From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
To: Jonathan Lundell <jlundell@pobox.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001 11:17:04 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3B28D570.F757DEF8@mandrakesoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3B273A20.8EE88F8F@vnet.ibm.com> <3B28C6C1.3477493F@mandrakesoft.com> <p05100306b74e83f6860f@[207.213.214.37]>
Jonathan Lundell wrote:
>
> At 10:14 AM -0400 2001-06-14, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >According to the PCI spec it is -impossible- to have more than 256 buses
> >on a single "hose", so you simply have to implement multiple hoses, just
> >like Alpha (and Sparc64?) already do. That's how the hardware is forced
> >to implement it...
>
> That's right, of course. A small problem is that dev->slot_name
> becomes ambiguous, since it doesn't have any hose identification. Nor
> does it have any room for the hose id; it's fixed at 8 chars, and
> fully used (bb:dd.f\0).
Ouch. Good point. Well, extending that field's size shouldn't break
anything except binary modules (which IMHO means, it doesn't break
anything).
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | Andre the Giant has a posse.
Building 1024 |
MandrakeSoft |
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-14 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-13 10:02 Going beyond 256 PCI buses Tom Gall
2001-06-13 17:17 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-13 18:29 ` Tom Gall
2001-06-14 14:14 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 15:15 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 17:59 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 20:50 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 14:24 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 14:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 14:42 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 15:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 18:01 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 18:47 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:04 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-14 19:12 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:41 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 19:57 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 20:14 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 21:46 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-14 21:48 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:12 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 22:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 22:49 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:35 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-14 23:35 ` VGA handling was [Re: Going beyond 256 PCI buses] James Simmons
2001-06-14 23:42 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 23:55 ` James Simmons
2001-06-15 15:14 ` Pavel Machek
2001-06-15 2:06 ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-06-15 8:52 ` Matan Ziv-Av
2001-06-14 21:35 ` Going beyond 256 PCI buses David S. Miller
2001-06-14 21:46 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-16 21:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2001-06-16 23:29 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2001-06-15 8:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2001-06-15 15:38 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 19:03 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 20:56 ` David S. Miller
2001-06-14 15:13 ` Jonathan Lundell
2001-06-14 15:17 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3B28D570.F757DEF8@mandrakesoft.com \
--to=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=jlundell@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).