From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
Linux Power Management <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Goran <goran.brkuljan@gmail.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 15:42:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2e512646-816f-ff98-d466-b82f3a7d05ef@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <107f05b8-0104-501c-130c-4f89f3f8a628@gmail.com>
[CCing Thermal maintainer Rafael, maybe he can help guide us]
Hi Bagas and everyone!
On 27.07.23 16:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>
> I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1].
Bagas, it looks like you forwarded this to the maintainers of
"THERMAL/CPU_COOLING"; I think "THERMAL" would have been the way better
entry in MAINTAINERS, as many (all?) of the former are Linaro employees
and thus primarily care about ARM based devices. That's why I CCed Rafael.
> Quoting from it:
>
>> On my new XPS 17 9730 laptop, I recently installed the Kernel 6.5-rc3. I noticed, however, that during its operation, the laptop was getting significantly warmer than before. I did some analysis using the 'stress' tool to measure and compare the difference in CPU temperatures between Kernel 6.4.3 and Kernel 6.5-rc3. Here are my results:
One thought: I wonder if there something wrong now or was there
something wrong earlier that was fixed to unleash the full performance
potential of the device. That 100°C there sounds like it's the latter
case, as that's the TJUNCTION temp for that processor. But would be good
to confirm from someone that knows better how hot such processors are
allowed to get these days.
Ciao, Thorsten
>> OS: Ubuntu 23.10
>> CPU: i7-13700H
>>
>> kernel 6.4.3:
>>
>> Initial CPU temperature:
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Core 0: +47.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 4: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 8: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 12: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 16: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 20: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 24: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 25: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 26: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 27: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 28: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 29: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 30: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 31: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
>> stress: info: [4858] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
>> stress: info: [4858] successful run completed in 30s
>> CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Core 0: +67.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 4: +76.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 8: +69.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 12: +77.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 16: +69.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 20: +76.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 24: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 25: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 26: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 27: +68.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 28: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 29: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 30: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 31: +71.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:10:16 PM CEST 2023
>>
>>
>> kernel 6.5-rc-3:
>>
>> Initial CPU temperature:
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Core 0: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 4: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 8: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 12: +46.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 16: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 20: +44.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 24: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 25: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 26: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 27: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 28: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 29: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 30: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 31: +45.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
>> stress: info: [11146] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
>> stress: info: [11146] successful run completed in 30s
>> CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
>> coretemp-isa-0000
>> Core 0: +84.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 4: +97.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 8: +87.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 12: +100.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 16: +86.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 20: +99.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 24: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 25: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 26: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 27: +83.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 28: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 29: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 30: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Core 31: +89.0°C (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>> Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:05:42 PM CEST 2023
>>
>> I tested few times with different setup and CPU temp on 6.5-rc3 is always higher especially when stressing with fewer cores.
>
> See Bugzilla for the full thread.
>
> Goran: On Tuesday, I asked you to perform bisection. Any update on it?
>
> Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
>
> #regzbot introduced: v6.4..v6.5-rc3 https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
> #regzbot title: significant temperature increase on XPS 17 9730
>
> Thanks.
>
> [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-28 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-27 14:24 Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 13:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
[not found] ` <CANhdOJEq-+KaMv=TX7E4ggf7rm456ibha2W_+Y5m1580ngCw_A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-07-28 19:43 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
2023-07-27 14:25 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 1:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 7:00 ` Bagas Sanjaya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2e512646-816f-ff98-d466-b82f3a7d05ef@leemhuis.info \
--to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=goran.brkuljan@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).