linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: run GCs synchronously given user requests
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 22:02:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <27138a10-a6b2-edad-1985-687a95b9039b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yq+kiXPyBsXgdYb2@google.com>

On 2022/6/20 6:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 06/19, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2022/6/18 6:31, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> When users set GC_URGENT or GC_MID, they expected to do GCs right away.
>>> But, there's a condition to bypass it. Let's indicate we need to do now
>>> in the thread.
>>
>> .should_migrate_blocks is used to force migrating blocks in full
>> section, so what is the condition here? GC should not never select
>> a full section, right?
> 
> I think it'll move a full section given .victim_segno is not NULL_SEGNO,
> as __get_victim will give a dirty segment all the time. wdyt?

However, in gc_thread_fun() victim_segno is NULL_SEGNO all the time.

I guess .should_migrate_blocks should only be set to true for
F2FS_IOC_FLUSH_DEVICE/F2FS_IOC_RESIZE_FS case? rather than GC_URGENT or GC_MID
case? See commit 7dede88659df ("f2fs: fix to allow migrating fully valid segment").

Thanks,

> 
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
>>> ---
>>>    fs/f2fs/gc.c | 8 ++++++--
>>>    1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>> index d5fb426e0747..f4aa3c88118b 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c
>>> @@ -37,7 +37,6 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
>>>    	unsigned int wait_ms;
>>>    	struct f2fs_gc_control gc_control = {
>>>    		.victim_segno = NULL_SEGNO,
>>> -		.should_migrate_blocks = false,
>>>    		.err_gc_skipped = false };
>>>    	wait_ms = gc_th->min_sleep_time;
>>> @@ -113,7 +112,10 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
>>>    				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID) {
>>>    			wait_ms = gc_th->urgent_sleep_time;
>>>    			f2fs_down_write(&sbi->gc_lock);
>>> +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = true;
>>>    			goto do_gc;
>>> +		} else {
>>> +			gc_control.should_migrate_blocks = false;
>>>    		}
>>>    		if (foreground) {
>>> @@ -139,7 +141,9 @@ static int gc_thread_func(void *data)
>>>    		if (!foreground)
>>>    			stat_inc_bggc_count(sbi->stat_info);
>>> -		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC;
>>> +		sync_mode = F2FS_OPTION(sbi).bggc_mode == BGGC_MODE_SYNC ||
>>> +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_HIGH ||
>>> +				sbi->gc_mode == GC_URGENT_MID;
>>>    		/* foreground GC was been triggered via f2fs_balance_fs() */
>>>    		if (foreground)

  reply	other threads:[~2022-06-22 14:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-17 22:31 [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: attach inline_data after setting compression Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] f2fs: run GCs synchronously given user requests Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-19  0:41   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-19 22:34     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 14:02       ` Chao Yu [this message]
2022-06-22 16:58         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-28  7:59           ` Chao Yu
2022-06-28 18:17             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-29 16:30               ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-17 22:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: do not skip updating inode when retrying to flush node page Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-19  0:54   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-19  0:35 ` [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 1/3] f2fs: attach inline_data after setting compression Chao Yu
2022-06-22 14:06   ` Chao Yu
2022-06-22 16:52     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-22 16:53 ` [PATCH 1/3 v2] " Jaegeuk Kim
2022-06-28  7:46   ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2022-06-28  7:50     ` Chao Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=27138a10-a6b2-edad-1985-687a95b9039b@kernel.org \
    --to=chao@kernel.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).