linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>
To: Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, raphael.gault@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] objtool: Move header sync-check ealier in build
Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 13:44:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <315c119a-0986-a3a0-7243-5fe0dd9038ea@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LSU.2.21.2004011430120.15809@pobox.suse.cz>



On 4/1/20 1:32 PM, Miroslav Benes wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020, Julien Thierry wrote:
> 
>> Currently, the check of tools files against kernel equivalent is only
>> done after every object file has been built.
> 
>> This means one might fix
>> build issues against outdated headers without seeing a warning about
>> this.
> 
> Could you explain the above in more detail, please?
> 

I must admit that this patch is more fixing the issues I've faced while 
working on the arm64 support and sharing some kernel headers from the 
arch/arm64 tree.

The annoying part was:
- Have build errors in objtool
- Fix them
- Objtool build succeeds, but have warning about outdated headers
- Update headers
- New errors come up, potentially making obsolete the ealier fixes

So it's not really a "must have" change. But it's nice to have when 
bringing new kernel headers to objtool.

I hope this makes things clearer.

Cheers,

-- 
Julien Thierry


  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-01 12:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-27 15:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] objtool: Move header sync-check ealier in build Julien Thierry
2020-04-01 12:32   ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-01 12:44     ` Julien Thierry [this message]
2020-04-01 12:55       ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-02 17:12   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 17:17     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] objtool: check: Remove redundant checks on operand type Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] objtool: check: Clean instruction state before each function validation Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] objtool: check: Ignore empty alternative groups Julien Thierry
2020-04-01 12:53   ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-01 13:43     ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-01 13:48       ` Miroslav Benes
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] objtool: check: Remove check preventing branches within alternative Julien Thierry
2020-05-01 18:22   ` [tip: objtool/core] objtool: " tip-bot2 for Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] objtool: check: Use arch specific values in restore_reg() Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] objtool: check: Allow save/restore hint in non standard function symbols Julien Thierry
2020-04-01 13:54   ` Miroslav Benes
2020-04-01 14:06     ` Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] objtool: Add abstraction for computation of symbols offsets Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] objtool: Split generic and arch specific CFI definitions Julien Thierry
2020-03-27 15:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] objtool: Support multiple stack_op per instruction Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 17:54   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 18:25     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03  8:01     ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 14:55       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-22 22:24   ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Julien Thierry
2020-04-23  7:49   ` tip-bot2 for Julien Thierry
2020-04-23 11:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 17:58 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] Objtool updates for easier portability Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 18:30   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03  7:17     ` Miroslav Benes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=315c119a-0986-a3a0-7243-5fe0dd9038ea@redhat.com \
    --to=jthierry@redhat.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbenes@suse.cz \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=raphael.gault@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).