linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
@ 2023-07-19 13:17 syzbot
  2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2023-07-19 13:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amir73il, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-unionfs, miklos,
	syzkaller-bugs

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    fdf0eaf11452 Linux 6.5-rc2
git tree:       upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=135aae66a80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a4507c291b5ab5d4
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f95d243908cc/disk-fdf0eaf1.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/f55beab9d6de/vmlinux-fdf0eaf1.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/bea743a43c4f/bzImage-fdf0eaf1.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.5.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor.0/14284 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff8880870e9c30 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88814bdc8410 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_sendfile+0x600/0x1070 fs/read_write.c:1253

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline]
       sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1569
       mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:403
       ovl_create_object+0xf8/0x300 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3492 [inline]
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3560 [inline]
       path_openat+0x13e7/0x3180 fs/namei.c:3790
       do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3820
       do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1407
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1422 [inline]
       __do_sys_openat fs/open.c:1438 [inline]
       __se_sys_openat fs/open.c:1433 [inline]
       __x64_sys_openat+0x247/0x290 fs/open.c:1433
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #2 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
       down_read+0x47/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1520
       inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:781 [inline]
       lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1706
       walk_component+0x2d0/0x400 fs/namei.c:1998
       lookup_last fs/namei.c:2455 [inline]
       path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2479
       filename_lookup+0x255/0x610 fs/namei.c:2508
       kern_path+0x3b/0x180 fs/namei.c:2606
       lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:943
       resume_store+0x19c/0x700 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1177
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3a6/0x4f0 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
       call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1871 [inline]
       new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:491 [inline]
       vfs_write+0x782/0xaf0 fs/read_write.c:584
       ksys_write+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:637
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #1 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
       kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
       seq_read_iter+0x3d4/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:225
       call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:1865 [inline]
       new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:389 [inline]
       vfs_read+0x795/0xb00 fs/read_write.c:470
       ksys_read+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:613
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

-> #0 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
       validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
       __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
       __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
       __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
       mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
       seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182
       proc_reg_read_iter+0x1bc/0x290 fs/proc/inode.c:305
       call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:1865 [inline]
       copy_splice_read+0x4c9/0x9c0 fs/splice.c:367
       splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c4/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1070
       do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1195
       do_sendfile+0x623/0x1070 fs/read_write.c:1254
       __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &p->lock --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> sb_writers#4

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(sb_writers#4);
                               lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
                               lock(sb_writers#4);
  lock(&p->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor.0/14284:
 #0: ffff88814bdc8410 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_sendfile+0x600/0x1070 fs/read_write.c:1253

stack backtrace:
CPU: 1 PID: 14284 Comm: syz-executor.0 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc2-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/03/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
 __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
 __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
 mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
 seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182
 proc_reg_read_iter+0x1bc/0x290 fs/proc/inode.c:305
 call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:1865 [inline]
 copy_splice_read+0x4c9/0x9c0 fs/splice.c:367
 splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c4/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1070
 do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1195
 do_sendfile+0x623/0x1070 fs/read_write.c:1254
 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
RIP: 0033:0x7fed17a7cb29
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 e1 20 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fed188640c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fed17b9c1f0 RCX: 00007fed17a7cb29
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000009 RDI: 0000000000000008
RBP: 00007fed17ac847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 4000000000010046 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000006e R14: 00007fed17b9c1f0 R15: 00007fff433e8a98
 </TASK>


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.

If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with:
#syz fix: exact-commit-title

If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set subsystems: new-subsystem
(See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard)

If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with:
#syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report

If you want to undo deduplication, reply with:
#syz undup

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-07-19 13:17 [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2) syzbot
@ 2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
  2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
  2024-01-28  7:53   ` Hillf Danton
  2023-12-20  0:30 ` syzbot
  2024-01-27  2:28 ` syzbot
  2 siblings, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2023-12-19 19:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amir73il, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-unionfs, miklos,
	syzkaller-bugs

syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
git tree:       upstream
console+strace: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12181571e80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176a4f49e80000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000

Downloadable assets:
disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/cc8943b61205/disk-2cf4f94d.raw.xz
vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/8b515b02658d/vmlinux-2cf4f94d.xz
kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/1f8ccc925248/bzImage-2cf4f94d.xz

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
6.7.0-rc6-syzkaller-00010-g2cf4f94d8e86 #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------------------------
syz-executor424/7758 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88801f1ef9e0 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182

but task is already holding lock:
ffff88814cd7a418 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_sendfile+0x607/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1253

which lock already depends on the new lock.


the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #3
 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline]
       sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1710
       mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
       ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x360 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3477 [inline]
       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3546 [inline]
       path_openat+0x13fa/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
       do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3809
       do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1437
       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1460 [inline]
       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1456 [inline]
       __x64_sys_open+0x225/0x270 fs/open.c:1456
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b

-> #2 (&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]){++++}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       down_read+0xb1/0xa40 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1526
       inode_lock_shared include/linux/fs.h:812 [inline]
       lookup_slow+0x45/0x70 fs/namei.c:1710
       walk_component+0x2d0/0x400 fs/namei.c:2002
       lookup_last fs/namei.c:2459 [inline]
       path_lookupat+0x16f/0x450 fs/namei.c:2483
       filename_lookup+0x255/0x610 fs/namei.c:2512
       kern_path+0x35/0x50 fs/namei.c:2610
       lookup_bdev+0xc5/0x290 block/bdev.c:979
       resume_store+0x1a0/0x710 kernel/power/hibernate.c:1177
       kernfs_fop_write_iter+0x3b3/0x510 fs/kernfs/file.c:334
       do_iter_readv_writev+0x330/0x4a0
       do_iter_write+0x1f6/0x8d0 fs/read_write.c:860
       iter_file_splice_write+0x86d/0x1010 fs/splice.c:736
       do_splice_from fs/splice.c:933 [inline]
       direct_splice_actor+0xea/0x1c0 fs/splice.c:1142
       splice_direct_to_actor+0x376/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1088
       do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1194
       do_sendfile+0x62c/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1254
       __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b

-> #1 (&of->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       kernfs_seq_start+0x53/0x3a0 fs/kernfs/file.c:154
       seq_read_iter+0x3d4/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:225
       call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2014 [inline]
       new_sync_read fs/read_write.c:389 [inline]
       vfs_read+0x78b/0xb00 fs/read_write.c:470
       ksys_read+0x1a0/0x2c0 fs/read_write.c:613
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b

-> #0 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}:
       check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
       check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
       validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
       __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
       __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
       __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
       seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182
       call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2014 [inline]
       copy_splice_read+0x4c9/0x9c0 fs/splice.c:364
       splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c4/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1069
       do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1194
       do_sendfile+0x62c/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1254
       __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
       __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
       do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b

other info that might help us debug this:

Chain exists of:
  &p->lock --> &ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth] --> sb_writers#4

 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0                    CPU1
       ----                    ----
  rlock(sb_writers#4);
                               lock(&ovl_i_mutex_dir_key[depth]);
                               lock(sb_writers#4);
  lock(&p->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

1 lock held by syz-executor424/7758:
 #0: ffff88814cd7a418 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: do_sendfile+0x607/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1253

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 7758 Comm: syz-executor424 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6-syzkaller-00010-g2cf4f94d8e86 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 11/17/2023
Call Trace:
 <TASK>
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
 dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
 check_noncircular+0x366/0x490 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2187
 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3134 [inline]
 check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3253 [inline]
 validate_chain+0x1909/0x5ab0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3869
 __lock_acquire+0x1345/0x1fd0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5137
 lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
 __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 [inline]
 __mutex_lock+0x136/0xd60 kernel/locking/mutex.c:747
 seq_read_iter+0xb2/0xd10 fs/seq_file.c:182
 call_read_iter include/linux/fs.h:2014 [inline]
 copy_splice_read+0x4c9/0x9c0 fs/splice.c:364
 splice_direct_to_actor+0x2c4/0x9e0 fs/splice.c:1069
 do_splice_direct+0x2ac/0x3f0 fs/splice.c:1194
 do_sendfile+0x62c/0x1000 fs/read_write.c:1254
 __do_sys_sendfile64 fs/read_write.c:1322 [inline]
 __se_sys_sendfile64+0x17c/0x1e0 fs/read_write.c:1308
 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
 do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b
RIP: 0033:0x7fef41211d49
Code: 28 00 00 00 75 05 48 83 c4 28 c3 e8 81 18 00 00 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
RSP: 002b:00007fef411d2218 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000028
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fef4129c3e8 RCX: 00007fef41211d49
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000004 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fef4129c3e0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0001000000201007 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 00007fef41269060
R13: 0030656c69662f2e R14: 6e6f3d6f6e69782c R15: 0079616c7265766f
 </TASK>


---
If you want syzbot to run the reproducer, reply with:
#syz test: git://repo/address.git branch-or-commit-hash
If you attach or paste a git patch, syzbot will apply it before testing.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-07-19 13:17 [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2) syzbot
  2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
@ 2023-12-20  0:30 ` syzbot
  2023-12-20  3:53   ` Amir Goldstein
  2024-01-27  2:28 ` syzbot
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2023-12-20  0:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amir73il, axboe, hch, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-unionfs,
	miklos, rafael, syzkaller-bugs

syzbot has bisected this issue to:

commit 1e8c813b083c4122dfeaa5c3b11028331026e85d
Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Date:   Wed May 31 12:55:32 2023 +0000

    PM: hibernate: don't use early_lookup_bdev in resume_store

bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=14b15592e80000
start commit:   2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
git tree:       upstream
final oops:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=16b15592e80000
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12b15592e80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176a4f49e80000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000

Reported-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 1e8c813b083c ("PM: hibernate: don't use early_lookup_bdev in resume_store")

For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-12-20  0:30 ` syzbot
@ 2023-12-20  3:53   ` Amir Goldstein
  2023-12-20  4:13     ` syzbot
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2023-12-20  3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot
  Cc: axboe, hch, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel, linux-unionfs, miklos,
	rafael, syzkaller-bugs, Christian Brauner, David Howells

On Wed, Dec 20, 2023 at 2:30 AM syzbot
<syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot has bisected this issue to:
>
> commit 1e8c813b083c4122dfeaa5c3b11028331026e85d
> Author: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Date:   Wed May 31 12:55:32 2023 +0000
>
>     PM: hibernate: don't use early_lookup_bdev in resume_store
>
> bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=14b15592e80000
> start commit:   2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> git tree:       upstream
> final oops:     https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/report.txt?x=16b15592e80000
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=12b15592e80000
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176a4f49e80000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Fixes: 1e8c813b083c ("PM: hibernate: don't use early_lookup_bdev in resume_store")
>

I'm not sure this bisection is reliable, so I wouldn't use this Fixes tag.
The reproducer may be a little flakey.

Anyway, this is just one of many problems, real or false positives,
related to the unholy dependency which sendfile() creates between
locks on two different filesystems.

I think those changes that are queued for 6.8 are going so fix this class
of problems:

#syz test: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.rw

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-12-20  3:53   ` Amir Goldstein
@ 2023-12-20  4:13     ` syzbot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2023-12-20  4:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amir73il, axboe, brauner, dhowells, hch, linux-fsdevel,
	linux-kernel, linux-unionfs, miklos, rafael, syzkaller-bugs

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

Tested on:

commit:         d9e5d310 fsnotify: optionally pass access range in fil..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vfs/vfs.git vfs.rw
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=127b3016e80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=a5300d21645bcd09
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Note: no patches were applied.
Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-07-19 13:17 [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2) syzbot
  2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
  2023-12-20  0:30 ` syzbot
@ 2024-01-27  2:28 ` syzbot
  2024-01-28 10:11   ` Amir Goldstein
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-01-27  2:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: amir73il, axboe, brauner, dhowells, hch, jack, linux-fsdevel,
	linux-kernel, linux-unionfs, miklos, rafael, syzkaller-bugs

syzbot suspects this issue was fixed by commit:

commit da40448ce4eb4de18eb7b0db61dddece32677939
Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu Nov 30 14:16:23 2023 +0000

    fs: move file_start_write() into direct_splice_actor()

bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=105aa1a0180000
start commit:   2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
git tree:       upstream
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176a4f49e80000
C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000

If the result looks correct, please mark the issue as fixed by replying with:

#syz fix: fs: move file_start_write() into direct_splice_actor()

For information about bisection process see: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#bisection

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
@ 2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
  2024-01-27 11:57     ` syzbot
  2024-01-28 21:43     ` Al Viro
  2024-01-28  7:53   ` Hillf Danton
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2024-01-27 11:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot; +Cc: linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:43:27 -0800
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> git tree:       upstream
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000

#syz test https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git  2cf4f94d8e86

--- x/fs/namei.c
+++ y/fs/namei.c
@@ -3533,6 +3533,8 @@ static const char *open_last_lookups(str
 
 	if (open_flag & (O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR)) {
 		got_write = !mnt_want_write(nd->path.mnt);
+		if (!got_write && (open_flag & O_CREAT))
+			return ERR_PTR(-EISDIR);
 		/*
 		 * do _not_ fail yet - we might not need that or fail with
 		 * a different error; let lookup_open() decide; we'll be
--

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
@ 2024-01-27 11:57     ` syzbot
  2024-01-28 21:43     ` Al Viro
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-01-27 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hdanton, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

Hello,

syzbot tried to test the proposed patch but the build/boot failed:

failed to checkout kernel repo https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git on commit 2cf4f94d8e86: failed to run ["git" "fetch" "--force" "--tags" "4d52a57a3858a6eee0d0b25cc3a0c9533f747d8f" "2cf4f94d8e86"]: exit status 128
fatal: couldn't find remote ref 2cf4f94d8e86



Tested on:

commit:         [unknown 
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2cf4f94d8e86
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
compiler:       
patch:          https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/patch.diff?x=102f1930180000


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
  2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
@ 2024-01-28  7:53   ` Hillf Danton
  2024-01-28  8:24     ` syzbot
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2024-01-28  7:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot; +Cc: linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:43:27 -0800
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> 
> HEAD commit:    2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> git tree:       upstream
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000

#syz test https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git  master

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2024-01-28  7:53   ` Hillf Danton
@ 2024-01-28  8:24     ` syzbot
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-01-28  8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: hdanton, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

Hello,

syzbot has tested the proposed patch and the reproducer did not trigger any issue:

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com

Tested on:

commit:         8a696a29 Merge tag 'platform-drivers-x86-v6.8-2' of gi..
git tree:       https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=1516855fe80000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5057c9bffe24fc70
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
compiler:       Debian clang version 15.0.6, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.40

Note: no patches were applied.
Note: testing is done by a robot and is best-effort only.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2024-01-27  2:28 ` syzbot
@ 2024-01-28 10:11   ` Amir Goldstein
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Amir Goldstein @ 2024-01-28 10:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: syzbot
  Cc: axboe, brauner, dhowells, hch, jack, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel,
	linux-unionfs, miklos, rafael, syzkaller-bugs

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 4:28 AM syzbot
<syzbot+da4f9f61f96525c62cc7@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> wrote:
>
> syzbot suspects this issue was fixed by commit:
>
> commit da40448ce4eb4de18eb7b0db61dddece32677939
> Author: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com>
> Date:   Thu Nov 30 14:16:23 2023 +0000
>
>     fs: move file_start_write() into direct_splice_actor()
>
> bisection log:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/bisect.txt?x=105aa1a0180000
> start commit:   2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> git tree:       upstream
> kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=e5751b3a2226135d
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=da4f9f61f96525c62cc7
> syz repro:      https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=176a4f49e80000
> C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000
>
> If the result looks correct, please mark the issue as fixed by replying with:
>
> #syz fix: fs: move file_start_write() into direct_splice_actor()

Yes. I already wrote that this work is going to fix this repro
as well as other potential deadlocks.

#syz fix: fs: move file_start_write() into direct_splice_actor()

Thanks,
Amir.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
  2024-01-27 11:57     ` syzbot
@ 2024-01-28 21:43     ` Al Viro
  2024-01-29  5:07       ` Hillf Danton
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: Al Viro @ 2024-01-28 21:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Hillf Danton; +Cc: syzbot, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 07:46:10PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:43:27 -0800
> > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> > 
> > HEAD commit:    2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> > git tree:       upstream
> > C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000
> 
> #syz test https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git  2cf4f94d8e86
> 
> --- x/fs/namei.c
> +++ y/fs/namei.c
> @@ -3533,6 +3533,8 @@ static const char *open_last_lookups(str
>  
>  	if (open_flag & (O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR)) {
>  		got_write = !mnt_want_write(nd->path.mnt);
> +		if (!got_write && (open_flag & O_CREAT))
> +			return ERR_PTR(-EISDIR);

NAK.

Please, RTFComment just below your addition.  Besides, EISDIR is
obviously bogus in a lot of cases, starting with attempting to
create a new file on a read-only filesystem.  Surely
echo bugger > /mnt/cdrom/no_such_file_there
should *not* fail with "no_such_file_there: Is a directory"?

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

* Re: [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2)
  2024-01-28 21:43     ` Al Viro
@ 2024-01-29  5:07       ` Hillf Danton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Hillf Danton @ 2024-01-29  5:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Al Viro; +Cc: syzbot, Amir Goldstein, linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs

On Sun, 28 Jan 2024 21:43:35 +0000 Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2024 at 07:46:10PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 11:43:27 -0800
> > > syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
> > > 
> > > HEAD commit:    2cf4f94d8e86 Merge tag 'scsi-fixes' of git://git.kernel.or..
> > > git tree:       upstream
> > > C reproducer:   https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=154aa8d6e80000
> > 
> > #syz test https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git  2cf4f94d8e86
> > 
> > --- x/fs/namei.c
> > +++ y/fs/namei.c
> > @@ -3533,6 +3533,8 @@ static const char *open_last_lookups(str
> >  
> >  	if (open_flag & (O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR)) {
> >  		got_write = !mnt_want_write(nd->path.mnt);
> > +		if (!got_write && (open_flag & O_CREAT))
> > +			return ERR_PTR(-EISDIR);
> 
> NAK.

Thanks for looking at it, the AV legend.
> 
> Please, RTFComment just below your addition.

That is a simple debug patch to test why mnt_want_write() is needed in
ovl_create_object() as per the syzbot report [1], given the locking
order in open_last_lookups() in case of O_CREAT.

	mnt_want_write();
	inode_lock();

> Besides, EISDIR is
> obviously bogus in a lot of cases, starting with attempting to
> create a new file on a read-only filesystem.

EISDIR should have been replaced with EDEADLOCK.

	-> #3
	 (sb_writers#4){.+.+}-{0:0}:
	       lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x530 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5754
	       percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline]
	       __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1635 [inline]
	       sb_start_write+0x4d/0x1c0 include/linux/fs.h:1710
	       mnt_want_write+0x3f/0x90 fs/namespace.c:404
	       ovl_create_object+0x13b/0x360 fs/overlayfs/dir.c:629
	       lookup_open fs/namei.c:3477 [inline]
	       open_last_lookups fs/namei.c:3546 [inline]
	       path_openat+0x13fa/0x3290 fs/namei.c:3776
	       do_filp_open+0x234/0x490 fs/namei.c:3809
	       do_sys_openat2+0x13e/0x1d0 fs/open.c:1437
	       do_sys_open fs/open.c:1452 [inline]
	       __do_sys_open fs/open.c:1460 [inline]
	       __se_sys_open fs/open.c:1456 [inline]
	       __x64_sys_open+0x225/0x270 fs/open.c:1456
	       do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
	       do_syscall_64+0x45/0x110 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
	       entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0x6b

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000008efd70060ce21487@google.com/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-01-29  5:08 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-07-19 13:17 [syzbot] [overlayfs?] possible deadlock in seq_read_iter (2) syzbot
2023-12-19 19:43 ` syzbot
2024-01-27 11:46   ` Hillf Danton
2024-01-27 11:57     ` syzbot
2024-01-28 21:43     ` Al Viro
2024-01-29  5:07       ` Hillf Danton
2024-01-28  7:53   ` Hillf Danton
2024-01-28  8:24     ` syzbot
2023-12-20  0:30 ` syzbot
2023-12-20  3:53   ` Amir Goldstein
2023-12-20  4:13     ` syzbot
2024-01-27  2:28 ` syzbot
2024-01-28 10:11   ` Amir Goldstein

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).