linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)
@ 2001-02-27  0:25 Vibol Hou
  2001-02-27  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
  2001-03-01  6:15 ` Balbir Singh
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vibol Hou @ 2001-02-27  0:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linux-Kernel

I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas.
To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking.  It's
difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/

When I was running 2.4.0, the system, a dual-processor webserver, would
_completely_ slow down after about 3 days of constant uptime (and a few
million pages served).  I mean _SLOW_.  I could get commands executed, but
it would take an unholy long time to type the commands in.  It seemed the
server was dropping lots of packets.  All TCP services simply stopped or
slowed.  ICMP packet loss to the server would be a sporadic from 50% to 75%.
Web service was rendered useless.  SSH _barely_ worked.  The number of
commands I could run (w, free, memstat, top) showed nothing out of the
ordinary.  Back then, I didn't have a serial console setup.

Now, I'm running 2.4.1-ac20 and I setup a serial console to try to catch any
errors.  I was hoping the problem wouldn't recur with this newer kernel, but
it seems to still happen, but now at about 5 days uptime.  When I manage to
get in a 'shutdown -h now' through SSH, the serial console spits out:

INIT: Switching to runlevel: 0
INIT:

And that's it.  It doesn't even seem to be able to finish shutting down.
Thusfar, no one else has reported any similar problems to what I have, so it
makes me wonder what is wrong.  The system ran fine with an uptime of over
100 days with the old 2.2.17 kernel.  What stifles me is the fact that the
serial console is completely unresponsive to input when the server gets into
this state.

Having said that, does anyone have any ideas or pointers for me?  Again,
this may seem like a fairly indescriptive e-mail, but that's just because I
can't do anything on the server when it gets to this state.  If there is
anything you recommend I do when this happens again (other than restart the
system), please let me know and I'll try.

--
Vibol Hou
KhmerConnection, http://khmer.cc


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)
  2001-02-27  0:25 Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0) Vibol Hou
@ 2001-02-27  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
  2001-02-27  1:03   ` Vibol Hou
  2001-03-01  6:15 ` Balbir Singh
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-02-27  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vibol Hou; +Cc: Linux-Kernel

Vibol Hou wrote:
> 
> I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas.
> To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking.  It's
> difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/
> 

Sounds like a network driver problem.

Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the
3c905B which you reported a week ago?

If so, do they only start coming out when the slowdown occurs?

You are probably a victim of the APIC bug.  A
workaround for this is present in 2.4.2-ac5.  Alternatively,
boot the kernel with the `noapic' LILO option.

Please let us know the outcome.

-

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)
  2001-02-27  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2001-02-27  1:03   ` Vibol Hou
  2001-02-27  1:18     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Vibol Hou @ 2001-02-27  1:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andrew Morton; +Cc: Linux-Kernel

> Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the
> 3c905B which you reported a week ago?

Yes, but they happen a few hours after the system starts up and continue
until the server is restarted.  It seems like a separate issue.  I haven't
tried taking down the interface and putting it back up since the interface
never dies link others have reported with their NICs.  The NIC continues to
work fine, though the logs get flooded with those messages.

> If so, do they only start coming out when the slowdown occurs?

That's a negative.

> You are probably a victim of the APIC bug.  A
> workaround for this is present in 2.4.2-ac5.  Alternatively,
> boot the kernel with the `noapic' LILO option.

I'll compile 2.4.2-ac5 and we'll see in another 5 days if this happens
again.  Till then, any suggestions on what to look for/at and/or what to do
when it happens will help.

Thanks!
--
Vibol Hou
KhmerConnection, http://khmer.cc

-----Original Message-----
From: morton@uow.edu.au [mailto:morton@uow.edu.au]On Behalf Of Andrew
Morton
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:44 PM
To: Vibol Hou
Cc: Linux-Kernel
Subject: Re: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)


Vibol Hou wrote:
>
> I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas.
> To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking.  It's
> difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/
>

Sounds like a network driver problem.

Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the
3c905B which you reported a week ago?

If so, do they only start coming out when the slowdown occurs?

You are probably a victim of the APIC bug.  A
workaround for this is present in 2.4.2-ac5.  Alternatively,
boot the kernel with the `noapic' LILO option.

Please let us know the outcome.

-


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)
  2001-02-27  1:03   ` Vibol Hou
@ 2001-02-27  1:18     ` Andrew Morton
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Morton @ 2001-02-27  1:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vibol Hou; +Cc: Linux-Kernel

Vibol Hou wrote:
> 
> > Are you still getting the "hordes" of Tx timeouts with the
> > 3c905B which you reported a week ago?
> 
> Yes, but they happen a few hours after the system starts up and continue
> until the server is restarted.  It seems like a separate issue.  I haven't
> tried taking down the interface and putting it back up since the interface
> never dies link others have reported with their NICs.  The NIC continues to
> work fine, though the logs get flooded with those messages.
> 
> > If so, do they only start coming out when the slowdown occurs?
> 
> That's a negative.
> 
> > You are probably a victim of the APIC bug.  A
> > workaround for this is present in 2.4.2-ac5.  Alternatively,
> > boot the kernel with the `noapic' LILO option.
> 
> I'll compile 2.4.2-ac5 and we'll see in another 5 days if this happens
> again.  Till then, any suggestions on what to look for/at and/or what to do
> when it happens will help.

OK.  The 'Interrupt posted but not delivered' message
means that the Ethernet controller thinks that it is driving
the physical interrupt line, but the CPUs aren't being interrupted.

Check /proc/interrupts, see if the NIC's IRQ is shared with
something else.   If it isn't, or if it is shared with
something reputable then, given that the machine works OK
with 2.2 kernels then it's probably the APIC.

But it's unusual that the system "continues to work fine".
Ususally, a busted APIC slows networking to a crawl.  We
generate an artificial interrupt once per 400 milliseconds
via the Tx timeout handler.  This can process 16 outgoing
packets and 32 incoming packets.  This `polled mode' is
present in many Linux network drivers - it's there so you
can still telnet into the machine and whack it when it's
being silly.

-

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* RE: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)
  2001-02-27  0:25 Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0) Vibol Hou
  2001-02-27  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
@ 2001-03-01  6:15 ` Balbir Singh
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Balbir Singh @ 2001-03-01  6:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Vibol Hou, Linux-Kernel

Just FYI:

I remember posting something a few days ago to make the serial console more
reliable for such situations. Some allocations in the serial port driver are
done at runtime using page_alloc, if somebody runs out of memory the serial
tty driver would not work properly.

I am not saying that u ran out of memory. All I am saying is that it is
possible to make the serial tty driver more reliable using boot time
initialization.

Please excuse me if u find this a little off-topic.



-----Original Message-----
From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
[mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Vibol Hou
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2001 4:25 PM
To: Linux-Kernel
Subject: Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0)


I've reported this problem a long while ago, but no one answered my pleas.
To tell you the honest truth, I don't know where to begin looking.  It's
difficult to poke around when the serial console is unresponsive :/

When I was running 2.4.0, the system, a dual-processor webserver, would
_completely_ slow down after about 3 days of constant uptime (and a few
million pages served).  I mean _SLOW_.  I could get commands executed, but
it would take an unholy long time to type the commands in.  It seemed the
server was dropping lots of packets.  All TCP services simply stopped or
slowed.  ICMP packet loss to the server would be a sporadic from 50% to 75%.
Web service was rendered useless.  SSH _barely_ worked.  The number of
commands I could run (w, free, memstat, top) showed nothing out of the
ordinary.  Back then, I didn't have a serial console setup.

Now, I'm running 2.4.1-ac20 and I setup a serial console to try to catch any
errors.  I was hoping the problem wouldn't recur with this newer kernel, but
it seems to still happen, but now at about 5 days uptime.  When I manage to
get in a 'shutdown -h now' through SSH, the serial console spits out:

INIT: Switching to runlevel: 0
INIT:

And that's it.  It doesn't even seem to be able to finish shutting down.
Thusfar, no one else has reported any similar problems to what I have, so it
makes me wonder what is wrong.  The system ran fine with an uptime of over
100 days with the old 2.2.17 kernel.  What stifles me is the fact that the
serial console is completely unresponsive to input when the server gets into
this state.

Having said that, does anyone have any ideas or pointers for me?  Again,
this may seem like a fairly indescriptive e-mail, but that's just because I
can't do anything on the server when it gets to this state.  If there is
anything you recommend I do when this happens again (other than restart the
system), please let me know and I'll try.

--
Vibol Hou
KhmerConnection, http://khmer.cc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-03-01  6:13 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-27  0:25 Sytem slowdown on 2.4.1-ac20 (recurring from 2.4.0) Vibol Hou
2001-02-27  0:43 ` Andrew Morton
2001-02-27  1:03   ` Vibol Hou
2001-02-27  1:18     ` Andrew Morton
2001-03-01  6:15 ` Balbir Singh

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).