linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
To: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>,
	<stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	<alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
	<ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
	<cristian.birsan@microchip.com>
Cc: <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: host: ohci-at91: suspend/resume ports after/before OHCI accesses
Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2021 14:40:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <21280c02-0dd2-461a-1baf-464f280d2f0e@microchip.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210609121027.70951-1-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>

On 09/06/2021 at 14:10, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> On SAMA7G5 suspending ports will cut the access to OHCI registers and
> any subsequent access to them will lead to CPU being blocked trying to
> access that memory. Same thing happens on resume: if OHCI memory is
> accessed before resuming ports the CPU will block on that access. The
> OCHI memory is accessed on suspend/resume though
> ohci_suspend()/ohci_resume().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>

Claudiu,

Your patch look good to me.

In addition, I see ohci_at91_port_suspend() function also used in 
ohci_at91_hub_control(). It might suffer the same problem as I see 
accesses to ohci register, at first glance.

Can you please double check that we are not in such condition with calls 
to ohci_at91_hub_control()?

Best regards,
   Nicolas


> ---
> 
> The patch was tested on SAMA7G5, SAMA5D2 and SAM9X60.
> 
> Thank you,
> Claudiu Beznea
> 
>   drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c | 9 +++++----
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
> index b3a6a497dcb1..7c6202b05ff4 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-at91.c
> @@ -666,8 +666,6 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend(struct device *dev)
>   	if (ohci_at91->wakeup)
>   		enable_irq_wake(hcd->irq);
>   
> -	ohci_at91_port_suspend(ohci_at91, 1);
> -
>   	ret = ohci_suspend(hcd, ohci_at91->wakeup);
>   	if (ret) {
>   		if (ohci_at91->wakeup)
> @@ -687,7 +685,10 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_suspend(struct device *dev)
>   		/* flush the writes */
>   		(void) ohci_readl (ohci, &ohci->regs->control);
>   		msleep(1);
> +		ohci_at91_port_suspend(ohci_at91, 1);
>   		at91_stop_clock(ohci_at91);
> +	} else {
> +		ohci_at91_port_suspend(ohci_at91, 1);
>   	}
>   
>   	return ret;
> @@ -699,6 +700,8 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	struct usb_hcd	*hcd = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   	struct ohci_at91_priv *ohci_at91 = hcd_to_ohci_at91_priv(hcd);
>   
> +	ohci_at91_port_suspend(ohci_at91, 0);
> +
>   	if (ohci_at91->wakeup)
>   		disable_irq_wake(hcd->irq);
>   	else
> @@ -706,8 +709,6 @@ ohci_hcd_at91_drv_resume(struct device *dev)
>   
>   	ohci_resume(hcd, false);
>   
> -	ohci_at91_port_suspend(ohci_at91, 0);
> -
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> 


-- 
Nicolas Ferre

  reply	other threads:[~2021-06-09 12:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-09 12:10 [PATCH] usb: host: ohci-at91: suspend/resume ports after/before OHCI accesses Claudiu Beznea
2021-06-09 12:40 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2021-06-09 23:07 ` Alan Stern
2021-06-23 12:47   ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-23 13:59     ` Alan Stern
2021-06-23 14:09       ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-23 14:19         ` Alan Stern
2021-06-23 14:33           ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-23 16:41             ` Alan Stern
2021-06-24  6:40               ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-24  6:54                 ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-24 13:23                 ` Alan Stern
2021-06-30 14:46                   ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-06-30 18:21                     ` Alan Stern
2021-07-01  5:45                       ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-07-01 14:01                         ` Alan Stern
2021-06-30 14:47                   ` Claudiu.Beznea
2021-07-21  8:08 ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=21280c02-0dd2-461a-1baf-464f280d2f0e@microchip.com \
    --to=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
    --cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=claudiu.beznea@microchip.com \
    --cc=cristian.birsan@microchip.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).