From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: "Shaheed R. Haque" <srhaque@iee.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu
Subject: Re: Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2003 20:52:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <241480000.1050205930@[10.10.2.4]> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1050177383.3e986f67b7f68@netmail.pipex.net>
> Hmmm, AFAICS, sched_getaffinity() and sched_setaffinity()
> allow the calling process to be bound to the nominated CPU(s), but that is not
> the same as giving them exclusive access, is it? In other words, other
> processes which have no particualr affinity needs can presumably still be
> scheduled to run on the same processor.
>
> I am looking for something more akin to the patch I referred to...or did I miss
> something in the effect of set_cpus_allowed()?
The NUMA scheduler work can trivially be converted into arbitrary
scheduler pools - they are not designed for dynamic modification
at the moment, but could be without too much effort I think.
Around 2.5.59 or so I posted a patch to rename them to pools, though
we had a few other things to sort out at the time. I might revive it
at some point - it's pretty simple.
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-13 3:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-12 11:20 Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6? Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 12:11 ` Dave Jones
2003-04-12 12:24 ` Antonio Vargas
2003-04-12 14:54 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-04-12 18:23 ` Robert Love
2003-04-12 19:56 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-12 20:02 ` Robert Love
2003-04-13 8:30 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-04-13 14:28 ` Robert Love
2003-05-13 11:49 ` 2.6 must-fix list, v2 Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-13 20:02 ` Andrew Morton
2003-05-13 22:46 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 2:42 ` Steven Cole
2003-05-14 11:49 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 13:08 ` Steven Cole
2003-05-13 22:49 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-14 11:02 ` Felipe Alfaro Solana
2003-05-14 15:59 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 16:04 ` Robert Love
2003-05-14 21:01 ` shaheed
2003-05-14 21:15 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 9:19 ` Shaheed R. Haque
2003-05-15 15:32 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:07 ` shaheed
2003-05-15 20:20 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 20:24 ` Robert Love
2003-05-15 21:30 ` shaheed
2003-04-13 3:52 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-07-15 11:39 ` [HOWTO] Emulate processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6 \"shaheed r. haque\"
2003-04-14 22:40 ` [RFC] patch to allow CPUs to be reserved to callers of sys_setaffinity [was Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?] shaheed
2003-05-01 20:19 ` Working .config for a Dell 2650 for 2.5.6x? (was Re: Processor sets (pset) for linux kernel 2.5/2.6?) shaheed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='241480000.1050205930@[10.10.2.4]' \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srhaque@iee.org \
--cc=thockin@isunix.it.ilstu.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).