* [PATCH] hinic: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
@ 2022-01-09 15:57 Christophe JAILLET
2022-01-10 1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Christophe JAILLET @ 2022-01-09 15:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller, Jakub Kicinski
Cc: linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, Christophe JAILLET, netdev
As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
[1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
index 1e1b1be86174..05329292d940 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_main.c
@@ -1392,12 +1392,8 @@ static int hinic_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
if (err) {
- dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't set 64-bit DMA mask\n");
- err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
- if (err) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set DMA mask\n");
- goto err_dma_mask;
- }
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set DMA mask\n");
+ goto err_dma_mask;
}
err = nic_dev_init(pdev);
--
2.32.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] hinic: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
2022-01-09 15:57 [PATCH] hinic: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration Christophe JAILLET
@ 2022-01-10 1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf @ 2022-01-10 1:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christophe JAILLET; +Cc: davem, kuba, linux-kernel, kernel-janitors, netdev
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2022 16:57:50 +0100 you wrote:
> As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
> dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same reason.
>
> Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
>
> [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
>
> [...]
Here is the summary with links:
- hinic: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/004464835bfc
You are awesome, thank you!
--
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2022-01-10 1:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2022-01-09 15:57 [PATCH] hinic: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration Christophe JAILLET
2022-01-10 1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).