linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* PATCH: Spinlock Macro Arguments Correction in pc_keyb.c
@ 2001-11-29 23:33 Alex Valys
  2001-11-30  0:43 ` David C. Hansen
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Alex Valys @ 2001-11-29 23:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

I was compiling 2.5.1-pre3 this evening, and recieved errors to the effect of:
Line xxx:spinlock_unlock used with too many arguments
Line xxxx:spinlock_unlock_irqrestore used with too few arguments
Line XXXX:spinlock_unlock_irqrestore used with too few arguments

Not having ever done any serious kernel programming, I have only a dim 
understanding of what spinlocks are, but by looking at those macro 
definitions in spinlock.h (and their occurences elsewhere in the file) I 
think I determined their proper usage.  The following patch fixed the compile 
errors, and I'm using 2.5.1-pre3 to type this message.  

This is my first patch, so if I did anything wrong please correct me.
-Alex Valys




--- drivers/char/pc_keyb.c.orig Thu Nov 29 18:05:00 2001
+++ drivers/char/pc_keyb.c      Thu Nov 29 18:07:14 2001
@@ -420,7 +420,7 @@
                               kbd_write_command(KBD_CCMD_WRITE_MODE);
                               kb_wait();
                               kbd_write_output(AUX_INTS_OFF);
-                              spin_unlock(&kbd_controller_lock, flags);
+                              spin_unlock(&kbd_controller_lock);
                       }
                       spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock,flags );
               }
@@ -1056,7 +1056,7 @@
        fasync_aux(-1, file, 0);
        spin_lock_irqsave( &aux_count, flags );
        if ( --aux_count ) {
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock );
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock, flags );
                return 0;
        }
        spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock, flags );
@@ -1076,7 +1076,7 @@
        int flags;
        spin_lock_irqsave( &aux_count_lock, flags );
        if ( aux_count++ ) {
-               spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock );
+               spin_unlock_irqrestore( &aux_count_lock, flags );
                return 0;
        }
        queue->head = queue->tail = 0;          /* Flush input queue */



















^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: PATCH: Spinlock Macro Arguments Correction in pc_keyb.c
  2001-11-29 23:33 PATCH: Spinlock Macro Arguments Correction in pc_keyb.c Alex Valys
@ 2001-11-30  0:43 ` David C. Hansen
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David C. Hansen @ 2001-11-30  0:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alex Valys; +Cc: linux-kernel

Alex Valys wrote:

>Not having ever done any serious kernel programming, I have only a dim 
>understanding of what spinlocks are, but by looking at those macro 
>definitions in spinlock.h (and their occurences elsewhere in the file) I 
>think I determined their proper usage.  The following patch fixed the compile 
>errors, and I'm using 2.5.1-pre3 to type this message.  
>
>This is my first patch, so if I did anything wrong please correct me.
>-Alex Valys
>
That looks like an error as a result of one of my patches.  Your 
solution looks correct.  Make sure to send it over to Linus.  Nice job 
with your first patch!

David C. Hansen
haveblue@us.ibm.com


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-11-30  0:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-11-29 23:33 PATCH: Spinlock Macro Arguments Correction in pc_keyb.c Alex Valys
2001-11-30  0:43 ` David C. Hansen

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).