18 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 19/45] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 21/45] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (24 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Daniel Vetter, Jani Nikula, Joonas Lahtinen, Rodrigo Vivi,
	Tvrtko Ursulin, David Airlie, dri-devel

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct drm_i915_private.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CC: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
CC: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
CC: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
CC: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c | 30 +++++++++++---------
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h              |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
index 214763942aa2..4504eb4f31d5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -284,8 +284,7 @@ unsigned long i915_gem_shrink_all(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 static unsigned long
 i915_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct drm_i915_private, mm.shrinker);
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = shrinker->private_data;
 	unsigned long num_objects;
 	unsigned long count;
 
@@ -302,8 +301,8 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 	if (num_objects) {
 		unsigned long avg = 2 * count / num_objects;
 
-		i915->mm.shrinker.batch =
-			max((i915->mm.shrinker.batch + avg) >> 1,
+		i915->mm.shrinker->batch =
+			max((i915->mm.shrinker->batch + avg) >> 1,
 			    128ul /* default SHRINK_BATCH */);
 	}
 
@@ -313,8 +312,7 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 static unsigned long
 i915_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct drm_i915_private *i915 =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct drm_i915_private, mm.shrinker);
+	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = shrinker->private_data;
 	unsigned long freed;
 
 	sc->nr_scanned = 0;
@@ -422,12 +420,18 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr
 
 void i915_gem_driver_register__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 {
-	i915->mm.shrinker.scan_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_scan;
-	i915->mm.shrinker.count_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_count;
-	i915->mm.shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	i915->mm.shrinker.batch = 4096;
-	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, register_shrinker(&i915->mm.shrinker,
-						  "drm-i915_gem"));
+	i915->mm.shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "drm-i915_gem");
+	if (!i915->mm.shrinker) {
+		drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, 1);
+	} else {
+		i915->mm.shrinker->scan_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_scan;
+		i915->mm.shrinker->count_objects = i915_gem_shrinker_count;
+		i915->mm.shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+		i915->mm.shrinker->batch = 4096;
+		i915->mm.shrinker->private_data = i915;
+
+		shrinker_register(i915->mm.shrinker);
+	}
 
 	i915->mm.oom_notifier.notifier_call = i915_gem_shrinker_oom;
 	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm, register_oom_notifier(&i915->mm.oom_notifier));
@@ -443,7 +447,7 @@ void i915_gem_driver_unregister__shrinker(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
 		    unregister_vmap_purge_notifier(&i915->mm.vmap_notifier));
 	drm_WARN_ON(&i915->drm,
 		    unregister_oom_notifier(&i915->mm.oom_notifier));
-	unregister_shrinker(&i915->mm.shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(i915->mm.shrinker);
 }
 
 void i915_gem_shrinker_taints_mutex(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
index 7a8ce7239bc9..f2f21da4d7f9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ struct i915_gem_mm {
 
 	struct notifier_block oom_notifier;
 	struct notifier_block vmap_notifier;
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MMU_NOTIFIER
 	/**
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 21/45] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (19 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 20/45] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 22/45] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (23 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Daniel Vetter, Rob Clark, Abhinav Kumar, Dmitry Baryshkov,
	Sean Paul, Marijn Suijten, David Airlie, linux-arm-msm,
	dri-devel

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct msm_drm_private.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CC: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
CC: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
CC: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
CC: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
CC: Marijn Suijten <marijn.suijten@somainline.org>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
CC: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c          |  4 ++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h          |  4 +--
 drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++----------
 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 4bd028fa7500..7f20249d6071 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@ -462,7 +462,9 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, const struct drm_driver *drv)
 	if (ret)
 		goto err_msm_uninit;
 
-	msm_gem_shrinker_init(ddev);
+	ret = msm_gem_shrinker_init(ddev);
+	if (ret)
+		goto err_msm_uninit;
 
 	if (priv->kms_init) {
 		ret = priv->kms_init(ddev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
index 02fd6c7d0bb7..e2fc56f161b5 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
 	} vram;
 
 	struct notifier_block vmap_notifier;
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
 	struct drm_atomic_state *pm_state;
 
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@ int msm_ioctl_gem_submit(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
 unsigned long msm_gem_shrinker_shrink(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long nr_to_scan);
 #endif
 
-void msm_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev);
+int msm_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev);
 void msm_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev);
 
 struct sg_table *msm_gem_prime_get_sg_table(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
index f38296ad8743..20699993e4f8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -34,8 +34,7 @@ static bool can_block(struct shrink_control *sc)
 static unsigned long
 msm_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct msm_drm_private *priv =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct msm_drm_private, shrinker);
+	struct msm_drm_private *priv = shrinker->private_data;
 	unsigned count = priv->lru.dontneed.count;
 
 	if (can_swap())
@@ -100,8 +99,7 @@ active_evict(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
 static unsigned long
 msm_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct msm_drm_private *priv =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct msm_drm_private, shrinker);
+	struct msm_drm_private *priv = shrinker->private_data;
 	struct {
 		struct drm_gem_lru *lru;
 		bool (*shrink)(struct drm_gem_object *obj);
@@ -148,10 +146,11 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_shrink(struct drm_device *dev, unsigned long nr_to_scan)
 	struct shrink_control sc = {
 		.nr_to_scan = nr_to_scan,
 	};
-	int ret;
+	unsigned long ret = SHRINK_STOP;
 
 	fs_reclaim_acquire(GFP_KERNEL);
-	ret = msm_gem_shrinker_scan(&priv->shrinker, &sc);
+	if (priv->shrinker)
+		ret = msm_gem_shrinker_scan(priv->shrinker, &sc);
 	fs_reclaim_release(GFP_KERNEL);
 
 	return ret;
@@ -210,16 +209,25 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
  *
  * This function registers and sets up the msm shrinker.
  */
-void msm_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev)
+int msm_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
-	priv->shrinker.count_objects = msm_gem_shrinker_count;
-	priv->shrinker.scan_objects = msm_gem_shrinker_scan;
-	priv->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	WARN_ON(register_shrinker(&priv->shrinker, "drm-msm_gem"));
+
+	priv->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "drm-msm_gem");
+	if (!priv->shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	priv->shrinker->count_objects = msm_gem_shrinker_count;
+	priv->shrinker->scan_objects = msm_gem_shrinker_scan;
+	priv->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	priv->shrinker->private_data = priv;
+
+	shrinker_register(priv->shrinker);
 
 	priv->vmap_notifier.notifier_call = msm_gem_shrinker_vmap;
 	WARN_ON(register_vmap_purge_notifier(&priv->vmap_notifier));
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -232,8 +240,8 @@ void msm_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct msm_drm_private *priv = dev->dev_private;
 
-	if (priv->shrinker.nr_deferred) {
+	if (priv->shrinker) {
 		WARN_ON(unregister_vmap_purge_notifier(&priv->vmap_notifier));
-		unregister_shrinker(&priv->shrinker);
+		shrinker_free(priv->shrinker);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 22/45] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (20 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 21/45] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 23/45] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (22 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Daniel Vetter,
	Rob Herring, Tomeu Vizoso, Alyssa Rosenzweig, David Airlie,
	dri-devel

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct panfrost_device.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
CC: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
CC: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@collabora.com>
CC: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa.rosenzweig@collabora.com>
CC: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>
CC: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h    |  2 +-
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c       |  6 +++-
 drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h       |  2 +-
 .../gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c  | 30 +++++++++++--------
 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
index b0126b9fbadc..e667e5689353 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_device.h
@@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ struct panfrost_device {
 
 	struct mutex shrinker_lock;
 	struct list_head shrinker_list;
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
 	struct panfrost_devfreq pfdevfreq;
 };
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
index a2ab99698ca8..e1d0e3a23757 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_drv.c
@@ -601,10 +601,14 @@ static int panfrost_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (err < 0)
 		goto err_out1;
 
-	panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(ddev);
+	err = panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(ddev);
+	if (err)
+		goto err_out2;
 
 	return 0;
 
+err_out2:
+	drm_dev_unregister(ddev);
 err_out1:
 	pm_runtime_disable(pfdev->dev);
 	panfrost_device_fini(pfdev);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h
index ad2877eeeccd..863d2ec8d4f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem.h
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ panfrost_gem_mapping_get(struct panfrost_gem_object *bo,
 void panfrost_gem_mapping_put(struct panfrost_gem_mapping *mapping);
 void panfrost_gem_teardown_mappings_locked(struct panfrost_gem_object *bo);
 
-void panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev);
+int panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev);
 void panfrost_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev);
 
 #endif /* __PANFROST_GEM_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c
index 6a71a2555f85..3dfe2b7ccdd9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/panfrost/panfrost_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -18,8 +18,7 @@
 static unsigned long
 panfrost_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct panfrost_device *pfdev =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct panfrost_device, shrinker);
+	struct panfrost_device *pfdev = shrinker->private_data;
 	struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem;
 	unsigned long count = 0;
 
@@ -65,8 +64,7 @@ static bool panfrost_gem_purge(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
 static unsigned long
 panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct panfrost_device *pfdev =
-		container_of(shrinker, struct panfrost_device, shrinker);
+	struct panfrost_device *pfdev = shrinker->private_data;
 	struct drm_gem_shmem_object *shmem, *tmp;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
 
@@ -97,13 +95,22 @@ panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
  *
  * This function registers and sets up the panfrost shrinker.
  */
-void panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev)
+int panfrost_gem_shrinker_init(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct panfrost_device *pfdev = dev->dev_private;
-	pfdev->shrinker.count_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_count;
-	pfdev->shrinker.scan_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan;
-	pfdev->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	WARN_ON(register_shrinker(&pfdev->shrinker, "drm-panfrost"));
+
+	pfdev->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "drm-panfrost");
+	if (!pfdev->shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pfdev->shrinker->count_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_count;
+	pfdev->shrinker->scan_objects = panfrost_gem_shrinker_scan;
+	pfdev->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	pfdev->shrinker->private_data = pfdev;
+
+	shrinker_register(pfdev->shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /**
@@ -116,7 +123,6 @@ void panfrost_gem_shrinker_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev)
 {
 	struct panfrost_device *pfdev = dev->dev_private;
 
-	if (pfdev->shrinker.nr_deferred) {
-		unregister_shrinker(&pfdev->shrinker);
-	}
+	if (pfdev->shrinker)
+		shrinker_free(pfdev->shrinker);
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 23/45] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (21 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 22/45] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 24/45] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (21 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct dm_bufio_client.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
CC: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
CC: dm-devel@redhat.com
---
 drivers/md/dm-bufio.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
index bc309e41d074..62eb27639c9b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-bufio.c
@@ -963,7 +963,7 @@ struct dm_bufio_client {
 
 	sector_t start;
 
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 	struct work_struct shrink_work;
 	atomic_long_t need_shrink;
 
@@ -2368,7 +2368,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
 {
 	struct dm_bufio_client *c;
 
-	c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+	c = shrink->private_data;
 	atomic_long_add(sc->nr_to_scan, &c->need_shrink);
 	queue_work(dm_bufio_wq, &c->shrink_work);
 
@@ -2377,7 +2377,7 @@ static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink
 
 static unsigned long dm_bufio_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct dm_bufio_client *c = container_of(shrink, struct dm_bufio_client, shrinker);
+	struct dm_bufio_client *c = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long count = cache_total(&c->cache);
 	unsigned long retain_target = get_retain_buffers(c);
 	unsigned long queued_for_cleanup = atomic_long_read(&c->need_shrink);
@@ -2490,14 +2490,20 @@ struct dm_bufio_client *dm_bufio_client_create(struct block_device *bdev, unsign
 	INIT_WORK(&c->shrink_work, shrink_work);
 	atomic_long_set(&c->need_shrink, 0);
 
-	c->shrinker.count_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_count;
-	c->shrinker.scan_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_scan;
-	c->shrinker.seeks = 1;
-	c->shrinker.batch = 0;
-	r = register_shrinker(&c->shrinker, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
-			      MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
-	if (r)
+	c->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "dm-bufio:(%u:%u)",
+				     MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
+	if (!c->shrinker) {
+		r = -ENOMEM;
 		goto bad;
+	}
+
+	c->shrinker->count_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_count;
+	c->shrinker->scan_objects = dm_bufio_shrink_scan;
+	c->shrinker->seeks = 1;
+	c->shrinker->batch = 0;
+	c->shrinker->private_data = c;
+
+	shrinker_register(c->shrinker);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
 	dm_bufio_client_count++;
@@ -2537,7 +2543,7 @@ void dm_bufio_client_destroy(struct dm_bufio_client *c)
 
 	drop_buffers(c);
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&c->shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(c->shrinker);
 	flush_work(&c->shrink_work);
 
 	mutex_lock(&dm_bufio_clients_lock);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 24/45] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (22 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 23/45] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (20 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Alasdair Kergon, Mike Snitzer, dm-devel

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct dmz_metadata.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
CC: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>
CC: dm-devel@redhat.com
---
 drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c | 29 +++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
index 9d3cca8e3dc9..bbb0e69a7908 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-zoned-metadata.c
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ struct dmz_metadata {
 	struct rb_root		mblk_rbtree;
 	struct list_head	mblk_lru_list;
 	struct list_head	mblk_dirty_list;
-	struct shrinker		mblk_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*mblk_shrinker;
 
 	/* Zone allocation management */
 	struct mutex		map_lock;
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ static unsigned long dmz_shrink_mblock_cache(struct dmz_metadata *zmd,
 static unsigned long dmz_mblock_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 					       struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = container_of(shrink, struct dmz_metadata, mblk_shrinker);
+	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = shrink->private_data;
 
 	return atomic_read(&zmd->nr_mblks);
 }
@@ -626,7 +626,7 @@ static unsigned long dmz_mblock_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long dmz_mblock_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 					      struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = container_of(shrink, struct dmz_metadata, mblk_shrinker);
+	struct dmz_metadata *zmd = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long count;
 
 	spin_lock(&zmd->mblk_lock);
@@ -2936,19 +2936,24 @@ int dmz_ctr_metadata(struct dmz_dev *dev, int num_dev,
 	 */
 	zmd->min_nr_mblks = 2 + zmd->nr_map_blocks + zmd->zone_nr_bitmap_blocks * 16;
 	zmd->max_nr_mblks = zmd->min_nr_mblks + 512;
-	zmd->mblk_shrinker.count_objects = dmz_mblock_shrinker_count;
-	zmd->mblk_shrinker.scan_objects = dmz_mblock_shrinker_scan;
-	zmd->mblk_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
 
 	/* Metadata cache shrinker */
-	ret = register_shrinker(&zmd->mblk_shrinker, "dm-zoned-meta:(%u:%u)",
-				MAJOR(dev->bdev->bd_dev),
-				MINOR(dev->bdev->bd_dev));
-	if (ret) {
-		dmz_zmd_err(zmd, "Register metadata cache shrinker failed");
+	zmd->mblk_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0,  "dm-zoned-meta:(%u:%u)",
+					    MAJOR(dev->bdev->bd_dev),
+					    MINOR(dev->bdev->bd_dev));
+	if (!zmd->mblk_shrinker) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		dmz_zmd_err(zmd, "Allocate metadata cache shrinker failed");
 		goto err;
 	}
 
+	zmd->mblk_shrinker->count_objects = dmz_mblock_shrinker_count;
+	zmd->mblk_shrinker->scan_objects = dmz_mblock_shrinker_scan;
+	zmd->mblk_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	zmd->mblk_shrinker->private_data = zmd;
+
+	shrinker_register(zmd->mblk_shrinker);
+
 	dmz_zmd_info(zmd, "DM-Zoned metadata version %d", zmd->sb_version);
 	for (i = 0; i < zmd->nr_devs; i++)
 		dmz_print_dev(zmd, i);
@@ -2995,7 +3000,7 @@ int dmz_ctr_metadata(struct dmz_dev *dev, int num_dev,
  */
 void dmz_dtr_metadata(struct dmz_metadata *zmd)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&zmd->mblk_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(zmd->mblk_shrinker);
 	dmz_cleanup_metadata(zmd);
 	kfree(zmd);
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (23 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 24/45] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:55   ` Song Liu
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 26/45] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (19 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Song Liu, linux-raid

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct r5conf.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
CC: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/md/raid5.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/md/raid5.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
index 4cb9c608ee19..c8d2c6e50aa1 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -7401,7 +7401,7 @@ static void free_conf(struct r5conf *conf)
 
 	log_exit(conf);
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&conf->shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(conf->shrinker);
 	free_thread_groups(conf);
 	shrink_stripes(conf);
 	raid5_free_percpu(conf);
@@ -7449,7 +7449,7 @@ static int raid5_alloc_percpu(struct r5conf *conf)
 static unsigned long raid5_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				      struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct r5conf *conf = container_of(shrink, struct r5conf, shrinker);
+	struct r5conf *conf = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long ret = SHRINK_STOP;
 
 	if (mutex_trylock(&conf->cache_size_mutex)) {
@@ -7470,7 +7470,7 @@ static unsigned long raid5_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long raid5_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				       struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct r5conf *conf = container_of(shrink, struct r5conf, shrinker);
+	struct r5conf *conf = shrink->private_data;
 
 	if (conf->max_nr_stripes < conf->min_nr_stripes)
 		/* unlikely, but not impossible */
@@ -7705,18 +7705,22 @@ static struct r5conf *setup_conf(struct mddev *mddev)
 	 * it reduces the queue depth and so can hurt throughput.
 	 * So set it rather large, scaled by number of devices.
 	 */
-	conf->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS * conf->raid_disks * 4;
-	conf->shrinker.scan_objects = raid5_cache_scan;
-	conf->shrinker.count_objects = raid5_cache_count;
-	conf->shrinker.batch = 128;
-	conf->shrinker.flags = 0;
-	ret = register_shrinker(&conf->shrinker, "md-raid5:%s", mdname(mddev));
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_warn("md/raid:%s: couldn't register shrinker.\n",
+	conf->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "md-raid5:%s", mdname(mddev));
+	if (!conf->shrinker) {
+		ret = -ENOMEM;
+		pr_warn("md/raid:%s: couldn't allocate shrinker.\n",
 			mdname(mddev));
 		goto abort;
 	}
 
+	conf->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS * conf->raid_disks * 4;
+	conf->shrinker->scan_objects = raid5_cache_scan;
+	conf->shrinker->count_objects = raid5_cache_count;
+	conf->shrinker->batch = 128;
+	conf->shrinker->private_data = conf;
+
+	shrinker_register(conf->shrinker);
+
 	sprintf(pers_name, "raid%d", mddev->new_level);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(conf->thread,
 			   md_register_thread(raid5d, mddev, pers_name));
diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.h b/drivers/md/raid5.h
index 97a795979a35..22bea20eccbd 100644
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@ struct r5conf {
 	wait_queue_head_t	wait_for_stripe;
 	wait_queue_head_t	wait_for_overlap;
 	unsigned long		cache_state;
-	struct shrinker		shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*shrinker;
 	int			pool_size; /* number of disks in stripeheads in pool */
 	spinlock_t		device_lock;
 	struct disk_info	*disks;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 26/45] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (24 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (18 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Coly Li,
	Kent Overstreet, linux-bcache

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct cache_set.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
CC: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
CC: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
CC: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
---
 drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h |  2 +-
 drivers/md/bcache/btree.c  | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
 drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c  |  3 ++-
 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
index 5a79bb3c272f..c622bc50f81b 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/bcache.h
@@ -541,7 +541,7 @@ struct cache_set {
 	struct bio_set		bio_split;
 
 	/* For the btree cache */
-	struct shrinker		shrink;
+	struct shrinker		*shrink;
 
 	/* For the btree cache and anything allocation related */
 	struct mutex		bucket_lock;
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
index fd121a61f17c..ae5cbb55861f 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/btree.c
@@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int mca_reap(struct btree *b, unsigned int min_order, bool flush)
 static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				  struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct cache_set *c = container_of(shrink, struct cache_set, shrink);
+	struct cache_set *c = shrink->private_data;
 	struct btree *b, *t;
 	unsigned long i, nr = sc->nr_to_scan;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
@@ -734,7 +734,7 @@ static unsigned long bch_mca_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long bch_mca_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				   struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct cache_set *c = container_of(shrink, struct cache_set, shrink);
+	struct cache_set *c = shrink->private_data;
 
 	if (c->shrinker_disabled)
 		return 0;
@@ -752,8 +752,8 @@ void bch_btree_cache_free(struct cache_set *c)
 
 	closure_init_stack(&cl);
 
-	if (c->shrink.list.next)
-		unregister_shrinker(&c->shrink);
+	if (c->shrink)
+		shrinker_free(c->shrink);
 
 	mutex_lock(&c->bucket_lock);
 
@@ -828,14 +828,19 @@ int bch_btree_cache_alloc(struct cache_set *c)
 		c->verify_data = NULL;
 #endif
 
-	c->shrink.count_objects = bch_mca_count;
-	c->shrink.scan_objects = bch_mca_scan;
-	c->shrink.seeks = 4;
-	c->shrink.batch = c->btree_pages * 2;
+	c->shrink = shrinker_alloc(0, "md-bcache:%pU", c->set_uuid);
+	if (!c->shrink) {
+		pr_warn("bcache: %s: could not allocate shrinker\n", __func__);
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	c->shrink->count_objects = bch_mca_count;
+	c->shrink->scan_objects = bch_mca_scan;
+	c->shrink->seeks = 4;
+	c->shrink->batch = c->btree_pages * 2;
+	c->shrink->private_data = c;
 
-	if (register_shrinker(&c->shrink, "md-bcache:%pU", c->set_uuid))
-		pr_warn("bcache: %s: could not register shrinker\n",
-				__func__);
+	shrinker_register(c->shrink);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
index 0e2c1880f60b..45d8af755de6 100644
--- a/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/sysfs.c
@@ -866,7 +866,8 @@ STORE(__bch_cache_set)
 
 		sc.gfp_mask = GFP_KERNEL;
 		sc.nr_to_scan = strtoul_or_return(buf);
-		c->shrink.scan_objects(&c->shrink, &sc);
+		if (c->shrink)
+			c->shrink->scan_objects(c->shrink, &sc);
 	}
 
 	sysfs_strtoul_clamp(congested_read_threshold_us,
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (25 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 26/45] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24 15:28   ` Nadav Amit
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 28/45] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (17 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Nadav Amit, VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers, Arnd Bergmann

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct vmballoon.

And we can simply exit vmballoon_init() when registering the shrinker
fails. So the shrinker_registered indication is redundant, just remove it.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Nadav Amit <namit@vmware.com>
CC: VMware PV-Drivers Reviewers <pv-drivers@vmware.com>
CC: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c | 38 ++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
index 9ce9b9e0e9b6..ac2cdb6cdf74 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/vmw_balloon.c
@@ -380,16 +380,7 @@ struct vmballoon {
 	/**
 	 * @shrinker: shrinker interface that is used to avoid over-inflation.
 	 */
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
-
-	/**
-	 * @shrinker_registered: whether the shrinker was registered.
-	 *
-	 * The shrinker interface does not handle gracefully the removal of
-	 * shrinker that was not registered before. This indication allows to
-	 * simplify the unregistration process.
-	 */
-	bool shrinker_registered;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 };
 
 static struct vmballoon balloon;
@@ -1568,29 +1559,27 @@ static unsigned long vmballoon_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 
 static void vmballoon_unregister_shrinker(struct vmballoon *b)
 {
-	if (b->shrinker_registered)
-		unregister_shrinker(&b->shrinker);
-	b->shrinker_registered = false;
+	shrinker_free(b->shrinker);
 }
 
 static int vmballoon_register_shrinker(struct vmballoon *b)
 {
-	int r;
-
 	/* Do nothing if the shrinker is not enabled */
 	if (!vmwballoon_shrinker_enable)
 		return 0;
 
-	b->shrinker.scan_objects = vmballoon_shrinker_scan;
-	b->shrinker.count_objects = vmballoon_shrinker_count;
-	b->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	b->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "vmw-balloon");
+	if (!b->shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	r = register_shrinker(&b->shrinker, "vmw-balloon");
+	b->shrinker->scan_objects = vmballoon_shrinker_scan;
+	b->shrinker->count_objects = vmballoon_shrinker_count;
+	b->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	b->shrinker->private_data = b;
 
-	if (r == 0)
-		b->shrinker_registered = true;
+	shrinker_register(b->shrinker);
 
-	return r;
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1883,7 +1872,7 @@ static int __init vmballoon_init(void)
 
 	error = vmballoon_register_shrinker(&balloon);
 	if (error)
-		goto fail;
+		return error;
 
 	/*
 	 * Initialization of compaction must be done after the call to
@@ -1905,9 +1894,6 @@ static int __init vmballoon_init(void)
 	vmballoon_debugfs_init(&balloon);
 
 	return 0;
-fail:
-	vmballoon_unregister_shrinker(&balloon);
-	return error;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 28/45] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (26 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 29/45] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (16 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Michael S. Tsirkin, David Hildenbrand, Jason Wang, Xuan Zhuo,
	virtualization

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct virtio_balloon.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
CC: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
CC: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
CC: Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>
CC: virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org
---
 drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c | 25 +++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
index 5b15936a5214..82e6087073a9 100644
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_balloon.c
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ struct virtio_balloon {
 	struct virtio_balloon_stat stats[VIRTIO_BALLOON_S_NR];
 
 	/* Shrinker to return free pages - VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_FREE_PAGE_HINT */
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
 	/* OOM notifier to deflate on OOM - VIRTIO_BALLOON_F_DEFLATE_ON_OOM */
 	struct notifier_block oom_nb;
@@ -816,8 +816,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_free_pages(struct virtio_balloon *vb,
 static unsigned long virtio_balloon_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 						  struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(shrinker,
-					struct virtio_balloon, shrinker);
+	struct virtio_balloon *vb = shrinker->private_data;
 
 	return shrink_free_pages(vb, sc->nr_to_scan);
 }
@@ -825,8 +824,7 @@ static unsigned long virtio_balloon_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 static unsigned long virtio_balloon_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 						   struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct virtio_balloon *vb = container_of(shrinker,
-					struct virtio_balloon, shrinker);
+	struct virtio_balloon *vb = shrinker->private_data;
 
 	return vb->num_free_page_blocks * VIRTIO_BALLOON_HINT_BLOCK_PAGES;
 }
@@ -847,16 +845,23 @@ static int virtio_balloon_oom_notify(struct notifier_block *nb,
 
 static void virtio_balloon_unregister_shrinker(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&vb->shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(vb->shrinker);
 }
 
 static int virtio_balloon_register_shrinker(struct virtio_balloon *vb)
 {
-	vb->shrinker.scan_objects = virtio_balloon_shrinker_scan;
-	vb->shrinker.count_objects = virtio_balloon_shrinker_count;
-	vb->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	vb->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "virtio-balloon");
+	if (!vb->shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	return register_shrinker(&vb->shrinker, "virtio-balloon");
+	vb->shrinker->scan_objects = virtio_balloon_shrinker_scan;
+	vb->shrinker->count_objects = virtio_balloon_shrinker_count;
+	vb->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	vb->shrinker->private_data = vb;
+
+	shrinker_register(vb->shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int virtballoon_probe(struct virtio_device *vdev)
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 29/45] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (27 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 28/45] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 30/45] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (15 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Alexander Viro

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct mb_cache.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
CC: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
---
 fs/mbcache.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/mbcache.c b/fs/mbcache.c
index 2a4b8b549e93..0d1e24e9a5e3 100644
--- a/fs/mbcache.c
+++ b/fs/mbcache.c
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ struct mb_cache {
 	struct list_head	c_list;
 	/* Number of entries in cache */
 	unsigned long		c_entry_count;
-	struct shrinker		c_shrink;
+	struct shrinker		*c_shrink;
 	/* Work for shrinking when the cache has too many entries */
 	struct work_struct	c_shrink_work;
 };
@@ -293,8 +293,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(mb_cache_entry_touch);
 static unsigned long mb_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				    struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct mb_cache *cache = container_of(shrink, struct mb_cache,
-					      c_shrink);
+	struct mb_cache *cache = shrink->private_data;
 
 	return cache->c_entry_count;
 }
@@ -333,8 +332,7 @@ static unsigned long mb_cache_shrink(struct mb_cache *cache,
 static unsigned long mb_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				   struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct mb_cache *cache = container_of(shrink, struct mb_cache,
-					      c_shrink);
+	struct mb_cache *cache = shrink->private_data;
 	return mb_cache_shrink(cache, sc->nr_to_scan);
 }
 
@@ -377,15 +375,20 @@ struct mb_cache *mb_cache_create(int bucket_bits)
 	for (i = 0; i < bucket_count; i++)
 		INIT_HLIST_BL_HEAD(&cache->c_hash[i]);
 
-	cache->c_shrink.count_objects = mb_cache_count;
-	cache->c_shrink.scan_objects = mb_cache_scan;
-	cache->c_shrink.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	if (register_shrinker(&cache->c_shrink, "mbcache-shrinker")) {
+	cache->c_shrink = shrinker_alloc(0, "mbcache-shrinker");
+	if (!cache->c_shrink) {
 		kfree(cache->c_hash);
 		kfree(cache);
 		goto err_out;
 	}
 
+	cache->c_shrink->count_objects = mb_cache_count;
+	cache->c_shrink->scan_objects = mb_cache_scan;
+	cache->c_shrink->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	cache->c_shrink->private_data = cache;
+
+	shrinker_register(cache->c_shrink);
+
 	INIT_WORK(&cache->c_shrink_work, mb_cache_shrink_worker);
 
 	return cache;
@@ -406,7 +409,7 @@ void mb_cache_destroy(struct mb_cache *cache)
 {
 	struct mb_cache_entry *entry, *next;
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&cache->c_shrink);
+	shrinker_free(cache->c_shrink);
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't bother with any locking. Cache must not be used at this
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 30/45] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (28 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 29/45] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (14 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Andreas Dilger, linux-ext4

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct ext4_sb_info.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/ext4/ext4.h           |  2 +-
 fs/ext4/extents_status.c | 24 ++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/ext4/ext4.h b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
index e5055eac42f6..353a7fcd609a 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@ -1653,7 +1653,7 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
 	__u32 s_csum_seed;
 
 	/* Reclaim extents from extent status tree */
-	struct shrinker s_es_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *s_es_shrinker;
 	struct list_head s_es_list;	/* List of inodes with reclaimable extents */
 	long s_es_nr_inode;
 	struct ext4_es_stats s_es_stats;
diff --git a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
index 9b5b8951afb4..0532a81a7669 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/extents_status.c
@@ -1596,7 +1596,7 @@ static unsigned long ext4_es_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	unsigned long nr;
 	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
 
-	sbi = container_of(shrink, struct ext4_sb_info, s_es_shrinker);
+	sbi = shrink->private_data;
 	nr = percpu_counter_read_positive(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_shk_cnt);
 	trace_ext4_es_shrink_count(sbi->s_sb, sc->nr_to_scan, nr);
 	return nr;
@@ -1605,8 +1605,7 @@ static unsigned long ext4_es_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long ext4_es_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 				  struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = container_of(shrink,
-					struct ext4_sb_info, s_es_shrinker);
+	struct ext4_sb_info *sbi = shrink->private_data;
 	int nr_to_scan = sc->nr_to_scan;
 	int ret, nr_shrunk;
 
@@ -1690,13 +1689,18 @@ int ext4_es_register_shrinker(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 	if (err)
 		goto err3;
 
-	sbi->s_es_shrinker.scan_objects = ext4_es_scan;
-	sbi->s_es_shrinker.count_objects = ext4_es_count;
-	sbi->s_es_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	err = register_shrinker(&sbi->s_es_shrinker, "ext4-es:%s",
-				sbi->s_sb->s_id);
-	if (err)
+	sbi->s_es_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "ext4-es:%s", sbi->s_sb->s_id);
+	if (!sbi->s_es_shrinker) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err4;
+	}
+
+	sbi->s_es_shrinker->scan_objects = ext4_es_scan;
+	sbi->s_es_shrinker->count_objects = ext4_es_count;
+	sbi->s_es_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	sbi->s_es_shrinker->private_data = sbi;
+
+	shrinker_register(sbi->s_es_shrinker);
 
 	return 0;
 err4:
@@ -1716,7 +1720,7 @@ void ext4_es_unregister_shrinker(struct ext4_sb_info *sbi)
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_cache_misses);
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_all_cnt);
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&sbi->s_es_stats.es_stats_shk_cnt);
-	unregister_shrinker(&sbi->s_es_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(sbi->s_es_shrinker);
 }
 
 /*
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (29 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 30/45] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  9:49   ` Jan Kara
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 32/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (13 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Jan Kara, linux-ext4

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct journal_s.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/jbd2/journal.c    | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
 include/linux/jbd2.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
index 768fa05bcbed..75692baa76e8 100644
--- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
+++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
@@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static int jbd2_min_tag_size(void)
 static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 					      struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	journal_t *journal = container_of(shrink, journal_t, j_shrinker);
+	journal_t *journal = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long nr_to_scan = sc->nr_to_scan;
 	unsigned long nr_shrunk;
 	unsigned long count;
@@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 					       struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	journal_t *journal = container_of(shrink, journal_t, j_shrinker);
+	journal_t *journal = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long count;
 
 	count = percpu_counter_read_positive(&journal->j_checkpoint_jh_count);
@@ -1588,14 +1588,22 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev,
 		goto err_cleanup;
 
 	journal->j_shrink_transaction = NULL;
-	journal->j_shrinker.scan_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_scan;
-	journal->j_shrinker.count_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_count;
-	journal->j_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	journal->j_shrinker.batch = journal->j_max_transaction_buffers;
-	err = register_shrinker(&journal->j_shrinker, "jbd2-journal:(%u:%u)",
-				MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
-	if (err)
+
+	journal->j_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "jbd2-journal:(%u:%u)",
+					     MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev),
+					     MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
+	if (!journal->j_shrinker) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
 		goto err_cleanup;
+	}
+
+	journal->j_shrinker->scan_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_scan;
+	journal->j_shrinker->count_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_count;
+	journal->j_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	journal->j_shrinker->batch = journal->j_max_transaction_buffers;
+	journal->j_shrinker->private_data = journal;
+
+	shrinker_register(journal->j_shrinker);
 
 	return journal;
 
@@ -2170,9 +2178,9 @@ int jbd2_journal_destroy(journal_t *journal)
 		brelse(journal->j_sb_buffer);
 	}
 
-	if (journal->j_shrinker.flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
+	if (journal->j_shrinker) {
 		percpu_counter_destroy(&journal->j_checkpoint_jh_count);
-		unregister_shrinker(&journal->j_shrinker);
+		shrinker_free(journal->j_shrinker);
 	}
 	if (journal->j_proc_entry)
 		jbd2_stats_proc_exit(journal);
diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
index 52772c826c86..6dcbb4eb80fb 100644
--- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
+++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
@@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ struct journal_s
 	 * Journal head shrinker, reclaim buffer's journal head which
 	 * has been written back.
 	 */
-	struct shrinker		j_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*j_shrinker;
 
 	/**
 	 * @j_checkpoint_jh_count:
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 32/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (30 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 33/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (12 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Chuck Lever,
	Jeff Layton, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey, linux-nfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct nfsd_net.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
CC: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
CC: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>
CC: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfsd/netns.h     |  2 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/netns.h b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
index ec49b200b797..f669444d5336 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/netns.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ struct nfsd_net {
 	int			nfs4_max_clients;
 
 	atomic_t		nfsd_courtesy_clients;
-	struct shrinker		nfsd_client_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*nfsd_client_shrinker;
 	struct work_struct	nfsd_shrinker_work;
 };
 
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
index 4c6a94a9699d..b2742065a813 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -4400,8 +4400,7 @@ static unsigned long
 nfsd4_state_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
 	int count;
-	struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(shrink,
-			struct nfsd_net, nfsd_client_shrinker);
+	struct nfsd_net *nn = shrink->private_data;
 
 	count = atomic_read(&nn->nfsd_courtesy_clients);
 	if (!count)
@@ -8149,12 +8148,17 @@ static int nfs4_state_create_net(struct net *net)
 	INIT_WORK(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work, nfsd4_state_shrinker_worker);
 	get_net(net);
 
-	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker.scan_objects = nfsd4_state_shrinker_scan;
-	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker.count_objects = nfsd4_state_shrinker_count;
-	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-
-	if (register_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_client_shrinker, "nfsd-client"))
+	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "nfsd-client");
+	if (!nn->nfsd_client_shrinker)
 		goto err_shrinker;
+
+	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker->scan_objects = nfsd4_state_shrinker_scan;
+	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker->count_objects = nfsd4_state_shrinker_count;
+	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	nn->nfsd_client_shrinker->private_data = nn;
+
+	shrinker_register(nn->nfsd_client_shrinker);
+
 	return 0;
 
 err_shrinker:
@@ -8252,7 +8256,7 @@ nfs4_state_shutdown_net(struct net *net)
 	struct list_head *pos, *next, reaplist;
 	struct nfsd_net *nn = net_generic(net, nfsd_net_id);
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_client_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(nn->nfsd_client_shrinker);
 	cancel_work(&nn->nfsd_shrinker_work);
 	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&nn->laundromat_work);
 	locks_end_grace(&nn->nfsd4_manager);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 33/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (31 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 32/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 34/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (11 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Chuck Lever,
	Jeff Layton, Neil Brown, Olga Kornievskaia, Dai Ngo, Tom Talpey,
	linux-nfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct nfsd_net.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Acked-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
CC: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
CC: Olga Kornievskaia <kolga@netapp.com>
CC: Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@oracle.com>
CC: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
CC: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/nfsd/netns.h    |  2 +-
 fs/nfsd/nfscache.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++---------------
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfsd/netns.h b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
index f669444d5336..ab303a8b77d5 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/netns.h
+++ b/fs/nfsd/netns.h
@@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ struct nfsd_net {
 	/* size of cache when we saw the longest hash chain */
 	unsigned int             longest_chain_cachesize;
 
-	struct shrinker		nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker;
 
 	/* tracking server-to-server copy mounts */
 	spinlock_t              nfsd_ssc_lock;
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
index 80621a709510..fd56a52aa5fb 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfscache.c
@@ -201,26 +201,29 @@ int nfsd_reply_cache_init(struct nfsd_net *nn)
 {
 	unsigned int hashsize;
 	unsigned int i;
-	int status = 0;
 
 	nn->max_drc_entries = nfsd_cache_size_limit();
 	atomic_set(&nn->num_drc_entries, 0);
 	hashsize = nfsd_hashsize(nn->max_drc_entries);
 	nn->maskbits = ilog2(hashsize);
 
-	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker.scan_objects = nfsd_reply_cache_scan;
-	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker.count_objects = nfsd_reply_cache_count;
-	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker.seeks = 1;
-	status = register_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker,
-				   "nfsd-reply:%s", nn->nfsd_name);
-	if (status)
-		return status;
-
 	nn->drc_hashtbl = kvzalloc(array_size(hashsize,
 				sizeof(*nn->drc_hashtbl)), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!nn->drc_hashtbl)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "nfsd-reply:%s",
+						       nn->nfsd_name);
+	if (!nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker)
 		goto out_shrinker;
 
+	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker->scan_objects = nfsd_reply_cache_scan;
+	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker->count_objects = nfsd_reply_cache_count;
+	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker->seeks = 1;
+	nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker->private_data = nn;
+
+	shrinker_register(nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < hashsize; i++) {
 		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nn->drc_hashtbl[i].lru_head);
 		spin_lock_init(&nn->drc_hashtbl[i].cache_lock);
@@ -229,7 +232,7 @@ int nfsd_reply_cache_init(struct nfsd_net *nn)
 
 	return 0;
 out_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
+	kvfree(nn->drc_hashtbl);
 	printk(KERN_ERR "nfsd: failed to allocate reply cache\n");
 	return -ENOMEM;
 }
@@ -239,7 +242,7 @@ void nfsd_reply_cache_shutdown(struct nfsd_net *nn)
 	struct nfsd_cacherep *rp;
 	unsigned int i;
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(nn->nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < nn->drc_hashsize; i++) {
 		struct list_head *head = &nn->drc_hashtbl[i].lru_head;
@@ -323,8 +326,7 @@ nfsd_prune_bucket_locked(struct nfsd_net *nn, struct nfsd_drc_bucket *b,
 static unsigned long
 nfsd_reply_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(shrink,
-				struct nfsd_net, nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
+	struct nfsd_net *nn = shrink->private_data;
 
 	return atomic_read(&nn->num_drc_entries);
 }
@@ -343,8 +345,7 @@ nfsd_reply_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 static unsigned long
 nfsd_reply_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
-	struct nfsd_net *nn = container_of(shrink,
-				struct nfsd_net, nfsd_reply_cache_shrinker);
+	struct nfsd_net *nn = shrink->private_data;
 	unsigned long freed = 0;
 	LIST_HEAD(dispose);
 	unsigned int i;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 34/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (32 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 33/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 35/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (10 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chandan Babu R, linux-xfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct xfs_buftarg.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
CC: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
index c1ece4a08ff4..202d4432d587 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.c
@@ -1913,8 +1913,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_buftarg	*btp = container_of(shrink,
-					struct xfs_buftarg, bt_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_buftarg	*btp = shrink->private_data;
 	LIST_HEAD(dispose);
 	unsigned long		freed;
 
@@ -1936,8 +1935,7 @@ xfs_buftarg_shrink_count(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_buftarg	*btp = container_of(shrink,
-					struct xfs_buftarg, bt_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_buftarg	*btp = shrink->private_data;
 	return list_lru_shrink_count(&btp->bt_lru, sc);
 }
 
@@ -1947,7 +1945,7 @@ xfs_free_buftarg(
 {
 	struct block_device	*bdev = btp->bt_bdev;
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(btp->bt_shrinker);
 	ASSERT(percpu_counter_sum(&btp->bt_io_count) == 0);
 	percpu_counter_destroy(&btp->bt_io_count);
 	list_lru_destroy(&btp->bt_lru);
@@ -2031,13 +2029,18 @@ xfs_alloc_buftarg(
 	if (percpu_counter_init(&btp->bt_io_count, 0, GFP_KERNEL))
 		goto error_lru;
 
-	btp->bt_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
-	btp->bt_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
-	btp->bt_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	btp->bt_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
-	if (register_shrinker(&btp->bt_shrinker, "xfs-buf:%s",
-			      mp->m_super->s_id))
+	btp->bt_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE, "xfs-buf:%s",
+					  mp->m_super->s_id);
+	if (!btp->bt_shrinker)
 		goto error_pcpu;
+
+	btp->bt_shrinker->count_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_count;
+	btp->bt_shrinker->scan_objects = xfs_buftarg_shrink_scan;
+	btp->bt_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	btp->bt_shrinker->private_data = btp;
+
+	shrinker_register(btp->bt_shrinker);
+
 	return btp;
 
 error_pcpu:
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
index df8f47953bb4..702e7d9ea2ac 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_buf.h
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_buftarg {
 	size_t			bt_logical_sectormask;
 
 	/* LRU control structures */
-	struct shrinker		bt_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*bt_shrinker;
 	struct list_lru		bt_lru;
 
 	struct percpu_counter	bt_io_count;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 35/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (33 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 34/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 36/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (9 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chandan Babu R, linux-xfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct xfs_mount.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
CC: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c | 26 +++++++++++++++-----------
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c  |  4 ++--
 fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h  |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
index e541f5c0bc25..aacc7eec2497 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_icache.c
@@ -2187,8 +2187,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_shrinker_count(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = container_of(shrink, struct xfs_mount,
-						   m_inodegc_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = shrink->private_data;
 	struct xfs_inodegc	*gc;
 	int			cpu;
 
@@ -2209,8 +2208,7 @@ xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_mount	*mp = container_of(shrink, struct xfs_mount,
-						   m_inodegc_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_mount	*mp = shrink->private_data;
 	struct xfs_inodegc	*gc;
 	int			cpu;
 	bool			no_items = true;
@@ -2246,13 +2244,19 @@ int
 xfs_inodegc_register_shrinker(
 	struct xfs_mount	*mp)
 {
-	struct shrinker		*shrink = &mp->m_inodegc_shrinker;
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NONSLAB,
+						"xfs-inodegc:%s",
+						mp->m_super->s_id);
+	if (!mp->m_inodegc_shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker->count_objects = xfs_inodegc_shrinker_count;
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker->scan_objects = xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan;
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker->seeks = 0;
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker->batch = XFS_INODEGC_SHRINKER_BATCH;
+	mp->m_inodegc_shrinker->private_data = mp;
 
-	shrink->count_objects = xfs_inodegc_shrinker_count;
-	shrink->scan_objects = xfs_inodegc_shrinker_scan;
-	shrink->seeks = 0;
-	shrink->flags = SHRINKER_NONSLAB;
-	shrink->batch = XFS_INODEGC_SHRINKER_BATCH;
+	shrinker_register(mp->m_inodegc_shrinker);
 
-	return register_shrinker(shrink, "xfs-inodegc:%s", mp->m_super->s_id);
+	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
index 0a0fd19573d8..aed5be5508fe 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.c
@@ -1021,7 +1021,7 @@ xfs_mountfs(
  out_log_dealloc:
 	xfs_log_mount_cancel(mp);
  out_inodegc_shrinker:
-	unregister_shrinker(&mp->m_inodegc_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(mp->m_inodegc_shrinker);
  out_fail_wait:
 	if (mp->m_logdev_targp && mp->m_logdev_targp != mp->m_ddev_targp)
 		xfs_buftarg_drain(mp->m_logdev_targp);
@@ -1104,7 +1104,7 @@ xfs_unmountfs(
 #if defined(DEBUG)
 	xfs_errortag_clearall(mp);
 #endif
-	unregister_shrinker(&mp->m_inodegc_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(mp->m_inodegc_shrinker);
 	xfs_free_perag(mp);
 
 	xfs_errortag_del(mp);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
index a25eece3be2b..b8796bfc9ba4 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_mount.h
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ typedef struct xfs_mount {
 	atomic_t		m_agirotor;	/* last ag dir inode alloced */
 
 	/* Memory shrinker to throttle and reprioritize inodegc */
-	struct shrinker		m_inodegc_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*m_inodegc_shrinker;
 	/*
 	 * Workqueue item so that we can coalesce multiple inode flush attempts
 	 * into a single flush.
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 36/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (34 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 35/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
                   ` (8 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chandan Babu R, linux-xfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct xfs_quotainfo.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chandan Babu R <chandan.babu@oracle.com>
CC: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
CC: linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++-------------
 fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h |  2 +-
 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
index 6abcc34fafd8..15ba23f11271 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
@@ -504,8 +504,7 @@ xfs_qm_shrink_scan(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_quotainfo	*qi = container_of(shrink,
-					struct xfs_quotainfo, qi_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_quotainfo	*qi = shrink->private_data;
 	struct xfs_qm_isolate	isol;
 	unsigned long		freed;
 	int			error;
@@ -539,8 +538,7 @@ xfs_qm_shrink_count(
 	struct shrinker		*shrink,
 	struct shrink_control	*sc)
 {
-	struct xfs_quotainfo	*qi = container_of(shrink,
-					struct xfs_quotainfo, qi_shrinker);
+	struct xfs_quotainfo	*qi = shrink->private_data;
 
 	return list_lru_shrink_count(&qi->qi_lru, sc);
 }
@@ -680,15 +678,19 @@ xfs_qm_init_quotainfo(
 	if (XFS_IS_PQUOTA_ON(mp))
 		xfs_qm_set_defquota(mp, XFS_DQTYPE_PROJ, qinf);
 
-	qinf->qi_shrinker.count_objects = xfs_qm_shrink_count;
-	qinf->qi_shrinker.scan_objects = xfs_qm_shrink_scan;
-	qinf->qi_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	qinf->qi_shrinker.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE;
-
-	error = register_shrinker(&qinf->qi_shrinker, "xfs-qm:%s",
-				  mp->m_super->s_id);
-	if (error)
+	qinf->qi_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE, "xfs-qm:%s",
+					   mp->m_super->s_id);
+	if (!qinf->qi_shrinker) {
+		error = -ENOMEM;
 		goto out_free_inos;
+	}
+
+	qinf->qi_shrinker->count_objects = xfs_qm_shrink_count;
+	qinf->qi_shrinker->scan_objects = xfs_qm_shrink_scan;
+	qinf->qi_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	qinf->qi_shrinker->private_data = qinf;
+
+	shrinker_register(qinf->qi_shrinker);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -718,7 +720,7 @@ xfs_qm_destroy_quotainfo(
 	qi = mp->m_quotainfo;
 	ASSERT(qi != NULL);
 
-	unregister_shrinker(&qi->qi_shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(qi->qi_shrinker);
 	list_lru_destroy(&qi->qi_lru);
 	xfs_qm_destroy_quotainos(qi);
 	mutex_destroy(&qi->qi_tree_lock);
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h
index 9683f0457d19..d5c9fc4ba591 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ struct xfs_quotainfo {
 	struct xfs_def_quota	qi_usr_default;
 	struct xfs_def_quota	qi_grp_default;
 	struct xfs_def_quota	qi_prj_default;
-	struct shrinker		qi_shrinker;
+	struct shrinker		*qi_shrinker;
 
 	/* Minimum and maximum quota expiration timestamp values. */
 	time64_t		qi_expiry_min;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (35 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 36/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  4:38   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 38/45] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (7 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Minchan Kim

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker, so that it can be freed
asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
critical section when releasing the struct zs_pool.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
CC: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>
---
 mm/zsmalloc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/zsmalloc.c b/mm/zsmalloc.c
index b58f957429f0..1909234bb345 100644
--- a/mm/zsmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/zsmalloc.c
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ struct zs_pool {
 	struct zs_pool_stats stats;
 
 	/* Compact classes */
-	struct shrinker shrinker;
+	struct shrinker *shrinker;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_ZSMALLOC_STAT
 	struct dentry *stat_dentry;
@@ -2086,8 +2086,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 		struct shrink_control *sc)
 {
 	unsigned long pages_freed;
-	struct zs_pool *pool = container_of(shrinker, struct zs_pool,
-			shrinker);
+	struct zs_pool *pool = shrinker->private_data;
 
 	/*
 	 * Compact classes and calculate compaction delta.
@@ -2105,8 +2104,7 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 	int i;
 	struct size_class *class;
 	unsigned long pages_to_free = 0;
-	struct zs_pool *pool = container_of(shrinker, struct zs_pool,
-			shrinker);
+	struct zs_pool *pool = shrinker->private_data;
 
 	for (i = ZS_SIZE_CLASSES - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
 		class = pool->size_class[i];
@@ -2121,18 +2119,24 @@ static unsigned long zs_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 
 static void zs_unregister_shrinker(struct zs_pool *pool)
 {
-	unregister_shrinker(&pool->shrinker);
+	shrinker_free(pool->shrinker);
 }
 
 static int zs_register_shrinker(struct zs_pool *pool)
 {
-	pool->shrinker.scan_objects = zs_shrinker_scan;
-	pool->shrinker.count_objects = zs_shrinker_count;
-	pool->shrinker.batch = 0;
-	pool->shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	pool->shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "mm-zspool:%s", pool->name);
+	if (!pool->shrinker)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	pool->shrinker->scan_objects = zs_shrinker_scan;
+	pool->shrinker->count_objects = zs_shrinker_count;
+	pool->shrinker->batch = 0;
+	pool->shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	pool->shrinker->private_data = pool;
 
-	return register_shrinker(&pool->shrinker, "mm-zspool:%s",
-				 pool->name);
+	shrinker_register(pool->shrinker);
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 static int calculate_zspage_chain_size(int class_size)
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 38/45] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (36 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 39/45] mm: shrinker: remove old APIs Qi Zheng
                   ` (6 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song,
	Chris Mason, Josef Bacik, David Sterba, Alexander Viro,
	linux-btrfs

In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
dynamically allocate the s_shrink, so that it can be freed asynchronously
via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side critical section
when releasing the struct super_block.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
CC: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
CC: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
CC: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
---
 fs/btrfs/super.c   |  2 +-
 fs/kernfs/mount.c  |  2 +-
 fs/proc/root.c     |  2 +-
 fs/super.c         | 34 +++++++++++++++++++---------------
 include/linux/fs.h |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 09bfe68d2ea3..3b165d9967bb 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1519,7 +1519,7 @@ static struct dentry *btrfs_mount_root(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 			error = -EBUSY;
 	} else {
 		snprintf(s->s_id, sizeof(s->s_id), "%pg", bdev);
-		shrinker_debugfs_rename(&s->s_shrink, "sb-%s:%s", fs_type->name,
+		shrinker_debugfs_rename(s->s_shrink, "sb-%s:%s", fs_type->name,
 					s->s_id);
 		btrfs_sb(s)->bdev_holder = fs_type;
 		error = btrfs_fill_super(s, fs_devices, data);
diff --git a/fs/kernfs/mount.c b/fs/kernfs/mount.c
index c4bf26142eec..79b96e74a8a0 100644
--- a/fs/kernfs/mount.c
+++ b/fs/kernfs/mount.c
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ static int kernfs_fill_super(struct super_block *sb, struct kernfs_fs_context *k
 	sb->s_time_gran = 1;
 
 	/* sysfs dentries and inodes don't require IO to create */
-	sb->s_shrink.seeks = 0;
+	sb->s_shrink->seeks = 0;
 
 	/* get root inode, initialize and unlock it */
 	down_read(&kf_root->kernfs_rwsem);
diff --git a/fs/proc/root.c b/fs/proc/root.c
index 9191248f2dac..b55dbc70287b 100644
--- a/fs/proc/root.c
+++ b/fs/proc/root.c
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ static int proc_fill_super(struct super_block *s, struct fs_context *fc)
 	s->s_stack_depth = FILESYSTEM_MAX_STACK_DEPTH;
 
 	/* procfs dentries and inodes don't require IO to create */
-	s->s_shrink.seeks = 0;
+	s->s_shrink->seeks = 0;
 
 	pde_get(&proc_root);
 	root_inode = proc_get_inode(s, &proc_root);
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 719b67cd4a6b..5ce0c51bb445 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	long	dentries;
 	long	inodes;
 
-	sb = container_of(shrink, struct super_block, s_shrink);
+	sb = shrink->private_data;
 
 	/*
 	 * Deadlock avoidance.  We may hold various FS locks, and we don't want
@@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ static unsigned long super_cache_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
 	struct super_block *sb;
 	long	total_objects = 0;
 
-	sb = container_of(shrink, struct super_block, s_shrink);
+	sb = shrink->private_data;
 
 	/*
 	 * We don't call super_trylock_shared() here as it is a scalability
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@ static void destroy_unused_super(struct super_block *s)
 	security_sb_free(s);
 	put_user_ns(s->s_user_ns);
 	kfree(s->s_subtype);
-	free_prealloced_shrinker(&s->s_shrink);
+	shrinker_free(s->s_shrink);
 	/* no delays needed */
 	destroy_super_work(&s->destroy_work);
 }
@@ -383,16 +383,20 @@ static struct super_block *alloc_super(struct file_system_type *type, int flags,
 	s->s_time_min = TIME64_MIN;
 	s->s_time_max = TIME64_MAX;
 
-	s->s_shrink.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
-	s->s_shrink.scan_objects = super_cache_scan;
-	s->s_shrink.count_objects = super_cache_count;
-	s->s_shrink.batch = 1024;
-	s->s_shrink.flags = SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
-	if (prealloc_shrinker(&s->s_shrink, "sb-%s", type->name))
+	s->s_shrink = shrinker_alloc(SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE | SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE,
+				     "sb-%s", type->name);
+	if (!s->s_shrink)
 		goto fail;
-	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_dentry_lru, &s->s_shrink))
+
+	s->s_shrink->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
+	s->s_shrink->scan_objects = super_cache_scan;
+	s->s_shrink->count_objects = super_cache_count;
+	s->s_shrink->batch = 1024;
+	s->s_shrink->private_data = s;
+
+	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_dentry_lru, s->s_shrink))
 		goto fail;
-	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_inode_lru, &s->s_shrink))
+	if (list_lru_init_memcg(&s->s_inode_lru, s->s_shrink))
 		goto fail;
 	return s;
 
@@ -450,7 +454,7 @@ void deactivate_locked_super(struct super_block *s)
 {
 	struct file_system_type *fs = s->s_type;
 	if (atomic_dec_and_test(&s->s_active)) {
-		unregister_shrinker(&s->s_shrink);
+		shrinker_free(s->s_shrink);
 		fs->kill_sb(s);
 
 		/*
@@ -808,7 +812,7 @@ struct super_block *sget_fc(struct fs_context *fc,
 	hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &s->s_type->fs_supers);
 	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 	get_filesystem(s->s_type);
-	register_shrinker_prepared(&s->s_shrink);
+	shrinker_register(s->s_shrink);
 	return s;
 
 share_extant_sb:
@@ -891,7 +895,7 @@ struct super_block *sget(struct file_system_type *type,
 	hlist_add_head(&s->s_instances, &type->fs_supers);
 	spin_unlock(&sb_lock);
 	get_filesystem(type);
-	register_shrinker_prepared(&s->s_shrink);
+	shrinker_register(s->s_shrink);
 	return s;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(sget);
@@ -1484,7 +1488,7 @@ int setup_bdev_super(struct super_block *sb, int sb_flags,
 	mutex_unlock(&bdev->bd_fsfreeze_mutex);
 
 	snprintf(sb->s_id, sizeof(sb->s_id), "%pg", bdev);
-	shrinker_debugfs_rename(&sb->s_shrink, "sb-%s:%s", sb->s_type->name,
+	shrinker_debugfs_rename(sb->s_shrink, "sb-%s:%s", sb->s_type->name,
 				sb->s_id);
 	sb_set_blocksize(sb, block_size(bdev));
 	return 0;
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index c8ff4156a0a1..82a0b5aca045 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1265,7 +1265,7 @@ struct super_block {
 
 	const struct dentry_operations *s_d_op; /* default d_op for dentries */
 
-	struct shrinker s_shrink;	/* per-sb shrinker handle */
+	struct shrinker *s_shrink;	/* per-sb shrinker handle */
 
 	/* Number of inodes with nlink == 0 but still referenced */
 	atomic_long_t s_remove_count;
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 39/45] mm: shrinker: remove old APIs
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (37 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 38/45] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 40/45] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred} Qi Zheng
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song

Now no users are using the old APIs, just remove them.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/shrinker.h |   8 ---
 mm/shrinker.c            | 143 ---------------------------------------
 2 files changed, 151 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 3f3fd9974ce5..025c8070dd86 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -103,14 +103,6 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
 void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 
-extern int __printf(2, 3) prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker,
-					    const char *fmt, ...);
-extern void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker);
-extern int __printf(2, 3) register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker,
-					    const char *fmt, ...);
-extern void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
-extern void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker);
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
 extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 						  const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 36711c5c01f9..a27779ed3798 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -650,146 +650,3 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	kfree(shrinker);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
-
-/*
- * Add a shrinker callback to be called from the vm.
- */
-static int __prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-{
-	unsigned int size;
-	int err;
-
-	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
-		err = prealloc_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
-		if (err != -ENOSYS)
-			return err;
-
-		shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
-	}
-
-	size = sizeof(*shrinker->nr_deferred);
-	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NUMA_AWARE)
-		size *= nr_node_ids;
-
-	shrinker->nr_deferred = kzalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!shrinker->nr_deferred)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
-int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
-	va_list ap;
-	int err;
-
-	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	shrinker->name = kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
-	va_end(ap);
-	if (!shrinker->name)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	err = __prealloc_shrinker(shrinker);
-	if (err) {
-		kfree_const(shrinker->name);
-		shrinker->name = NULL;
-	}
-
-	return err;
-}
-#else
-int prealloc_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
-	return __prealloc_shrinker(shrinker);
-}
-#endif
-
-void free_prealloced_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-{
-#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
-	kfree_const(shrinker->name);
-	shrinker->name = NULL;
-#endif
-	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
-		down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
-		up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-		return;
-	}
-
-	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
-	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
-}
-
-void register_shrinker_prepared(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-{
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
-	shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
-	shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-}
-
-static int __register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-{
-	int err = __prealloc_shrinker(shrinker);
-
-	if (err)
-		return err;
-	register_shrinker_prepared(shrinker);
-	return 0;
-}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
-int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
-	va_list ap;
-	int err;
-
-	va_start(ap, fmt);
-	shrinker->name = kvasprintf_const(GFP_KERNEL, fmt, ap);
-	va_end(ap);
-	if (!shrinker->name)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	err = __register_shrinker(shrinker);
-	if (err) {
-		kfree_const(shrinker->name);
-		shrinker->name = NULL;
-	}
-	return err;
-}
-#else
-int register_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
-{
-	return __register_shrinker(shrinker);
-}
-#endif
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(register_shrinker);
-
-/*
- * Remove one
- */
-void unregister_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-{
-	struct dentry *debugfs_entry;
-	int debugfs_id;
-
-	if (!(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))
-		return;
-
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	list_del(&shrinker->list);
-	shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
-	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
-		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
-	debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_detach(shrinker, &debugfs_id);
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-
-	shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
-
-	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
-	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(unregister_shrinker);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 40/45] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred}
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (38 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 39/45] mm: shrinker: remove old APIs Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:42 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 41/45] mm: shrinker: rename {prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}() Qi Zheng
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng, Muchun Song

Currently, we maintain two linear arrays per node per memcg, which are
shrinker_info::map and shrinker_info::nr_deferred. And we need to resize
them when the shrinker_nr_max is exceeded, that is, allocate a new array,
and then copy the old array to the new array, and finally free the old
array by RCU.

For shrinker_info::map, we do set_bit() under the RCU lock, so we may set
the value into the old map which is about to be freed. This may cause the
value set to be lost. The current solution is not to copy the old map when
resizing, but to set all the corresponding bits in the new map to 1. This
solves the data loss problem, but bring the overhead of more pointless
loops while doing memcg slab shrink.

For shrinker_info::nr_deferred, we will only modify it under the read lock
of shrinker_rwsem, so it will not run concurrently with the resizing. But
after we make memcg slab shrink lockless, there will be the same data loss
problem as shrinker_info::map, and we can't work around it like the map.

For such resizable arrays, the most straightforward idea is to change it
to xarray, like we did for list_lru [1]. We need to do xa_store() in the
list_lru_add()-->set_shrinker_bit(), but this will cause memory
allocation, and the list_lru_add() doesn't accept failure. A possible
solution is to pre-allocate, but the location of pre-allocation is not
well determined (such as deferred_split_shrinker case).

Therefore, this commit chooses to introduce the following secondary array
for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred}:

+---------------+--------+--------+-----+
| shrinker_info | unit 0 | unit 1 | ... | (secondary array)
+---------------+--------+--------+-----+
                     |
                     v
                +---------------+-----+
                | nr_deferred[] | map | (leaf array)
                +---------------+-----+
                (shrinker_info_unit)

The leaf array is never freed unless the memcg is destroyed. The secondary
array will be resized every time the shrinker id exceeds shrinker_nr_max.
So the shrinker_info_unit can be indexed from both the old and the new
shrinker_info->unit[x]. Then even if we get the old secondary array under
the RCU lock, the found map and nr_deferred are also true, so the updated
nr_deferred and map will not be lost.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220228122126.37293-13-songmuchun@bytedance.com/

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/memcontrol.h |  12 +-
 include/linux/shrinker.h   |  17 +++
 mm/shrinker.c              | 249 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 3 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index ab94ad4597d0..67b823dfa47d 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <linux/vmstat.h>
 #include <linux/writeback.h>
 #include <linux/page-flags.h>
+#include <linux/shrinker.h>
 
 struct mem_cgroup;
 struct obj_cgroup;
@@ -88,17 +89,6 @@ struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter {
 	unsigned int generation;
 };
 
-/*
- * Bitmap and deferred work of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware
- * shrinkers, which have elements charged to this memcg.
- */
-struct shrinker_info {
-	struct rcu_head rcu;
-	atomic_long_t *nr_deferred;
-	unsigned long *map;
-	int map_nr_max;
-};
-
 struct lruvec_stats_percpu {
 	/* Local (CPU and cgroup) state */
 	long state[NR_VM_NODE_STAT_ITEMS];
diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index 025c8070dd86..eb342994675a 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -5,6 +5,23 @@
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
 
+#define SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS	BITS_PER_LONG
+
+/*
+ * Bitmap and deferred work of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware
+ * shrinkers, which have elements charged to the memcg.
+ */
+struct shrinker_info_unit {
+	atomic_long_t nr_deferred[SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS];
+	DECLARE_BITMAP(map, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS);
+};
+
+struct shrinker_info {
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
+	int map_nr_max;
+	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit[];
+};
+
 /*
  * This struct is used to pass information from page reclaim to the shrinkers.
  * We consolidate the values for easier extension later.
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index a27779ed3798..8fb94cda86ef 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -12,15 +12,50 @@ DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 static int shrinker_nr_max;
 
-/* The shrinker_info is expanded in a batch of BITS_PER_LONG */
-static inline int shrinker_map_size(int nr_items)
+static inline int shrinker_unit_size(int nr_items)
 {
-	return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
+	return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS) * sizeof(struct shrinker_info_unit *));
 }
 
-static inline int shrinker_defer_size(int nr_items)
+static inline void shrinker_unit_free(struct shrinker_info *info, int start)
 {
-	return (round_up(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(atomic_long_t));
+	struct shrinker_info_unit **unit;
+	int nr, i;
+
+	if (!info)
+		return;
+
+	unit = info->unit;
+	nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(info->map_nr_max, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS);
+
+	for (i = start; i < nr; i++) {
+		if (!unit[i])
+			break;
+
+		kfree(unit[i]);
+		unit[i] = NULL;
+	}
+}
+
+static inline int shrinker_unit_alloc(struct shrinker_info *new,
+				       struct shrinker_info *old, int nid)
+{
+	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
+	int nr = DIV_ROUND_UP(new->map_nr_max, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS);
+	int start = old ? DIV_ROUND_UP(old->map_nr_max, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS) : 0;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = start; i < nr; i++) {
+		unit = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*unit), GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+		if (!unit) {
+			shrinker_unit_free(new, start);
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
+
+		new->unit[i] = unit;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
 }
 
 void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
@@ -32,6 +67,7 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
 		info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
+		shrinker_unit_free(info, 0);
 		kvfree(info);
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
 	}
@@ -40,28 +76,27 @@ void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
-	int nid, size, ret = 0;
-	int map_size, defer_size = 0;
+	int nid, ret = 0;
+	int array_size = 0;
 
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	map_size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
-	defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(shrinker_nr_max);
-	size = map_size + defer_size;
+	array_size = shrinker_unit_size(shrinker_nr_max);
 	for_each_node(nid) {
-		info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
-		if (!info) {
-			free_shrinker_info(memcg);
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			break;
-		}
-		info->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(info + 1);
-		info->map = (void *)info->nr_deferred + defer_size;
+		info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+		if (!info)
+			goto err;
 		info->map_nr_max = shrinker_nr_max;
+		if (shrinker_unit_alloc(info, NULL, nid))
+			goto err;
 		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
 	}
 	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
 
 	return ret;
+
+err:
+	free_shrinker_info(memcg);
+	return -ENOMEM;
 }
 
 static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
@@ -71,15 +106,12 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
 }
 
-static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
-				    int map_size, int defer_size,
-				    int old_map_size, int old_defer_size,
-				    int new_nr_max)
+static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int new_size,
+				    int old_size, int new_nr_max)
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *new, *old;
 	struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
 	int nid;
-	int size = map_size + defer_size;
 
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
@@ -92,21 +124,17 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 		if (new_nr_max <= old->map_nr_max)
 			continue;
 
-		new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+		new = kvmalloc_node(sizeof(*new) + new_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
 		if (!new)
 			return -ENOMEM;
 
-		new->nr_deferred = (atomic_long_t *)(new + 1);
-		new->map = (void *)new->nr_deferred + defer_size;
 		new->map_nr_max = new_nr_max;
 
-		/* map: set all old bits, clear all new bits */
-		memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_map_size);
-		memset((void *)new->map + old_map_size, 0, map_size - old_map_size);
-		/* nr_deferred: copy old values, clear all new values */
-		memcpy(new->nr_deferred, old->nr_deferred, old_defer_size);
-		memset((void *)new->nr_deferred + old_defer_size, 0,
-		       defer_size - old_defer_size);
+		memcpy(new->unit, old->unit, old_size);
+		if (shrinker_unit_alloc(new, old, nid)) {
+			kvfree(new);
+			return -ENOMEM;
+		}
 
 		rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, new);
 		kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
@@ -118,9 +146,8 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
-	int new_nr_max = round_up(new_id + 1, BITS_PER_LONG);
-	int map_size, defer_size = 0;
-	int old_map_size, old_defer_size = 0;
+	int new_nr_max = round_up(new_id + 1, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS);
+	int new_size, old_size = 0;
 	struct mem_cgroup *memcg;
 
 	if (!root_mem_cgroup)
@@ -128,15 +155,12 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
 
 	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
 
-	map_size = shrinker_map_size(new_nr_max);
-	defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(new_nr_max);
-	old_map_size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
-	old_defer_size = shrinker_defer_size(shrinker_nr_max);
+	new_size = shrinker_unit_size(new_nr_max);
+	old_size = shrinker_unit_size(shrinker_nr_max);
 
 	memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
 	do {
-		ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, map_size, defer_size,
-					       old_map_size, old_defer_size,
+		ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, new_size, old_size,
 					       new_nr_max);
 		if (ret) {
 			mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
@@ -150,17 +174,34 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
 	return ret;
 }
 
+static inline int shrinker_id_to_index(int shrinker_id)
+{
+	return shrinker_id / SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS;
+}
+
+static inline int shrinker_id_to_offset(int shrinker_id)
+{
+	return shrinker_id % SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS;
+}
+
+static inline int calc_shrinker_id(int index, int offset)
+{
+	return index * SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS + offset;
+}
+
 void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
 {
 	if (shrinker_id >= 0 && memcg && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
 		struct shrinker_info *info;
+		struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
 
 		rcu_read_lock();
 		info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
+		unit = info->unit[shrinker_id_to_index(shrinker_id)];
 		if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(shrinker_id >= info->map_nr_max)) {
 			/* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
 			smp_mb__before_atomic();
-			set_bit(shrinker_id, info->map);
+			set_bit(shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker_id), unit->map);
 		}
 		rcu_read_unlock();
 	}
@@ -209,26 +250,31 @@ static long xchg_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
 				   struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
+	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
 
 	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
-	return atomic_long_xchg(&info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id], 0);
+	unit = info->unit[shrinker_id_to_index(shrinker->id)];
+	return atomic_long_xchg(&unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)], 0);
 }
 
 static long add_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
 				  struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
+	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
 
 	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
-	return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &info->nr_deferred[shrinker->id]);
+	unit = info->unit[shrinker_id_to_index(shrinker->id)];
+	return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)]);
 }
 
 void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
-	int i, nid;
+	int nid, index, offset;
 	long nr;
 	struct mem_cgroup *parent;
 	struct shrinker_info *child_info, *parent_info;
+	struct shrinker_info_unit *child_unit, *parent_unit;
 
 	parent = parent_mem_cgroup(memcg);
 	if (!parent)
@@ -239,9 +285,13 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 		parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
-		for (i = 0; i < child_info->map_nr_max; i++) {
-			nr = atomic_long_read(&child_info->nr_deferred[i]);
-			atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_info->nr_deferred[i]);
+		for (index = 0; index < shrinker_id_to_index(child_info->map_nr_max); index++) {
+			child_unit = child_info->unit[index];
+			parent_unit = parent_info->unit[index];
+			for (offset = 0; offset < SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS; offset++) {
+				nr = atomic_long_read(&child_unit->nr_deferred[offset]);
+				atomic_long_add(nr, &parent_unit->nr_deferred[offset]);
+			}
 		}
 	}
 	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
@@ -407,7 +457,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
 	unsigned long ret, freed = 0;
-	int i;
+	int offset, index = 0;
 
 	if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
 		return 0;
@@ -419,56 +469,63 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	if (unlikely(!info))
 		goto unlock;
 
-	for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, info->map_nr_max) {
-		struct shrink_control sc = {
-			.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
-			.nid = nid,
-			.memcg = memcg,
-		};
-		struct shrinker *shrinker;
+	for (; index < shrinker_id_to_index(info->map_nr_max); index++) {
+		struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
 
-		shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, i);
-		if (unlikely(!shrinker || !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))) {
-			if (!shrinker)
-				clear_bit(i, info->map);
-			continue;
-		}
+		unit = info->unit[index];
 
-		/* Call non-slab shrinkers even though kmem is disabled */
-		if (!memcg_kmem_online() &&
-		    !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
-			continue;
+		for_each_set_bit(offset, unit->map, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS) {
+			struct shrink_control sc = {
+				.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
+				.nid = nid,
+				.memcg = memcg,
+			};
+			struct shrinker *shrinker;
+			int shrinker_id = calc_shrinker_id(index, offset);
 
-		ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
-		if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) {
-			clear_bit(i, info->map);
-			/*
-			 * After the shrinker reported that it had no objects to
-			 * free, but before we cleared the corresponding bit in
-			 * the memcg shrinker map, a new object might have been
-			 * added. To make sure, we have the bit set in this
-			 * case, we invoke the shrinker one more time and reset
-			 * the bit if it reports that it is not empty anymore.
-			 * The memory barrier here pairs with the barrier in
-			 * set_shrinker_bit():
-			 *
-			 * list_lru_add()     shrink_slab_memcg()
-			 *   list_add_tail()    clear_bit()
-			 *   <MB>               <MB>
-			 *   set_bit()          do_shrink_slab()
-			 */
-			smp_mb__after_atomic();
-			ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
-			if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
-				ret = 0;
-			else
-				set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, i);
-		}
-		freed += ret;
+			shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, shrinker_id);
+			if (unlikely(!shrinker || !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))) {
+				if (!shrinker)
+					clear_bit(offset, unit->map);
+				continue;
+			}
 
-		if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
-			freed = freed ? : 1;
-			break;
+			/* Call non-slab shrinkers even though kmem is disabled */
+			if (!memcg_kmem_online() &&
+			    !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_NONSLAB))
+				continue;
+
+			ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
+			if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) {
+				clear_bit(offset, unit->map);
+				/*
+				 * After the shrinker reported that it had no objects to
+				 * free, but before we cleared the corresponding bit in
+				 * the memcg shrinker map, a new object might have been
+				 * added. To make sure, we have the bit set in this
+				 * case, we invoke the shrinker one more time and reset
+				 * the bit if it reports that it is not empty anymore.
+				 * The memory barrier here pairs with the barrier in
+				 * set_shrinker_bit():
+				 *
+				 * list_lru_add()     shrink_slab_memcg()
+				 *   list_add_tail()    clear_bit()
+				 *   <MB>               <MB>
+				 *   set_bit()          do_shrink_slab()
+				 */
+				smp_mb__after_atomic();
+				ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
+				if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
+					ret = 0;
+				else
+					set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, shrinker_id);
+			}
+			freed += ret;
+
+			if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
+				freed = freed ? : 1;
+				goto unlock;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 unlock:
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 41/45] mm: shrinker: rename {prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}()
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (39 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 40/45] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred} Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:43 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 42/45] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

With the new shrinker APIs, there is no action such as prealloc, so rename
{prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}(),
which corresponds to the idr_{alloc|remove}() inside the function.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/shrinker.c | 12 ++++++------
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 8fb94cda86ef..578599c9e12e 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
 
 static DEFINE_IDR(shrinker_idr);
 
-static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	int id, ret = -ENOMEM;
 
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+static void shrinker_memcg_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	int id = shrinker->id;
 
@@ -297,12 +297,12 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
 }
 #else
-static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	return -ENOSYS;
 }
 
-static void unregister_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+static void shrinker_memcg_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 }
 
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...)
 	shrinker->flags = flags | SHRINKER_ALLOCATED;
 
 	if (flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE) {
-		err = prealloc_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
+		err = shrinker_memcg_alloc(shrinker);
 		if (err == -ENOSYS)
 			shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE;
 		else if (err == 0)
@@ -695,7 +695,7 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	}
 
 	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
-		unregister_memcg_shrinker(shrinker);
+		shrinker_memcg_remove(shrinker);
 	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
 
 	if (debugfs_entry)
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 42/45] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (40 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 41/45] mm: shrinker: rename {prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}() Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:43 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 43/45] mm: shrinker: make memcg " Qi Zheng
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

The shrinker_rwsem is a global read-write lock in shrinkers subsystem,
which protects most operations such as slab shrink, registration and
unregistration of shrinkers, etc. This can easily cause problems in the
following cases.

1) When the memory pressure is high and there are many filesystems
   mounted or unmounted at the same time, slab shrink will be affected
   (down_read_trylock() failed).

   Such as the real workload mentioned by Kirill Tkhai:

   ```
   One of the real workloads from my experience is start
   of an overcommitted node containing many starting
   containers after node crash (or many resuming containers
   after reboot for kernel update). In these cases memory
   pressure is huge, and the node goes round in long reclaim.
   ```

2) If a shrinker is blocked (such as the case mentioned
   in [1]) and a writer comes in (such as mount a fs),
   then this writer will be blocked and cause all
   subsequent shrinker-related operations to be blocked.

Even if there is no competitor when shrinking slab, there may still be a
problem. The down_read_trylock() may become a perf hotspot with frequent
calls to shrink_slab(). Because of the poor multicore scalability of
atomic operations, this can lead to a significant drop in IPC
(instructions per cycle).

We used to implement the lockless slab shrink with SRCU [2], but then
kernel test robot reported -88.8% regression in
stress-ng.ramfs.ops_per_sec test case [3], so we reverted it [4].

This commit uses the refcount+RCU method [5] proposed by Dave Chinner
to re-implement the lockless global slab shrink. The memcg slab shrink is
handled in the subsequent patch.

For now, all shrinker instances are converted to dynamically allocated and
will be freed by call_rcu(). So we can use rcu_read_{lock,unlock}() to
ensure that the shrinker instance is valid.

And the shrinker instance will not be run again after unregistration. So
the structure that records the pointer of shrinker instance can be safely
freed without waiting for the RCU read-side critical section.

In this way, while we implement the lockless slab shrink, we don't need to
be blocked in unregister_shrinker().

The following are the test results:

stress-ng --timeout 60 --times --verify --metrics-brief --ramfs 9 &

1) Before applying this patchset:

setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
                          (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs            735238     60.00     12.37    363.70     12253.05        1955.08
for a 60.01s run time:
   1440.27s available CPU time
     12.36s user time   (  0.86%)
    363.70s system time ( 25.25%)
    376.06s total time  ( 26.11%)
load average: 10.79 4.47 1.69
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)

2) After applying this patchset:

setting to a 60 second run per stressor
dispatching hogs: 9 ramfs
stressor       bogo ops real time  usr time  sys time   bogo ops/s     bogo ops/s
                          (secs)    (secs)    (secs)   (real time) (usr+sys time)
ramfs            746698     60.00     12.45    376.16     12444.02        1921.47
for a 60.01s run time:
   1440.28s available CPU time
     12.44s user time   (  0.86%)
    376.16s system time ( 26.12%)
    388.60s total time  ( 26.98%)
load average: 9.01 3.85 1.49
passed: 9: ramfs (9)
failed: 0
skipped: 0
successful run completed in 60.01s (1 min, 0.01 secs)

We can see that the ops/s has hardly changed.

[1]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191129214541.3110-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com/
[2]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230313112819.38938-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com/
[3]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/202305230837.db2c233f-yujie.liu@intel.com/
[4]. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230609081518.3039120-1-qi.zheng@linux.dev/
[5]. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ZIJhou1d55d4H1s0@dread.disaster.area/

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 include/linux/shrinker.h | 24 +++++++++++
 mm/shrinker.c            | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 2 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/shrinker.h b/include/linux/shrinker.h
index eb342994675a..4908109d924f 100644
--- a/include/linux/shrinker.h
+++ b/include/linux/shrinker.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/atomic.h>
 #include <linux/types.h>
+#include <linux/refcount.h>
+#include <linux/completion.h>
 
 #define SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS	BITS_PER_LONG
 
@@ -87,6 +89,17 @@ struct shrinker {
 	int seeks;	/* seeks to recreate an obj */
 	unsigned flags;
 
+	/*
+	 * The reference count of this shrinker. Registered shrinker have an
+	 * initial refcount of 1, then the lookup operations are now allowed
+	 * to use it via shrinker_try_get(). Later in the unregistration step,
+	 * the initial refcount will be discarded, and will free the shrinker
+	 * asynchronously via RCU after its refcount reaches 0.
+	 */
+	refcount_t refcount;
+	struct completion done;	/* use to wait for refcount to reach 0 */
+	struct rcu_head rcu;
+
 	void *private_data;
 
 	/* These are for internal use */
@@ -120,6 +133,17 @@ struct shrinker *shrinker_alloc(unsigned int flags, const char *fmt, ...);
 void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker);
 
+static inline bool shrinker_try_get(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+	return refcount_inc_not_zero(&shrinker->refcount);
+}
+
+static inline void shrinker_put(struct shrinker *shrinker)
+{
+	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&shrinker->refcount))
+		complete(&shrinker->done);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SHRINKER_DEBUG
 extern int __printf(2, 3) shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 						  const char *fmt, ...);
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 578599c9e12e..2b8c1f1bbf2d 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
 #include <linux/memcontrol.h>
 #include <linux/rwsem.h>
 #include <linux/shrinker.h>
+#include <linux/rculist.h>
 #include <trace/events/vmscan.h>
 
 #include "internal.h"
@@ -576,33 +577,50 @@ unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid, struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 	if (!mem_cgroup_disabled() && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
 		return shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_mask, nid, memcg, priority);
 
-	if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
-		goto out;
-
-	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
+	/*
+	 * lockless algorithm of global shrink.
+	 *
+	 * In the unregistration setp, the shrinker will be freed asynchronously
+	 * via RCU after its refcount reaches 0. So both rcu_read_lock() and
+	 * shrinker_try_get() can be used to ensure the existence of the shrinker.
+	 *
+	 * So in the global shrink:
+	 *  step 1: use rcu_read_lock() to guarantee existence of the shrinker
+	 *          and the validity of the shrinker_list walk.
+	 *  step 2: use shrinker_try_get() to try get the refcount, if successful,
+	 *          then the existence of the shrinker can also be guaranteed,
+	 *          so we can release the RCU lock to do do_shrink_slab() that
+	 *          may sleep.
+	 *  step 3: *MUST* to reacquire the RCU lock before calling shrinker_put(),
+	 *          which ensures that neither this shrinker nor the next shrinker
+	 *          will be freed in the next traversal operation.
+	 *  step 4: do shrinker_put() paired with step 2 to put the refcount,
+	 *          if the refcount reaches 0, then wake up the waiter in
+	 *          shrinker_free() by calling complete().
+	 */
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	list_for_each_entry_rcu(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list) {
 		struct shrink_control sc = {
 			.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
 			.nid = nid,
 			.memcg = memcg,
 		};
 
+		if (!shrinker_try_get(shrinker))
+			continue;
+
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
 		ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
 		if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY)
 			ret = 0;
 		freed += ret;
-		/*
-		 * Bail out if someone want to register a new shrinker to
-		 * prevent the registration from being stalled for long periods
-		 * by parallel ongoing shrinking.
-		 */
-		if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
-			freed = freed ? : 1;
-			break;
-		}
+
+		rcu_read_lock();
+		shrinker_put(shrinker);
 	}
 
-	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
-out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	cond_resched();
 	return freed;
 }
@@ -670,13 +688,29 @@ void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	}
 
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	list_add_tail(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
+	list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
 	shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
 	shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
 	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+
+	init_completion(&shrinker->done);
+	/*
+	 * Now the shrinker is fully set up, take the first reference to it to
+	 * indicate that lookup operations are now allowed to use it via
+	 * shrinker_try_get().
+	 */
+	refcount_set(&shrinker->refcount, 1);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_register);
 
+static void shrinker_free_rcu_cb(struct rcu_head *head)
+{
+	struct shrinker *shrinker = container_of(head, struct shrinker, rcu);
+
+	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
+	kfree(shrinker);
+}
+
 void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 {
 	struct dentry *debugfs_entry = NULL;
@@ -685,9 +719,25 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	if (!shrinker)
 		return;
 
+	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
+		/* drop the initial refcount */
+		shrinker_put(shrinker);
+		/*
+		 * Wait for all lookups of the shrinker to complete, after that,
+		 * no shrinker is running or will run again, then we can safely
+		 * free it asynchronously via RCU and safely free the structure
+		 * where the shrinker is located, such as super_block etc.
+		 */
+		wait_for_completion(&shrinker->done);
+	}
+
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
 	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
-		list_del(&shrinker->list);
+		/*
+		 * Now we can safely remove it from the shrinker_list and then
+		 * free it.
+		 */
+		list_del_rcu(&shrinker->list);
 		debugfs_entry = shrinker_debugfs_detach(shrinker, &debugfs_id);
 		shrinker->flags &= ~SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
 	} else {
@@ -701,9 +751,6 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	if (debugfs_entry)
 		shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
 
-	kfree(shrinker->nr_deferred);
-	shrinker->nr_deferred = NULL;
-
-	kfree(shrinker);
+	call_rcu(&shrinker->rcu, shrinker_free_rcu_cb);
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(shrinker_free);
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 43/45] mm: shrinker: make memcg slab shrink lockless
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (41 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 42/45] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:43 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 44/45] mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 45/45] mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Like global slab shrink, this commit also uses refcount+RCU method to make
memcg slab shrink lockless.

Use the following script to do slab shrink stress test:

```

DIR="/root/shrinker/memcg/mnt"

do_create()
{
    mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test
    echo 4G > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/memory.limit_in_bytes
    for i in `seq 0 $1`;
    do
        mkdir -p /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i;
        echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
        mkdir -p $DIR/$i;
    done
}

do_mount()
{
    for i in `seq $1 $2`;
    do
        mount -t tmpfs $i $DIR/$i;
    done
}

do_touch()
{
    for i in `seq $1 $2`;
    do
        echo $$ > /sys/fs/cgroup/memory/test/$i/cgroup.procs;
        dd if=/dev/zero of=$DIR/$i/file$i bs=1M count=1 &
    done
}

case "$1" in
  touch)
    do_touch $2 $3
    ;;
  test)
    do_create 4000
    do_mount 0 4000
    do_touch 0 3000
    ;;
  *)
    exit 1
    ;;
esac
```

Save the above script, then run test and touch commands. Then we can use
the following perf command to view hotspots:

perf top -U -F 999

1) Before applying this patchset:

  40.44%  [kernel]            [k] down_read_trylock
  17.59%  [kernel]            [k] up_read
  13.64%  [kernel]            [k] pv_native_safe_halt
  11.90%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_slab
   8.21%  [kernel]            [k] idr_find
   2.71%  [kernel]            [k] _find_next_bit
   1.36%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_node
   0.81%  [kernel]            [k] shrink_lruvec
   0.80%  [kernel]            [k] __radix_tree_lookup
   0.50%  [kernel]            [k] do_shrink_slab
   0.21%  [kernel]            [k] list_lru_count_one
   0.16%  [kernel]            [k] mem_cgroup_iter

2) After applying this patchset:

  60.17%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_slab
  20.42%  [kernel]           [k] pv_native_safe_halt
   3.03%  [kernel]           [k] do_shrink_slab
   2.73%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_node
   2.27%  [kernel]           [k] shrink_lruvec
   2.00%  [kernel]           [k] __rcu_read_unlock
   1.92%  [kernel]           [k] mem_cgroup_iter
   0.98%  [kernel]           [k] __rcu_read_lock
   0.91%  [kernel]           [k] osq_lock
   0.63%  [kernel]           [k] mem_cgroup_calculate_protection
   0.55%  [kernel]           [k] shrinker_put
   0.46%  [kernel]           [k] list_lru_count_one

We can see that the first perf hotspot becomes shrink_slab, which is what
we expect.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/shrinker.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index 2b8c1f1bbf2d..a66e2a30cc16 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -218,7 +218,6 @@ static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
 	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
-	/* This may call shrinker, so it must use down_read_trylock() */
 	id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (id < 0)
 		goto unlock;
@@ -252,10 +251,15 @@ static long xchg_nr_deferred_memcg(int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
 	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
+	long nr_deferred;
 
-	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
 	unit = info->unit[shrinker_id_to_index(shrinker->id)];
-	return atomic_long_xchg(&unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)], 0);
+	nr_deferred = atomic_long_xchg(&unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)], 0);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return nr_deferred;
 }
 
 static long add_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
@@ -263,10 +267,16 @@ static long add_nr_deferred_memcg(long nr, int nid, struct shrinker *shrinker,
 {
 	struct shrinker_info *info;
 	struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
+	long nr_deferred;
 
-	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
 	unit = info->unit[shrinker_id_to_index(shrinker->id)];
-	return atomic_long_add_return(nr, &unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)]);
+	nr_deferred =
+		atomic_long_add_return(nr, &unit->nr_deferred[shrinker_id_to_offset(shrinker->id)]);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
+	return nr_deferred;
 }
 
 void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
@@ -463,18 +473,54 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 	if (!mem_cgroup_online(memcg))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
-		return 0;
-
-	info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
+	/*
+	 * lockless algorithm of memcg shrink.
+	 *
+	 * The shrinker_info may be freed asynchronously via RCU in the
+	 * expand_one_shrinker_info(), so the rcu_read_lock() needs to be used
+	 * to ensure the existence of the shrinker_info.
+	 *
+	 * The shrinker_info_unit is never freed unless its corresponding memcg
+	 * is destroyed. Here we already hold the refcount of memcg, so the
+	 * memcg will not be destroyed, and of course shrinker_info_unit will
+	 * not be freed.
+	 *
+	 * So in the memcg shrink:
+	 *  step 1: use rcu_read_lock() to guarantee existence of the
+	 *          shrinker_info.
+	 *  step 2: after getting shrinker_info_unit we can safely release the
+	 *          RCU lock.
+	 *  step 3: traverse the bitmap and calculate shrinker_id
+	 *  step 4: use rcu_read_lock() to guarantee existence of the shrinker.
+	 *  step 5: use shrinker_id to find the shrinker, then use
+	 *          shrinker_try_get() to guarantee existence of the shrinker,
+	 *          then we can release the RCU lock to do do_shrink_slab() that
+	 *          may sleep.
+	 *  step 6: do shrinker_put() paired with step 5 to put the refcount,
+	 *          if the refcount reaches 0, then wake up the waiter in
+	 *          shrinker_free() by calling complete().
+	 *          Note: here is different from the global shrink, we don't
+	 *                need to acquire the RCU lock to guarantee existence of
+	 *                the shrinker, because we don't need to use this
+	 *                shrinker to traverse the next shrinker in the bitmap.
+	 *  step 7: we have already exited the read-side of rcu critical section
+	 *          before calling do_shrink_slab(), the shrinker_info may be
+	 *          released in expand_one_shrinker_info(), so go back to step 1
+	 *          to reacquire the shrinker_info.
+	 */
+again:
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
 	if (unlikely(!info))
 		goto unlock;
 
-	for (; index < shrinker_id_to_index(info->map_nr_max); index++) {
+	if (index < shrinker_id_to_index(info->map_nr_max)) {
 		struct shrinker_info_unit *unit;
 
 		unit = info->unit[index];
 
+		rcu_read_unlock();
+
 		for_each_set_bit(offset, unit->map, SHRINKER_UNIT_BITS) {
 			struct shrink_control sc = {
 				.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
@@ -484,12 +530,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 			struct shrinker *shrinker;
 			int shrinker_id = calc_shrinker_id(index, offset);
 
+			rcu_read_lock();
 			shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, shrinker_id);
-			if (unlikely(!shrinker || !(shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED))) {
-				if (!shrinker)
-					clear_bit(offset, unit->map);
+			if (unlikely(!shrinker || !shrinker_try_get(shrinker))) {
+				clear_bit(offset, unit->map);
+				rcu_read_unlock();
 				continue;
 			}
+			rcu_read_unlock();
 
 			/* Call non-slab shrinkers even though kmem is disabled */
 			if (!memcg_kmem_online() &&
@@ -522,15 +570,14 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
 					set_shrinker_bit(memcg, nid, shrinker_id);
 			}
 			freed += ret;
-
-			if (rwsem_is_contended(&shrinker_rwsem)) {
-				freed = freed ? : 1;
-				goto unlock;
-			}
+			shrinker_put(shrinker);
 		}
+
+		index++;
+		goto again;
 	}
 unlock:
-	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return freed;
 }
 #else /* !CONFIG_MEMCG */
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 44/45] mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (42 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 43/45] mm: shrinker: make memcg " Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:43 ` Qi Zheng
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 45/45] mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

For now, reparent_shrinker_deferred() is the only holder of read lock of
shrinker_rwsem. And it already holds the global cgroup_mutex, so it will
not be called in parallel.

Therefore, in order to convert shrinker_rwsem to shrinker_mutex later,
here we change to hold the write lock of shrinker_rwsem to reparent.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 mm/shrinker.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index a66e2a30cc16..b8cb9d2f5dbf 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		parent = root_mem_cgroup;
 
 	/* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
-	down_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 		parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
 }
 #else
 static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v5 45/45] mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex
  2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
                   ` (43 preceding siblings ...)
  2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 44/45] mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:43 ` Qi Zheng
  44 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  3:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Qi Zheng

Now there are no readers of shrinker_rwsem, so we can simply replace it
with mutex lock.

Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
---
 drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c |  2 +-
 fs/super.c                     |  2 +-
 mm/shrinker.c                  | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
 mm/shrinker_debug.c            | 14 +++++++-------
 4 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c b/drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c
index acffed750e3e..9e0c69958587 100644
--- a/drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-cache-metadata.c
@@ -1828,7 +1828,7 @@ int dm_cache_metadata_abort(struct dm_cache_metadata *cmd)
 	 * Replacement block manager (new_bm) is created and old_bm destroyed outside of
 	 * cmd root_lock to avoid ABBA deadlock that would result (due to life-cycle of
 	 * shrinker associated with the block manager's bufio client vs cmd root_lock).
-	 * - must take shrinker_rwsem without holding cmd->root_lock
+	 * - must take shrinker_mutex without holding cmd->root_lock
 	 */
 	new_bm = dm_block_manager_create(cmd->bdev, DM_CACHE_METADATA_BLOCK_SIZE << SECTOR_SHIFT,
 					 CACHE_MAX_CONCURRENT_LOCKS);
diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
index 5ce0c51bb445..b7a914f3ac5c 100644
--- a/fs/super.c
+++ b/fs/super.c
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ static void super_wake(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int flag)
  * One thing we have to be careful of with a per-sb shrinker is that we don't
  * drop the last active reference to the superblock from within the shrinker.
  * If that happens we could trigger unregistering the shrinker from within the
- * shrinker path and that leads to deadlock on the shrinker_rwsem. Hence we
+ * shrinker path and that leads to deadlock on the shrinker_mutex. Hence we
  * take a passive reference to the superblock to avoid this from occurring.
  */
 static unsigned long super_cache_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
diff --git a/mm/shrinker.c b/mm/shrinker.c
index b8cb9d2f5dbf..a174d1d4b08d 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker.c
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 
 LIST_HEAD(shrinker_list);
-DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
+DEFINE_MUTEX(shrinker_mutex);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
 static int shrinker_nr_max;
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 	int nid, ret = 0;
 	int array_size = 0;
 
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	array_size = shrinker_unit_size(shrinker_nr_max);
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + array_size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 			goto err;
 		rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
 	}
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static struct shrinker_info *shrinker_info_protected(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 						     int nid)
 {
 	return rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
-					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_rwsem));
+					 lockdep_is_held(&shrinker_mutex));
 }
 
 static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int new_size,
@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
 	if (!root_mem_cgroup)
 		goto out;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	new_size = shrinker_unit_size(new_nr_max);
 	old_size = shrinker_unit_size(shrinker_nr_max);
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	if (mem_cgroup_disabled())
 		return -ENOSYS;
 
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	id = idr_alloc(&shrinker_idr, shrinker, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (id < 0)
 		goto unlock;
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	shrinker->id = id;
 	ret = 0;
 unlock:
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -241,7 +241,7 @@ static void shrinker_memcg_remove(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 
 	BUG_ON(id < 0);
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
 }
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 		parent = root_mem_cgroup;
 
 	/* Prevent from concurrent shrinker_info expand */
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	for_each_node(nid) {
 		child_info = shrinker_info_protected(memcg, nid);
 		parent_info = shrinker_info_protected(parent, nid);
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ void reparent_shrinker_deferred(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 			}
 		}
 	}
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 }
 #else
 static int shrinker_memcg_alloc(struct shrinker *shrinker)
@@ -734,11 +734,11 @@ void shrinker_register(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 		return;
 	}
 
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	list_add_tail_rcu(&shrinker->list, &shrinker_list);
 	shrinker->flags |= SHRINKER_REGISTERED;
 	shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	init_completion(&shrinker->done);
 	/*
@@ -778,7 +778,7 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 		wait_for_completion(&shrinker->done);
 	}
 
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
 		/*
 		 * Now we can safely remove it from the shrinker_list and then
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ void shrinker_free(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 
 	if (shrinker->flags & SHRINKER_MEMCG_AWARE)
 		shrinker_memcg_remove(shrinker);
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	if (debugfs_entry)
 		shrinker_debugfs_remove(debugfs_entry, debugfs_id);
diff --git a/mm/shrinker_debug.c b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
index 38452f539f40..c80fd124f605 100644
--- a/mm/shrinker_debug.c
+++ b/mm/shrinker_debug.c
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #include "internal.h"
 
 /* defined in vmscan.c */
-extern struct rw_semaphore shrinker_rwsem;
+extern struct mutex shrinker_mutex;
 extern struct list_head shrinker_list;
 
 static DEFINE_IDA(shrinker_debugfs_ida);
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_add(struct shrinker *shrinker)
 	char buf[128];
 	int id;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	/* debugfs isn't initialized yet, add debugfs entries later. */
 	if (!shrinker_debugfs_root)
@@ -222,7 +222,7 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
 	if (!new)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	old = shrinker->name;
 	shrinker->name = new;
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@ int shrinker_debugfs_rename(struct shrinker *shrinker, const char *fmt, ...)
 			shrinker->debugfs_entry = entry;
 	}
 
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	kfree_const(old);
 
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ struct dentry *shrinker_debugfs_detach(struct shrinker *shrinker,
 {
 	struct dentry *entry = shrinker->debugfs_entry;
 
-	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	shrinker_debugfs_name_free(shrinker);
 
@@ -281,14 +281,14 @@ static int __init shrinker_debugfs_init(void)
 	shrinker_debugfs_root = dentry;
 
 	/* Create debugfs entries for shrinkers registered at boot */
-	down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_lock(&shrinker_mutex);
 	list_for_each_entry(shrinker, &shrinker_list, list)
 		if (!shrinker->debugfs_entry) {
 			ret = shrinker_debugfs_add(shrinker);
 			if (ret)
 				break;
 		}
-	up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
+	mutex_unlock(&shrinker_mutex);
 
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
2.30.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  3:55   ` Song Liu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Song Liu @ 2023-08-24  3:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song, linux-raid

On Wed, Aug 23, 2023 at 8:47 PM Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
> dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker, so that it can be freed
> asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
> critical section when releasing the struct r5conf.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
> CC: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org

LGTM!

Reviewed-by: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  4:38   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Sergey Senozhatsky @ 2023-08-24  4:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song, Minchan Kim

On (23/08/24 11:42), Qi Zheng wrote:
> In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
> dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker, so that it can be freed
> asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
> critical section when releasing the struct zs_pool.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> CC: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>

Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  6:00   ` Juergen Gross
  2023-08-24  6:24     ` Qi Zheng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Juergen Gross @ 2023-08-24  6:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng, akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong,
	brauner, paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky,
	yujie.liu, gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song,
	Stefano Stabellini, Oleksandr Tyshchenko, xen-devel


[-- Attachment #1.1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 659 bytes --]

On 24.08.23 05:42, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
> CC: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
> CC: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Just one note: it seems as if most users will set seeks to DEFAULT_SEEKS.
Wouldn't it be better to do this in shrinker_alloc() and let only callers
who want a different value overwrite that?


Juergen

[-- Attachment #1.1.2: OpenPGP public key --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-keys, Size: 3149 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 495 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker
  2023-08-24  6:00   ` Juergen Gross
@ 2023-08-24  6:24     ` Qi Zheng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-24  6:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Juergen Gross
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song, Stefano Stabellini, Oleksandr Tyshchenko, xen-devel

Hi Juergen,

On 2023/8/24 14:00, Juergen Gross wrote:
> On 24.08.23 05:42, Qi Zheng wrote:
>> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
>> CC: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>> CC: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
>> CC: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@epam.com>
>> CC: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> 
> Acked-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>

Thanks for your review!

> 
> Just one note: it seems as if most users will set seeks to DEFAULT_SEEKS.
> Wouldn't it be better to do this in shrinker_alloc() and let only callers
> who want a different value overwrite that?

I think it makes sense, will do.

Thanks,
Qi

> 
> 
> Juergen

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  9:49   ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2023-08-24  9:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song, Jan Kara, linux-ext4

On Thu 24-08-23 11:42:50, Qi Zheng wrote:
> In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
> dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker, so that it can be freed
> asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
> critical section when releasing the struct journal_s.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
> CC: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza

> ---
>  fs/jbd2/journal.c    | 30 +++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  include/linux/jbd2.h |  2 +-
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/jbd2/journal.c b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> index 768fa05bcbed..75692baa76e8 100644
> --- a/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> +++ b/fs/jbd2/journal.c
> @@ -1290,7 +1290,7 @@ static int jbd2_min_tag_size(void)
>  static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  					      struct shrink_control *sc)
>  {
> -	journal_t *journal = container_of(shrink, journal_t, j_shrinker);
> +	journal_t *journal = shrink->private_data;
>  	unsigned long nr_to_scan = sc->nr_to_scan;
>  	unsigned long nr_shrunk;
>  	unsigned long count;
> @@ -1316,7 +1316,7 @@ static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_scan(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  static unsigned long jbd2_journal_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink,
>  					       struct shrink_control *sc)
>  {
> -	journal_t *journal = container_of(shrink, journal_t, j_shrinker);
> +	journal_t *journal = shrink->private_data;
>  	unsigned long count;
>  
>  	count = percpu_counter_read_positive(&journal->j_checkpoint_jh_count);
> @@ -1588,14 +1588,22 @@ static journal_t *journal_init_common(struct block_device *bdev,
>  		goto err_cleanup;
>  
>  	journal->j_shrink_transaction = NULL;
> -	journal->j_shrinker.scan_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_scan;
> -	journal->j_shrinker.count_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_count;
> -	journal->j_shrinker.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
> -	journal->j_shrinker.batch = journal->j_max_transaction_buffers;
> -	err = register_shrinker(&journal->j_shrinker, "jbd2-journal:(%u:%u)",
> -				MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev), MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
> -	if (err)
> +
> +	journal->j_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "jbd2-journal:(%u:%u)",
> +					     MAJOR(bdev->bd_dev),
> +					     MINOR(bdev->bd_dev));
> +	if (!journal->j_shrinker) {
> +		err = -ENOMEM;
>  		goto err_cleanup;
> +	}
> +
> +	journal->j_shrinker->scan_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_scan;
> +	journal->j_shrinker->count_objects = jbd2_journal_shrink_count;
> +	journal->j_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
> +	journal->j_shrinker->batch = journal->j_max_transaction_buffers;
> +	journal->j_shrinker->private_data = journal;
> +
> +	shrinker_register(journal->j_shrinker);
>  
>  	return journal;
>  
> @@ -2170,9 +2178,9 @@ int jbd2_journal_destroy(journal_t *journal)
>  		brelse(journal->j_sb_buffer);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (journal->j_shrinker.flags & SHRINKER_REGISTERED) {
> +	if (journal->j_shrinker) {
>  		percpu_counter_destroy(&journal->j_checkpoint_jh_count);
> -		unregister_shrinker(&journal->j_shrinker);
> +		shrinker_free(journal->j_shrinker);
>  	}
>  	if (journal->j_proc_entry)
>  		jbd2_stats_proc_exit(journal);
> diff --git a/include/linux/jbd2.h b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> index 52772c826c86..6dcbb4eb80fb 100644
> --- a/include/linux/jbd2.h
> +++ b/include/linux/jbd2.h
> @@ -886,7 +886,7 @@ struct journal_s
>  	 * Journal head shrinker, reclaim buffer's journal head which
>  	 * has been written back.
>  	 */
> -	struct shrinker		j_shrinker;
> +	struct shrinker		*j_shrinker;
>  
>  	/**
>  	 * @j_checkpoint_jh_count:
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24  9:51   ` Jan Kara
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Jan Kara @ 2023-08-24  9:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song, Jan Kara

On Thu 24-08-23 11:42:32, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>

Looks good to me. Feel free to add:

Acked-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>

								Honza



> ---
>  fs/quota/dquot.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/quota/dquot.c b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> index 9e72bfe8bbad..c303cffdf433 100644
> --- a/fs/quota/dquot.c
> +++ b/fs/quota/dquot.c
> @@ -791,12 +791,6 @@ dqcache_shrink_count(struct shrinker *shrink, struct shrink_control *sc)
>  	percpu_counter_read_positive(&dqstats.counter[DQST_FREE_DQUOTS]));
>  }
>  
> -static struct shrinker dqcache_shrinker = {
> -	.count_objects = dqcache_shrink_count,
> -	.scan_objects = dqcache_shrink_scan,
> -	.seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS,
> -};
> -
>  /*
>   * Safely release dquot and put reference to dquot.
>   */
> @@ -2956,6 +2950,7 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void)
>  {
>  	int i, ret;
>  	unsigned long nr_hash, order;
> +	struct shrinker *dqcache_shrinker;
>  
>  	printk(KERN_NOTICE "VFS: Disk quotas %s\n", __DQUOT_VERSION__);
>  
> @@ -2990,8 +2985,15 @@ static int __init dquot_init(void)
>  	pr_info("VFS: Dquot-cache hash table entries: %ld (order %ld,"
>  		" %ld bytes)\n", nr_hash, order, (PAGE_SIZE << order));
>  
> -	if (register_shrinker(&dqcache_shrinker, "dquota-cache"))
> -		panic("Cannot register dquot shrinker");
> +	dqcache_shrinker = shrinker_alloc(0, "dquota-cache");
> +	if (!dqcache_shrinker)
> +		panic("Cannot allocate dquot shrinker");
> +
> +	dqcache_shrinker->count_objects = dqcache_shrink_count;
> +	dqcache_shrinker->scan_objects = dqcache_shrink_scan;
> +	dqcache_shrinker->seeks = DEFAULT_SEEKS;
> +
> +	shrinker_register(dqcache_shrinker);
>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-24 15:28   ` Nadav Amit
  2023-08-25  2:27     ` Qi Zheng
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 58+ messages in thread
From: Nadav Amit @ 2023-08-24 15:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: Andrew Morton, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong,
	brauner, Paul E. McKenney, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky,
	yujie.liu, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Muchun Song,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song,
	Pv-drivers, Arnd Bergmann



> On Aug 23, 2023, at 8:42 PM, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
> 
> In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
> dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker, so that it can be freed
> asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
> critical section when releasing the struct vmballoon.
> 
> And we can simply exit vmballoon_init() when registering the shrinker
> fails. So the shrinker_registered indication is redundant, just remove it.

...

Ugh. We should have already moved to OOM notifier instead...

> static void vmballoon_unregister_shrinker(struct vmballoon *b)
> {
> -	if (b->shrinker_registered)
> -		unregister_shrinker(&b->shrinker);
> -	b->shrinker_registered = false;
> +	shrinker_free(b->shrinker);
> }

If the patch goes through another iteration, please add:

	b->shrinker = NULL;

Not that this is a real issue, but I prefer it so in order to more easily
identify UAF if the function is called elsewhere.

Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-25  1:17   ` Chao Yu
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2023-08-25  1:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng, akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong,
	brauner, paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky,
	yujie.liu, gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song, Jaegeuk Kim,
	linux-f2fs-devel

On 2023/8/24 11:42, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
> CC: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> CC: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-25  1:18   ` Chao Yu
  2023-08-25  2:54   ` Gao Xiang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Chao Yu @ 2023-08-25  1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng, akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong,
	brauner, paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky,
	yujie.liu, gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song, Gao Xiang,
	Yue Hu, Jeffle Xu, linux-erofs

On 2023/8/24 11:42, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> CC: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> CC: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> CC: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> CC: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org

Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>

Thanks,

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker
  2023-08-24 15:28   ` Nadav Amit
@ 2023-08-25  2:27     ` Qi Zheng
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Qi Zheng @ 2023-08-25  2:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nadav Amit
  Cc: Qi Zheng, Andrew Morton, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin,
	djwong, brauner, Paul E. McKenney, tytso, steven.price, cel,
	senozhatsky, yujie.liu, Greg Kroah-Hartman, Muchun Song,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song,
	Pv-drivers, Arnd Bergmann

Hi Nadav,

On 2023/8/24 23:28, Nadav Amit wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Aug 23, 2023, at 8:42 PM, Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> wrote:
>>
>> In preparation for implementing lockless slab shrink, use new APIs to
>> dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker, so that it can be freed
>> asynchronously via RCU. Then it doesn't need to wait for RCU read-side
>> critical section when releasing the struct vmballoon.
>>
>> And we can simply exit vmballoon_init() when registering the shrinker
>> fails. So the shrinker_registered indication is redundant, just remove it.
> 
> ...
> 
> Ugh. We should have already moved to OOM notifier instead...
> 
>> static void vmballoon_unregister_shrinker(struct vmballoon *b)
>> {
>> -	if (b->shrinker_registered)
>> -		unregister_shrinker(&b->shrinker);
>> -	b->shrinker_registered = false;
>> +	shrinker_free(b->shrinker);
>> }
> 
> If the patch goes through another iteration, please add:
> 
> 	b->shrinker = NULL;
> 
> Not that this is a real issue, but I prefer it so in order to more easily
> identify UAF if the function is called elsewhere.

OK, will add it.

> 
> Otherwise, LGTM. Thanks.

Thanks for your review!

Qi

> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
  2023-08-25  1:18   ` Chao Yu
@ 2023-08-25  2:54   ` Gao Xiang
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Gao Xiang @ 2023-08-25  2:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng, akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong,
	brauner, paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky,
	yujie.liu, gregkh, muchun.song
  Cc: linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel, Muchun Song, Gao Xiang,
	Chao Yu, Yue Hu, Jeffle Xu, linux-erofs



On 2023/8/24 11:42, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Gao Xiang <xiang@kernel.org>
> CC: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
> CC: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
> CC: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
> CC: linux-erofs@lists.ozlabs.org

Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>

Thanks,
Gao Xiang

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker
  2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker Qi Zheng
@ 2023-08-31 16:41   ` Carlos Llamas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 58+ messages in thread
From: Carlos Llamas @ 2023-08-31 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Qi Zheng
  Cc: akpm, david, tkhai, vbabka, roman.gushchin, djwong, brauner,
	paulmck, tytso, steven.price, cel, senozhatsky, yujie.liu,
	gregkh, muchun.song, linux-kernel, linux-mm, linux-fsdevel,
	Muchun Song

On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 11:42:22AM +0800, Qi Zheng wrote:
> Use new APIs to dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com>
> Reviewed-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
> CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> CC: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>
> ---

Looks good to me, thanks!

Acked-by: Carlos Llamas <cmllamas@google.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 58+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-08-31 16:41 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-08-24  3:42 [PATCH v5 00/45] use refcount+RCU method to implement lockless slab shrink Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 01/45] mm: shrinker: add infrastructure for dynamically allocating shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 02/45] kvm: mmu: dynamically allocate the x86-mmu shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 03/45] binder: dynamically allocate the android-binder shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-31 16:41   ` Carlos Llamas
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 04/45] drm/ttm: dynamically allocate the drm-ttm_pool shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 05/45] xenbus/backend: dynamically allocate the xen-backend shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  6:00   ` Juergen Gross
2023-08-24  6:24     ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 06/45] erofs: dynamically allocate the erofs-shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-25  1:18   ` Chao Yu
2023-08-25  2:54   ` Gao Xiang
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 07/45] f2fs: dynamically allocate the f2fs-shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-25  1:17   ` Chao Yu
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 08/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-glock shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 09/45] gfs2: dynamically allocate the gfs2-qd shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 10/45] NFSv4.2: dynamically allocate the nfs-xattr shrinkers Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 11/45] nfs: dynamically allocate the nfs-acl shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 12/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-filecache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 13/45] quota: dynamically allocate the dquota-cache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  9:51   ` Jan Kara
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 14/45] ubifs: dynamically allocate the ubifs-slab shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 15/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-lazy shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 16/45] rcu: dynamically allocate the rcu-kfree shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 17/45] mm: thp: dynamically allocate the thp-related shrinkers Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 18/45] sunrpc: dynamically allocate the sunrpc_cred shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 19/45] mm: workingset: dynamically allocate the mm-shadow shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 20/45] drm/i915: dynamically allocate the i915_gem_mm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 21/45] drm/msm: dynamically allocate the drm-msm_gem shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 22/45] drm/panfrost: dynamically allocate the drm-panfrost shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 23/45] dm: dynamically allocate the dm-bufio shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 24/45] dm zoned: dynamically allocate the dm-zoned-meta shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 25/45] md/raid5: dynamically allocate the md-raid5 shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:55   ` Song Liu
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 26/45] bcache: dynamically allocate the md-bcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 27/45] vmw_balloon: dynamically allocate the vmw-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24 15:28   ` Nadav Amit
2023-08-25  2:27     ` Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 28/45] virtio_balloon: dynamically allocate the virtio-balloon shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 29/45] mbcache: dynamically allocate the mbcache shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 30/45] ext4: dynamically allocate the ext4-es shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 31/45] jbd2,ext4: dynamically allocate the jbd2-journal shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  9:49   ` Jan Kara
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 32/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-client shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 33/45] nfsd: dynamically allocate the nfsd-reply shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 34/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-buf shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 35/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-inodegc shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 36/45] xfs: dynamically allocate the xfs-qm shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 37/45] zsmalloc: dynamically allocate the mm-zspool shrinker Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  4:38   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 38/45] fs: super: dynamically allocate the s_shrink Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 39/45] mm: shrinker: remove old APIs Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:42 ` [PATCH v5 40/45] mm: shrinker: add a secondary array for shrinker_info::{map, nr_deferred} Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 41/45] mm: shrinker: rename {prealloc|unregister}_memcg_shrinker() to shrinker_memcg_{alloc|remove}() Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 42/45] mm: shrinker: make global slab shrink lockless Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 43/45] mm: shrinker: make memcg " Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 44/45] mm: shrinker: hold write lock to reparent shrinker nr_deferred Qi Zheng
2023-08-24  3:43 ` [PATCH v5 45/45] mm: shrinker: convert shrinker_rwsem to mutex Qi Zheng

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).