linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
@ 2003-11-09 17:21 David Brownell
  2003-11-09 22:50 ` Greg KH
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2003-11-09 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, colin; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List

The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine
in a hardirq context.  See this patch:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2

It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final.

- Dave



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
  2003-11-09 17:21 kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem David Brownell
@ 2003-11-09 22:50 ` Greg KH
  2003-11-10 12:21   ` David Brownell
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Greg KH @ 2003-11-09 22:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Brownell; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, colin, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:21:59AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
> The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine
> in a hardirq context.  See this patch:
> 
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2
> 
> It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final.

I've not planned to submit it for 2.6.0 as it's a relativly big change,
and I don't have the hardware to test it out.  Anyone have any other
thoughts about this?

thanks,

greg k-h

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
  2003-11-09 22:50 ` Greg KH
@ 2003-11-10 12:21   ` David Brownell
  2003-11-11 12:39     ` Colin Leroy
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: David Brownell @ 2003-11-10 12:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Greg KH, colin; +Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Linux Kernel Mailing List

>>The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine
>>in a hardirq context.  See this patch:
>>
>>http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2
>>
>>It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final.
> 
> 
> I've not planned to submit it for 2.6.0 as it's a relativly big change,
> and I don't have the hardware to test it out.  Anyone have any other
> thoughts about this?

Doesn't seem big to me.  It could be shrunk a smidgeon, but
that's the version that's gotten the positive test results.

The folk who have this kind of hardware have reported this
happening for quite a few months now, and it does seem to
fill up log buffers with catastrophic-seeming stack traces.

Colin, does it fix your problem?  Can you eke more than
twenty minutes from your laptop battery now?  :)

- Dave


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
  2003-11-10 12:21   ` David Brownell
@ 2003-11-11 12:39     ` Colin Leroy
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Colin Leroy @ 2003-11-11 12:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: David Brownell; +Cc: Greg KH, Benjamin Herrenschmidt, Linux Kernel Mailing List

On 10 Nov 2003 at 04h21, David Brownell wrote:

Hi,

>>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2

> Colin, does it fix your problem?  Can you eke more than
> twenty minutes from your laptop battery now?  :)

That works great :-)
Many thanks for the pointer. I think it'd be nice if this was in 2.6.0 :)

-- 
Colin
http://www.colino.net/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
       [not found] ` <Q6Hy.T5.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
@ 2003-11-10 19:16   ` Peter Matthias
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Peter Matthias @ 2003-11-10 19:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

Greg KH schrieb:

> On Sun, Nov 09, 2003 at 09:21:59AM -0800, David Brownell wrote:
>> The problem is that cdc_acm calls a "softirq-only" routine
>> in a hardirq context.  See this patch:
>> 
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-usb-devel&m=106764585001038&w=2
>> 
>> It's not clear that'll make it into 2.6.0-final.
> 
> I've not planned to submit it for 2.6.0 as it's a relativly big change,
> and I don't have the hardware to test it out.  Anyone have any other
> thoughts about this?

IMO it's a must be fixed issue for 2.6.0 and it works on my system.

Peter


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

* Re: kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem
       [not found] <20031109122039.47e78a91.colin@colino.net>
@ 2003-11-09 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt @ 2003-11-09 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Colin Leroy; +Cc: linuxppc-dev list, Paul Mackerras, Linux Kernel list

On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 22:20, Colin Leroy wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> just to report a problem with kernel 2.6.0-tes9-benh.. Using my GPRS phone
> to access internet spits out lots (real lots) of these to syslog:
> 
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel: Call trace:
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c000b604] dump_stack+0x18/0x28
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c000885c] check_bug_trap+0x84/0x98
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0008940] ProgramCheckException+0xd0/0x170
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0007ee0] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4c
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0021250] local_bh_enable+0x28/0x60
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0109c68] ppp_input+0x204/0x21c
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c010e99c] ppp_async_input+0x50c/0x618
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c010d890] ppp_asynctty_receive+0x50/0xac
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c00d5c7c] flush_to_ldisc+0xa0/0xb0
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c00d5d34] tty_flip_buffer_push+0x1c/0x3c
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [d98fb250] acm_read_bulk+0xdc/0x138
> [cdc_acm]
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c017e298] usb_hcd_giveback_urb+0x90/0xac
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0187ac8] finish_urb+0xd8/0xec
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0188f28] dl_done_list+0x7c/0x128
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel:  [c0189a48] ohci_irq+0xec/0x1b4
> Nov  8 23:36:21 chloe kernel: Badness in local_bh_enable at
> kernel/softirq.c:121
> 
> This makes the computer very irresponsive and the log-storm emptied the
> battery in about 20 minutes :-)

Looks like a bug calling local_bh_enable with irq off, though it isn't
clear who is disabling them at this point. I don't have time to track
it down more precisely right now, it could be either OHCI finishing the
urbs within a spinlock_irqsave or some TTY or PPP issue, the ACM driver
doesn't seem to play with irq masking by itself.

Ben.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2003-11-11 12:40 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-11-09 17:21 kernel 2.6 : cdc_acm problem David Brownell
2003-11-09 22:50 ` Greg KH
2003-11-10 12:21   ` David Brownell
2003-11-11 12:39     ` Colin Leroy
     [not found] <Q1or.1EU.17@gated-at.bofh.it>
     [not found] ` <Q6Hy.T5.11@gated-at.bofh.it>
2003-11-10 19:16   ` Peter Matthias
     [not found] <20031109122039.47e78a91.colin@colino.net>
2003-11-09 11:11 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).