From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: edubezval@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@gmail.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>, Keerthy <j-keerthy@ti.com>,
"open list:CPU FREQUENCY DRIVERS - ARM BIG LITTLE"
<linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:TI BANDGAP AND THERMAL DRIVER"
<linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/6] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2019 09:30:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3f324189-aa1e-ae78-1d69-61e00c5d033a@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190624060334.kak2mjuou4napi4x@vireshk-i7>
On 24/06/2019 08:03, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21-06-19, 15:22, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>> Currently the function cpufreq_cooling_register() returns a cooling
>> device pointer which is used back as a pointer to call the function
>> cpufreq_cooling_unregister(). Even if it is correct, it would make
>> sense to not leak the structure inside a cpufreq driver and keep the
>> code thermal code self-encapsulate. Moreover, that forces to add an
>> extra variable in each driver using this function.
>>
>> Instead of passing the cooling device to unregister, pass the policy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/arm_big_little.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/thermal/cpu_cooling.c | 18 ++++++++++--------
>> drivers/thermal/imx_thermal.c | 4 ++--
>> .../thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-thermal-common.c | 2 +-
>> include/linux/cpu_cooling.h | 6 +++---
>> 6 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Just a side note, does it make sense to have the function called from
imx_thermal.c and ti-thermal-common.c? Sounds like also a leakage from
cpufreq to thermal drivers, no?
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-06-24 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-06-21 13:22 [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/6] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Unregister with the policy Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 6:03 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-24 7:30 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2019-06-24 7:37 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-24 7:45 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 9:39 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-21 13:22 ` [PATCH 3/6] cpufreq/drivers/arm_big_little: Remove cooling device usage Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 6:04 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 4/6] cpufreq: " Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 6:05 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 5/6] thermal/drivers/imx: " Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 6:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-21 13:23 ` [PATCH 6/6] thermal/drivers/ti: " Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 6:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-06-22 9:12 ` [PATCH 1/6] cpufreq: Use existing stub functions instead of IS_ENABLED macro Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 9:22 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 9:30 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 9:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 8:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 9:00 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-06-24 9:07 ` Daniel Lezcano
2019-06-24 9:08 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3f324189-aa1e-ae78-1d69-61e00c5d033a@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@gmail.com \
--cc=edubezval@gmail.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=j-keerthy@ti.com \
--cc=javi.merino@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).