linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Tom Gall <tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 10:14:25 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B28C6C1.3477493F@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B273A20.8EE88F8F@vnet.ibm.com>

Tom Gall wrote:
>   The box that I'm wrestling with, has a setup where each PHB has an
> additional id, then each PHB can have up to 256 buses.  So when you are
> talking to a device, the scheme is phbid, bus, dev etc etc. Pretty easy
> really.
> 
>   I am getting for putting something like this into the kernel at large,
> it would probably be best to have a CONFIG_GREATER_THAN_256_BUSES or
> some such.

We don't need such a CONFIG_xxx at all.  The current PCI core code
should scale up just fine.

According to the PCI spec it is -impossible- to have more than 256 buses
on a single "hose", so you simply have to implement multiple hoses, just
like Alpha (and Sparc64?) already do.  That's how the hardware is forced
to implement it...

	Jeff


-- 
Jeff Garzik      | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024    |
MandrakeSoft     |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-06-14 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-13 10:02 Going beyond 256 PCI buses Tom Gall
2001-06-13 17:17 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-13 18:29   ` Tom Gall
2001-06-14 14:14 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2001-06-14 15:15   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 17:59   ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 20:50     ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 14:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 14:32   ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 14:42   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:29     ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 15:33       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 18:01   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 18:47   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:04     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 19:12     ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:41       ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 19:57       ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:08         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 20:14         ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:30           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 21:46             ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 21:48             ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:57               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:12               ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 22:29                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:49                 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:35                   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 23:35                 ` VGA handling was [Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses] James Simmons
2001-06-14 23:42                 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:55                   ` James Simmons
2001-06-15 15:14                     ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-15  2:06                   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-15  8:52                   ` Matan Ziv-Av
2001-06-14 21:35           ` Going beyond 256 PCI buses David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:46             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-16 21:32           ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 23:29             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-15  8:42       ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-15 15:38       ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:03   ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:56     ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:13 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 15:17   ` Jeff Garzik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3B28C6C1.3477493F@mandrakesoft.com \
    --to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).