linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
To: Goran Brkuljan <goran.brkuljan@gmail.com>
Cc: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@gmail.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Regressions <regressions@lists.linux.dev>,
	Linux Power Management <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2023 21:43:22 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <da2bfc5b-8c98-17a4-1dbc-ef7989facc54@leemhuis.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANhdOJEq-+KaMv=TX7E4ggf7rm456ibha2W_+Y5m1580ngCw_A@mail.gmail.com>

On 28.07.23 20:13, Goran Brkuljan wrote:
> Hi Everyone,

Please don't sent HTML mail to Linux kernel lists, it often will be
rejected.

>     Goran: On Tuesday, I asked you to perform bisection. Any update on it?
> 
>  
> Sorry for the delayed response. I wasn't able to do git bisection as I
> was quite busy this week. 
> 
> However, I am no longer convinced that there is a kernel related issue.
> I reinstalled both kernels and now I get consistent results between two,
> and they both return higher values.
> Now on both kernels, core20 spikes to +100.0°C and it stays there for
> the duration of the test. Other cores are going from 80-95°C.
>
> Note that I used the mainline kernel installer for handling installation. 

FWIW, I (and likely many others that read this) have no idea what
(distro specifc?) tool you are talking about. But I guess that doesn't
matter. :-D

> I would close the issue as tests and behaviour don't suggest significant
> differences between kernel versions. 

Okydo, thx for the update.

#regzbot resolve: notabug: seems everything is working fine

Ciao, Thorsten

> On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 3:42 PM Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@leemhuis.info <mailto:regressions@leemhuis.info>> wrote:
> 
>     [CCing Thermal maintainer Rafael, maybe he can help guide us]
> 
>     Hi Bagas and everyone!
> 
>     On 27.07.23 16:24, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
>     >
>     > I notice a regression report on Bugzilla [1].
> 
>     Bagas, it looks like you forwarded this to the maintainers of
>     "THERMAL/CPU_COOLING"; I think "THERMAL" would have been the way better
>     entry in MAINTAINERS, as many (all?) of the former are Linaro employees
>     and thus primarily care about ARM based devices. That's why I CCed
>     Rafael.
> 
>     > Quoting from it:
>     >
>     >> On my new XPS 17 9730 laptop, I recently installed the Kernel
>     6.5-rc3. I noticed, however, that during its operation, the laptop
>     was getting significantly warmer than before. I did some analysis
>     using the 'stress' tool to measure and compare the difference in CPU
>     temperatures between Kernel 6.4.3 and Kernel 6.5-rc3. Here are my
>     results:
> 
>     One thought: I wonder if there something wrong now or was there
>     something wrong earlier that was fixed to unleash the full performance
>     potential of the device. That 100°C there sounds like it's the latter
>     case, as that's the TJUNCTION temp for that processor. But would be good
>     to confirm from someone that knows better how hot such processors are
>     allowed to get these days.
> 
>     Ciao, Thorsten
> 
>     >> OS: Ubuntu 23.10
>     >> CPU: i7-13700H
>     >>
>     >> kernel 6.4.3:
>     >>                                                                 
>                                                                        
>                                                        
>     >> Initial CPU temperature:
>     >> coretemp-isa-0000
>     >> Core 0:        +47.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 4:        +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 8:        +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 12:       +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 16:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 20:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 24:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 25:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 26:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 27:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 28:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 29:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 30:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 31:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
>     >> stress: info: [4858] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
>     >> stress: info: [4858] successful run completed in 30s
>     >> CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
>     >> coretemp-isa-0000
>     >> Core 0:        +67.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 4:        +76.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 8:        +69.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 12:       +77.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 16:       +69.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 20:       +76.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 24:       +68.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 25:       +68.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 26:       +68.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 27:       +68.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 28:       +71.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 29:       +71.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 30:       +71.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 31:       +71.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:10:16 PM CEST 2023
>     >>
>     >>
>     >> kernel 6.5-rc-3:
>     >>
>     >> Initial CPU temperature:
>     >> coretemp-isa-0000
>     >> Core 0:        +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 4:        +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 8:        +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 12:       +46.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 16:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 20:       +44.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 24:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 25:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 26:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 27:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 28:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 29:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 30:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 31:       +45.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Stressing CPU for 30 seconds...
>     >> stress: info: [11146] dispatching hogs: 14 cpu, 0 io, 0 vm, 0 hdd
>     >> stress: info: [11146] successful run completed in 30s
>     >> CPU temperature immediately after stress test:
>     >> coretemp-isa-0000
>     >> Core 0:        +84.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 4:        +97.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 8:        +87.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 12:      +100.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 16:       +86.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 20:       +99.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 24:       +83.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 25:       +83.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 26:       +83.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 27:       +83.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 28:       +89.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 29:       +89.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 30:       +89.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Core 31:       +89.0°C  (high = +100.0°C, crit = +100.0°C)
>     >> Test ended at: Tue Jul 25 01:05:42 PM CEST 2023
>     >>
>     >> I tested few times with different setup and CPU temp on 6.5-rc3
>     is always higher especially when stressing with fewer cores.
>     >
>     > See Bugzilla for the full thread.
>     >
>     > Goran: On Tuesday, I asked you to perform bisection. Any update on it?
>     >
>     > Anyway, I'm adding this regression to regzbot:
>     >
>     > #regzbot introduced: v6.4..v6.5-rc3
>     https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
>     <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703>
>     > #regzbot title: significant temperature increase on XPS 17 9730
>     >
>     > Thanks.
>     >
>     > [1]: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703
>     <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217703>
>     >
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-07-28 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-07-27 14:24 Fwd: XPS 17 9730 runs significantly warmer on Kernel 6.5-rc3 compared to Kernel 6.4.3 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28 13:42 ` Thorsten Leemhuis
     [not found]   ` <CANhdOJEq-+KaMv=TX7E4ggf7rm456ibha2W_+Y5m1580ngCw_A@mail.gmail.com>
2023-07-28 19:43     ` Thorsten Leemhuis [this message]
2023-07-27 14:25 Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28  1:31 ` Bagas Sanjaya
2023-07-28  7:00   ` Bagas Sanjaya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=da2bfc5b-8c98-17a4-1dbc-ef7989facc54@leemhuis.info \
    --to=regressions@leemhuis.info \
    --cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
    --cc=bagasdotme@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=goran.brkuljan@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).