* [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_warn_missing() to consolidate logs
@ 2019-02-07 16:14 John Garry
2019-02-07 16:21 ` Jeremy Linton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: John Garry @ 2019-02-07 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: rjw, lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, jeremy.linton, linuxarm, John Garry
For a system using ACPI-based FW without a PPTT, we may get many warnings
about the lack of a PPTT, as shown:
root@(none)$ dmesg | grep -i pptt
[ 0.010125] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate
[ 7.138339] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
[ 7.145368] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
These logs are generated with pr_warn_once(), so the intention was for a
single log, but the logs overlap, so consolidate them.
Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
index da031b1df6f5..ad31c50de3be 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
@@ -451,6 +451,11 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_ta
return cpu;
}
+static void acpi_pptt_warn_missing(void)
+{
+ pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu and cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
+}
+
/**
* topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag() - Find a unique topology value for a feature
* @table: Pointer to the head of the PPTT table
@@ -498,7 +503,7 @@ static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate\n");
+ acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
return -ENOENT;
}
retval = topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(table, cpu, level, flag);
@@ -531,7 +536,7 @@ int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
+ acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
} else {
number_of_levels = acpi_find_cache_levels(table, acpi_cpu_id);
acpi_put_table(table);
@@ -563,7 +568,7 @@ int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
+ acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
return -ENOENT;
}
@@ -617,7 +622,7 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, topology may be inaccurate\n");
+ acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
return -ENOENT;
}
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_warn_missing() to consolidate logs
2019-02-07 16:14 [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_warn_missing() to consolidate logs John Garry
@ 2019-02-07 16:21 ` Jeremy Linton
2019-02-08 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Linton @ 2019-02-07 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: John Garry, rjw, lenb; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linuxarm
Hi,
On 2/7/19 10:14 AM, John Garry wrote:
> For a system using ACPI-based FW without a PPTT, we may get many warnings
> about the lack of a PPTT, as shown:
>
> root@(none)$ dmesg | grep -i pptt
> [ 0.010125] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate
> [ 7.138339] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
> [ 7.145368] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
>
> These logs are generated with pr_warn_once(), so the intention was for a
> single log, but the logs overlap, so consolidate them.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> index da031b1df6f5..ad31c50de3be 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> @@ -451,6 +451,11 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_ta
> return cpu;
> }
>
> +static void acpi_pptt_warn_missing(void)
> +{
> + pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu and cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> +}
> +
> /**
> * topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag() - Find a unique topology value for a feature
> * @table: Pointer to the head of the PPTT table
> @@ -498,7 +503,7 @@ static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
>
> status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate\n");
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> return -ENOENT;
> }
> retval = topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(table, cpu, level, flag);
> @@ -531,7 +536,7 @@ int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> } else {
> number_of_levels = acpi_find_cache_levels(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> acpi_put_table(table);
> @@ -563,7 +568,7 @@ int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
>
> status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
> @@ -617,7 +622,7 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
>
> status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, topology may be inaccurate\n");
> + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> return -ENOENT;
> }
>
>
This all looks fine to me,
Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
Thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_warn_missing() to consolidate logs
2019-02-07 16:21 ` Jeremy Linton
@ 2019-02-08 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rafael J. Wysocki @ 2019-02-08 11:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Linton, John Garry; +Cc: lenb, linux-acpi, linux-kernel, linuxarm
On Thursday, February 7, 2019 5:21:35 PM CET Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/7/19 10:14 AM, John Garry wrote:
> > For a system using ACPI-based FW without a PPTT, we may get many warnings
> > about the lack of a PPTT, as shown:
> >
> > root@(none)$ dmesg | grep -i pptt
> > [ 0.010125] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate
> > [ 7.138339] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
> > [ 7.145368] ACPI PPTT: No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate
> >
> > These logs are generated with pr_warn_once(), so the intention was for a
> > single log, but the logs overlap, so consolidate them.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> > index da031b1df6f5..ad31c50de3be 100644
> > --- a/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/acpi/pptt.c
> > @@ -451,6 +451,11 @@ static struct acpi_pptt_processor *acpi_find_processor_package_id(struct acpi_ta
> > return cpu;
> > }
> >
> > +static void acpi_pptt_warn_missing(void)
> > +{
> > + pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu and cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > * topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag() - Find a unique topology value for a feature
> > * @table: Pointer to the head of the PPTT table
> > @@ -498,7 +503,7 @@ static int find_acpi_cpu_topology_tag(unsigned int cpu, int level, int flag)
> >
> > status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cpu topology may be inaccurate\n");
> > + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> > retval = topology_get_acpi_cpu_tag(table, cpu, level, flag);
> > @@ -531,7 +536,7 @@ int acpi_find_last_cache_level(unsigned int cpu)
> > acpi_cpu_id = get_acpi_id_for_cpu(cpu);
> > status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> > + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> > } else {
> > number_of_levels = acpi_find_cache_levels(table, acpi_cpu_id);
> > acpi_put_table(table);
> > @@ -563,7 +568,7 @@ int cache_setup_acpi(unsigned int cpu)
> >
> > status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, cache topology may be inaccurate\n");
> > + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> >
> > @@ -617,7 +622,7 @@ int find_acpi_cpu_cache_topology(unsigned int cpu, int level)
> >
> > status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_PPTT, 0, &table);
> > if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> > - pr_warn_once("No PPTT table found, topology may be inaccurate\n");
> > + acpi_pptt_warn_missing();
> > return -ENOENT;
> > }
> >
> >
>
> This all looks fine to me,
>
> Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>
>
> Thanks!
>
Patch applied, thanks!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-02-08 11:35 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-02-07 16:14 [PATCH] ACPI/PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_warn_missing() to consolidate logs John Garry
2019-02-07 16:21 ` Jeremy Linton
2019-02-08 11:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).