linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
@ 2015-03-03  3:25 Minchan Kim
  2015-03-03  3:59 ` Wang, Yalin
  2015-03-05 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2015-03-03  3:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang, Yalin
  Cc: 'Michal Hocko', 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

Could you separte this patch in this patchset thread?
It's tackling differnt problem.

As well, I had a question to previous thread about why shared page
has a problem now but you didn't answer and send a new patchset.
It makes reviewers/maintainer time waste/confuse. Please, don't
hurry to send a code. Before that, resolve reviewers's comments.

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
> if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
> treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
> freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
> so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
> all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.

Please, spend more time to make description clear. I really doubt
who understand this description without code inspection. :(
Of course, I'm not a person to write description clear like native
, either but just I'm sure I spend a more time to write description
rather than coding, at least. :)

> 
> Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@sonymobile.com>
> ---
>  mm/madvise.c | 16 +++++++++-------
>  mm/memory.c  | 12 ++++++++++--
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 6d0fcb8..b61070d 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -297,23 +297,25 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
>  			continue;
>  
>  		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
> -		if (!page)
> +		if (!page || !trylock_page(page))
>  			continue;
>  
>  		if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
> -			if (!trylock_page(page))
> -				continue;
> -
>  			if (!try_to_free_swap(page)) {
>  				unlock_page(page);
>  				continue;
>  			}
> -
> -			ClearPageDirty(page);
> -			unlock_page(page);
>  		}
>  
>  		/*
> +		 * we clear page dirty flag for AnonPage, no matter if this
> +		 * page is in swapcahce or not, AnonPage not in swapcache also set
> +		 * dirty flag sometimes, this happened when a AnonPage is removed
> +		 * from swapcahce by try_to_free_swap()
> +		 */
> +		ClearPageDirty(page);
> +		unlock_page(page);
> +		/*

Parent:

ptrP = malloc();
*ptrP = 'a';
fork(); -> child process pte has dirty by your patch
..
memory pressure -> So, swapped out the page.
..
..
Child: var = *ptrP; assert(var =='a') -> So, swapin happens and child has pte_clean
parent: var = *ptrP; aasert(var == 'a') -> So, swapin happens and parent has pte_clean
..
..
Parent:
madvise_free -> remove PageDirty
So, both parent and child has pte_clean and !PageDirty, which
is target for VM to discard a page.
..
VM discard the page by memory pressure.
..
Child: var = *ptrP: assert(var == 'a'); <---- oops.

And blindly ClearPageDirty makes duplicates swap out.

>  		 * Some of architecture(ex, PPC) don't update TLB
>  		 * with set_pte_at and tlb_remove_tlb_entry so for
>  		 * the portability, remap the pte with old|clean
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 8068893..3d949b3 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -874,10 +874,18 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
>  	if (page) {
>  		get_page(page);
>  		page_dup_rmap(page);
> -		if (PageAnon(page))
> +		if (PageAnon(page)) {
> +			/*
> +			 * we dirty the copyed pte for anon page,
> +			 * this is useful for madvise_free_pte_range(),
> +			 * this can prevent shared anon page freed by madvise_free
> +			 * syscall
> +			 */
> +			pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);

It made every MADV_FREE hinted page void. IOW, if a process called MADV_FREE
calls fork, VM cannot discard pages if child doesn't free pages or calls madvise_free.
Then, if parent calls madvise_free before fork, we couldn't free those pages.
IOW, you are ignoring below example.

parent:
ptr1 = malloc(len);
        -> allocator calls mmap(len);
memset(ptr1, 'a', len);
free(ptr1);
        -> allocator calls madvise_free(ptr1, len);
fork();
..
..
        -> VM discard hinted pages
child:

ptr2 = malloc(len)
        -> allocator reuses the chunk allocated from parent.
so, child will see zero pages from ptr2 but he doesn't write
anything so garbage|zero page anything is okay to him.

As well, you are adding new instructions in fork which is very frequent syscall
so I'd like to find another way to avoid adding instructions in such hot path.

I will send different patch. Please review it.

So, my suggestion is below. It always makes pte dirty so let's Cc
Cyrill to take care of softdirty and Hugh who is Mr.Swap.

>From 30c6d5b35a3dc7e451041183ce5efd6a6c42bf88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:06:59 +0900
Subject: [RFC] mm: make every pte dirty on do_swap_page

Bascially, MADV_FREE relys on the pte dirty to decide whether
VM should discard or not. However, swapped-in page doesn't have
pte_dirty. Instead, it checks PageDirty and PageSwapCache for
such page because swapped-in page could live on swap cache or
set PageDirty when it is removed from swapcache so MADV_FREE
checks it and doesn't discard.

The problem in here is any anonymous page can have PageDirty if
it is removed from swapcache so that VM cannot parse those pages
as freeable even if we did madvise_free. Look at below example.

ptr = malloc();
memset(ptr);
..
heavy memory pressure -> swap-out all of pages
..
out of memory pressure
..
var = *ptr; -> swap-in page/remove the page from swapcache. so pte_clean
               but SetPageDirty

madvise_free(ptr);
..
..
heavy memory pressure -> VM cannot discard the page by PageDirty.

PageDirty for anonymous page aims for avoiding duplicating
swapping out. In other words, if a page have swapped-in but
live swapcache(ie, !PageDirty), we could save swapout if the page
is selected as victim by VM in future because swap device have
kept previous swapped-out contents of the page.

So, rather than relying on the PG_dirty for working madvise_free,
pte_dirty is more straightforward.
Inherently, swapped-out page was pte_dirty so this patch restores
the dirtiness when swap-in fault happens and madvise_free doesn't
rely on the PageDirty.

Signed-off-by: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
---
 mm/madvise.c | 1 -
 mm/memory.c  | 9 +++++++--
 mm/rmap.c    | 2 +-
 mm/vmscan.c  | 3 +--
 4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 6d0fcb8..d64200e 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 				continue;
 			}
 
-			ClearPageDirty(page);
 			unlock_page(page);
 		}
 
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8ae52c9..2f45e77 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -2460,9 +2460,14 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
-	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
+
+	/*
+	 * Every page swapped-out was pte_dirty so we makes pte dirty again.
+	 * MADV_FREE relys on it.
+	 */
+	pte = mk_pte(pte_mkdirty(page), vma->vm_page_prot);
 	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
-		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
+		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma);
 		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
 		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;
 		exclusive = 1;
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 47b3ba8..34c1d66 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
 
 		if (flags & TTU_FREE) {
 			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
-			if (!dirty && !PageDirty(page)) {
+			if (!dirty) {
 				/* It's a freeable page by MADV_FREE */
 				dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
 				goto discard;
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 671e47e..7f520c9 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ static enum page_references page_check_references(struct page *page,
 		return PAGEREF_KEEP;
 	}
 
-	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page) &&
-			!PageDirty(page))
+	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page))
 		*freeable = true;
 
 	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
-- 
1.9.3

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-03  3:25 [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty Minchan Kim
@ 2015-03-03  3:59 ` Wang, Yalin
  2015-03-03  4:14   ` Minchan Kim
  2015-03-05 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2015-03-03  3:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Minchan Kim'
  Cc: 'Michal Hocko', 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan Kim
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:26 AM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> 
> Could you separte this patch in this patchset thread?
> It's tackling differnt problem.
> 
> As well, I had a question to previous thread about why shared page
> has a problem now but you didn't answer and send a new patchset.
> It makes reviewers/maintainer time waste/confuse. Please, don't
> hurry to send a code. Before that, resolve reviewers's comments.
> 
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
> > if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
> > treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
> > freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
> > so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
> > all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.
> 
> Please, spend more time to make description clear. I really doubt
> who understand this description without code inspection. :(
> Of course, I'm not a person to write description clear like native
> , either but just I'm sure I spend a more time to write description
> rather than coding, at least. :)
> 
I see, I will send another mail for file private map pages.
Sorry for my English expressions.
I think your solution is ok,
Your patch will make sure the anonpage pte will always be dirty.
I add some comments for your patch:

> ---
>  mm/madvise.c | 1 -
>  mm/memory.c  | 9 +++++++--
>  mm/rmap.c    | 2 +-
>  mm/vmscan.c  | 3 +--
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> index 6d0fcb8..d64200e 100644
> --- a/mm/madvise.c
> +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> @@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned
> long addr,
>  				continue;
>  			}
> 
> -			ClearPageDirty(page);
>  			unlock_page(page);
>  		}
> 
> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> index 8ae52c9..2f45e77 100644
> --- a/mm/memory.c
> +++ b/mm/memory.c
> @@ -2460,9 +2460,14 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
> 
>  	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
>  	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> -	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Every page swapped-out was pte_dirty so we makes pte dirty again.
> +	 * MADV_FREE relys on it.
> +	 */
> +	pte = mk_pte(pte_mkdirty(page), vma->vm_page_prot);
pte_mkdirty() usage seems wrong here.

>  	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
> -		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
> +		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma);
>  		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
>  		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;
>  		exclusive = 1;
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 47b3ba8..34c1d66 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct
> vm_area_struct *vma,
> 
>  		if (flags & TTU_FREE) {
>  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> -			if (!dirty && !PageDirty(page)) {
> +			if (!dirty) {
>  				/* It's a freeable page by MADV_FREE */
>  				dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
>  				goto discard;
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 671e47e..7f520c9 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ static enum page_references
> page_check_references(struct page *page,
>  		return PAGEREF_KEEP;
>  	}
> 
> -	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page) &&
> -			!PageDirty(page))
> +	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page))
>  		*freeable = true;
> 
>  	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> --
> 1.9.3
Could we remove SetPageDirty(page); in try_to_free_swap() function based on this patch?
Because your patch will make sure the pte is always dirty,
We don't need setpagedirty(),
The try_to_unmap() path will re-dirty the page during reclaim path,
Isn't it?

Thanks








^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-03  3:59 ` Wang, Yalin
@ 2015-03-03  4:14   ` Minchan Kim
  2015-03-03  6:46     ` Wang, Yalin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2015-03-03  4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang, Yalin
  Cc: 'Michal Hocko', 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:59:17AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan Kim
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:26 AM
> > To: Wang, Yalin
> > Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> > 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> > 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> > Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> > 
> > Could you separte this patch in this patchset thread?
> > It's tackling differnt problem.
> > 
> > As well, I had a question to previous thread about why shared page
> > has a problem now but you didn't answer and send a new patchset.
> > It makes reviewers/maintainer time waste/confuse. Please, don't
> > hurry to send a code. Before that, resolve reviewers's comments.
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
> > > if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
> > > treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
> > > freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
> > > so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
> > > all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.
> > 
> > Please, spend more time to make description clear. I really doubt
> > who understand this description without code inspection. :(
> > Of course, I'm not a person to write description clear like native
> > , either but just I'm sure I spend a more time to write description
> > rather than coding, at least. :)
> > 
> I see, I will send another mail for file private map pages.
> Sorry for my English expressions.
> I think your solution is ok,
> Your patch will make sure the anonpage pte will always be dirty.
> I add some comments for your patch:
> 
> > ---
> >  mm/madvise.c | 1 -
> >  mm/memory.c  | 9 +++++++--
> >  mm/rmap.c    | 2 +-
> >  mm/vmscan.c  | 3 +--
> >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> > index 6d0fcb8..d64200e 100644
> > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > @@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned
> > long addr,
> >  				continue;
> >  			}
> > 
> > -			ClearPageDirty(page);
> >  			unlock_page(page);
> >  		}
> > 
> > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > index 8ae52c9..2f45e77 100644
> > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > @@ -2460,9 +2460,14 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct
> > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > 
> >  	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> >  	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> > -	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * Every page swapped-out was pte_dirty so we makes pte dirty again.
> > +	 * MADV_FREE relys on it.
> > +	 */
> > +	pte = mk_pte(pte_mkdirty(page), vma->vm_page_prot);
> pte_mkdirty() usage seems wrong here.

Argh, it reveals I didn't test even build. My shame.
But RFC tag might mitigate my shame. :)
I will fix it if I send a formal version.
Thanks for the review.

> 
> >  	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
> > -		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
> > +		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma);
> >  		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> >  		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;
> >  		exclusive = 1;
> > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > index 47b3ba8..34c1d66 100644
> > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct
> > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > 
> >  		if (flags & TTU_FREE) {
> >  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> > -			if (!dirty && !PageDirty(page)) {
> > +			if (!dirty) {
> >  				/* It's a freeable page by MADV_FREE */
> >  				dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> >  				goto discard;
> > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > index 671e47e..7f520c9 100644
> > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > @@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ static enum page_references
> > page_check_references(struct page *page,
> >  		return PAGEREF_KEEP;
> >  	}
> > 
> > -	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page) &&
> > -			!PageDirty(page))
> > +	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page))
> >  		*freeable = true;
> > 
> >  	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> > --
> > 1.9.3
> Could we remove SetPageDirty(page); in try_to_free_swap() function based on this patch?
> Because your patch will make sure the pte is always dirty,
> We don't need setpagedirty(),
> The try_to_unmap() path will re-dirty the page during reclaim path,
> Isn't it?

I dont't know what side-effect we will have if we removes SetPageDirty.
It might regress on tmpfs which would page without pte.
I don't want to have such risk in this patch.
If you want it, you could suggest it separately if this patch lands.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* RE: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-03  4:14   ` Minchan Kim
@ 2015-03-03  6:46     ` Wang, Yalin
  2015-03-03 13:40       ` Minchan Kim
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2015-03-03  6:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Minchan Kim'
  Cc: 'Michal Hocko', 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan Kim
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:15 PM
> To: Wang, Yalin
> Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> 
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:59:17AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan
> Kim
> > > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:26 AM
> > > To: Wang, Yalin
> > > Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> > > 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> > > 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> > > Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> > >
> > > Could you separte this patch in this patchset thread?
> > > It's tackling differnt problem.
> > >
> > > As well, I had a question to previous thread about why shared page
> > > has a problem now but you didn't answer and send a new patchset.
> > > It makes reviewers/maintainer time waste/confuse. Please, don't
> > > hurry to send a code. Before that, resolve reviewers's comments.
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > > This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
> > > > if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
> > > > treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
> > > > freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
> > > > so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
> > > > all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.
> > >
> > > Please, spend more time to make description clear. I really doubt
> > > who understand this description without code inspection. :(
> > > Of course, I'm not a person to write description clear like native
> > > , either but just I'm sure I spend a more time to write description
> > > rather than coding, at least. :)
> > >
> > I see, I will send another mail for file private map pages.
> > Sorry for my English expressions.
> > I think your solution is ok,
> > Your patch will make sure the anonpage pte will always be dirty.
> > I add some comments for your patch:
> >
> > > ---
> > >  mm/madvise.c | 1 -
> > >  mm/memory.c  | 9 +++++++--
> > >  mm/rmap.c    | 2 +-
> > >  mm/vmscan.c  | 3 +--
> > >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> > > index 6d0fcb8..d64200e 100644
> > > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > > @@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> unsigned
> > > long addr,
> > >  				continue;
> > >  			}
> > >
> > > -			ClearPageDirty(page);
> > >  			unlock_page(page);
> > >  		}
> > >
> > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > > index 8ae52c9..2f45e77 100644
> > > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > > @@ -2460,9 +2460,14 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct
> > > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > >
> > >  	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> > >  	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> > > -	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Every page swapped-out was pte_dirty so we makes pte dirty again.
> > > +	 * MADV_FREE relys on it.
> > > +	 */
> > > +	pte = mk_pte(pte_mkdirty(page), vma->vm_page_prot);
> > pte_mkdirty() usage seems wrong here.
> 
> Argh, it reveals I didn't test even build. My shame.
> But RFC tag might mitigate my shame. :)
> I will fix it if I send a formal version.
> Thanks for the review.
> 
> >
> > >  	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
> > > -		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
> > > +		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma);
> > >  		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> > >  		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;
> > >  		exclusive = 1;
> > > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > > index 47b3ba8..34c1d66 100644
> > > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > > @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page,
> struct
> > > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > >
> > >  		if (flags & TTU_FREE) {
> > >  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> > > -			if (!dirty && !PageDirty(page)) {
> > > +			if (!dirty) {
> > >  				/* It's a freeable page by MADV_FREE */
> > >  				dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> > >  				goto discard;
> > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > index 671e47e..7f520c9 100644
> > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > @@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ static enum page_references
> > > page_check_references(struct page *page,
> > >  		return PAGEREF_KEEP;
> > >  	}
> > >
> > > -	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page) &&
> > > -			!PageDirty(page))
> > > +	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page))
> > >  		*freeable = true;
> > >
> > >  	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> > > --
> > > 1.9.3
> > Could we remove SetPageDirty(page); in try_to_free_swap() function based
> on this patch?
> > Because your patch will make sure the pte is always dirty,
> > We don't need setpagedirty(),
> > The try_to_unmap() path will re-dirty the page during reclaim path,
> > Isn't it?
> 
> I dont't know what side-effect we will have if we removes SetPageDirty.
> It might regress on tmpfs which would page without pte.
> I don't want to have such risk in this patch.
> If you want it, you could suggest it separately if this patch lands.
> 
Ok, Could you send out your change as a normal patch for more related maintainers to review /comment it?

Thanks


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-03  6:46     ` Wang, Yalin
@ 2015-03-03 13:40       ` Minchan Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2015-03-03 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Wang, Yalin
  Cc: 'Michal Hocko', 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:46:40PM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan Kim
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 12:15 PM
> > To: Wang, Yalin
> > Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> > 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> > 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> > Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 11:59:17AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Minchan Kim [mailto:minchan.kim@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Minchan
> > Kim
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 11:26 AM
> > > > To: Wang, Yalin
> > > > Cc: 'Michal Hocko'; 'Andrew Morton'; 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org';
> > > > 'linux-mm@kvack.org'; 'Rik van Riel'; 'Johannes Weiner'; 'Mel Gorman';
> > > > 'Shaohua Li'; Hugh Dickins; Cyrill Gorcunov
> > > > Subject: Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
> > > >
> > > > Could you separte this patch in this patchset thread?
> > > > It's tackling differnt problem.
> > > >
> > > > As well, I had a question to previous thread about why shared page
> > > > has a problem now but you didn't answer and send a new patchset.
> > > > It makes reviewers/maintainer time waste/confuse. Please, don't
> > > > hurry to send a code. Before that, resolve reviewers's comments.
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 10:06:40AM +0800, Wang, Yalin wrote:
> > > > > This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
> > > > > if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
> > > > > treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
> > > > > freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
> > > > > so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
> > > > > all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.
> > > >
> > > > Please, spend more time to make description clear. I really doubt
> > > > who understand this description without code inspection. :(
> > > > Of course, I'm not a person to write description clear like native
> > > > , either but just I'm sure I spend a more time to write description
> > > > rather than coding, at least. :)
> > > >
> > > I see, I will send another mail for file private map pages.
> > > Sorry for my English expressions.
> > > I think your solution is ok,
> > > Your patch will make sure the anonpage pte will always be dirty.
> > > I add some comments for your patch:
> > >
> > > > ---
> > > >  mm/madvise.c | 1 -
> > > >  mm/memory.c  | 9 +++++++--
> > > >  mm/rmap.c    | 2 +-
> > > >  mm/vmscan.c  | 3 +--
> > > >  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
> > > > index 6d0fcb8..d64200e 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/madvise.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/madvise.c
> > > > @@ -309,7 +309,6 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd,
> > unsigned
> > > > long addr,
> > > >  				continue;
> > > >  			}
> > > >
> > > > -			ClearPageDirty(page);
> > > >  			unlock_page(page);
> > > >  		}
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
> > > > index 8ae52c9..2f45e77 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/memory.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/memory.c
> > > > @@ -2460,9 +2460,14 @@ static int do_swap_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > struct
> > > > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > >
> > > >  	inc_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> > > >  	dec_mm_counter_fast(mm, MM_SWAPENTS);
> > > > -	pte = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> > > > +
> > > > +	/*
> > > > +	 * Every page swapped-out was pte_dirty so we makes pte dirty again.
> > > > +	 * MADV_FREE relys on it.
> > > > +	 */
> > > > +	pte = mk_pte(pte_mkdirty(page), vma->vm_page_prot);
> > > pte_mkdirty() usage seems wrong here.
> > 
> > Argh, it reveals I didn't test even build. My shame.
> > But RFC tag might mitigate my shame. :)
> > I will fix it if I send a formal version.
> > Thanks for the review.
> > 
> > >
> > > >  	if ((flags & FAULT_FLAG_WRITE) && reuse_swap_page(page)) {
> > > > -		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte_mkdirty(pte), vma);
> > > > +		pte = maybe_mkwrite(pte, vma);
> > > >  		flags &= ~FAULT_FLAG_WRITE;
> > > >  		ret |= VM_FAULT_WRITE;
> > > >  		exclusive = 1;
> > > > diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> > > > index 47b3ba8..34c1d66 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/rmap.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> > > > @@ -1268,7 +1268,7 @@ static int try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page,
> > struct
> > > > vm_area_struct *vma,
> > > >
> > > >  		if (flags & TTU_FREE) {
> > > >  			VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PageSwapCache(page), page);
> > > > -			if (!dirty && !PageDirty(page)) {
> > > > +			if (!dirty) {
> > > >  				/* It's a freeable page by MADV_FREE */
> > > >  				dec_mm_counter(mm, MM_ANONPAGES);
> > > >  				goto discard;
> > > > diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > index 671e47e..7f520c9 100644
> > > > --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> > > > @@ -805,8 +805,7 @@ static enum page_references
> > > > page_check_references(struct page *page,
> > > >  		return PAGEREF_KEEP;
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > > -	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page) &&
> > > > -			!PageDirty(page))
> > > > +	if (PageAnon(page) && !pte_dirty && !PageSwapCache(page))
> > > >  		*freeable = true;
> > > >
> > > >  	/* Reclaim if clean, defer dirty pages to writeback */
> > > > --
> > > > 1.9.3
> > > Could we remove SetPageDirty(page); in try_to_free_swap() function based
> > on this patch?
> > > Because your patch will make sure the pte is always dirty,
> > > We don't need setpagedirty(),
> > > The try_to_unmap() path will re-dirty the page during reclaim path,
> > > Isn't it?
> > 
> > I dont't know what side-effect we will have if we removes SetPageDirty.
> > It might regress on tmpfs which would page without pte.
> > I don't want to have such risk in this patch.
> > If you want it, you could suggest it separately if this patch lands.
> > 
> Ok, Could you send out your change as a normal patch for more related maintainers to review /comment it?

NP but let's wait a few days to see if we have a luck which they grab a time
slot to review. :)

Thanks.

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-03  3:25 [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty Minchan Kim
  2015-03-03  3:59 ` Wang, Yalin
@ 2015-03-05 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
  2015-03-09  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2015-03-05 15:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Minchan Kim
  Cc: Wang, Yalin, 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

On Tue 03-03-15 12:25:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
[...]
> From 30c6d5b35a3dc7e451041183ce5efd6a6c42bf88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:06:59 +0900
> Subject: [RFC] mm: make every pte dirty on do_swap_page

Hi Minchan, could you resend this patch separately. I am afraid that
this one got so convoluted with originally unrelated issues that
people might miss it.

Thanks!
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* Re: [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-05 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
@ 2015-03-09  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Minchan Kim @ 2015-03-09  0:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Michal Hocko
  Cc: Wang, Yalin, 'Andrew Morton',
	'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li',
	Hugh Dickins, Cyrill Gorcunov

Hello Michal,

On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 04:35:05PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 03-03-15 12:25:51, Minchan Kim wrote:
> [...]
> > From 30c6d5b35a3dc7e451041183ce5efd6a6c42bf88 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
> > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 10:06:59 +0900
> > Subject: [RFC] mm: make every pte dirty on do_swap_page
> 
> Hi Minchan, could you resend this patch separately. I am afraid that
> this one got so convoluted with originally unrelated issues that
> people might miss it.
> 
> Thanks!

No problem. Thanks for the review.
I will resend it this week but I'm afraid everybody will be in LSF/MM
so they will be busy with hardwork in there. :)


> -- 
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs

-- 
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty
  2015-03-02 12:38             ` Michal Hocko
@ 2015-03-03  2:06               ` Wang, Yalin
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Wang, Yalin @ 2015-03-03  2:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: 'Michal Hocko', 'Minchan Kim',
	'Andrew Morton', 'linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org',
	'linux-mm@kvack.org', 'Rik van Riel',
	'Johannes Weiner', 'Mel Gorman',
	'Shaohua Li'

This patch add ClearPageDirty() to clear AnonPage dirty flag,
if not clear page dirty for this anon page, the page will never be
treated as freeable. We also make sure the shared AnonPage is not
freeable, we implement it by dirty all copyed AnonPage pte,
so that make sure the Anonpage will not become freeable, unless
all process which shared this page call madvise_free syscall.

Signed-off-by: Yalin Wang <yalin.wang@sonymobile.com>
---
 mm/madvise.c | 16 +++++++++-------
 mm/memory.c  | 12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/madvise.c b/mm/madvise.c
index 6d0fcb8..b61070d 100644
--- a/mm/madvise.c
+++ b/mm/madvise.c
@@ -297,23 +297,25 @@ static int madvise_free_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
 			continue;
 
 		page = vm_normal_page(vma, addr, ptent);
-		if (!page)
+		if (!page || !trylock_page(page))
 			continue;
 
 		if (PageSwapCache(page)) {
-			if (!trylock_page(page))
-				continue;
-
 			if (!try_to_free_swap(page)) {
 				unlock_page(page);
 				continue;
 			}
-
-			ClearPageDirty(page);
-			unlock_page(page);
 		}
 
 		/*
+		 * we clear page dirty flag for AnonPage, no matter if this
+		 * page is in swapcahce or not, AnonPage not in swapcache also set
+		 * dirty flag sometimes, this happened when a AnonPage is removed
+		 * from swapcahce by try_to_free_swap()
+		 */
+		ClearPageDirty(page);
+		unlock_page(page);
+		/*
 		 * Some of architecture(ex, PPC) don't update TLB
 		 * with set_pte_at and tlb_remove_tlb_entry so for
 		 * the portability, remap the pte with old|clean
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index 8068893..3d949b3 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -874,10 +874,18 @@ copy_one_pte(struct mm_struct *dst_mm, struct mm_struct *src_mm,
 	if (page) {
 		get_page(page);
 		page_dup_rmap(page);
-		if (PageAnon(page))
+		if (PageAnon(page)) {
+			/*
+			 * we dirty the copyed pte for anon page,
+			 * this is useful for madvise_free_pte_range(),
+			 * this can prevent shared anon page freed by madvise_free
+			 * syscall
+			 */
+			pte = pte_mkdirty(pte);
 			rss[MM_ANONPAGES]++;
-		else
+		} else {
 			rss[MM_FILEPAGES]++;
+		}
 	}
 
 out_set_pte:
-- 
2.2.2


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2015-03-09  0:57 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-03-03  3:25 [RFC V3] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty Minchan Kim
2015-03-03  3:59 ` Wang, Yalin
2015-03-03  4:14   ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-03  6:46     ` Wang, Yalin
2015-03-03 13:40       ` Minchan Kim
2015-03-05 15:35 ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-09  0:57   ` Minchan Kim
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-02-24  8:18 [PATCH RFC 1/4] mm: throttle MADV_FREE Minchan Kim
2015-02-24 15:43 ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-25  0:08   ` Minchan Kim
2015-02-27  3:37     ` [RFC] mm: change mm_advise_free to clear page dirty Wang, Yalin
2015-02-27 21:02       ` Michal Hocko
2015-02-28  2:11         ` Wang, Yalin
2015-02-28  6:01           ` [RFC V2] " Wang, Yalin
2015-03-02 12:38             ` Michal Hocko
2015-03-03  2:06               ` [RFC V3] " Wang, Yalin

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).