From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@gmail.com>
To: Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>,
Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-staging@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_write8/16/32/N()
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2021 22:41:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2791328.7pjKATJfGa@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202109050113.Uyg2SCTW-lkp@intel.com>
On Saturday, September 4, 2021 7:09:58 PM CEST kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi "Fabio,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on staging/staging-testing]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Fabio-M-De-Francesco/
staging-r8188eu-Shorten-and-simplify-calls-chain/20210904-231010
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/staging.git
fde4862d1ac7100028da4371d92454fec6cf3f4f
>
> [...]
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c: In function 'usb_write':
> >> drivers/staging/r8188eu/hal/usb_ops_linux.c:105:47: error:
'REALTEK_USB_VENQT_SEND' undeclared (first use in this function); did you
mean 'REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ'?
> 105 |
REALTEK_USB_VENQT_SEND, value,
> |
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
Hello to all,
I apologize for this easily avoidable mistake. I'm about to post the v2
series.
However, I write this message to affirm that Pavel's tests on this patch are
still valid and confirmed because his copy *has* the right parameter that is
REALTEK_USB_VENQT_WRITE.
It's all my fault. Pavel warned me that during the review and test he noticed
that I had written REALTEK_USB_VENQT_READ and obviously my build was
successful because it was a symbol known to the compiler.
Pavel successfully changed his local copy and I (independently) changed mine
without thinking about rebuilding. I was absolutely certain it was the
expected parameter (perhaps the function name - usb_control_msg_send () -
played a part in leading me to this stupid mistake).
In summary, first I want to apologize for the noise, secondly I want to
apologize to Pavel who is co-author and tester of this 3/3 of our series.
Regards,
Fabio
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-04 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-09-04 15:04 [PATCH 0/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten and simplify calls chain Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-04 15:04 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: r8188eu: remove _io_ops structure Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-06 7:49 ` Dan Carpenter
2021-09-06 14:04 ` Pavel Skripkin
2021-09-04 15:04 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_read8/16/32() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-04 15:04 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_write8/16/32/N() Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-04 17:09 ` kernel test robot
2021-09-04 20:41 ` Fabio M. De Francesco [this message]
2021-09-04 21:27 [PATCH v2 0/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten and simplify calls chain Fabio M. De Francesco
2021-09-04 21:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: r8188eu: Shorten calls chain of rtw_write8/16/32/N() Fabio M. De Francesco
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2791328.7pjKATJfGa@localhost.localdomain \
--to=fmdefrancesco@gmail.com \
--cc=Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-staging@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=paskripkin@gmail.com \
--cc=phil@philpotter.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).