linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
	luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com, aarcange@redhat.com,
	ak@linux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, david@redhat.com,
	hpa@zytor.com, jgross@suse.com, jmattson@google.com,
	joro@8bytes.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, knsathya@kernel.org,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, sdeep@vmware.com, seanjc@google.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, vkuznets@redhat.com, wanpengli@tencent.com,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, brijesh.singh@amd.com, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 21/30] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 11:23:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2847763c-6202-9e2a-54c5-44c761b59a63@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220318153048.51177-22-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1438 bytes --]

On 3/18/22 08:30, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> +	/*
> +	 * After writing the wakeup command, wait for maximum timeout of 0xFF
> +	 * for firmware to reset the command address back zero to indicate
> +	 * the successful reception of command.
> +	 * NOTE: 0xFF as timeout value is decided based on our experiments.
> +	 *
> +	 * XXX: Change the timeout once ACPI specification comes up with
> +	 *      standard maximum timeout value.
> +	 */
> +	timeout = 0xFF;
> +	while (READ_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command) && --timeout)
> +		cpu_relax();

I don't feel like this was ever actually resolved.  This timeout
basically boiled down to "this value seems to work for us".  There are
also *SURELY* timeouts that are going to happen here.

In the end, the host has to choose to run the guest.  If it decides for
some odd reason not to run the CPU that's being booted, we'll get timeouts.

The other thing that baffles me is the re-wakeup bits:

>         /*
>          * If the CPU wakeup process is successful, store the
>          * status in apic_id_wakemap to prevent re-wakeup
>          * requests.
>          */
>         physid_set(apicid, apic_id_wakemap);
> 
>         return 0;
> }

If this goes wrong, won't the new wakeup just timeout?  Do we really
need a dedicated mechanism to stop re-wakeups?  How much of a problem is
this going to be?

Anyway, see the totally untested hunk I've attached.  It fixes a bunch
of issues IMNHO.

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-x86-acpi-x86-boot-Add-multiprocessor-wake-up-support.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 8163 bytes --]

From 4ea10d7084e58c367724d7e3278a62beef2561d4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2022 18:30:39 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support

 * Rewrite changelog
 * Fix too-wide ->apic_id vertical alignment
 * Remove errant "Virtual address of ..." comment
 * Rename timeout=>wake_tries_left
 * Make wake_tries_left an int, not a u8
 * Actually try to explain the timeout in a comment
   * I'd still love to know what the experiment actually did and
     what the lower bound on the timeout is.  Oh well.
 * Change smp_wmb()/WRITE_ONCE() back to Peterz's
   smp_store_release() suggestion.
 * Use smp_store_release() for =0 too
 * add a pr_warn() for failures
 * Add an endif #ifdef comment, and fix up CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
   oddity.

--

Secondary CPU startup is currently performed with something called
the "INIT/SIPI protocol".  This protocol requires assistance from
VMMs to boot guests.  As should be a familiar story by now, that
support can not be provded to TDX guests because TDX VMMs are
not trusted by guests.

To remedy this situation a new[1] "Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure"
has been added to to an existing ACPI table (MADT).  This structure
provides the physical address of a "mailbox".  A write to the mailbox
then steers the secondary CPU to the boot code.

Add ACPI MADT wake structure parsing support and wake support.  Use
this support to wake CPUs whenever it is present instead of INIT/SIPI.

While this structure can theoretically be used on 32-bit kernels,
there are no 32-bit TDX guest kernels.  It has not been tested and
can not practically *be* tested on 32-bit.  Make it 64-bit only.

1. Details about the new structure can be found in ACPI v6.4, in the
   "Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure" section.

Co-developed-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h |   5 ++
 arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c | 115 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c |  10 ++++
 3 files changed, 130 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
index 48067af94678..3cef7f126876 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/apic.h
@@ -488,6 +488,11 @@ static inline unsigned int read_apic_id(void)
 	return apic->get_apic_id(reg);
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+typedef int (*wakeup_cpu_handler)(int apicid, unsigned long start_eip);
+extern void acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(wakeup_cpu_handler handler);
+#endif
+
 extern int default_apic_id_valid(u32 apicid);
 extern int default_acpi_madt_oem_check(char *, char *);
 extern void default_setup_apic_routing(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 5b6d1a95776f..0ebfab0f4f7a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -65,6 +65,13 @@ static u64 acpi_lapic_addr __initdata = APIC_DEFAULT_PHYS_BASE;
 static bool acpi_support_online_capable;
 #endif
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+/* Physical address of the Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure mailbox */
+static u64 acpi_mp_wake_mailbox_paddr;
+/* Virtual address of the Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure mailbox */
+static struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup_mailbox *acpi_mp_wake_mailbox;
+#endif
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
 /*
  * Locks related to IOAPIC hotplug
@@ -336,6 +343,83 @@ acpi_parse_lapic_nmi(union acpi_subtable_headers * header, const unsigned long e
 	return 0;
 }
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+/* Virtual address of the Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure mailbox */
+static int acpi_wakeup_cpu(int apicid, unsigned long start_ip)
+{
+	static physid_mask_t apic_id_wakemap = PHYSID_MASK_NONE;
+	u8 timeout;
+
+	/*
+	 * Remap mailbox memory only for the first call to acpi_wakeup_cpu().
+	 *
+	 * Wakeup of secondary CPUs is fully serialized in the core code.
+	 * No need to protect acpi_mp_wake_mailbox from concurrent accesses.
+	 */
+	if (!acpi_mp_wake_mailbox) {
+		acpi_mp_wake_mailbox = memremap(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox_paddr,
+						sizeof(*acpi_mp_wake_mailbox),
+						MEMREMAP_WB);
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * According to the ACPI specification r6.4, section titled
+	 * "Multiprocessor Wakeup Structure" the mailbox-based wakeup
+	 * mechanism cannot be used more than once for the same CPU.
+	 * Skip wakeups if they are attempted more than once.
+	 */
+	if (physid_isset(apicid, apic_id_wakemap)) {
+		pr_err("CPU already awake (APIC ID %x), skipping wakeup\n",
+		       apicid);
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * Mailbox memory is shared between firmware and OS. Firmware will
+	 * listen on mailbox command address, and once it receives the wakeup
+	 * command, CPU associated with the given apicid will be booted.
+	 *
+	 * The value of apic_id and wakeup_vector has to be set before updating
+	 * the wakeup command. Use memory barrier to preserve write order.
+	 */
+	acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->apic_id		= apicid;
+	acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->wakeup_vector	= start_ip;
+	smp_wmb();
+	WRITE_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command, ACPI_MP_WAKE_COMMAND_WAKEUP);
+
+	/*
+	 * After writing the wakeup command, wait for maximum timeout of 0xFF
+	 * for firmware to reset the command address back zero to indicate
+	 * the successful reception of command.
+	 * NOTE: 0xFF as timeout value is decided based on our experiments.
+	 *
+	 * XXX: Change the timeout once ACPI specification comes up with
+	 *      standard maximum timeout value.
+	 */
+	timeout = 0xFF;
+	while (READ_ONCE(acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command) && --timeout)
+		cpu_relax();
+
+	/* If timed out (timeout == 0), return error */
+	if (!timeout) {
+		/*
+		 * XXX: Is there a recovery path after timeout is hit?
+		 * Spec is unclear. Reset command to 0 if timeout is hit.
+		 */
+		acpi_mp_wake_mailbox->command = 0;
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If the CPU wakeup process is successful, store the
+	 * status in apic_id_wakemap to prevent re-wakeup
+	 * requests.
+	 */
+	physid_set(apicid, apic_id_wakemap);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif
 #endif				/*CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC */
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
@@ -1083,6 +1167,29 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_madt_lapic_entries(void)
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+static int __init acpi_parse_mp_wake(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
+				     const unsigned long end)
+{
+	struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *mp_wake;
+
+	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMP))
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	mp_wake = (struct acpi_madt_multiproc_wakeup *)header;
+	if (BAD_MADT_ENTRY(mp_wake, end))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	acpi_table_print_madt_entry(&header->common);
+
+	acpi_mp_wake_mailbox_paddr = mp_wake->base_address;
+
+	acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(acpi_wakeup_cpu);
+
+	return 0;
+}
+#endif				/* CONFIG_X86_64 */
 #endif				/* CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC */
 
 #ifdef	CONFIG_X86_IO_APIC
@@ -1278,6 +1385,14 @@ static void __init acpi_process_madt(void)
 
 				smp_found_config = 1;
 			}
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+			/*
+			 * Parse MADT MP Wake entry.
+			 */
+			acpi_table_parse_madt(ACPI_MADT_TYPE_MULTIPROC_WAKEUP,
+					      acpi_parse_mp_wake, 1);
+#endif
 		}
 		if (error == -EINVAL) {
 			/*
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
index b70344bf6600..3c8f2c797a98 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c
@@ -2551,6 +2551,16 @@ u32 x86_msi_msg_get_destid(struct msi_msg *msg, bool extid)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(x86_msi_msg_get_destid);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
+void __init acpi_wake_cpu_handler_update(wakeup_cpu_handler handler)
+{
+	struct apic **drv;
+
+	for (drv = __apicdrivers; drv < __apicdrivers_end; drv++)
+		(*drv)->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64 = handler;
+}
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Override the generic EOI implementation with an optimized version.
  * Only called during early boot when only one CPU is active and with
-- 
2.34.0


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-18 18:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-18 15:30 [PATCHv7 00/30] TDX Guest: TDX core support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 01/30] x86/tdx: Detect running as a TDX guest in early boot Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 02/30] x86/tdx: Provide common base for SEAMCALL and TDCALL C wrappers Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-19 14:48   ` Borislav Petkov
2022-03-21 15:52     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-21 16:02     ` [PATCHv7.1 " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-04  3:19       ` Kai Huang
2022-04-04  3:25         ` Kai Huang
2022-04-04 13:51         ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-04 23:35           ` Kai Huang
2022-04-05  0:01             ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-05  0:23               ` Kai Huang
2022-04-08 20:12                 ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 03/30] x86/tdx: Add __tdx_module_call() and __tdx_hypercall() helper functions Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 04/30] x86/tdx: Extend the confidential computing API to support TDX guests Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 05/30] x86/tdx: Exclude shared bit from __PHYSICAL_MASK Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 06/30] x86/traps: Refactor exc_general_protection() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 07/30] x86/traps: Add #VE support for TDX guest Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 08/30] x86/tdx: Add HLT support for TDX guests Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 09/30] x86/tdx: Add MSR " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 10/30] x86/tdx: Handle CPUID via #VE Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 11/30] x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 12/30] x86/tdx: Detect TDX at early kernel decompression time Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 13/30] x86: Adjust types used in port I/O helpers Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 14/30] x86: Consolidate " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 15/30] x86/boot: Port I/O: allow to hook up alternative helpers Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 16:04   ` [PATCHv7.1 " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 16/30] x86/boot: Port I/O: add decompression-time support for TDX Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 16:05   ` [PATCHv7.1 " Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 17/30] x86/tdx: Port I/O: add runtime hypercalls Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 18/30] x86/tdx: Port I/O: add early boot support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 19/30] x86/tdx: Wire up KVM hypercalls Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 20/30] x86/boot: Add a trampoline for booting APs via firmware handoff Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 21/30] x86/acpi, x86/boot: Add multiprocessor wake-up support Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 18:23   ` Dave Hansen [this message]
2022-03-18 19:22     ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-24 15:24     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-28 19:17       ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-30 23:16         ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-30 23:44           ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-31  1:52             ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-01 17:33               ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 22/30] x86/boot: Set CR0.NE early and keep it set during the boot Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 23/30] x86/boot: Avoid #VE during boot for TDX platforms Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 24/30] x86/topology: Disable CPU online/offline control for TDX guests Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 25/30] x86/tdx: Make pages shared in ioremap() Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 26/30] x86/mm/cpa: Add support for TDX shared memory Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 27/30] x86/mm: Make DMA memory shared for TD guest Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:53   ` Dave Hansen
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 28/30] x86/tdx: ioapic: Add shared bit for IOAPIC base address Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 29/30] ACPICA: Avoid cache flush inside virtual machines Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-03-18 15:30 ` [PATCHv7 30/30] Documentation/x86: Document TDX kernel architecture Kirill A. Shutemov
2022-04-04  4:32   ` Kai Huang
2022-04-04  6:25     ` Dave Hansen
2022-04-04  7:23       ` Kai Huang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2847763c-6202-9e2a-54c5-44c761b59a63@intel.com \
    --to=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=knsathya@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sdeep@vmware.com \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).