linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Linux SCSI benchmarking tool??
@ 2003-08-19  4:52 Nayak, Samdeep
  2003-08-19  5:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
  2003-08-19  5:04 ` Nuno Silva
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nayak, Samdeep @ 2003-08-19  4:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Hi,

I am trying to benchmark a iSCSI driver for performance on a 2.4 kernel. I
have used dd, dt, IOmeter and rawio utilities so far and each seemed to
represent a different picture to me on the same setup (Single target with
few LUNS).  (DD showed good performance on an ext2 mounted file system till
I realized that I was writing to the buffer and not writing on the raw
drive). Since I am trying to catch up with the SCSI world, I am just
wondering if any one else has tried any other utilities that would provide
better results or am I doing something wrong here??
 
-Thanks in advance,

-Regards
Samdeep



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux SCSI benchmarking tool??
  2003-08-19  4:52 Linux SCSI benchmarking tool?? Nayak, Samdeep
@ 2003-08-19  5:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
  2003-08-19  5:04 ` Nuno Silva
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Valdis.Kletnieks @ 2003-08-19  5:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nayak, Samdeep; +Cc: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1166 bytes --]

On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 21:52:54 PDT, "Nayak, Samdeep" <Samdeep_Nayak@adaptec.com>  said:

> have used dd, dt, IOmeter and rawio utilities so far and each seemed to
> represent a different picture to me on the same setup (Single target with
> few LUNS).  (DD showed good performance on an ext2 mounted file system till
> I realized that I was writing to the buffer and not writing on the raw
> drive). Since I am trying to catch up with the SCSI world, I am just
> wondering if any one else has tried any other utilities that would provide
> better results or am I doing something wrong here??

Those tools report different things because they are measuring different
aspects of the performance.  For many system configurations, the fact that 'dd'
is writing on a buffer rather than a drive is actually a *feature*, as you
might care about just how much of a boost the cache is giving you - I don't
care how fast my compile writes to disk, I care how fast the cache and page
subsystems actually present the data to userspace...

"better results" depends on the question - otherwise "42" is as good an answer as
any, for exactly the reasons that Deep Thought gave.... ;)

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 226 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: Linux SCSI benchmarking tool??
  2003-08-19  4:52 Linux SCSI benchmarking tool?? Nayak, Samdeep
  2003-08-19  5:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
@ 2003-08-19  5:04 ` Nuno Silva
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nuno Silva @ 2003-08-19  5:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Nayak, Samdeep; +Cc: linux-kernel

Hi!

Nayak, Samdeep wrote:

[..snip..]

> I realized that I was writing to the buffer and not writing on the raw

The simple solutions is to boot with 16MB of RAM :)
Just append RAM=16M to linux's command line (in lilo...) and use large 
sets of data.

Regards,
Nuno Silva



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-08-19  5:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-08-19  4:52 Linux SCSI benchmarking tool?? Nayak, Samdeep
2003-08-19  5:03 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2003-08-19  5:04 ` Nuno Silva

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).