linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com,
	pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] soundwire: qcom: update register read/write routine
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2021 15:50:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <360ddca6-6f64-5297-2e88-9507500dfd4d@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210201142646.GD2771@vkoul-mobl>



On 01/02/2021 14:26, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 29-01-21, 17:32, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> In the existing code every soundwire register read and register write
>> are kinda blocked. Each of these are using a special command id that
>> generates interrupt after it successfully finishes. This is really
>> overhead, limiting and not really necessary unless we are doing
>> something special.
>>
>> We can simply read/write the fifo that should also give exactly
>> what we need! This will also allow to read/write registers in
>> interrupt context, which was not possible with the special
> 
> Okay but then why use a mutex ?

Read and writes can come from two places,
1> from SoundWire Core itself which takes care of locking
2> from interrupt handler in the driver itself, which is why we need an 
additional locking!

Having said that I did have look at the current state of driver 
interrupt handler, and it does not do any soundwire register read/writes 
from interrupt handler so we can remove the lock for now!

> 
>> command approach.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/soundwire/qcom.c | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 96 insertions(+), 52 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> index 83df15d83935..d61b204dc284 100644
>> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
>> @@ -78,13 +78,15 @@
>>   #define SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID	0xF
>>   #define MAX_FREQ_NUM		1
>>   #define TIMEOUT_MS		(2 * HZ)
>> -#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN	0xf
>> +#define QCOM_SWRM_MAX_RD_LEN	0x1
>>   #define QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS	14
>>   #define DEFAULT_CLK_FREQ	9600000
>>   #define SWRM_MAX_DAIS		0xF
>>   #define SWR_INVALID_PARAM 0xFF
>>   #define SWR_HSTOP_MAX_VAL 0xF
>>   #define SWR_HSTART_MIN_VAL 0x0
>> +#define SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID    0x0F
>> +#define MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY 3
>>   
>>   struct qcom_swrm_port_config {
>>   	u8 si;
>> @@ -104,11 +106,13 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>>   	struct regmap *regmap;
>>   	void __iomem *mmio;
>>   	struct completion *comp;
>> +	struct completion broadcast;
>>   	struct work_struct slave_work;
>>   	/* read/write lock */
>>   	spinlock_t comp_lock;
>>   	/* Port alloc/free lock */
>>   	struct mutex port_lock;
>> +	struct mutex io_lock;
>>   	struct clk *hclk;
>>   	u8 wr_cmd_id;
>>   	u8 rd_cmd_id;
>> @@ -122,6 +126,8 @@ struct qcom_swrm_ctrl {
>>   	int rows_index;
>>   	unsigned long dout_port_mask;
>>   	unsigned long din_port_mask;
>> +	u8 rcmd_id;
>> +	u8 wcmd_id;
>>   	struct qcom_swrm_port_config pconfig[QCOM_SDW_MAX_PORTS];
>>   	struct sdw_stream_runtime *sruntime[SWRM_MAX_DAIS];
>>   	enum sdw_slave_status status[SDW_MAX_DEVICES];
>> @@ -200,75 +206,111 @@ static int qcom_swrm_cpu_reg_write(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, int reg,
>>   	return SDW_CMD_OK;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl, u8 cmd_data,
>> -				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>> +static u32 swrm_get_packed_reg_val(u8 *cmd_id, u8 cmd_data,
>> +				 u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>>   {
>> -	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(comp);
>> -	unsigned long flags;
>>   	u32 val;
>> -	int ret;
>> -
>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> -	ctrl->comp = &comp;
>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> -	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr,
>> -				SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID, reg_addr);
>> -	ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		goto err;
>> -
>> -	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(ctrl->comp,
>> -					  msecs_to_jiffies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> +	u8 id = *cmd_id;
>>   
>> -	if (!ret)
>> -		ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> -	else
>> -		ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>> -err:
>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> -	ctrl->comp = NULL;
>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> +	if (id != SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID) {
>> +		if (id < 14)
>> +			id += 1;
>> +		else
>> +			id = 0;
>> +		*cmd_id = id;
>> +	}
>> +	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(cmd_data, dev_addr, id, reg_addr);
>>   
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return val;
>>   }
>>   
>> -static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl,
>> -				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
>> -				     u32 len, u8 *rval)
>> +
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_wr_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm, u8 cmd_data,
>> +				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr)
>>   {
>> -	int i, ret;
>> +
>>   	u32 val;
>> -	DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(comp);
>> -	unsigned long flags;
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +	u8 cmd_id = 0x0;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&swrm->io_lock);
>> +	if (dev_addr == SDW_BROADCAST_DEV_NUM) {
>> +		cmd_id = SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID;
>> +		val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&cmd_id, cmd_data,
>> +					      dev_addr, reg_addr);
>> +	} else {
>> +		val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&swrm->wcmd_id, cmd_data,
>> +					      dev_addr, reg_addr);
>> +	}
>>   
>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> -	ctrl->comp = &comp;
>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> +	swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_WR_CMD, val);
>>   
>> -	val = SWRM_REG_VAL_PACK(len, dev_addr, SWRM_SPECIAL_CMD_ID, reg_addr);
>> -	ret = ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
>> -	if (ret)
>> -		goto err;
>> +	/* version 1.3 or less */
>> +	if (swrm->version_major == 1 && swrm->version_minor <= 3)
>> +		usleep_range(150, 155);
>>   
>> -	ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(ctrl->comp,
>> -					  msecs_to_jif
--srini
fies(TIMEOUT_MS));
>> +	if (cmd_id == SWR_BROADCAST_CMD_ID) {
>> +		/*
>> +		 * sleep for 10ms for MSM soundwire variant to allow broadcast
>> +		 * command to complete.
>> +		 */
>> +		ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&swrm->broadcast, (2 * HZ/10));
>> +		if (!ret)
>> +			ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +		else
>> +			ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>>   
>> -	if (!ret) {
>> -		ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> -		goto err;
>>   	} else {
>>   		ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>>   	}
>> +	mutex_unlock(&swrm->io_lock);
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>>   
>> -	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>> -		ctrl->reg_read(ctrl, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR, &val);
>> -		rval[i] = val & 0xFF;
>> +static int qcom_swrm_cmd_fifo_rd_cmd(struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *swrm,
>> +				     u8 dev_addr, u16 reg_addr,
>> +				     u32 len, u8 *rval)
>> +{
>> +	u32 val;
>> +	u32 retry_attempt = 0;
>> +	u32 cmd_data;
>> +	int ret = SDW_CMD_OK;
>> +
>> +	mutex_lock(&swrm->io_lock);
>> +	val = swrm_get_packed_reg_val(&swrm->rcmd_id, len, dev_addr, reg_addr);
>> +
>> +	/* wait for FIFO RD to complete to avoid overflow */
>> +	usleep_range(100, 105);
>> +	swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
>> +	/* wait for FIFO RD CMD complete to avoid overflow */
>> +	usleep_range(250, 255);
>> +
>> +retry_read:
> 
> do while{} ?

Sure!

> 
>> +
>> +	swrm->reg_read(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_FIFO_ADDR, &cmd_data);
>> +	rval[0] = cmd_data & 0xFF;
>> +
>> +	if ((((cmd_data) & 0xF00) >> 8) != swrm->rcmd_id) {
>> +		if (retry_attempt < MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY) {
>> +			/* wait 500 us before retry on fifo read failure */
>> +			usleep_range(500, 505);
>> +			if (retry_attempt == (MAX_FIFO_RD_FAIL_RETRY - 1)) {
> 
> why not do this at the end if retry fails, that will make code look
> neater

I agree, will clean this one in next version!

> 
>> +				swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_CMD, 0x1);
>> +				swrm->reg_write(swrm, SWRM_CMD_FIFO_RD_CMD, val);
>> +			}
>> +			retry_attempt++;
>> +			goto retry_read;
>> +		} else {
>> +			dev_err(swrm->dev,
>> +					"failed to read fifo: reg: 0x%x, \
>> +					rcmd_id: 0x%x, dev_num: 0x%x, cmd_data: 0x%x\n",
>> +					reg_addr, swrm->rcmd_id,
>> +					dev_addr, cmd_data);
> 
> Do you want to log retry as err..?
> 
>> +			ret = SDW_CMD_IGNORED;
>> +		}
>>   	}
>>   
>> -err:
>> -	spin_lock_irqsave(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> -	ctrl->comp = NULL;
>> -	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&ctrl->comp_lock, flags);
>> +	mutex_unlock(&swrm->io_lock);
>>   
>>   	return ret;
>>   }
>> @@ -949,6 +991,8 @@ static int qcom_swrm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>   	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ctrl);
>>   	spin_lock_init(&ctrl->comp_lock);
>>   	mutex_init(&ctrl->port_lock);
>> +	mutex_init(&ctrl->io_lock);
>> +	init_completion(&ctrl->broadcast);
>>   	INIT_WORK(&ctrl->slave_work, qcom_swrm_slave_wq);
>>   
>>   	ctrl->bus.ops = &qcom_swrm_ops;
>> -- 
>> 2.21.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2021-02-01 15:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-29 17:32 [PATCH 0/6] soundwire: qcom: various improvements Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 1/6] soundwire: qcom: add support to missing transport params Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:20   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 16:33       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:13   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 2/6] soundwire: qcom: extract version field Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] soundwire: qcom: set continue execution flag for ignored commands Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:21   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:16   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02  4:46       ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 4/6] soundwire: qcom: start the clock during initialization Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 14:21   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02  4:46       ` Vinod Koul
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 5/6] soundwire: qcom: update register read/write routine Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:33   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 16:42       ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-02 10:19         ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-02 16:58           ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 14:26   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:50     ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2021-01-29 17:32 ` [PATCH 6/6] soundwire: qcom: add support to new interrupts Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-01-29 19:38   ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2021-02-01 15:51     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2021-02-01 14:31   ` Vinod Koul
2021-02-01 15:51     ` Srinivas Kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=360ddca6-6f64-5297-2e88-9507500dfd4d@linaro.org \
    --to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    --cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).