linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>,
	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
	"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@intel.com>,
	"Penner, Miles J" <miles.j.penner@intel.com>,
	Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] PCI: acpiphp: do not check for SLOT_ENABLED in enable_device()
Date: Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:49:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2243397.l6uQhQpZPo@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130702203117.GT9294@intel.com>

On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 11:31:17 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:29:12PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Tuesday, July 02, 2013 10:40:39 AM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:29 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> > > > On Monday, July 01, 2013 09:36:13 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > >> On Mon, Jul 01, 2013 at 04:01:37PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > >> > > Given the fact that SLOT_ENABLED is only checked in acpiphp_enable_slot()
> > > >> > > (after this patch) and that /sys/bus/pci/slots/*/power uses SLOT_POWEREDON
> > > >> > > anyway, should we remove the whole flag?
> > > >> >
> > > >> > Sure, if it is not necessary any more, we should remove it.
> > > >>
> > > >> Well, there is one thing that changes due that. Once the flag is gone
> > > >> userspace can do 'echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/*/power' several times and
> > > >> the slot is always re-enumerated.
> > > >>
> > > >> If that is not acceptable we should probably move the SLOT_ENABLED check
> > > >> closer to acpiphp_core:enable_device() and drop it from here, so that we
> > > >> always re-enumerate on Bus Check event but userspace can only do enable
> > > >> once (we still re-enumerate on Bus Check).
> > > >
> > > > Yes, that sounds like the right thing to do.
> > > 
> > > Is it actually a problem if we re-enumerate every time userspace does
> > > 'echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/slots/*/power'?  I assume re-enumeration is a
> > > no-op if nothing has changed.
> > 
> > Well, if it's a no-op in that case, then re-enumerating shouldn't be a problem,
> > but is it a no-op?
> 
> I can confirm that it's a no-op (at least for the Thunderbolt case).
> Basically we just scan for new devices and nothing is to be found.

We can try to drop SLOT_ENABLED entirely then I suppose.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-02 20:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-25 16:22 [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 1/6] PCI: acpiphp: do not check for SLOT_ENABLED in enable_device() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:28   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:25     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28  9:51     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 17:00       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-28 18:54         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01  9:32           ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-01 14:01             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-01 18:36               ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02  1:29                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 16:40                   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 20:29                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:31                       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-07-02 20:49                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI: acpiphp: enable_device(): rescan even if no new devices on slot Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 23:37   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 13:02     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:32       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:50         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 16:54         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27  1:20   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:04     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI: introduce pci_trim_stale_devices() Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 17:47   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 17:56     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 19:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI: acpiphp: check for new devices on enabled host Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-26  9:39     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-27 19:05   ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28  9:33     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-06-28 16:22       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-28 20:04         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI: acpiphp: look _RMV method a bit deeper in the hierarhcy Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:15   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:31     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 18:31       ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-25 18:51         ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 19:30           ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-07-02 10:44   ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 17:09     ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-02 17:45       ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2013-07-02 20:48         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-07-02 20:40       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-25 16:22 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/PCI: quirk Thunderbolt PCI-to-PCI bridges Mika Westerberg
2013-06-25 21:15   ` Jesse Barnes
2013-06-26 12:17     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 15:04       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2013-06-26 20:59       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:15         ` Alex Williamson
2013-06-27 13:09           ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 22:18   ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 22:26     ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:31       ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:44         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 22:38           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-26 22:55         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 23:56           ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 16:00             ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-27 17:27               ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-27 13:58       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 13:54     ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 16:27       ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-27 17:18         ` Yinghai Lu
2013-06-25 23:24 ` [PATCH 0/6] Thunderbolt workarounds take 2 Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26  7:25   ` Mika Westerberg
2013-06-26 12:45     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:48       ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-06-26 20:01         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2013-06-26 19:55           ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2243397.l6uQhQpZPo@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=bruce.w.allan@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=miles.j.penner@intel.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).