From: Quentin Schulz <quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: Alexander Stein <alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jdelvare@suse.com, knaack.h@gmx.de,
lars@metafoo.de, pmeerw@pmeerw.net,
maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com, wens@csie.org,
lee.jones@linaro.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall
Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2016 09:15:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3164bade-8022-8ad1-e327-f183128a3e88@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ECA41B39-BCC0-44D0-8B3D-838C48D713D0@kernel.org>
On 15/08/2016 23:35, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>
>
> On 15 August 2016 18:07:30 BST, Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:40:21PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> On 26/07/16 17:04, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 12:00:33PM +0200, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 11:33:59, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>>>>> On 26/07/2016 11:05, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:24:48, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 26/07/2016 10:21, Alexander Stein wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Tuesday 26 July 2016 09:43:44, Quentin Schulz wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> iio_channel_get_all returns -ENODEV when it cannot find
>> either phandles
>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>> properties in the Device Tree or channels whose
>> consumer_dev_name
>>>>>>>>>> matches
>>>>>>>>>> iio_hwmon in iio_map_list. The iio_map_list is filled in by
>> iio drivers
>>>>>>>>>> which might be probed after iio_hwmon.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would it work if iio_channel_get_all returning ENODEV is used
>> for
>>>>>>>>> returning
>>>>>>>>> EPROBE_DEFER in iio_channel_get_all? Using late initcalls for
>>>>>>>>> driver/device
>>>>>>>>> dependencies seems not right for me at this place.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Then what if the iio_channel_get_all is called outside of the
>> probe of a
>>>>>>>> driver? We'll have to change the error code, things we are
>> apparently
>>>>>>>> trying to avoid (see v2 patches' discussions).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I didn't express my idea enough. I don't want to change
>> the behavior
>>>>>>> of iio_channel_get_all at all. Just the result evaluation of
>>>>>>> iio_channel_get_all in iio_hwmon_probe. I have something link
>> the patch
>>>>>>> below in mind.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>>>> Alexander
>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
>> b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
>>>>>>> index b550ba5..e32d150 100644
>>>>>>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
>>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/iio_hwmon.c
>>>>>>> @@ -73,8 +73,12 @@ static int iio_hwmon_probe(struct
>> platform_device
>>>>>>> *pdev)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> name = dev->of_node->name;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> channels = iio_channel_get_all(dev);
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - if (IS_ERR(channels))
>>>>>>> - return PTR_ERR(channels);
>>>>>>> + if (IS_ERR(channels)) {
>>>>>>> + if (PTR_ERR(channels) == -ENODEV)
>>>>>>> + return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>>>>>> + else
>>>>>>> + return PTR_ERR(channels);
>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> st = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*st), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>>>>> if (st == NULL) {
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Indeed, I misunderstood what you told me.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Actually, the patch you proposed is part of my v1
>>>>>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/28/203) and v2
>>>>>> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/215).
>>>>>> Jonathan and Guenter didn't really like the idea of changing the
>> -ENODEV
>>>>>> in -EPROBE_DEFER.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for the links.
>>>>>
>>>>>> What I thought you were proposing was to change the -ENODEV
>> return code
>>>>>> inside iio_channel_get_all. This cannot be an option since the
>> function
>>>>>> might be called outside of a probe (it is not yet, but might be
>> in the
>>>>>> future?).
>>>>>
>>>>> AFAICS this is a helper function not knowing about device probing
>> itself. And
>>>>> it should stay at that.
>>>>>
>>>>>> Of what I understood, two possibilities are then possible
>> (proposed
>>>>>> either by Guenter or Jonathan): either rework the iio framework
>> to
>>>>>> register iio map array earlier or to use late_initcall instead of
>> init
>>>>>> for the driver consuming the iio channels.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interestingly using this problem would not arise due to module
>> dependencies.
>>>>> But using late_initcall would mean this needs to be done on any
>> driver using
>>>>> iio channels? I would rather keep those consumers simple.
>>>>>
>>>> Me too, but that would imply a solution in iio. The change you
>> propose above
>>>> isn't exactly simple either, and would also be needed in each
>> consumer driver.
>>>>
>>>> Just for the record, I dislike the late_initcall solution as well,
>> but I prefer
>>>> it over blindly converting ENODEV to EPROBE_DEFER.
>>> I'm falling on the other side on this one right now. Though I'd be
>> tempted
>>> to renaming the function to something like
>> iio_channel_get_all_or_defer
>>> to make it explicit that it can result in deferred probing.
>>>
>> Would this new function return -EPROBE_DEFER instead of -ENODEV ?
> Yes. Though whether it really adds much over doing that in drivers isn't clear.
>
> Hmm. Needs more thought...
Either we do the exact same "hack" as in the v2[1] in what you call
iio_channel_get_all_or_defer or we duplicate the code from
iio_channel_get_all in iio_channel_get_all_or_defer. Both do not seem
right to me but I really dislike the late_initcall method. With this
method we can only have one level of "channel dependency".
This means if we ever create a new driver which depends on channels from
the driver using late_initcall, we will also have to use late_initcall
and we can't be sure the new driver will always be probed after the
driver he depends on.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/7/15/215
Quentin
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Guenter
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-iio" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-01 7:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-26 7:43 [PATCH v3 0/4] add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] hwmon: iio_hwmon: delay probing with late_initcall Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:48 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2016-07-26 7:55 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 8:21 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 8:24 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 9:05 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 9:33 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 10:00 ` Alexander Stein
2016-07-26 10:07 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 16:04 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-15 15:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 17:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2016-08-15 21:35 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-09-01 7:15 ` Quentin Schulz [this message]
2016-09-01 9:03 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-09-03 19:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-08-15 15:36 ` Jonathan Cameron
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mfd: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-29 6:49 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mfd: mfd-core: reattach mfd of_node to cells without of_compatible Quentin Schulz
2016-08-09 13:48 ` Lee Jones
2016-08-24 6:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-31 11:56 ` Lee Jones
2016-09-01 8:35 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-07-26 7:43 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] iio: adc: add support for Allwinner SoCs ADC Quentin Schulz
2016-07-29 7:12 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-04 8:41 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-24 6:41 ` Maxime Ripard
2016-08-04 9:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-08-04 10:27 ` Quentin Schulz
2016-08-21 19:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3164bade-8022-8ad1-e327-f183128a3e88@free-electrons.com \
--to=quentin.schulz@free-electrons.com \
--cc=alexander.stein@systec-electronic.com \
--cc=antoine.tenart@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=knaack.h@gmx.de \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=wens@csie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).