linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, ardb@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sumit.garg@linaro.org,
	oliver.sang@intel.com, jarkko@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2021 16:44:36 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34ceee59-4276-90b5-871b-cda303901ce3@rasmusvillemoes.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4e9dfdf-c83a-3314-8c55-5b2371a56ec8@rasmusvillemoes.dk>

On 19/03/2021 15.40, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 19/03/2021 15.13, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
>>> Dunno, probably overkill, but perhaps we could have an atomic_t (or
>>> refcount, whatever) init_ref inited to 1, with init_ref_get() doing an
>>> inc_unless_zero, and iff you get a ref, you're free to call (/patch)
>>> __init functions and access __initdata, but must do init_ref_put(), with
>>> PID1 dropping its initial ref and waiting for it to drop to 0 before
>>> doing the *free_initmem() calls.
>>
>> I'd as soon simply add another SYSTEM state. That way we don't have to
>> worry about who else looks at RUNNING for what etc..
> 
> I don't understand. How would that solve the
> 
> PID1                           PIDX
>                                ok = system_state < INIT_MEM_GONE;
> system_state = INIT_MEM_GONE;
> free_initmem();
> system_state = RUNNING;
>                                if (ok)
>                                    poke init mem
> 
> race? I really don't see any way arbitrary threads can reliably check
> how far PID1 has progressed at one point in time and use that
> information (a few lines) later to access init memory without
> synchronizing with PID1.
> 
> AFAICT, having an atomic_t object representing the init memory 

something like

--- a/init/main.c
+++ b/init/main.c
@@ -1417,6 +1417,18 @@ void __weak free_initmem(void)
        free_initmem_default(POISON_FREE_INITMEM);
 }

+static atomic_t init_mem_ref = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
+static DECLARE_COMPLETION(init_mem_may_go);
+bool init_mem_get(void)
+{
+       return atomic_inc_not_zero(&init_mem_ref);
+}
+void init_mem_put(void)
+{
+       if (atomic_dec_and_test(&init_mem_ref))
+               complete(&init_mem_may_go);
+}
+
 static int __ref kernel_init(void *unused)
 {
        int ret;
@@ -1424,6 +1436,8 @@ static int __ref kernel_init(void *unused)
        kernel_init_freeable();
        /* need to finish all async __init code before freeing the memory */
        async_synchronize_full();
+       init_mem_put();
+       wait_for_completion(&init_mem_may_go);
        kprobe_free_init_mem();
        ftrace_free_init_mem();
        kgdb_free_init_mem();


  reply	other threads:[~2021-03-19 15:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 11:31 [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] static_call: Fix static_call_set_init() Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25   ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] static_call: Align static_call_is_init() patching condition Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25   ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 13:31   ` [PATCH 2/3] " Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-19 14:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 14:40       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2021-03-19 15:44         ` Rasmus Villemoes [this message]
2021-03-22 16:59         ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] static_call: Fix static_call_update() sanity check Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 11:42   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 16:13   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-03-18 16:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 18:00         ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-19 19:34           ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 20:57             ` Steven Rostedt
2021-03-22 14:50               ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 16:54                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-22 17:36                   ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 13:07           ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-22 14:06             ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-19 12:25   ` [tip: locking/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2021-03-18 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/3] static_call() vs __exit fixes Sumit Garg
2021-03-18 19:38 ` Jarkko Sakkinen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34ceee59-4276-90b5-871b-cda303901ce3@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --to=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).