[PATCH] clk: rockchip: use separate compatibles for rk3288w-cru

[PATCH] clk: rockchip: use separate compatibles for rk3288w-cru

[Heiko Stuebner]

From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>

Commit 1627f683636d ("clk: rockchip: Handle clock tree for rk3288w variant")
added the check for rk3288w-specific clock-tree changes but in turn would
require a double-compatible due to re-using the main rockchip,rk3288-cru
compatible as entry point.

The binding change actually describes the compatibles as one or the other
so adapt the code accordingly and add a real second entry-point for the
clock controller.

Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
---
 drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
index 204976e2d0cb..a39ca9809cc3 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
@@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static struct syscore_ops rk3288_clk_syscore_ops = {
 	.resume = rk3288_clk_resume,
 };
 
-static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
+static void __init rk3288_common_init(struct device_node *np, bool is_w)
 {
 	struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx;
 
@@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 	rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288_clk_branches,
 				  ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288_clk_branches));
 
-	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru"))
+	if (is_w)
 		rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288w_hclkvio_branch,
 					       ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288w_hclkvio_branch));
 	else
@@ -970,4 +970,15 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 
 	rockchip_clk_of_add_provider(np, ctx);
 }
+
+static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	rk3288_common_init(np, false);
+}
 CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288_cru, "rockchip,rk3288-cru", rk3288_clk_init);
+
+static void __init rk3288w_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
+{
+	rk3288_common_init(np, true);
+}
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288w_cru, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru", rk3288w_clk_init);
-- 
2.26.2

Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: use separate compatibles for rk3288w-cru

[Ezequiel Garcia]

On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 17:28 +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> 
> Commit 1627f683636d ("clk: rockchip: Handle clock tree for rk3288w variant")
> added the check for rk3288w-specific clock-tree changes but in turn would
> require a double-compatible due to re-using the main rockchip,rk3288-cru
> compatible as entry point.
> 
> The binding change actually describes the compatibles as one or the other
> so adapt the code accordingly and add a real second entry-point for the
> clock controller.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> index 204976e2d0cb..a39ca9809cc3 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
> @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static struct syscore_ops rk3288_clk_syscore_ops = {
>  	.resume = rk3288_clk_resume,
>  };
>  
> -static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> +static void __init rk3288_common_init(struct device_node *np, bool is_w)

From an API standpoint, avoid boolean arguments
in favor of a simple enum.

This case is trivial, but I think it's useful to avoid
the anti pattern.

Thanks for quickly working on this :)

Ezequiel 

>  {
>  	struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx;
>  
> @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>  	rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288_clk_branches,
>  				  ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288_clk_branches));
>  
> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru"))
> +	if (is_w)
>  		rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288w_hclkvio_branch,
>  					       ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288w_hclkvio_branch));
>  	else
> @@ -970,4 +970,15 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>  
>  	rockchip_clk_of_add_provider(np, ctx);
>  }
> +
> +static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	rk3288_common_init(np, false);
> +}
>  CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288_cru, "rockchip,rk3288-cru", rk3288_clk_init);
> +
> +static void __init rk3288w_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
> +{
> +	rk3288_common_init(np, true);
> +}
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288w_cru, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru", rk3288w_clk_init);

Re: [PATCH] clk: rockchip: use separate compatibles for rk3288w-cru

[Robin Murphy]

On 2020-07-03 16:38, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-07-03 at 17:28 +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>> From: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
>>
>> Commit 1627f683636d ("clk: rockchip: Handle clock tree for rk3288w variant")
>> added the check for rk3288w-specific clock-tree changes but in turn would
>> require a double-compatible due to re-using the main rockchip,rk3288-cru
>> compatible as entry point.
>>
>> The binding change actually describes the compatibles as one or the other
>> so adapt the code accordingly and add a real second entry-point for the
>> clock controller.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko.stuebner@theobroma-systems.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
>> index 204976e2d0cb..a39ca9809cc3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/rockchip/clk-rk3288.c
>> @@ -922,7 +922,7 @@ static struct syscore_ops rk3288_clk_syscore_ops = {
>>   	.resume = rk3288_clk_resume,
>>   };
>>   
>> -static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>> +static void __init rk3288_common_init(struct device_node *np, bool is_w)
> 
>  From an API standpoint, avoid boolean arguments
> in favor of a simple enum.

And if the enum's just a selector between different data, consider 
simply passing the data directly ;)

Robin.

> 
> This case is trivial, but I think it's useful to avoid
> the anti pattern.
> 
> Thanks for quickly working on this :)
> 
> Ezequiel
> 
>>   {
>>   	struct rockchip_clk_provider *ctx;
>>   
>> @@ -945,7 +945,7 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   	rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288_clk_branches,
>>   				  ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288_clk_branches));
>>   
>> -	if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru"))
>> +	if (is_w)
>>   		rockchip_clk_register_branches(ctx, rk3288w_hclkvio_branch,
>>   					       ARRAY_SIZE(rk3288w_hclkvio_branch));
>>   	else
>> @@ -970,4 +970,15 @@ static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>>   
>>   	rockchip_clk_of_add_provider(np, ctx);
>>   }
>> +
>> +static void __init rk3288_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> +	rk3288_common_init(np, false);
>> +}
>>   CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288_cru, "rockchip,rk3288-cru", rk3288_clk_init);
>> +
>> +static void __init rk3288w_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
>> +{
>> +	rk3288_common_init(np, true);
>> +}
>> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(rk3288w_cru, "rockchip,rk3288w-cru", rk3288w_clk_init);
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
>