linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
@ 2016-12-13 10:03 Tin Huynh
  2016-12-13 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tin Huynh @ 2016-12-13 10:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jarkko Nikula, Andy Shevchenko, Mika Westerberg, Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Loc Ho, Thang Nguyen,
	Phong Vo, patches, Tin Huynh

ACPI always sets Tx/Rx FIFO to 32. This configuration will
cause problem if the IP core supports a FIFO size of less than 32.
The driver should read the FIFO size from the IP and select the smaller
one of the two.

Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Change from V3:
 -Use uppercase of FIFO instead of lowercase.
 -Fix the problem  when IP core return 0 of FIFO.

Change from V2:
 -Add a helper function to set FIFO size.

Change from V1:
 -Revert the default 32 for FIFO, read parameter from IP core
 and pick the smaller one of the two.
 -Correct the title to describe new approach.

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
index 0b42a12..24032d6 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
@@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ static int i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(struct dw_i2c_dev *i_dev, bool prepare)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, int id)
+{
+	u32 param, tx_fifo_depth, rx_fifo_depth;
+
+	param = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
+	tx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
+	rx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
+	if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
+		dev->tx_fifo_depth = tx_fifo_depth;
+		dev->rx_fifo_depth = rx_fifo_depth;
+		dev->adapter.nr = id;
+	} else if (tx_fifo_depth > 1) {
+		dev->tx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->tx_fifo_depth,
+				tx_fifo_depth);
+		dev->rx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->rx_fifo_depth,
+				rx_fifo_depth);
+	}
+}
+
 static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	struct dw_i2c_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
@@ -246,13 +265,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 				1000000);
 	}
 
-	if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
-		u32 param1 = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
-
-		dev->tx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
-		dev->rx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
-		dev->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
-	}
+	dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(dev, pdev->id);
 
 	adap = &dev->adapter;
 	adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
-- 
1.7.1

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
  2016-12-13 10:03 [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI Tin Huynh
@ 2016-12-13 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-12-13 13:35   ` Jarkko Nikula
  2016-12-14  3:20   ` Tin Huynh
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2016-12-13 11:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tin Huynh, Jarkko Nikula, Mika Westerberg, Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Loc Ho, Thang Nguyen,
	Phong Vo, patches

On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 17:03 +0700, Tin Huynh wrote:
> ACPI always sets Tx/Rx FIFO to 32. This configuration will
> cause problem if the IP core supports a FIFO size of less than 32.
> The driver should read the FIFO size from the IP and select the
> smaller
> one of the two.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
> 

One comment below, after addressing it

Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |   27
> ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> Change from V3:
>  -Use uppercase of FIFO instead of lowercase.
>  -Fix the problem  when IP core return 0 of FIFO.
> 
> Change from V2:
>  -Add a helper function to set FIFO size.
> 
> Change from V1:
>  -Revert the default 32 for FIFO, read parameter from IP core
>  and pick the smaller one of the two.
>  -Correct the title to describe new approach.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> index 0b42a12..24032d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ static int i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(struct
> dw_i2c_dev *i_dev, bool prepare)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static void dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, int id)
> +{
> +	u32 param, tx_fifo_depth, rx_fifo_depth;
> +
> 

        /*               
         * Try to detect the FIFO depth if not
set by interface driver,
         * the depth could be from 2 to 256 from
HW spec.
         */     

> +	param = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
> +	tx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
> +	rx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
> +	if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
> +		dev->tx_fifo_depth = tx_fifo_depth;
> +		dev->rx_fifo_depth = rx_fifo_depth;
> +		dev->adapter.nr = id;
> +	} else if (tx_fifo_depth > 1) {

This makes sense now, though I would add a comment here and use >= 2 to
reflect datasheet.

		/*
                 * Choose minimum values between HW and interface
                 * driver provided.
		 */

> +		dev->tx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->tx_fifo_depth,
> +				tx_fifo_depth);
> +		dev->rx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->rx_fifo_depth,
> +				rx_fifo_depth);
> +	}
> +}
> +
>  static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
>  	struct dw_i2c_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev-
> >dev);
> @@ -246,13 +265,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
> platform_device *pdev)
>  				1000000);
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
> -		u32 param1 = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
> -
> -		dev->tx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
> -		dev->rx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
> -		dev->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
> -	}
> +	dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(dev, pdev->id);
>  
>  	adap = &dev->adapter;
>  	adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
  2016-12-13 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2016-12-13 13:35   ` Jarkko Nikula
  2016-12-14  3:20   ` Tin Huynh
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Nikula @ 2016-12-13 13:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko, Tin Huynh, Mika Westerberg, Wolfram Sang
  Cc: linux-i2c, linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Loc Ho, Thang Nguyen,
	Phong Vo, patches

On 12/13/2016 01:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 17:03 +0700, Tin Huynh wrote:
>> ACPI always sets Tx/Rx FIFO to 32. This configuration will
>> cause problem if the IP core supports a FIFO size of less than 32.
>> The driver should read the FIFO size from the IP and select the
>> smaller
>> one of the two.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
>>
>
> One comment below, after addressing it
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
Feel free to add my

Acked-by: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
  2016-12-13 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2016-12-13 13:35   ` Jarkko Nikula
@ 2016-12-14  3:20   ` Tin Huynh
  2016-12-14  8:59     ` Jarkko Nikula
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Tin Huynh @ 2016-12-14  3:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Jarkko Nikula, Mika Westerberg, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c,
	linux-kernel, linux-acpi, Loc Ho, Thang Nguyen, Phong Vo,
	patches

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko
<andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2016-12-13 at 17:03 +0700, Tin Huynh wrote:
>> ACPI always sets Tx/Rx FIFO to 32. This configuration will
>> cause problem if the IP core supports a FIFO size of less than 32.
>> The driver should read the FIFO size from the IP and select the
>> smaller
>> one of the two.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tin Huynh <tnhuynh@apm.com>
>>
>
> One comment below, after addressing it
>
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
>
>> ---
>>  drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c |   27
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>>  1 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> Change from V3:
>>  -Use uppercase of FIFO instead of lowercase.
>>  -Fix the problem  when IP core return 0 of FIFO.
>>
>> Change from V2:
>>  -Add a helper function to set FIFO size.
>>
>> Change from V1:
>>  -Revert the default 32 for FIFO, read parameter from IP core
>>  and pick the smaller one of the two.
>>  -Correct the title to describe new approach.
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> index 0b42a12..24032d6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c
>> @@ -150,6 +150,25 @@ static int i2c_dw_plat_prepare_clk(struct
>> dw_i2c_dev *i_dev, bool prepare)
>>       return 0;
>>  }
>>
>> +static void dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, int id)
>> +{
>> +     u32 param, tx_fifo_depth, rx_fifo_depth;
>> +
>>
>
>         /*
>          * Try to detect the FIFO depth if not
> set by interface driver,
>          * the depth could be from 2 to 256 from
> HW spec.
>          */
>
I will add your comment to the driver.
>> +     param = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
>> +     tx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
>> +     rx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
>> +     if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
>> +             dev->tx_fifo_depth = tx_fifo_depth;
>> +             dev->rx_fifo_depth = rx_fifo_depth;
>> +             dev->adapter.nr = id;
>> +     } else if (tx_fifo_depth > 1) {
>
> This makes sense now, though I would add a comment here and use >= 2 to
> reflect datasheet.
>
>                 /*
>                  * Choose minimum values between HW and interface
>                  * driver provided.
>                  */
>
I will implement as your comment. However , because adding 1 to the
value , can i use > 2  or >=3 ?
>> +             dev->tx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->tx_fifo_depth,
>> +                             tx_fifo_depth);
>> +             dev->rx_fifo_depth = min_t(u32, dev->rx_fifo_depth,
>> +                             rx_fifo_depth);
>> +     }
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>  {
>>       struct dw_i2c_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev-
>> >dev);
>> @@ -246,13 +265,7 @@ static int dw_i2c_plat_probe(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>>                               1000000);
>>       }
>>
>> -     if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
>> -             u32 param1 = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
>> -
>> -             dev->tx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
>> -             dev->rx_fifo_depth = ((param1 >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
>> -             dev->adapter.nr = pdev->id;
>> -     }
>> +     dw_i2c_set_fifo_size(dev, pdev->id);
>>
>>       adap = &dev->adapter;
>>       adap->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>
> --
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Intel Finland Oy
Thank you and regards,
Tin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI
  2016-12-14  3:20   ` Tin Huynh
@ 2016-12-14  8:59     ` Jarkko Nikula
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jarkko Nikula @ 2016-12-14  8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Tin Huynh, Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Mika Westerberg, Wolfram Sang, linux-i2c, linux-kernel,
	linux-acpi, Loc Ho, Thang Nguyen, Phong Vo, patches

On 12/14/2016 05:20 AM, Tin Huynh wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:25 PM, Andy Shevchenko
>>> +     param = i2c_dw_read_comp_param(dev);
>>> +     tx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 16) & 0xff) + 1;
>>> +     rx_fifo_depth = ((param >> 8)  & 0xff) + 1;
>>> +     if (!dev->tx_fifo_depth) {
>>> +             dev->tx_fifo_depth = tx_fifo_depth;
>>> +             dev->rx_fifo_depth = rx_fifo_depth;
>>> +             dev->adapter.nr = id;
>>> +     } else if (tx_fifo_depth > 1) {
>>
>> This makes sense now, though I would add a comment here and use >= 2 to
>> reflect datasheet.
>>
>>                 /*
>>                  * Choose minimum values between HW and interface
>>                  * driver provided.
>>                  */
>>
> I will implement as your comment. However , because adding 1 to the
> value , can i use > 2  or >=3 ?

either > 1 or >= 2 since register value 0x01 from HW means FIFO depth 2 
and register value 0x00 is reserved.

-- 
Jarkko

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-12-14  8:59 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-12-13 10:03 [PATCH V4] i2c: designware: fix wrong Tx/Rx FIFO for ACPI Tin Huynh
2016-12-13 11:25 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-12-13 13:35   ` Jarkko Nikula
2016-12-14  3:20   ` Tin Huynh
2016-12-14  8:59     ` Jarkko Nikula

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).