From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: pinotj@club-internet.fr, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray)
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2003 19:07:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3FC63D60.8020304@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0311251443280.1524@home.osdl.org>
Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 pinotj@club-internet.fr wrote:
>
>
>>3. 2.6.0-test10 vanilla + PREEMPT_CONFIG=y + patch printk + patch magic numbers
>>The patch solves the problem, I can compile 4 times a kernel and do heavy work in parallele (load average around 1.2 during 2 hours) without any problems.
>>
>>
>
>Those magic numbers don't make any sense. In particular, SLAB_LIMIT is
>clearly bogus both in the original version and in the "magic number
>patch". The only place that uses SLAB_LIMIT is the code that decides how
>many entries fit in one slab, and quite frankly, it makes no _sense_ to
>have a SLAB_LIMIT that is big enough to be unsigned.
>
Object numbers (kmem_bufctl_t) are unsigned, but some values have a
special meaning:
"-1" is the magic value for end-of-list.
"-2" is the magic value for object in use.
All other values are valid object numbers. Right now object numbers are
unsigned int, but initially I considered unsigned char or unsigned
short. And then an explicit SLAB_LIMIT is necessary - with unsigned
char, the limit would be 253 objects per slab, which could be reached if
someone creates objects smaller than 16 bytes.
In Jerome's case, the debug checks noticed that the object-in-use
sentinel was not in the bufctl entry during free, instead there was a
"-1". There are several sources for the "-1": My initial guess was
either a bug in slab, or a bad memory cell (only one bit difference).
Thus I sent him a patch that changes multiple bits. Result: It remained
a single bit change, i.e it's proven that slab doesn't write BUFCTL_END
into the wrong slot.
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-11-27 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-11-25 17:30 Re: [Oops] i386 mm/slab.c (cache_flusharray) pinotj
2003-11-25 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-27 18:07 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-12-09 0:57 pinotj
2003-12-09 2:03 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-09 7:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-09 23:58 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-12 19:00 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-12 20:07 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-04 18:27 pinotj
2003-12-04 18:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 21:21 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 7:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 9:34 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 14:22 ` Christoph Hellwig
2003-12-05 3:00 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-05 6:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-04 19:19 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-04 21:26 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-03 23:06 pinotj
2003-12-03 23:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-11-29 17:41 pinotj
2003-12-02 0:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-12-02 1:37 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 6:44 ` Nathan Scott
2003-12-02 18:05 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-12-02 20:05 ` Nathan Scott
2003-11-27 18:42 pinotj
2003-11-27 18:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-12-02 1:03 ` Mike Fedyk
2003-11-22 7:47 Re: " pinotj
2003-11-22 10:55 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-21 18:12 pinotj
2003-11-21 18:58 ` Manfred Spraul
2003-11-20 1:50 pinotj
2003-11-20 2:09 ` Andrew Morton
2003-11-19 18:19 pinotj
2003-11-20 1:07 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3FC63D60.8020304@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pinotj@club-internet.fr \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).