[PATCH 1/5 v5] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[PATCH 1/5 v5] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
changes in v3 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
              Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
changes in v5 :
              Add separate error for irq == 0 and irq < 0.

 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a92..cd5a939 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int irq;
+	int irq;
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (irq <= 0)
+		return irq < 0 ? irq : -ENODEV;
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
 			       IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, pdev->name, info);
-- 
2.7.4

[PATCH 2/5 v5] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so changed it to signed.
changes in v3 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
              Return -ENXIO insted of irq.
changes in v5 :
              Add separate error for irq == 0 and irq < 0.

 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 8a643a3..c7f7f8a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int mt8173_afe_init_audio_clk(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
 static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret, i;
-	unsigned int irq_id;
+	int irq_id;
 	struct mtk_base_afe *afe;
 	struct mt8173_afe_private *afe_priv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	afe->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
+	if (irq_id <= 0) {
 		dev_err(afe->dev, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
+		return irq_id < 0 ? irq_id : -ENXIO;
 	}
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8173_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
-- 
2.7.4

Applied "ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From d6e2c4ffdf67de68e0263630525d2b521132d66a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:47:11 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: mt8173: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
index 8a643a35d3d4..c7f7f8add5d9 100644
--- a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/mt8173-afe-pcm.c
@@ -1083,7 +1083,7 @@ static int mt8173_afe_init_audio_clk(struct mtk_base_afe *afe)
 static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	int ret, i;
-	unsigned int irq_id;
+	int irq_id;
 	struct mtk_base_afe *afe;
 	struct mt8173_afe_private *afe_priv;
 	struct resource *res;
@@ -1105,9 +1105,9 @@ static int mt8173_afe_pcm_dev_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	afe->dev = &pdev->dev;
 
 	irq_id = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq_id) {
+	if (irq_id <= 0) {
 		dev_err(afe->dev, "np %s no irq\n", afe->dev->of_node->name);
-		return -ENXIO;
+		return irq_id < 0 ? irq_id : -ENXIO;
 	}
 	ret = devm_request_irq(afe->dev, irq_id, mt8173_afe_irq_handler,
 			       0, "Afe_ISR_Handle", (void *)afe);
-- 
2.15.0

[PATCH 3/5 v5] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

[Arvind Yadav]

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
               irq was unsigned. so using signed variable ret.
changes in v3 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v4 :
              Return -EBUSY insted of irq.
changes in v5 :
              Add separate error for irq == 0 and irq < 0.

 sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
index b6615af..5e4fbd2 100644
--- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!nuc900_audio->irq_num) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
+	if (nuc900_audio->irq_num <= 0) {
+		ret = nuc900_audio->irq_num < 0 ? nuc900_audio->irq_num : -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-- 
2.7.4

Applied "ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From fa8cc38165c2f6f73bf947087b3cdc5dd9b9b560 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:47:12 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: nuc900: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
index b6615affe571..5e4fbd2d3479 100644
--- a/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/nuc900/nuc900-ac97.c
@@ -346,8 +346,8 @@ static int nuc900_ac97_drvprobe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	}
 
 	nuc900_audio->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!nuc900_audio->irq_num) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
+	if (nuc900_audio->irq_num <= 0) {
+		ret = nuc900_audio->irq_num < 0 ? nuc900_audio->irq_num : -EBUSY;
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-- 
2.15.0

[PATCH 4/5 v4] ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

[Arvind Yadav]

platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v3 :
              Return -EIO insted of ctx->irq_num.
changes in v4 :
              Add separate error for irq == 0 and irq < 0.

 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
index 0e928d5..aec7408 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
 	/* Find the IRQ */
 	ctx->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev,
 				ctx->pdata->res_info->acpi_ipc_irq_index);
+	if (ctx->irq_num <= 0)
+		return ctx->irq_num < 0 ? ctx->irq_num : -EIO;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4

Applied "ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From eee44bfcf931428d7e94a9ae2092d687386a135a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:47:13 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: sst: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
index 32d6e02e2104..6cd481bec275 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/atom/sst/sst_acpi.c
@@ -236,6 +236,9 @@ static int sst_platform_get_resources(struct intel_sst_drv *ctx)
 	/* Find the IRQ */
 	ctx->irq_num = platform_get_irq(pdev,
 				ctx->pdata->res_info->acpi_ipc_irq_index);
+	if (ctx->irq_num <= 0)
+		return ctx->irq_num < 0 ? ctx->irq_num : -EIO;
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.15.0

[PATCH 5/5 v4] ASoC: intel: mfld: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

[Arvind Yadav]

platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
---
changes in v2 :
              Add failure case '<= 0' instead of '< 0'. IRQ0 is not valid.
changes in v3 :
              Return -ENODEV insted of irq.
changes in v4 :
              Add separate error for irq == 0 and irq < 0.

 sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
index 6f44acf..7cb44fd 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ static int snd_mfld_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* retrive the irq number */
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq <= 0)
+		return irq < 0 ? irq : -ENODEV;
 
 	/* audio interrupt base of SRAM location where
 	 * interrupts are stored by System FW */
-- 
2.7.4

Applied "ASoC: intel: mfld: Handle return value of platform_get_irq" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: intel: mfld: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 00a5cc096774fbc9ac979765fa820e7c8d9121c4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:47:14 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: intel: mfld: Handle return value of platform_get_irq

platform_get_irq() can fail here and we must check its return value.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c b/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
index 6f44acfb4aae..7cb44fdde1ee 100644
--- a/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
+++ b/sound/soc/intel/boards/mfld_machine.c
@@ -372,6 +372,8 @@ static int snd_mfld_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	/* retrive the irq number */
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
+	if (irq <= 0)
+		return irq < 0 ? irq : -ENODEV;
 
 	/* audio interrupt base of SRAM location where
 	 * interrupts are stored by System FW */
-- 
2.15.0

Applied "ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking" to the asoc tree

[Mark Brown]

The patch

   ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

has been applied to the asoc tree at

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git 

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.  

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

>From 8d6fb0bce2021baf056344cb0abb2df00c5fe6d5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:47:10 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: ep93xx-ac97: Fix platform_get_irq's error checking

The platform_get_irq() function returns negative if an error occurs.
zero or positive number on success. platform_get_irq() error checking
for zero is not correct.

Signed-off-by: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
index bbf7a9266a99..cd5a939ad608 100644
--- a/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
+++ b/sound/soc/cirrus/ep93xx-ac97.c
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct ep93xx_ac97_info *info;
 	struct resource *res;
-	unsigned int irq;
+	int irq;
 	int ret;
 
 	info = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -378,8 +378,8 @@ static int ep93xx_ac97_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		return PTR_ERR(info->regs);
 
 	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
-	if (!irq)
-		return -ENODEV;
+	if (irq <= 0)
+		return irq < 0 ? irq : -ENODEV;
 
 	ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, irq, ep93xx_ac97_interrupt,
 			       IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH, pdev->name, info);
-- 
2.15.0