From: Jie Deng <jie.deng@intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wsa@kernel.org,
wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com, mst@redhat.com, arnd@arndb.de,
jasowang@redhat.com, andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com,
yu1.wang@intel.com, shuo.a.liu@intel.com, conghui.chen@intel.com,
stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver
Date: Mon, 5 Jul 2021 11:45:39 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <332af2be-0fb0-a846-8092-49d496fe8b6b@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210705024056.ndth2bwn2itii5g3@vireshk-i7>
On 2021/7/5 10:40, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> I think we missed the first deadline for 5.14-rc1 as Wolfram should be out of
> office now. Anyway lets make sure we fix all the pending bits before he is back
> and see if we can still pull it off by rc2.
>
> On 02-07-21, 16:46, Jie Deng wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-virtio.c
>> +static int virtio_i2c_send_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
> It would be better to rename this to virtio_i2c_prepare_reqs instead, as this
> doesn't send anything.
That's a better name. I'm OK with that.
>
>> + struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
>> + struct i2c_msg *msgs, int nr)
>> +{
>> + struct scatterlist *sgs[3], out_hdr, msg_buf, in_hdr;
>> + int i, outcnt, incnt, err = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>> + /*
>> + * Only 7-bit mode supported for this moment. For the address format,
>> + * Please check the Virtio I2C Specification.
>> + */
>> + reqs[i].out_hdr.addr = cpu_to_le16(msgs[i].addr << 1);
>> +
>> + if (i != nr - 1)
>> + reqs[i].out_hdr.flags = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_I2C_FLAGS_FAIL_NEXT);
>> +
>> + outcnt = incnt = 0;
>> + sg_init_one(&out_hdr, &reqs[i].out_hdr, sizeof(reqs[i].out_hdr));
>> + sgs[outcnt++] = &out_hdr;
>> +
>> + if (msgs[i].len) {
>> + reqs[i].buf = i2c_get_dma_safe_msg_buf(&msgs[i], 1);
>> + if (!reqs[i].buf)
>> + break;
>> +
>> + sg_init_one(&msg_buf, reqs[i].buf, msgs[i].len);
>> +
>> + if (msgs[i].flags & I2C_M_RD)
>> + sgs[outcnt + incnt++] = &msg_buf;
>> + else
>> + sgs[outcnt++] = &msg_buf;
>> + }
>> +
>> + sg_init_one(&in_hdr, &reqs[i].in_hdr, sizeof(reqs[i].in_hdr));
>> + sgs[outcnt + incnt++] = &in_hdr;
>> +
>> + err = virtqueue_add_sgs(vq, sgs, outcnt, incnt, &reqs[i], GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (err < 0) {
>> + i2c_put_dma_safe_msg_buf(reqs[i].buf, &msgs[i], false);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return i;
>> +}
> The right way of doing this is is making this function return - Error on failure
> and 0 on success. There is no point returning number of successful additions
> here.
We need the number for virtio_i2c_complete_reqs to do cleanup. We don't
have to
do cleanup "num" times every time. Just do it as needed.
>
> Moreover, on failures this needs to clean up (free the dmabufs) itself, just
> like you did i2c_put_dma_safe_msg_buf() at the end. The caller shouldn't be
> required to handle the error cases by freeing up resources.
This function will return the number of requests being successfully
prepared and make sure
resources of the failed request being freed. And
virtio_i2c_complete_reqs will free the
resources of those successful request.
>> +static int virtio_i2c_complete_reqs(struct virtqueue *vq,
>> + struct virtio_i2c_req *reqs,
>> + struct i2c_msg *msgs, int nr,
>> + bool fail)
>> +{
>> + struct virtio_i2c_req *req;
>> + bool failed = fail;
>> + unsigned int len;
>> + int i, j = 0;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < nr; i++) {
>> + /* Detach the ith request from the vq */
>> + req = virtqueue_get_buf(vq, &len);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Condition (req && req == &reqs[i]) should always meet since
>> + * we have total nr requests in the vq.
>> + */
>> + if (!failed && (WARN_ON(!(req && req == &reqs[i])) ||
>> + (req->in_hdr.status != VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK)))
> What about writing this as:
>
> if (!failed && (WARN_ON(req != &reqs[i]) ||
> (req->in_hdr.status != VIRTIO_I2C_MSG_OK)))
>
> We don't need to check req here since if req is NULL, we will not do req->in_hdr
> at all.
It's right here just because the &reqs[i] will never be NULL in our
case. But if you see
"virtio_i2c_complete_reqs" as an independent function, you need to check the
req. From the perspective of the callee, you can't ask the caller always
give you
the non-NULL parameters. And some tools may give warnings.
>> + failed = true;
>> +
>> + i2c_put_dma_safe_msg_buf(reqs[i].buf, &msgs[i], !failed);
>> + if (!failed)
>> + ++j;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return (fail ? -ETIMEDOUT : j);
>> +}
>> +
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-07-05 3:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-02 8:46 [PATCH v12] i2c: virtio: add a virtio i2c frontend driver Jie Deng
2021-07-02 9:58 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-07-02 23:01 ` Wolfram Sang
2021-07-05 2:43 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05 3:01 ` Jie Deng
2021-07-05 6:21 ` Jie Deng
2021-07-05 6:31 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05 3:46 ` Jie Deng
2021-07-05 2:40 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05 3:45 ` Jie Deng [this message]
2021-07-05 4:38 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05 6:22 ` Jie Deng
2021-07-05 6:30 ` Viresh Kumar
2021-07-05 7:13 ` Jie Deng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=332af2be-0fb0-a846-8092-49d496fe8b6b@intel.com \
--to=jie.deng@intel.com \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=conghui.chen@intel.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=shuo.a.liu@intel.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
--cc=wsa@kernel.org \
--cc=yu1.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).