linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
@ 2018-10-17 11:30 Alexey Brodkin
  2018-10-23 22:33 ` Vineet Gupta
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Brodkin @ 2018-10-17 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-snps-arc, Alexey Brodkin, Daniel Lezcano, Vineet Gupta,
	Thomas Gleixner

It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.

Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.

Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
counters.

This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
That's what we used to have:
------------------------------>8------------------------
$ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null

 Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':

         10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
                 1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
                 1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
                63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
           3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
           1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
            256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
             27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches

       0.003530687 seconds time elapsed

       0.000000000 seconds user
       0.010000000 seconds sys
------------------------------>8------------------------

And now we'll see:
------------------------------>8------------------------
$ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null

 Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':

          3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
                 1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
                 1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
                63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
           2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
           1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
            255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
             26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches

       0.003474829 seconds time elapsed

       0.003519000 seconds user
       0.000000000 seconds sys
------------------------------>8------------------------

Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
@ 1GHz here).

Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---

Changes v1 -> v2:

 * Timer read callbacks marked as "notrace"
 * ARC Timer1 explicitly described as 32-bit one on
   sched_clock_register() invocation

 arch/arc/Kconfig                |  1 +
 drivers/clocksource/Kconfig     |  1 +
 drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arc/Kconfig b/arch/arc/Kconfig
index 5151d81476a1..714f769389a4 100644
--- a/arch/arc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/arc/Kconfig
@@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
 config ARC
 	def_bool y
 	select ARC_TIMERS
+	select GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
 	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_CPU
 	select ARCH_HAS_SYNC_DMA_FOR_DEVICE
 	select ARCH_HAS_SG_CHAIN
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
index dec0dd88ec15..3268dad4effe 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/Kconfig
@@ -290,6 +290,7 @@ config CLKSRC_MPS2
 
 config ARC_TIMERS
 	bool "Support for 32-bit TIMERn counters in ARC Cores" if COMPILE_TEST
+	depends on GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
 	select TIMER_OF
 	help
 	  These are legacy 32-bit TIMER0 and TIMER1 counters found on all ARC cores
diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c b/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c
index 20da9b1d7f7d..b28970ca4a7a 100644
--- a/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c
+++ b/drivers/clocksource/arc_timer.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <linux/cpu.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_irq.h>
+#include <linux/sched_clock.h>
 
 #include <soc/arc/timers.h>
 #include <soc/arc/mcip.h>
@@ -88,6 +89,11 @@ static u64 arc_read_gfrc(struct clocksource *cs)
 	return (((u64)h) << 32) | l;
 }
 
+static notrace u64 arc_gfrc_clock_read(void)
+{
+	return arc_read_gfrc(NULL);
+}
+
 static struct clocksource arc_counter_gfrc = {
 	.name   = "ARConnect GFRC",
 	.rating = 400,
@@ -111,6 +117,8 @@ static int __init arc_cs_setup_gfrc(struct device_node *node)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	sched_clock_register(arc_gfrc_clock_read, 64, arc_timer_freq);
+
 	return clocksource_register_hz(&arc_counter_gfrc, arc_timer_freq);
 }
 TIMER_OF_DECLARE(arc_gfrc, "snps,archs-timer-gfrc", arc_cs_setup_gfrc);
@@ -139,6 +147,11 @@ static u64 arc_read_rtc(struct clocksource *cs)
 	return (((u64)h) << 32) | l;
 }
 
+static notrace u64 arc_rtc_clock_read(void)
+{
+	return arc_read_rtc(NULL);
+}
+
 static struct clocksource arc_counter_rtc = {
 	.name   = "ARCv2 RTC",
 	.rating = 350,
@@ -170,6 +183,8 @@ static int __init arc_cs_setup_rtc(struct device_node *node)
 
 	write_aux_reg(AUX_RTC_CTRL, 1);
 
+	sched_clock_register(arc_rtc_clock_read, 64, arc_timer_freq);
+
 	return clocksource_register_hz(&arc_counter_rtc, arc_timer_freq);
 }
 TIMER_OF_DECLARE(arc_rtc, "snps,archs-timer-rtc", arc_cs_setup_rtc);
@@ -185,6 +200,11 @@ static u64 arc_read_timer1(struct clocksource *cs)
 	return (u64) read_aux_reg(ARC_REG_TIMER1_CNT);
 }
 
+static notrace u64 arc_timer1_clock_read(void)
+{
+	return arc_read_timer1(NULL);
+}
+
 static struct clocksource arc_counter_timer1 = {
 	.name   = "ARC Timer1",
 	.rating = 300,
@@ -209,6 +229,8 @@ static int __init arc_cs_setup_timer1(struct device_node *node)
 	write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_TIMER1_CNT, 0);
 	write_aux_reg(ARC_REG_TIMER1_CTRL, TIMER_CTRL_NH);
 
+	sched_clock_register(arc_timer1_clock_read, 32, arc_timer_freq);
+
 	return clocksource_register_hz(&arc_counter_timer1, arc_timer_freq);
 }
 
-- 
2.17.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-10-17 11:30 [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock Alexey Brodkin
@ 2018-10-23 22:33 ` Vineet Gupta
  2018-11-05 14:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-05 14:48   ` Daniel Lezcano
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Vineet Gupta @ 2018-10-23 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Brodkin, linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-snps-arc, Daniel Lezcano, Thomas Gleixner

On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
> from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
> by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
>
> Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
> CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
>
> Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
> counters.
>
> This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
> That's what we used to have:
> ------------------------------>8------------------------
> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>
>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>
>          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
>                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
>                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
>            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
>            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
>              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
>
>        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
>
>        0.000000000 seconds user
>        0.010000000 seconds sys
> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>
> And now we'll see:
> ------------------------------>8------------------------
> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>
>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>
>           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
>                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
>                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
>            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
>            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
>              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
>
>        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
>
>        0.003519000 seconds user
>        0.000000000 seconds sys
> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>
> Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
> execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
> @ 1GHz here).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> ---

Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>

@Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.

Thx,
-Vineet


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-10-23 22:33 ` Vineet Gupta
@ 2018-11-05 14:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-18  2:17     ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-05 14:48   ` Daniel Lezcano
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2018-11-05 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vineet Gupta, Alexey Brodkin, linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-snps-arc, Thomas Gleixner

On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
>> from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
>> by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
>>
>> Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
>> CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
>>
>> Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
>> counters.
>>
>> This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
>> That's what we used to have:
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>
>>          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
>>            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
>>            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
>>              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
>>
>>        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>        0.000000000 seconds user
>>        0.010000000 seconds sys
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>
>> And now we'll see:
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>
>>           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
>>            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
>>            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
>>              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
>>
>>        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>        0.003519000 seconds user
>>        0.000000000 seconds sys
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>
>> Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
>> execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
>> @ 1GHz here).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
> 
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> 
> @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.

I will take care of it.

  -- Daniel


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-10-23 22:33 ` Vineet Gupta
  2018-11-05 14:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2018-11-05 14:48   ` Daniel Lezcano
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2018-11-05 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vineet Gupta, Alexey Brodkin, linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-snps-arc, Thomas Gleixner

On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>> It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
>> from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
>> by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
>>
>> Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
>> CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
>>
>> Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
>> counters.
>>
>> This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
>> That's what we used to have:
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>
>>          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
>>            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
>>            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
>>              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
>>
>>        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>        0.000000000 seconds user
>>        0.010000000 seconds sys
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>
>> And now we'll see:
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>
>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>
>>           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
>>            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
>>            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
>>              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
>>
>>        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
>>
>>        0.003519000 seconds user
>>        0.000000000 seconds sys
>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>
>> Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
>> execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
>> @ 1GHz here).
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>> ---
> 
> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> 
> @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.

Applied, thanks

  -- Daniel

-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-05 14:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2018-11-18  2:17     ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-19  9:31       ` Alexey Brodkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2018-11-18  2:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vineet Gupta, Alexey Brodkin, linux-kernel
  Cc: linux-snps-arc, Thomas Gleixner

On 05/11/2018 15:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>> On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>>> It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
>>> from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
>>> by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
>>>
>>> Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
>>> CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
>>>
>>> Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
>>> counters.
>>>
>>> This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
>>> That's what we used to have:
>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>>
>>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>>
>>>          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
>>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
>>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
>>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
>>>            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
>>>            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>>             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
>>>              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
>>>
>>>        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
>>>
>>>        0.000000000 seconds user
>>>        0.010000000 seconds sys
>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>
>>> And now we'll see:
>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>>
>>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>>
>>>           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
>>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
>>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
>>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
>>>            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
>>>            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>>             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
>>>              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
>>>
>>>        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
>>>
>>>        0.003519000 seconds user
>>>        0.000000000 seconds sys
>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>
>>> Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
>>> execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
>>> @ 1GHz here).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>> ---
>>
>> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>>
>> @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.
> 
> I will take care of it.

Please resend without the arch Kconfig change


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-18  2:17     ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2018-11-19  9:31       ` Alexey Brodkin
  2018-11-19  9:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Brodkin @ 2018-11-19  9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: daniel.lezcano; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, Vineet Gupta, linux-snps-arc

Hi Daniel,

On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 03:17 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 05/11/2018 15:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > > It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
> > > > from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
> > > > by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
> > > > 
> > > > Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
> > > > CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
> > > > 
> > > > Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
> > > > counters.
> > > > 
> > > > This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
> > > > That's what we used to have:
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > > 
> > > >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > > 
> > > >          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
> > > >                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
> > > >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
> > > >                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
> > > >            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
> > > >            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> > > >             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
> > > >              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
> > > > 
> > > >        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
> > > > 
> > > >        0.000000000 seconds user
> > > >        0.010000000 seconds sys
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > And now we'll see:
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > > 
> > > >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > > 
> > > >           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
> > > >                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
> > > >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
> > > >                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
> > > >            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
> > > >            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> > > >             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
> > > >              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
> > > > 
> > > >        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
> > > > 
> > > >        0.003519000 seconds user
> > > >        0.000000000 seconds sys
> > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > 
> > > > Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
> > > > execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
> > > > @ 1GHz here).
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> > > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > > > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > ---
> > > 
> > > Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > > 
> > > @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.
> > 
> > I will take care of it.
> 
> Please resend without the arch Kconfig change

I'm wondering if there's a problem with arc/arc/Kconfig change going
through your tree? This way it will be really atomic change and it will be
much easier to back-port (and that's what we'd really like to happen).

If Vineet is OK with that IMHO it's safe to keep it in the one and only commit.

Otherwise should I just split this patch in 2 and still submit them as series or
have 2 completely not-related patches one for you and one for Vineet?

In that case do I understand correctly that we may enable GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
for ARC even before proposed change for arc_timer.c gets merged - i.e. with no
special GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK driver we'll safely fall-back to jiffie-based
sched clock which we anyways use now when GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK is disabled, right?

-Alexey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-19  9:31       ` Alexey Brodkin
@ 2018-11-19  9:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-19  9:55           ` Alexey Brodkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2018-11-19  9:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Brodkin; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, Vineet Gupta, linux-snps-arc

On 19/11/2018 10:31, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
> 
> On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 03:17 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> On 05/11/2018 15:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>> On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
>>>> On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
>>>>> It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
>>>>> from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
>>>>> by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
>>>>> CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
>>>>> counters.
>>>>>
>>>>> This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
>>>>> That's what we used to have:
>>>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>>>>
>>>>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>>>>
>>>>>          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
>>>>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
>>>>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
>>>>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
>>>>>            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
>>>>>            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>>>>             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
>>>>>              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
>>>>>
>>>>>        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
>>>>>
>>>>>        0.000000000 seconds user
>>>>>        0.010000000 seconds sys
>>>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> And now we'll see:
>>>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>>> $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
>>>>>
>>>>>  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
>>>>>
>>>>>           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
>>>>>                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
>>>>>                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
>>>>>                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
>>>>>            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
>>>>>            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
>>>>>             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
>>>>>              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
>>>>>
>>>>>        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
>>>>>
>>>>>        0.003519000 seconds user
>>>>>        0.000000000 seconds sys
>>>>> ------------------------------>8------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
>>>>> execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
>>>>> @ 1GHz here).
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
>>>>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>>>>> Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>>>>> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
>>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>> Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
>>>>
>>>> @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.
>>>
>>> I will take care of it.
>>
>> Please resend without the arch Kconfig change
> 
> I'm wondering if there's a problem with arc/arc/Kconfig change going
> through your tree? This way it will be really atomic change and it will be
> much easier to back-port (and that's what we'd really like to happen).
> 
> If Vineet is OK with that IMHO it's safe to keep it in the one and only commit.
> 
> Otherwise should I just split this patch in 2 and still submit them as series or
> have 2 completely not-related patches one for you and one for Vineet?
> 
> In that case do I understand correctly that we may enable GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
> for ARC even before proposed change for arc_timer.c gets merged - i.e. with no
> special GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK driver we'll safely fall-back to jiffie-based
> sched clock which we anyways use now when GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK is disabled, right?

The ARC's Kconfig part does not apply on tip/timers/core.

As you described, sending a separate arc timer change is fine IMO.





-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-19  9:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2018-11-19  9:55           ` Alexey Brodkin
  2018-11-19  9:58             ` Daniel Lezcano
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Brodkin @ 2018-11-19  9:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: daniel.lezcano; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, vineet.gupta1, linux-snps-arc

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 10:43 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 19/11/2018 10:31, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> > 
> > On Sun, 2018-11-18 at 03:17 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > On 05/11/2018 15:39, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> > > > On 24/10/2018 00:33, Vineet Gupta wrote:
> > > > > On 10/17/2018 04:30 AM, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > > > > > It turned out we used to use default implementation of sched_clock()
> > > > > > from kernel/sched/clock.c which was as precise as 1/HZ, i.e.
> > > > > > by default we had 10 msec granularity of time measurement.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Now given ARC built-in timers are clocked with the same frequency as
> > > > > > CPU cores we may get much higher precision of time tracking.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thus we switch to generic sched_clock which really reads ARC hardware
> > > > > > counters.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is especially helpful for measuring short events.
> > > > > > That's what we used to have:
> > > > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >          10.000000      task-clock (msec)         #    2.832 CPUs utilized
> > > > > >                  1      context-switches          #    0.100 K/sec
> > > > > >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.100 K/sec
> > > > > >                 63      page-faults               #    0.006 M/sec
> > > > > >            3049480      cycles                    #    0.305 GHz
> > > > > >            1091259      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> > > > > >             256828      branches                  #   25.683 M/sec
> > > > > >              27026      branch-misses             #   10.52% of all branches
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >        0.003530687 seconds time elapsed
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >        0.000000000 seconds user
> > > > > >        0.010000000 seconds sys
> > > > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > And now we'll see:
> > > > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > > > $ perf stat /bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello > /dev/null
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >  Performance counter stats for '/bin/sh -c /root/lmbench-master/bin/arc/hello':
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >           3.004322      task-clock (msec)         #    0.865 CPUs utilized
> > > > > >                  1      context-switches          #    0.333 K/sec
> > > > > >                  1      cpu-migrations            #    0.333 K/sec
> > > > > >                 63      page-faults               #    0.021 M/sec
> > > > > >            2986734      cycles                    #    0.994 GHz
> > > > > >            1087466      instructions              #    0.36  insn per cycle
> > > > > >             255209      branches                  #   84.947 M/sec
> > > > > >              26002      branch-misses             #   10.19% of all branches
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >        0.003474829 seconds time elapsed
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >        0.003519000 seconds user
> > > > > >        0.000000000 seconds sys
> > > > > > ------------------------------>8------------------------
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Note how much more meaningful is the second output - time spent for
> > > > > > execution pretty much matches number of cycles spent (we're running
> > > > > > @ 1GHz here).
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Brodkin <abrodkin@synopsys.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > 
> > > > > Acked-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@synopsys.com>
> > > > > 
> > > > > @Daniel is this going via timer tree or you want me to pick it up.
> > > > 
> > > > I will take care of it.
> > > 
> > > Please resend without the arch Kconfig change
> > 
> > I'm wondering if there's a problem with arc/arc/Kconfig change going
> > through your tree? This way it will be really atomic change and it will be
> > much easier to back-port (and that's what we'd really like to happen).
> > 
> > If Vineet is OK with that IMHO it's safe to keep it in the one and only commit.
> > 
> > Otherwise should I just split this patch in 2 and still submit them as series or
> > have 2 completely not-related patches one for you and one for Vineet?
> > 
> > In that case do I understand correctly that we may enable GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
> > for ARC even before proposed change for arc_timer.c gets merged - i.e. with no
> > special GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK driver we'll safely fall-back to jiffie-based
> > sched clock which we anyways use now when GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK is disabled, right?
> 
> The ARC's Kconfig part does not apply on tip/timers/core.

May I have a reference to that tree so I may check what gets in the way there
and then I'll just move "select GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK" a bit below so there're no
clashes any longer.

-Alexey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-19  9:55           ` Alexey Brodkin
@ 2018-11-19  9:58             ` Daniel Lezcano
  2018-11-19 11:30               ` Alexey Brodkin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 10+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Lezcano @ 2018-11-19  9:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexey Brodkin; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, vineet.gupta1, linux-snps-arc


Hi Alexey,

On 19/11/2018 10:55, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> Hi Daniel,

[ ... ]

>>> In that case do I understand correctly that we may enable GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
>>> for ARC even before proposed change for arc_timer.c gets merged - i.e. with no
>>> special GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK driver we'll safely fall-back to jiffie-based
>>> sched clock which we anyways use now when GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK is disabled, right?
>>
>> The ARC's Kconfig part does not apply on tip/timers/core.
> 
> May I have a reference to that tree so I may check what gets in the way there
> and then I'll just move "select GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK" a bit below so there're no
> clashes any longer.

sure, here it is:

https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git/log/?h=timers/core


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock
  2018-11-19  9:58             ` Daniel Lezcano
@ 2018-11-19 11:30               ` Alexey Brodkin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: Alexey Brodkin @ 2018-11-19 11:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: daniel.lezcano; +Cc: tglx, linux-kernel, vineet.gupta1, linux-snps-arc

Hi Daniel,

On Mon, 2018-11-19 at 10:58 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> Hi Alexey,
> 
> On 19/11/2018 10:55, Alexey Brodkin wrote:
> > Hi Daniel,
> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > > > In that case do I understand correctly that we may enable GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK
> > > > for ARC even before proposed change for arc_timer.c gets merged - i.e. with no
> > > > special GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK driver we'll safely fall-back to jiffie-based
> > > > sched clock which we anyways use now when GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK is disabled, right?
> > > 
> > > The ARC's Kconfig part does not apply on tip/timers/core.
> > 
> > May I have a reference to that tree so I may check what gets in the way there
> > and then I'll just move "select GENERIC_SCHED_CLOCK" a bit below so there're no
> > clashes any longer.
> 
> sure, here it is:
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.kernel.org_pub_scm_linux_kernel_git_tip_tip.git_log_-3Fh-3Dtimers_core&d=DwIDaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=lqdeeSSEes0GFDDl656eViXO7breS55ytWkhpk5R81I&m=r2hJtdjpPi2Y1yDo7wgo7nKu7MV8MU8gRPg3DD1mcyI&s=NOTZZBd25Vlk8-jmMUHxtpEhfxlkanXdvKN3-HQSc9w&e=

Well I did have it based on 4.18 for some reason thus were those clashes.
Rebased on top of Linus' up-to-date tree and re-sent v3.

-Alexey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2018-11-19 11:30 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-10-17 11:30 [PATCH v2] clocksource/drivers/arc_timer: Utilize generic sched_clock Alexey Brodkin
2018-10-23 22:33 ` Vineet Gupta
2018-11-05 14:39   ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-18  2:17     ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19  9:31       ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-11-19  9:43         ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19  9:55           ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-11-19  9:58             ` Daniel Lezcano
2018-11-19 11:30               ` Alexey Brodkin
2018-11-05 14:48   ` Daniel Lezcano

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).