From: "Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@Oracle.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@chromium.org>, Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, keescook@chromium.org,
jannh@google.com, sroettger@google.com, willy@infradead.org,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, usama.anjum@collabora.com,
rdunlap@infradead.org, jorgelo@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mm@kvack.org, pedro.falcato@gmail.com,
dave.hansen@intel.com, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce mseal
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 16:18:07 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240202211807.6sca4ppezma7cyev@revolver> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjNXcqDVxDBJW8hEVpHHAE0odJEf63+oigabtpU6GoCBg@mail.gmail.com>
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> [240202 15:37]:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:32, Theo de Raadt <deraadt@openbsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > Unix system calls must be atomic.
> >
> > They either return an error, and that is a promise they made no changes.
>
> That's actually not true, and never has been.
...
>
> In the specific case of mseal(), I suspect there are very few reasons
> ever *not* to be atomic, so in this particular context atomicity is
> likely always something that should be guaranteed. But I just wanted
> to point out that it's most definitely not a black-and-white issue in
> the general case.
There will be a larger performance cost to checking up front without
allowing the partial completion. I don't expect these to be high, but
it's something to keep in mind if we are okay with the flexibility and
less atomic operation.
Thanks,
Liam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-02 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-31 17:50 [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce mseal jeffxu
2024-01-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 1/4] mseal: Wire up mseal syscall jeffxu
2024-01-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 2/4] mseal: add " jeffxu
2024-02-01 23:11 ` Eric Biggers
2024-02-02 3:30 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 3:54 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 4:03 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 4:10 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 4:22 ` Jeff Xu
2024-01-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 3/4] selftest mm/mseal memory sealing jeffxu
2024-01-31 17:50 ` [PATCH v8 4/4] mseal:add documentation jeffxu
2024-01-31 19:34 ` [PATCH v8 0/4] Introduce mseal Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-01 1:27 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-01 1:46 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-01 16:56 ` Bird, Tim
2024-02-01 1:55 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-01 20:45 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-01 22:24 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 1:06 ` Greg KH
2024-02-02 3:24 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 3:29 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-02 3:46 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 15:18 ` Greg KH
2024-02-01 22:37 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-01 22:54 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-01 23:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-01 23:43 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 0:26 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 3:20 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 4:05 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 4:54 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 5:00 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 17:58 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 18:51 ` Pedro Falcato
2024-02-02 21:20 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-04 19:39 ` David Laight
2024-02-02 17:05 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 21:02 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 3:14 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 15:13 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-02 17:24 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 19:21 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-02 19:32 ` Theo de Raadt
2024-02-02 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-02 20:57 ` Jeff Xu
2024-02-02 21:18 ` Liam R. Howlett [this message]
2024-02-02 23:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-02-03 4:45 ` Liam R. Howlett
2024-02-05 22:13 ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2024-02-02 20:14 ` Jeff Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240202211807.6sca4ppezma7cyev@revolver \
--to=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=groeck@chromium.org \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffxu@chromium.org \
--cc=jeffxu@google.com \
--cc=jorgelo@chromium.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pedro.falcato@gmail.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sroettger@google.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=usama.anjum@collabora.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).