linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
@ 2006-03-03  4:46 Yu, Luming
  2006-03-03  5:58 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [600X S3 sleep] Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2006-03-03  4:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sanjoy Mahajan
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley,
	Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Brown, Len, linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap,
	jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan, Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input,
	Meelis Roos


>
>>> Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
>>> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
>
>From: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com>
>> According to bug report, the BIOS DSDT is modified.  I don't know
>> how these changes affect the results of suspend/resume. But, it is
>> clear this is NOT right approach to fix problem. Hence, I need the
>> testing report with un-modified DSDT on TP 600X, bios 1.11.
>
>I'll try it, although I don't think I'll get any data on the problem.
>The unmodified DSDT (bios 1.11) lacks an S3 sleep object, so I had to
>modify the DSDT even to get S3 to sleep at all.  See
><http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534> for that discussion.
>In additional comment #4 there (2004-10-14), you said:
>
>  The root cause of [the missing S3 object] failure is that linux is
>  using element in
>
>  const char      *acpi_gbl_sleep_state_names[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT] =
>  {
>	  "\_S0_",
>	  "\_S1_",
>	  "\_S2_",
>	  "\_S3_",
>	  "\_S4_",
>	  "\_S5_"
>  };
>
>  to call acpi_get_sleep_type_data, but your box define _S3 under the
>  device PNP0A03. So, the evaluating \_S3 will fail.
>
>  The workaround in DSDT is to change _S3 to \_S3_ .
>  We can fix it in acpi driver soon.

Hmm, this conclusion seems to be wrong. at that time, I said it too
early.  The real problem is this, if your box support S3, the _S3 method
should return from ELSE-statement which return package
{0x01,0x01,0x00,0x00}.

If you still use this
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534#c10 to
override your DSDT, which bypass the testing and blindly assume BIOS or
platform
do support S3, then I suggest you to retest, and post dmesg with
UN-modified BIOS.

Thanks,
Luming


    Method (_S3, 0, NotSerialized)
    {
        If (BXPT)
        {
            Return (Package (0x04)
            {
                0x06,
                0x06,
                0x00,
                0x00
            })
        }
        Else
        {
            Return (Package (0x04)
            {
                0x01,
                0x01,
                0x00,
                0x00
            })
        }
    }

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [600X S3 sleep]
  2006-03-03  4:46 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Yu, Luming
@ 2006-03-03  5:58 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-03-03  5:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu, Luming
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley,
	Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Brown, Len, linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap,
	jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan, Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input,
	Meelis Roos

>>>> Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
>>>> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989

>>From: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com>
>>> According to bug report, the BIOS DSDT is modified.  I don't know
>>> how these changes affect the results of suspend/resume. But, it is
>>> clear this is NOT right approach to fix problem. Hence, I need the
>>> testing report with un-modified DSDT on TP 600X, bios 1.11.

>>I'll try it, although I don't think I'll get any data on the problem.
>>The unmodified DSDT (bios 1.11) lacks an S3 sleep object, so I had to
>>modify the DSDT even to get S3 to sleep at all.  See
>><http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534> for that discussion.

I just tried the first failing commit
(02b28a33aae93a3b53068e0858d62f8bcaef60a3):

Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 5 16:46:36 2005 -0500

    [ACPI] Enable Embedded Controller (EC) interrupt mode by default
    
    "ec_intr=0" reverts to polling
    "ec_burst=" no longer exists.
    
    Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
    Acked-by: Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>

but with the vanilla (BIOS 1.11) DSDT.  And not only did S3 sleep
happen, but the thermal+processor bug didn't show up: i.e. it did two
(actually) many S3 sleep-wake cycles.  So the problem is due to
something in the modified DSDT, which is either a problem itself or it
exposes another problem.

[Picture of me hanging head in shame for putting people to the trouble.]

My only excuse is that long ago (2.6.11), the machine wouldn't S3
sleep at all with the vanilla DSDT, and I patched it as recommended by
the ACPI experts.  However, the current ACPI interpreter seems to
handle the 600X's mangy DSDT.

Now I agree 100% with Len Brown that it's best to have ACPI handle
marginal DSDT's, not hack the DSDT.

-Sanjoy

`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
         --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-03-01  0:17         ` Randy.Dunlap
@ 2006-03-04 13:18           ` Adrian Bunk
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-03-04 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Randy.Dunlap
  Cc: Jens Axboe, jgarzik, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, lkml, linux-ide

On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 04:17:25PM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > > >Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > > > >Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > > > >Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
> > > >  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
> > > 
> > > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> > > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
> > 
> > It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
> > goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
> > regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
> > earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.
> > 
> > So please scratch that entry.
> 
> I'll third that request/comment.

OK, done.

> ~Randy

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-03-03 16:51   ` Matthew Garrett
@ 2006-03-03 21:04     ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-03-03 21:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Matthew Garrett
  Cc: Yu, Luming, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
	Tom Seeley, Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab,
	v4l-dvb-maintainer, video4linux-list, Brian Marete,
	Ryan Phillips, gregkh, linux-usb-devel, Brown, Len, linux-acpi,
	Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

>> I'll try it, although I don't think I'll get any data on the problem.
>> The unmodified DSDT (bios 1.11) lacks an S3 sleep object, so I had to
>> modify the DSDT even to get S3 to sleep at all.  See
>> <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534> for that discussion.

> I think it's arguably a bit extreme to describe "My setup is so 
> unsupported that I had to modify my firmware to enable sleep and then 
> override the kernel's sanity checks and it's stopped working with 
> 2.6.16" as a regression.

I agree, and that was the point of 'picture of me hanging head in
shame', so there's no need to rub it in.

Anyway, the TP600X w/ vanilla DSDT *was* unsupported (circa 2.6.11),
but now the ACPI interpreter can interpret the vanilla DSDT and go
into S3 sleep (before, it would complain about a missing S3 sleep
object because the DSDT used a funny syntax).  There were other
problems in the vanilla DSDT (e.g. probably using fn-F7 to switch to
an external display doesn't work) but I'll investigate them one at a
time.

-Sanjoy

`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
         --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-03-03  2:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
@ 2006-03-03 16:51   ` Matthew Garrett
  2006-03-03 21:04     ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Matthew Garrett @ 2006-03-03 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Sanjoy Mahajan
  Cc: Yu, Luming, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
	Tom Seeley, Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab,
	v4l-dvb-maintainer, video4linux-list, Brian Marete,
	Ryan Phillips, gregkh, linux-usb-devel, Brown, Len, linux-acpi,
	Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 02:59:22AM +0000, Sanjoy Mahajan wrote:

> I'll try it, although I don't think I'll get any data on the problem.
> The unmodified DSDT (bios 1.11) lacks an S3 sleep object, so I had to
> modify the DSDT even to get S3 to sleep at all.  See
> <http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534> for that discussion.

I think it's arguably a bit extreme to describe "My setup is so 
unsupported that I had to modify my firmware to enable sleep and then 
override the kernel's sanity checks and it's stopped working with 
2.6.16" as a regression.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@srcf.ucam.org

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  9:04 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Yu, Luming
@ 2006-03-03  2:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  2006-03-03 16:51   ` Matthew Garrett
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Sanjoy Mahajan @ 2006-03-03  2:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu, Luming
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley,
	Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Brown, Len, linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap,
	jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan, Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input,
	Meelis Roos

>> Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
>> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989

From: "Yu, Luming" <luming.yu@intel.com>
> According to bug report, the BIOS DSDT is modified.  I don't know
> how these changes affect the results of suspend/resume. But, it is
> clear this is NOT right approach to fix problem. Hence, I need the
> testing report with un-modified DSDT on TP 600X, bios 1.11.

I'll try it, although I don't think I'll get any data on the problem.
The unmodified DSDT (bios 1.11) lacks an S3 sleep object, so I had to
modify the DSDT even to get S3 to sleep at all.  See
<http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3534> for that discussion.
In additional comment #4 there (2004-10-14), you said:

  The root cause of [the missing S3 object] failure is that linux is
  using element in

  const char      *acpi_gbl_sleep_state_names[ACPI_S_STATE_COUNT] =
  {
	  "\_S0_",
	  "\_S1_",
	  "\_S2_",
	  "\_S3_",
	  "\_S4_",
	  "\_S5_"
  };

  to call acpi_get_sleep_type_data, but your box define _S3 under the
  device PNP0A03. So, the evaluating \_S3 will fail.

  The workaround in DSDT is to change _S3 to \_S3_ .
  We can fix it in acpi driver soon.

It looks unchanged in a recent acpi driver
(drivers/acpi/utilities/utglobal.c, line 170, 2.6.16-rc2), so I
suspect S3 won't happen with the vanilla DSDT.

(Sorry, I was away for 10 days and also just saw your info requests in
the bugme #5989.)

-Sanjoy

`Never underestimate the evil of which men of power are capable.'
         --Bertrand Russell, _War Crimes in Vietnam_, chapter 1.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-28  9:40       ` Jens Axboe
@ 2006-03-01  0:17         ` Randy.Dunlap
  2006-03-04 13:18           ` Adrian Bunk
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Randy.Dunlap @ 2006-03-01  0:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jens Axboe; +Cc: bunk, jgarzik, linux-kernel, torvalds, akpm, lkml, linux-ide

On Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:40:53 +0100 Jens Axboe wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > > >Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > > >Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > > >Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> > > 
> > > 
> > > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
> > >  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
> > 
> > It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> > according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.
> 
> It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
> goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
> regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
> earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.
> 
> So please scratch that entry.

I'll third that request/comment.

---
~Randy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  7:08     ` Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-02-28  9:40       ` Jens Axboe
  2006-03-01  0:17         ` Randy.Dunlap
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jens Axboe @ 2006-02-28  9:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Adrian Bunk
  Cc: Jeff Garzik, linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton,
	Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, linux-ide

On Mon, Feb 27 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > >Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> > >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> > >Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> > >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > >Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> > 
> > 
> > This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
> >  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.
> 
> It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
> according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.

It might have worked under lucky circumstances with an idle disk and a
goat sacrifice, so I agree with Jeff that this is definitely not a
regression. To my knowledge, Mark always used my libata suspend patch on
earlier kernels so it's not even an apples-apples comparison.

So please scratch that entry.

-- 
Jens Axboe


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
                     ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2006-02-27 13:36   ` Mark Lord
@ 2006-02-27 14:09   ` Pavel Machek
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Pavel Machek @ 2006-02-27 14:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley, Dave Jones,
	Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown,
	linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

On Mon 27-02-06 07:13:54, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> 
> Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
> Submitter  : Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
> Handled-By : Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
> Status     : is being debugged,
>              we might want to change the default back for 2.6.16:
>              http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/25/101

Luming's call, but ec_intr apparently fixed some machines, too.s

> Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it

Is this really regression?

-- 
Thanks, Sharp!

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
  2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
  2006-02-27  6:54   ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2006-02-27 13:36   ` Mark Lord
  2006-02-27 14:09   ` Pavel Machek
  3 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Mark Lord @ 2006-02-27 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley, Dave Jones,
	Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown,
	linux-acpi, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it

I'm not certain about this.  It may also have been broken in 2.6.15,
but it (resume) did work fine with 2.6.14.  I've been using Randy's
patches with both 2.6.15 (since -rc?), and 2.6.16-rc.

Cheers

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* RE: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
@ 2006-02-27  9:04 Yu, Luming
  2006-03-03  2:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Yu, Luming @ 2006-02-27  9:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Tom Seeley, Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab,
	v4l-dvb-maintainer, video4linux-list, Brian Marete,
	Ryan Phillips, gregkh, linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Brown,
	Len, linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide,
	Duncan, Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

>Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
>References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
>Submitter  : Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
>Handled-By : Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
>Status     : is being debugged,
>             we might want to change the default back for 2.6.16:
>             http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/25/101
>

Accordint to bug report, the BIOS DSDT is modified.
I don't know how these changes affect the results
of suspend/resume. But, it is clear this is NOT right approach 
to fix problem. Hence, I need the testing report with 
un-modified DSDT on TP 600X, bios 1.11.

--Luming


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:54   ` Jeff Garzik
@ 2006-02-27  7:08     ` Adrian Bunk
  2006-02-28  9:40       ` Jens Axboe
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-02-27  7:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jeff Garzik
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Mark Lord,
	Randy Dunlap, linux-ide

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 01:54:17AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> >References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> >Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> >Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> >Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it
> 
> 
> This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
>  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.

It might have always been crappy, but it is a regression since
according to the submitter it is working with 2.6.15.

> 	Jeff

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
  2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
@ 2006-02-27  6:54   ` Jeff Garzik
  2006-02-27  7:08     ` Adrian Bunk
  2006-02-27 13:36   ` Mark Lord
  2006-02-27 14:09   ` Pavel Machek
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Garzik @ 2006-02-27  6:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley, Dave Jones,
	Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown,
	linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
> Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
> Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it


This is not a regression, libata suspend/resume has always been crappy. 
  It's under active development (by Randy, among others) to fix this.

	Jeff



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
@ 2006-02-27  6:39     ` Vojtech Pavlik
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Vojtech Pavlik @ 2006-02-27  6:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ryan Phillips
  Cc: linux-kernel, Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley,
	Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown,
	linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	linux-input, Meelis Roos

On Sun, Feb 26, 2006 at 10:26:41PM -0800, Ryan Phillips wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.16-rc5 compared to 2.6.15.
> >
> > If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> > of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> > of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any
> > other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
> >
> > Due to the huge amount of recipients, this email has a Reply-To set.
> > Please add the appropriate people to the Cc when replying regarding one 
> > of these issues.
> >
> >
> > Subject    : usb_submit_urb(ctrl) failed on 2.6.16-rc4-git10 kernel
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6134
> > Submitter  : Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org>
> > Status     : unknown
> >
> >   
> *snipped
> > Subject    : total ps2 keyboard lockup from boot
> > References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6130
> > Submitter  : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> > Handled-By : Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
> >              Pavlik Vojtech <vojtech@suse.cz>
> > Status     : discussion and debugging in the bug logs
> >
> >   
> *snipped
> 
> It appears that Duncan's "total ps2 keyboard lockup from boot" is the
> same, or similar problem as mine.
> 2.6.15.1 kernel is working for me though.
 
Except one of the keyboards is USB and the other PS/2. Both are
Microsoft wireless, though.

-- 
Vojtech Pavlik
Director SuSE Labs

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* Re: 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
@ 2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
  2006-02-27  6:39     ` Vojtech Pavlik
  2006-02-27  6:54   ` Jeff Garzik
                     ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  3 siblings, 1 reply; 16+ messages in thread
From: Ryan Phillips @ 2006-02-27  6:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel
  Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, Tom Seeley, Dave Jones,
	Jiri Slaby, michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer,
	video4linux-list, Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh,
	linux-usb-devel, Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown,
	linux-acpi, Mark Lord, Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan,
	Pavlik Vojtech, linux-input, Meelis Roos

Adrian Bunk wrote:
> This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.16-rc5 compared to 2.6.15.
>
> If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
> of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
> of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any
> other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues.
>
> Due to the huge amount of recipients, this email has a Reply-To set.
> Please add the appropriate people to the Cc when replying regarding one 
> of these issues.
>
>
> Subject    : usb_submit_urb(ctrl) failed on 2.6.16-rc4-git10 kernel
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6134
> Submitter  : Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org>
> Status     : unknown
>
>   
*snipped
> Subject    : total ps2 keyboard lockup from boot
> References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6130
> Submitter  : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
> Handled-By : Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
>              Pavlik Vojtech <vojtech@suse.cz>
> Status     : discussion and debugging in the bug logs
>
>   
*snipped


It appears that Duncan's "total ps2 keyboard lockup from boot" is the
same, or similar problem as mine.
2.6.15.1 kernel is working for me though.

-Ryan

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

* 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions
  2006-02-27  5:27 Linux v2.6.16-rc5 Linus Torvalds
@ 2006-02-27  6:13 ` Adrian Bunk
  2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
                     ` (3 more replies)
  0 siblings, 4 replies; 16+ messages in thread
From: Adrian Bunk @ 2006-02-27  6:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Tom Seeley, Dave Jones, Jiri Slaby,
	michael, mchehab, v4l-dvb-maintainer, video4linux-list,
	Brian Marete, Ryan Phillips, gregkh, linux-usb-devel,
	Sanjoy Mahajan, Luming Yu, len.brown, linux-acpi, Mark Lord,
	Randy Dunlap, jgarzik, linux-ide, Duncan, Pavlik Vojtech,
	linux-input, Meelis Roos

This email lists some known regressions in 2.6.16-rc5 compared to 2.6.15.

If you find your name in the Cc header, you are either submitter of one
of the bugs, maintainer of an affectected subsystem or driver, a patch
of you was declared guilty for a breakage or I'm considering you in any
other way possibly involved with one or more of these issues.

Due to the huge amount of recipients, this email has a Reply-To set.
Please add the appropriate people to the Cc when replying regarding one 
of these issues.


Subject    : usb_submit_urb(ctrl) failed on 2.6.16-rc4-git10 kernel
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6134
Submitter  : Ryan Phillips <rphillips@gentoo.org>
Status     : unknown


Subject    : Oops in Kernel 2.6.16-rc4 on Modprobe of saa7134.ko
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/122
Submitter  : Brian Marete <bgmarete@gmail.com>
Status     : unknown


Subject    : saa7146: no devices created in /dev/dvb
References : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=181063
             http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/18/204
Submitter  : Tom Seeley <redhat@tomseeley.co.uk>
             Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Handled-By : Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
Status     : unknown


Subject    : S3 sleep hangs the second time - 600X
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5989
Submitter  : Sanjoy Mahajan <sanjoy@mrao.cam.ac.uk>
Handled-By : Luming Yu <luming.yu@intel.com>
Status     : is being debugged,
             we might want to change the default back for 2.6.16:
             http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/25/101


Subject    : 2.6.16-rc[34]: resume-from-RAM unreliable (SATA)
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/20/159
Submitter  : Mark Lord <lkml@rtr.ca>
Handled-By : Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Status     : one of Randy's patches seems to fix it


Subject    : total ps2 keyboard lockup from boot
References : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6130
Submitter  : Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@cox.net>
Handled-By : Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
             Pavlik Vojtech <vojtech@suse.cz>
Status     : discussion and debugging in the bug logs


Subject    : psmouse starts losing sync in 2.6.16-rc2
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/2/5/50
Submitter  : Meelis Roos <mroos@linux.ee>
Handled-By : Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Status     : Dmitry: Working on various manifestations of this one.
                     At worst we will have to disable resync by default
                     before 2.6.16 final is out and continue in 2.6.17 cycle.



cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 16+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2006-03-04 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2006-03-03  4:46 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Yu, Luming
2006-03-03  5:58 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions [600X S3 sleep] Sanjoy Mahajan
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-02-27  9:04 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Yu, Luming
2006-03-03  2:59 ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-03-03 16:51   ` Matthew Garrett
2006-03-03 21:04     ` Sanjoy Mahajan
2006-02-27  5:27 Linux v2.6.16-rc5 Linus Torvalds
2006-02-27  6:13 ` 2.6.16-rc5: known regressions Adrian Bunk
2006-02-27  6:26   ` Ryan Phillips
2006-02-27  6:39     ` Vojtech Pavlik
2006-02-27  6:54   ` Jeff Garzik
2006-02-27  7:08     ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-28  9:40       ` Jens Axboe
2006-03-01  0:17         ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-03-04 13:18           ` Adrian Bunk
2006-02-27 13:36   ` Mark Lord
2006-02-27 14:09   ` Pavel Machek

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).