From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au>
To: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: fadvise syscall?
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2002 00:17:21 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3C95A291.F34986A2@zip.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C945635.4050101@mandrakesoft.com> <3C945A5A.9673053F@zip.com.au> <5.1.0.14.2.20020317131910.0522b490@pop.cus.cam.ac.uk> <3C959716.6040308@mandrakesoft.com> <3C959D55.14768770@zip.com.au> <3C95A031.6070107@mandrakesoft.com>
Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> ...
> >Given this, I don't see a persuasive need to implement a non-standard
> >interface. It takes an off_t, so posix_fadvise64() is also needed.
> >
> agreed WRT non-standard.
>
> Are we required to have both foo and foo64 variants? If I had my
> druthers, I would just do the foo64 version.
That would be good. I can't see a reason why
#define posix_fadvise posix_fadvise64
would not suffice. That doesn't mean there isn't one :)
-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-18 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-03-17 8:39 fadvise syscall? Jeff Garzik
2002-03-17 8:56 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-17 9:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-17 23:59 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 13:41 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 14:31 ` Simon Richter
2002-03-17 14:56 ` Jan Hudec
2002-03-17 15:00 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 19:20 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-18 7:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 7:55 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 8:07 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 8:17 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2002-03-18 16:41 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-18 19:00 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 19:15 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-22 16:05 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-24 6:38 ` Stevie O
2002-03-24 11:24 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-24 12:52 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-25 11:12 ` Pavel Machek
2002-03-18 8:05 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-18 8:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 8:20 ` Joel Becker
2002-03-18 8:14 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 14:39 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-18 19:15 ` Andrew Morton
2002-03-18 19:42 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-19 20:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2002-03-19 23:38 ` Martin K. Petersen
2002-03-17 20:18 ` Richard Gooch
2002-03-17 15:13 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-17 17:14 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 18:31 ` Mark Mielke
2002-03-17 18:35 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-17 19:06 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2002-03-17 20:19 ` Ken Hirsch
2002-03-18 0:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
[not found] ` <a73ujs$5mc$1@cesium.transmeta.com>
2002-03-18 8:58 ` Jan Hudec
2002-03-18 10:08 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-03-18 17:29 ` Mark Mielke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3C95A291.F34986A2@zip.com.au \
--to=akpm@zip.com.au \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).