From: Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
To: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@oracle.com>,
Kate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
deller@gmx.de, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
christian@brauner.io, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Dave.Martin@arm.com, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
guro@fb.com, Marcos Souza <marcos.souza.org@gmail.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
linux@dominikbrodowski.net, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org>,
yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
Victor Kamensky <kamensky@cisco.com>,
xe-linux-external@cisco.com, sstrogin@cisco.com,
Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2018 16:01:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2631f765-8d7a-45ea-6aa4-d8a9bb00d56f@cisco.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG48ez2ZD=dovBApR07wi_DzYjJvEyO-Pm35eLv9AyXv1tcAFQ@mail.gmail.com>
Hi, Jann:
Regarding the security considerations, it seems simpler and more secure to
just clear the "pre-coredump signal" cross execve(2), and let the new program
decide for itself. What do you think?
---
Changes to prctl(2):
DESCRIPTION
PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
This allows the calling process to receive a signal (arg2,
if nonzero) from a child process prior to the coredump of
the child process. arg2 must be SIGUSR1, or SIGUSR2, or
SIGCHLD, or 0 (for clear).
When SIGCHLD is specified, the signal code is set to
CLD_PREDUMP in such an SIGCHLD signal.
The value of the pre-coredump signal is cleared across
execve(2), or for the child of a fork(2).
PR_GET_PREDUMP_SIG (since Linux 4.20.x)
Return the current value of the pre-coredump signal for the
calling process, in the location pointed to by (int *) arg2.
---
Thanks. -- Enke
On 10/15/18 11:54 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:36 PM Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> wrote:
>> On 10/13/18 11:27 AM, Jann Horn wrote:
>>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018 at 2:33 AM Enke Chen <enkechen@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>> For simplicity and consistency, this patch provides an implementation
>>>> for signal-based fault notification prior to the coredump of a child
>>>> process. A new prctl command, PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG, is defined that can
>>>> be used by an application to express its interest and to specify the
>>>> signal (SIGCHLD or SIGUSR1 or SIGUSR2) for such a notification. A new
>>>> signal code (si_code), CLD_PREDUMP, is also defined for SIGCHLD.
>>>
>>> Your suggested API looks vaguely similar to PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, but with
>>> some important differences:
>>>
>>> - You don't reset the signal on setuid execution.
> [...]
>>>
>>> For both of these: Are these differences actually necessary, and if
>>> so, can you provide a specific rationale? From a security perspective,
>>> I would very much prefer it if this API had semantics closer to
>>> PR_SET_PDEATHSIG.
>>
> [...]
>>
>> Regarding the impact of "setuid", this property "PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG" has to
>> do with the application/process whether the signal handler is set for receiving
>> such a notification. If it is set, the "uid" should not matter.
>
> If an attacker's process first calls PR_SET_PREDUMP_SIG, then forks
> off a child, then calls execve() on a setuid binary, the setuid binary
> calls setuid(0), and the attacker-controlled child then crashes, the
> privileged process will receive an unexpected signal that the attacker
> wouldn't have been allowed to send otherwise. For similar reasons, the
> parent death signal is reset when a setuid binary is executed:
>
> void setup_new_exec(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
> {
> /*
> * Once here, prepare_binrpm() will not be called any more, so
> * the final state of setuid/setgid/fscaps can be merged into the
> * secureexec flag.
> */
> bprm->secureexec |= bprm->cap_elevated;
>
> if (bprm->secureexec) {
> /* Make sure parent cannot signal privileged process. */
> current->pdeath_signal = 0;
> [...]
> }
> [...]
> }
>
> int commit_creds(struct cred *new)
> {
> [...]
> /* dumpability changes */
> if (!uid_eq(old->euid, new->euid) ||
> !gid_eq(old->egid, new->egid) ||
> !uid_eq(old->fsuid, new->fsuid) ||
> !gid_eq(old->fsgid, new->fsgid) ||
> !cred_cap_issubset(old, new)) {
> if (task->mm)
> set_dumpable(task->mm, suid_dumpable);
> task->pdeath_signal = 0;
> smp_wmb();
> }
> [...]
> }
>
> AppArmor and SELinux also do related changes:
>
> static void apparmor_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> {
> [...]
> /* bail out if unconfined or not changing profile */
> if ((new_label->proxy == label->proxy) ||
> (unconfined(new_label)))
> return;
>
> aa_inherit_files(bprm->cred, current->files);
>
> current->pdeath_signal = 0;
> [...]
> }
>
> static void selinux_bprm_committing_creds(struct linux_binprm *bprm)
> {
> [...]
> new_tsec = bprm->cred->security;
> if (new_tsec->sid == new_tsec->osid)
> return;
>
> /* Close files for which the new task SID is not authorized. */
> flush_unauthorized_files(bprm->cred, current->files);
>
> /* Always clear parent death signal on SID transitions. */
> current->pdeath_signal = 0;
> [...]
> }
>
> You should probably reset the coredump signal in the same places - or
> even better, add a new helper for resetting the parent death signal,
> and then add code for resetting the coredump signal in there.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-19 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-13 0:33 [PATCH] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification Enke Chen
2018-10-13 6:40 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:16 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:43 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-15 18:49 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:58 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2018-10-13 10:44 ` Christian Brauner
2018-10-15 18:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-13 18:27 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-15 18:36 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-15 19:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-19 23:01 ` Enke Chen [this message]
2018-10-22 15:40 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-22 20:48 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 12:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-15 18:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:17 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 19:26 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-16 14:14 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-16 15:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-17 0:39 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 21:21 ` Alan Cox
2018-10-15 21:31 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-15 23:28 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-16 0:33 ` valdis.kletnieks
2018-10-16 0:54 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-16 15:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-22 21:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Enke Chen
2018-10-23 9:23 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-23 19:43 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-23 21:40 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 13:52 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-24 5:39 ` [PATCH v3] " Enke Chen
2018-10-24 14:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-24 22:02 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 22:56 ` [PATCH v4] " Enke Chen
2018-10-26 8:28 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-26 22:23 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-29 11:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-29 21:08 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-29 22:31 ` [PATCH v5] " Enke Chen
2018-10-30 16:46 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-31 0:25 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 0:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 1:09 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:18 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-22 1:33 ` Andrew Morton
2018-11-22 4:57 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-12 23:22 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] " Enke Chen
2018-11-28 15:19 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-29 0:15 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-29 11:55 ` Dave Martin
2018-11-30 0:27 ` Enke Chen
2018-11-30 12:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-12-05 6:47 ` Jann Horn
2018-12-04 22:37 ` Andrew Morton
2018-12-06 17:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2018-10-25 22:56 ` [PATCH] selftests/prctl: selftest for pre-coredump signal notification Enke Chen
2018-11-27 22:54 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] " Enke Chen
2018-10-24 13:29 ` [PATCH v2] kernel/signal: Signal-based pre-coredump notification Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-24 23:50 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 12:23 ` Eric W. Biederman
2018-10-25 20:45 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:24 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 21:56 ` Enke Chen
2018-10-25 13:45 ` Jann Horn
2018-10-25 20:21 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2631f765-8d7a-45ea-6aa4-d8a9bb00d56f@cisco.com \
--to=enkechen@cisco.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christian@brauner.io \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=kamensky@cisco.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=khalid.aziz@oracle.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@dominikbrodowski.net \
--cc=marcos.souza.org@gmail.com \
--cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=sstrogin@cisco.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xe-linux-external@cisco.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).