linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	davem@davemloft.net
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 18:15:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <229ebc3b-1c7e-474f-36f9-0fa603b889fb@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1567178728.5576.32.camel@lca.pw>



On 8/30/19 5:25 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-30 at 17:11 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>> On 8/30/19 4:57 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>>> When running heavy memory pressure workloads, the system is throwing
>>> endless warnings below due to the allocation could fail from
>>> __build_skb(), and the volume of this call could be huge which may
>>> generate a lot of serial console output and cosumes all CPUs as
>>> warn_alloc() could be expensive by calling dump_stack() and then
>>> show_mem().
>>>
>>> Fix it by silencing the warning in this call site. Also, it seems
>>> unnecessary to even print a warning at all if the allocation failed in
>>> __build_skb(), as it may just retransmit the packet and retry.
>>>
>>
>> Same patches are showing up there and there from time to time.
>>
>> Why is this particular spot interesting, against all others not adding
>> __GFP_NOWARN ?
>>
>> Are we going to have hundred of patches adding __GFP_NOWARN at various points,
>> or should we get something generic to not flood the syslog in case of memory
>> pressure ?
>>
> 
> From my testing which uses LTP oom* tests. There are only 3 places need to be
> patched. The other two are in IOMMU code for both Intel and AMD. The place is
> particular interesting because it could cause the system with floating serial
> console output for days without making progress in OOM. I suppose it ends up in
> a looping condition that warn_alloc() would end up generating more calls into
> __build_skb() via ksoftirqd.
> 

Yes, but what about other tests done by other people ?

You do not really answer my last question, which was really the point I tried
to make.

If there is a risk of flooding the syslog, we should fix this generically
in mm layer, not adding hundred of __GFP_NOWARN all over the places.

Maybe just make __GFP_NOWARN the default, I dunno.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-30 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-30 14:57 [PATCH] net/skbuff: silence warnings under memory pressure Qian Cai
2019-08-30 15:11 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-08-30 15:25   ` Qian Cai
2019-08-30 16:15     ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2019-08-30 18:06       ` Qian Cai
2019-09-03 13:22       ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-03 15:42         ` Qian Cai
2019-09-03 18:53           ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-03 21:42             ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04  6:15               ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04  6:41                 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04  6:54                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04  7:19                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04  7:43                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 12:14                         ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 14:48                           ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04 15:07                             ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 20:42                             ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05  8:32                               ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 14:09                                 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 15:06                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 15:14                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2019-09-05 11:32                               ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-05 16:03                                 ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 17:14                                   ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-06  2:50                                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06  4:32                                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 21:17                                     ` Qian Cai
2019-09-05 17:23                                 ` Steven Rostedt
2019-09-06  3:39                                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 15:32                                     ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-09  1:10                                       ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-06 14:55                                 ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-06 19:51                                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-14 17:12                                 ` Qian Cai
2019-11-18 15:27                                   ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19  0:41                                     ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-19  9:41                                       ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-19 15:58                                         ` Qian Cai
2019-11-20  1:30                                         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-20 16:13                                           ` Petr Mladek
2019-11-21  1:05                                             ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-11-21  9:15                                               ` Petr Mladek
2019-09-04  7:00                   ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2019-09-04  8:25                     ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 11:59                       ` Qian Cai
2019-09-04 12:07                         ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-04 12:28                           ` Qian Cai
2019-09-07 11:00                       ` Tetsuo Handa
2019-09-04  6:15               ` Michal Hocko
2019-09-02 14:24     ` Vlastimil Babka

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=229ebc3b-1c7e-474f-36f9-0fa603b889fb@gmail.com \
    --to=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).